Question regarding two versions of a page (redirect)
-
At one point in my SEO journey I had noticed some duplicate issues going on in Google webmaster tools (I could have been reading it wrong.)
It looked like WMT was saying I had 2 versions of some of pages...it looked like pages that ended in a '/' ranking differently than pages that have no slash at the end.
So I downloaded the redirect plugin and redirected many non / pages to the page that end with the "/". This was probably a mistake. but I'm trying to clean all of that up. (I'm also noticing that SEOMoz tools tells me my site has many, many redirected url's. I'm not sure why.
I was looking at http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/pages?site=noahsdad.com%2F this morning at my top pages and it shows 2 versions (one being redirected) of the page about my son who was born with Down syndrome. (Noahsdad.com/story and Noahsdad.com/story/) I don't know if I've built rankings for those pages separately and it would now hurt me if I did away with the redirect. I'm not sure why I did the redirects (I must have read something online somewhere.)
I'm wondering if someone wouldn't mind looking at the report and letting me know what the best way to 'clean' this stuff up...Should I go into the redirect software and delete all of the redirects where the non / page is being redirected to the / page?
Thanks.
-
You'll need to check the source code, as you'll be changing redirects rather than removing them, redirects will still be in place.
rel="canonical" href="http://noahsdad.com/story/" /> is a current Canonical.
rel="canonical" href="http://noahsdad.com/story" /> would be the new Canonical ( without the / )
-
Thanks!
So when I remove the redirect how can I check to make sure the new page gets the canonical? There will only be one page if I remove the redirect, right? So since it is just one page, wouldn't that page be the canonical?
-
Yep, some Canonical tags are being used. Will need to change the canonicals if you change your redirects ( removing the / ) unless it's automated that is.
Good luck with whatever you decide to do
-
Thanks. Like I said above I think my theme adds the canonical tag, because in the seo tools I can see many of links showing 'canonical.'
-
Using the / at the end when linking; if it matches the URL being linked to, then absolutely. If it differs to the URL being linked to, then it's linking to a different page essentially. Best to choose one method and to stick with it for consistency, whichever that ends up being. Usually, without the / is the better option.
You're right, with redirects, link juice is passed to the page being redirected to, however not 100% of it. Usually varies between 60% and 90%, as a guide, so some loss for sure.
With those new pages and redirects from last night; have you considered using the Canonical tag? Sounds like it's something that your website would benefit from using.
Here you'll find a **Guide to Canonical Tags**and here you'll find a Post & Discussion on 301 Redirects vs the Canonical tag which will explain everything you need to know about Canonicals.
Regards
Simon
-
I'm not sure. I believe the wordpress theme I have does this...
-
I was under the impression that it was always best to use the / at the end of the domain when linking, etc. Is this not the case?
Either way is fine. However, I choose to use the no "/" pages rather than the "/" pages. I do this because I get more links pointing at my site without the "/," and I want to retain as much link juice as possible.
Also, when you do a redirect I was under the impression that the link juice from the redirected page would be passed on to the page it is redirected to. Is this not the case?
A portion of it does pass. I've heard as high as 90% passes on.
I deleted some of those redirects but left the /down-syndrome-1 there...I have no idea how a url was generated with the -1 at the end, but it did. So i left it there (I may need to do something with that.)
Is it an exact duplicate of another page? If so, redirect.
Are you utilizing a "canonical" tag on the pages you want to be the "true" source? As it, using the "canonical" to say, "hey, this is the original!"
-
Thanks for the info, it helps a lot.
I was under the impression that it was always best to use the / at the end of the domain when linking, etc. Is this not the case?
When I go to my wordpress settings I see that under general settings my wordpress address and site address both have http://noahsdad.com (no slash) - just wanted to add that bit of info just in case it made any difference.
Also, when you do a redirect I was under the impression that the link juice from the redirected page would be passed on to the page it is redirected to. Is this not the case?
I made a change last night regarding a redirect to http://noahsdad.com/down-syndrome and http://noahsdad.com/down-syndrome-1 (both with and without the slash) I'm not sure if it was something with a slug I changed or something, but I had about 4 different redirects going to one page. I deleted some of those redirects but left the /down-syndrome-1 there...I have no idea how a url was generated with the -1 at the end, but it did. So i left it there (I may need to do something with that.)
-
Hi there,
You have a fab website dedicated to your son and his amazing progress, you must be very proud of the little chap.
Your question; there is some tidying up required moving forwards.
An example of a good redirect that you have is:
www.noahsdad.com/ is being 301'd to www.noahsdad.com
You apparently have 23 other pages being redirected from a version without / at the end to a version with / at the end, e.g. http://noahsdad.com/story 301'd to http://noahsdad.com/story/
The main issue with redirects this way round (non / pointing to a page with / at the end) is that with inbound links, the vast majority will point to pages without / at the end, so you'll be loosing some link juice through the redirects.
However, you already have many links pointing to your pages with a / at the end, some of this link juice would be lost if those pages are redirected. Though looking to the future, it could still be worth doing this sooner rather than later, so long as you try and request that your most valuable inbound links kindly have the / removed from the link, a time consuming process.
So an option is to remove the redirects that are in place, then 301 redirect the URLs with a / at the end to the corrosponding URLs without the / at the end.
You'll also need to update your sitemap.xml ( http://noahsdad.com/sitemap.xml ) to remove the / at the end of URLs once the 301 redirects are in place.
Over time, the URLs with a / at the end will disappear from search engine indexes.
So it's a calculated decision to make really, whether or not to change your Redirects around. It will likely result in some ranking drops (and more importantly, some visitor reduction) in the short-term, however would likely be more beneficial to do so in the medium & long term.
I hope that helps,
Regards
Simon
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Structured Data on mobile and desktop version of a page
Hey there,
On-Page Optimization | | Online-Marketing-Guy
certain pages of our website have mobile versions like m.mysite.com/content-xyz. On the desktop pages (i.e. mysite.com/content-xyz) we have "rich snippets for ratings" marked up and displayed in SERPs. However the ratings also appear in mobile search results when SERPS reference the mobile version of the page (m.mysite.com/content-xyz) which doesn't have any ratings or markup? I am trying to figure out how Google treats mobile versions of a page in relation to the desktop version in relation to structured data (breadcrumbs etc.)? Would you always mark up both versions to be the same? Any ideas and thoughts on this are greatly appreciated. Cheers, Jochen rich Snippets for Ratings1 -
Is it better to create more pages of content or expand on current pages of content?
I am assuming that one way of improving the rankings of current pages will be to create more content on the keywords used... should this be an expansion of the content on current pages I am optimising for a keyword or is it better to keep creating new pages and if we are creating new pages is it best to use an extension of the keyword on the new page – for example if we are optimising one page for ‘does voltage optimisation work’ would it then be worth creating a page optimised for ‘does voltage optimisation work in hotels’ for example and so on? I am guessing maybe both might help, this is just a question I have had from one of my clients.
On-Page Optimization | | TWSI1 -
Looking for a few hours of consult from an on-page/redirection SEO guru.
Hi! I could post our question here, but I think we will need an hour or so of questions and answers. Anyone consider themselves an on-page guru or redirection strategy guru? Here is the breakdown: 1. We sell digital media. 2. Most of the pages that return for us in the serps are indexed Search Results pages. From the research we have done, these are our highest trafficked results, but also our lowest converters. We have hundreds of thousands of indexed and dynamic Search Result pages we need to deal with. 3. We are concerned about Panda eventually giving us issues with these indexed Search Pages. 4. We would like to 301 re-direct these indexed Search Results pages to applicable product pages. 5. Looking for advice on a strategy to do so which would include the best way to locate the pages we need to 301 in the SERPS, being careful that the 301 will help and not harm us, etc. Note, we are just looking for a couple of hours of discussion and guidance. We don't need a massive SEO analysis or anything. Just looking for input and guidance on this one particular issue. If you just want to answer here for free, hey, we won't complain, but are happy to pay for quality advice. PM if interested. Thanks! Craig
On-Page Optimization | | TheCraig0 -
How do I do a 301 Redirect in Wordpress
I have several pages that are showing up as "duplicate" on my Wordpress based site based upon the structure of site. I was wondering how to do a 301 redirect for these pages
On-Page Optimization | | SteveSweat0 -
Home Page SEO
Hi! We recently re-designed our home page in early March. After Google panda, we re-tweaked it again, before we take it live, we really want to get some expert's opinions. We would be grateful for any comments/suggestions/feedback, particularly in the following area (you will need to click a few times to get the page to real size): is the bottom content ok? please scroll down all the way. 2) We used semantic keywords for 5-6 anchor interlinks to the same page to promote core products from the home page. Is this too much? 80% links on the footer is a repetition of header navigation links, do these footer serve any SEO value or is it over - optimization? Here is the URL: https://www.dropbox.com/gallery/36547134/1/WebDesign?h=109d4a Thanks a lot!
On-Page Optimization | | ypl0 -
URL for location pages
Hello all We would like to create clean, easy URLs for our large list of Location pages. If there are a few URLs for each of the pages, am I right when I'm saying we would like this to be the canonical? Right now we would like the URL to be: For example
On-Page Optimization | | Ferguson
Domain.com/locations/Columbus I have found some instances where there might be 2,3 or more locations in the same city,zip. My conclusion for these would be: adding their Branch id's on to the URL
Domain.com/locations/Columbus/0304 Is this an okay approach? We are unsure if the URL should have city,State,zip for SEO purposes?
The pages will have all of this info in it's content
BUT what would be best for SEO and ranking for a given location? Thank you for any info!0 -
Page Rank Drop
Just trying to get more feedback - so we recently edited title and meta descriptions for existing website SEO and we've noticed in the past several weeks, our client's website has dropped out of the top 50 in a variety of terms we were targeting that they used to show up for (note: when updating SEO, we DID NOT remove any relevant terms we were targeting). When the website does come up in searches, it is the old meta description and title. So far, the feedback we've gotten is that first, it takes Google a few weeks to recrawl and index - however, we are now on week 3 after the changes and still no rebound in rankings. We were also told to check with the SEO Moz page grader to be sure the keywords were being optimized correctly - got As and Bs for the test terms I tried. We also submitted an XML site map to speed up the crawl process as another user suggested. We've tested the site with various tools to make sure there are redirect errors, etc. and everything looks fine. Again, it's now been 3+ weeks and no ranking rebound. Any other suggestions on what could be happening?
On-Page Optimization | | laidlawseo0 -
Page Rank
I had just made a 301 re-direct on one of our product pages which had a PR of 4, now that Google has indexed the new page, it's now got a PR of 0, i'm struggling to understand why this could be, i know that you may see a drop of 1, which has happened in the past, but this drop just does not make sense. Any ideas of why this could be? Kind Regards
On-Page Optimization | | Paul780