What's been the best SERP rank tracker for you?
-
I do a lot of my SERP ranking tracking via Aaron Wall's Rank Checker, but I'm realizing it's taking up too much time. I was looking at Raven's tools and a few others. What's been your favorite thus far?
If you do reply, can you talk about:
- price
- capabilities
- time savings b/c of it
- graphical UI
- other thoughts
I like SEOMoz's UI, but I can only manage 5 domains and I don't have a huge budget yet.
Also, if there's a rank checker out there that incorporates google places results, that would be great too! Maybe too good, eh?
-
im not sure if you are still searching but I have spent the last 3 years experimenting with various options. I initially started with the usual suspects but then found RankWatch. This was great but there were some instances that were not 100% correct - bear in mind that I monitor 800 keywords daily. i then switched to ranktrackr which is really great. HOWEVER, there were some instances when the software was out of snyc and I woke up a few times to a screen showing hundreds of drops which, in fact had not happened. More recently I came across this which so far seems to work well http://serptoday.com/
-
LOL. Exactly.
-
^ And that is why us SEOs are all a little mad!
-
It's an interesting question about tracking many vs. a specific group of key terms.
The main reason for multiple terms, I would say is that we truly don't know what google's doing on the back end (or rather don't know every association they make), and so we may see how one term jumping up may also affect another term. There's so many permutations of each phrase:
dallas seo, seo in dallas, seo dallas, dallas seo firm (+ reverse), dallas seo company (+ reverse), etc.
While I'm not exactly keen on knowing all permutations of every single phrase, it's interesting how google gives us credit for one and not the other, but we won't know unless we're either tracking it or it pulls into our GA account.
With that said, you're probably right about the KPI's, but you might not find a phrase's potential without knowing that you're right on the cusp of bringing it up to page 1 for a client or yourself. If you do know that, you can make the efforts to pull it into the prized 3 positions where there is actually traffic and then see if it does pull traffic for a client.
I don't know if I'm answering or clarifying my stance really on the multiple phrases that well, but the ultimate point is that sometimes being able to see factors on phrases you don't keep close tabs on every day can be interesting in a) learning more about the algo's correlation between phrases and b) whether you're close to getting a phrase somewhere where it might mean something to you in terms of traffic, etc.
Then again, how many people can regularly process thousands of keywords and put the connections together in their head? Right?
-
Tool costs can add up, that's for sure! With even basic tools demanding $1000+ per year you do have to pick and choose carefully.
The only tool I can think of, off the top of my head, that provides unlimited tracking is http://authoritylabs.com . This is the firm who provide the data for raventools tracker. Unfortunately they list costs on their unlimited package as "starting from $450/month", so not a bargain offering!
Thinking on a tangent: How useful is tracking that number of terms anyway? If you don't have a big team how much value could you extract from thousands of terms tracking each month?
If it is for clients it could be worth checking how much attention they pay to it. We started doing that last year and it turns out that most of ours weren't watching the SERP tracking data. Rightly so as well, as it's a red herring most of the time. We simplified our reporting as a result and tried to tie it back to better KPIs than rank movement (this still isn't perfect, and we're trying to do this again at the moment).
Not the answer you were looking for, but worth a thought.
-
Thanks Mat. This last list definitely had a lot of possible rank checkers to look through.
I ended up buying the Rank Checker from Link-Assistant.com today, but a bit disappointed for what you get from $249.00 right now. I really need something to automate this rankings process for my clients, but all the reporting functions require you to upgrade or buy their most expensive package. Plus, they try to get you with other little extras to keep the software current after 6 months. I think I'm going to ask for my money back because they have a 30 day money back guarantee on keeping us happy.
I'm not having any luck with other tools either like cuterank.net and rankerizer.com which weren't on the list. I just need a tool that can do unlimited rank checks, keep track of the rankings over time so I save a good 3 days worth of work. Doing it manually with SEOBook's rank checker can't be an option moving forward.
I've been very attracted by Raven before and actually signed up for a while. However, the 1000 a month might be too little. They have a lot of other great benefits for the $99/mo, but I already have SEOMOz, Majestic SEO and bought SECockpit recently which I'm considering returning because I don't know if I have the time to take advantage of them all per month. Maybe when I build up a team that can start leveraging them, I may invest. Or maybe I'm just being too cheap? If I was rolling in it, it would be a different story. I would be buying tools right and left just to try them out.
Thanks again.
-
In addition to my previous comment, this popped in to my RSS reader this morning and I thought of your question:
http://www.evolvingseo.com/2012/01/24/the-ultimate-list-of-rank-checkers/
(by Dan Shure, who you might know from around these parts). Nice round up there to check back to.
Regarding Google places (and in fact other universal results), I cannot believe that no-one is (publicly) offering this. It's a huge need (Take note seomoz brigade!)
-
I like the tracker in seoMoz, but I monitor too many sites for it to be viable as my primary tool.
For me it is RavenTools. The cost of the tracker is effectively free for me, as I wouldn't live without Raven because of other features it offers anyway. However even if it was a standalone tracker I would probably go with Raven simply because:
- It works
- The packages work out very cost effective for me
Price
$99/month gives you unlimed websites and tracking on up to 1000 keyword rankings. As a tracker that isn't bad, but I suspect it isn't the best deal if you are not using their other toosl as well. If you factor in the social monitoring and link manager that becomes far easier to justify.
Capabilities
Check the site. It's a long list and seems to be growing.
In terms of the SERP tracker it'll check weekly, graph past performance, allow tracking of multiple engines (and geographic variants), allows tagging etc.
Time Savings
For me, immesurable. It would simply not be possible for us to do what we do without Raven or something similar.
UI
Raven does look dated compared to some and, despite daily use, I still struggle with their UI at times. There isn't a great deal wrong with it (and they are REALLY responsive if you do point out shortcomings), but it just doesn't sing.
Other Thoughts
Raven is an all rounder. If I only have access to one tool it would be Raven (sorry Moz!). Some of the tools they have seem to be "labs" style bolt ons, but the core tools are very good.
Hope that is some help.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Ranking History Chart
The attached image shows the Keyword Ranking History with big downward spirals on Aug 27 and Sep 24th. Yet it's also showing up within the #10-#20 row. What is the official technical reason for why it's in both places? My boss is asking and I'm blanking. 🙂 Just that the URL was found in both spots? B69toK9
Moz Pro | | WineCellarInnovations0 -
Ranking fluctuations from week to week
Over the past couple of months I have seen a couple of my campaigns have key phrases that change from week to week from being in the top 3 to being >51. I worked pretty hard on the sites to get them mostly #1 for their preferred key phrases, and haven't been working that hard lately, but not sure what to make of it. It looks as though those keyphrases that dropped this week to >51 will probably be back in the top 3. Makes it diffuclt when you are trying to prepare a report for your client. Any suggestions are welcomed, and Happy New Year!
Moz Pro | | chill9861 -
Solving 'duplicate content' for page 2 of X for 1 blog post
Hi to all SEO wizards, For my Dutch blog google-plus-marketing.nl I'm using WordPress Genesis framework 2.0 with news theme pro 2.0 responsive theme. I love the out of the box SEO friendliness and features. One of those features is that it allows for a blog post or page to be divided into several pages. This results in MOZ signaling duplicate titles for all pages after the 1st page. Now I was thinking that a canonical url set to the first page should do the trick for me as I reason that the rank will go the the first page and the rest will not be seen as duplicates. Genesis does some good stuff on it's own and places the following meta tags in the header for the first page. All looks well and my question is about the same meta tags for the 2nd page and higher that I pasted below this one for the 1st page. Meta tags page 1 of X for blog post Meta tags page 2 of X for the same blog post Would it not be better to point the canonical url for page 2 till X to always point to the first page? In this case:
Moz Pro | | DanielMulderNL0 -
Local Rankings Drop?
G'morning! I got a disturbing report this morning that showed seven of our big keywords drop from high on the first page to not in the top 50. After further research I have found that we are now in Google's local cluster, but no longer on the traditional organic results. My question is this, has Google changed something that doesn't allow results in the local cluster AND in the traditional organic listings? I'm assuming that this is the case because we're doing smart SEO and have built these rankings up nicely over time, but then just fell off the face of the earth. I have attached a snapshot of Moz's Ranking History for a few of the keywords, as I assume this will help explain the story. (We're in green). Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks! euxQb kwAqh pUxkC
Moz Pro | | jpretz0 -
Do you know if there is an problem with the rank Tracker on SEOmoz
My rank tracker is stating that I am not in the top 50 for my keyword which is auto insurance fremont ca. I check on bing and yahoo and i am listed as #2. Also on Google it states that my rank has gone down by 2 place but I acutally increase one from spot 12 to spot 11. Is anyone else having the same issue??
Moz Pro | | Greenpeak0 -
Can you change RankTracker's setting?
Is it possible to change RankTrackers settings to see if my keywords are in the top 500 spots instead of only the top 50?
Moz Pro | | theLotter0 -
Moz's customer service. Is this normal?
A few days ago I noticed an issue with the on-page optimizer, when I couldn't find a solution, or even any mention of the problem in the forum I posted a ticket at the help desk.
Moz Pro | | Abidos
After ten hours I got a generic reply that didn't answer my ticket so I posted saying so.
After two days of not getting any reaction I looked through the forums again, this time searching for reactions about Moz's help desk. I found the post saying that sometimes the mail with a reply isn't received correctly so I went to the page of the ticket.
Here I saw that not only didn't I get an answer but my issue had been marked as solved, even though my last message clearly stated that it wasn't. This was three days ago. So my question is, is this how Moz usually treats it's clients? I'm new and my free trial is about to expire. At this point Moz should be impressing me with their great tools and services, convincing me it's worth my money. If I can barely get their attention now I don't expect it to change once I have payed them.0 -
Bing Not Complete in Ranking Report
Curious as to what the "FRI" image means under Bing on my Keyword Ranking reports? I saw this on Friday and assumed it hadn't crawled yet (as it was to set to crawl on Friday Jan 27, 2012) but here we are Monday AM and I'm still seeing the same thing. Glf4F.jpg
Moz Pro | | QueenSt0