Open Site Explorer - SEO - Company Back Links not visible?
-
Hi Guys,
I am relatively new to the SEO community and have what is hopefully a pretty quick and simple question?
I have recently outsourced some of my SEO campaigns to an Australian SEO group which were referred to me buy a friend, and i do not have the time to manage all sites SEO.
On pitch the SEO company said they had in excess of 7000 domains, and they would implement a massive back linking strategy for me anywhere upwards of 200 links a month and all legit.
Initially there were some basic header and title tag changes needed on the site, and I am now in month 4 of my campaign.
Looking forward to using SEOMOZ service and specifically Open Site Explorer, I entered my URL but to my disappointment I could only see 4 links and two I was responsible for.
I spoke to the SEO company who responded Open Site Explorer wasn't a good indication of back links and that a lot of their sites were not on the network because of the structure of their linking being only one way.
I would appreciate a second opinion (external of this company) on this because of my short time learning and dabbling with SEO.
On a side note thoroughly enjoying learning SEO and my journey as part of the SEOMOZ community.
Appreciate any feedback or responses I get.
Kind regards
Bodie
-
Hi Mike
Thanks for all your feedback and yeh i agree with your sales comment.
i have set a timeframe of 6 months before i start dissecting the analytics and working out my ROI as I was told its a minimum of three months before you start seeing real traction with SEO.
Thanks for all your help! and you too Seattle!
b
-
Frankly, we've tried to keep rates as low as possible, but over time, we also have found there's a ton of work that needs to be done for some clients who come on board. It really depends on what they do.
I do 2 things for clients: 1) provide them rankings, but 2) and most importantly, what the rankings translates into traffic. I dive into the google analytics. Do those rankings equate to improvements in traffic? Do they help you evaluate your google analytics to show you that they do?
Rankings are not the whole picture.
Also, for some clients who do want to know more details, I provide details of the sources I pointed out above (OSE, Majestic & Google Webmasters). I will tell them how their links have increased or rather prove it via those sources. So, I'll give whatever a client basically wants within reason. These have given us very positive ratings everywhere clients have rated us and happy clients as far as I can tell. And for now, I think these are the main reports that show that we "did something" frankly.
Sorry, but when I reread this, this sort of sounds like we're selling our services, but frankly, all the above is what we do because we feel like it's fair communication. An SEO or an SEO firm has an obligation to report their work as much as the client wants to know...and I'm sorry, but it sounds like you haven't had other standards to compare it to in the past. Thus, the feeling of not getting what you pay for.
By the way, have you asked the provider these questions? If not, definitely do.
-
When they report your keyword rankings every month, do they cover a variety of search engines or are they just giving you Google.com.au results?
It's entirely possible that your site could be gradually increasing in rankings with the few links you have depending on your targeted keyword phrases. This is especially true in Google.com.au. The less competitive your keyword phrases, the less you have to work on link building (most of the time) to show up in the SERPs.
I just used the keyword phrase "luxury resorts" (just as an example) in the SEOmoz Keyword Analysis tool and found that the same keyword has a keyword difficulty of 77% on Google.com and 64% on Google.com.au. So it's important to check which search engines are being reported every month.
In the end, it comes down to traffic and sales. Are you seeing a satisfactory increase in traffic for what you're paying the company? Is that traffic converting as well as you'd expect?
It's really tough to call out an SEO company for not doing any work if you're seeing some results. It's the ones that do a ton of work poorly that are easy to spot. You could be seeing ranking increases with or without the company. It's tough to say without a lot more data and monitoring.
As for how much SEO companies should charge, I'll defer to the experts on this one: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/seo-pricing-costs-of-services
Mike
-
Hi SeattleorganicSEO, (sorry i didn't catch your name)
i don't think they would be responsible for many of those links, 4 of the domains we own and at least 5 other links i am responsible for.
In a nutshell, every month I get a 'Summary Of Your Rankings email', this email compares Initial Rankings to Current Rankings.
They show where I placed for the five initial keywords when we started and now where we are for those keywords and a whole bunch of other keywords that stem from those targeted ones. (which I know are really useless because I have checked the keyword volume tool to collate their worth. They have no search volume.
i am not doubting they are getting results as for these five keywords we are moving up through the ranks of google and approaching a first page spot.
I guess my main questions or concern is how can they be getting results if they are doing little or no link building?
The only onsite changes they have implemented are header and title tag updates.
I just don't want to be taken advantage of, as i stated earlier i am pretty new to the SEO game.
Also what do you think is fair for a monthly fee per site for SEO?
Appreciate any feedback moving forward.
Kind regards
Bodie
-
Hi Bodie,
I use Majestic SEO and Google Webmasters to verify my links a bit quicker. The links typically show up on those much faster than they do on OSE.
I see links from:
|
http://www.kimberleyaccommodation.com.au
| http://www.hotelkununurra.com.au |
| http://www.morgenpost.de/reise/article1873557/Palaeste-Strandhuetten-und-andere-neue-Hotels.html |
| http://www.australien-news.com |
| http://www.bha.broomeaccommodation.com.au |
| http://www.gourmet-report.de/artikel/340712/Westaustralien-Luxusurlaub-ohne-Strassenanbindung.html |
| http://www.lookcook.net/index2.php?artikel=7416&typ=news& |
| http://australien-info.de/serendipity/authors/1-Newsletter-AUSTRALIEN-INFO/P1.html |
| http://pindanpost.com/2011/12/19/the-berkeley-river-experience-coming-soon |
| http://www.kimberleyhotel.com.au/?id=37x71378420738950769 |
| http://www.tourismtopend.com.au/accom_result1/berkeley-river |
| http://australiabig.com.au/?p=291 |
|
http://www.reisegezwitscher.de/reisetipps?format=feed&type=rss
| http://www.eastkimberleydirectory.com.au/search/?link=Accommodation&category=ekdbusiness |
| http://content.yudu.com/A1usv7/SLHDEC11/resources/47.htm |
As your unique domains linking back.
However, 4 months and not seeing movement or a growth in the backlinks is a pretty big red flag.
Let me know if you ever need a quick check on Majestic. You can get a free glance of the total domains and backlinks for free
though via SEObook's SEO tool bar.
Can't validate Michael's concerns 100%, but it does seem a little fishy given that you've been with them for 4 months. No reports?
How do they communicate that their work's been complete?
|
|
-
Hey again Bodie,
I checked your site using a bunch of SEO tools and, I'm sorry to say, but I don't see any evidence that any link building has been going on with your site. OSE is not a perfect tool by any means, but it's just so remote that only a couple of links would show up after 4 months. Alexa shows the same amount of links and my personal script shows only 1 more.
I'm not going to say that the company you're using isn't building any links, but I really don't see it.
This is a shame too because link building to your site would be very easy. You have a great design and well written content. I could see pitching "Top 10 Hidden Australian Luxury Resorts" articles getting picked up no problem for guest posts. Even doing viral content like infographics and high-powered articles on travel sites wouldn't be too difficult.
I would recommend switching companies if only based on the fact that, when you questioned them, they could have easily given you a spreadsheet of every live link they had for you. That's just basic SEO reporting. The fact that they didn't do that makes me even more suspicious.
Mike
-
Hi Michael,
Updated and looking forward to your feedback.
Kind Regards
b
-
Hello Bodie,
I suspect I know what's going on but I don't want to jump to conclusions. If you'd kindly include your URL, I can check what's going on with your backlinks.
Mike
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can we efficiently use Fresh Web Explorer and Just Discovered Links?
Love the fresh data sources SEOmoz is building for us. However, I'm frustrated by the lack of scale the tools offer. Let's say I have 30 competitors I want to watch (which is pretty conservative - if we're targeting 100 keywords on a site, we could easily have 100's of top 20 ranked competitors). If I have to run individual reports for each using OSE and Fresh Web Explorer, that would be hours of work every day/week. Ideally, I'd like to see a campaign feature where you could add 2-200 competitors to view in one report. You could view recent links (from FWE and JDL) for all competitors on one handy report, and sort by various metrics. So for example, if you wanted to view the top 10 links your competitors have gotten in the past week, you could see that in 30 seconds of work, vs many hours of work. Any others who think this would be useful? Any ideas for how we can use the data in such a way without this feature?
Moz Pro | | AdamThompson1 -
What's the best way for SEO newbie to analyze & fix a site after being hit by Panda?
Hi, I have a prospective client who was in the top 3 on Google for two of their primary keywords. They fell way back in the rankings immediately after Panda was rolled out on September 27, 2012. Two weeks ago, they were at position #118 for one keyword. After looking for them in Rank Checker today, they cannot be found in Google at all. Here's my question. Because of the "bad links" (some pointing to Porno sites)... what's the possibility that this situation cannot be fixed? I don't know... maybe I'm asking an irrelevant question. I'm attempting to assess the situation so I can go back and present my findings to the prospective client. I'm committed to understanding what's going on with their website so I can assess the situation properly. Fixing their problem starts with a correct assessment. They have a ranking problem, and I know I can fix that... IF all their site needs is white hat <acronym title="Search Engine Optimization">SEO</acronym>. What I DON'T want is... to sell them <acronym title="Search Engine Optimization">SEO</acronym> services, only to find out in 3-6 months... I made an incorrect diagnosis of the problem, and therefore sold them the wrong solution. I know I can close the sale if I can show them with reasonable substantiation that the damage is not beyond repair. I'm familiar with the basics of <acronym title="Search Engine Optimization">SEO</acronym>, but I'm unfamiliar with how "bad linking" might effect the long-term commitment to optimizing. They're wondering if they should start over on another website. I was attempting to do an assessment to better understand if my typical approach on this site would be sufficient. Also... I wanted to get an assessment/report to show them something to substantiate my conclusion(s) about their website. If Open Site Explorer is sufficient to do the link analysis... great. At least I know I'm working with the right tool. All I have to do is learn how to use the tool quickly. At this point... I'm not sure which tool would be helpful. So... can you speak to the following 2 questions: 1.) How do you know when ranking problem is beyond fixing? 2.) What software/tool is ideal for doing some link analysis in order to assess the problem, and prescribe a solution? Thanks so much! Ramon
Moz Pro | | 48dayscoach0 -
How do I see all links to my site in Web Explore?
It appears that the Web Explore looks for exact matches to a page. I'd like to see all matches to any page. Will regular expressions work?
Moz Pro | | Leverage_Marketing0 -
One Follow Link from each subdomain/domain best for SEO?
Hi there, we have a lot of customers linking to our homepage from a subdomain of our domain or from an external domain. From SEO point of view is it best that they all only have one DoFollow Link and the rest of the links are NoFollow? Or does this have no matter at all? The problem is that we have like 900.000 links but only from round about 1000 different root domains. If we put like half of the links on NoFollow our ratio of links/ different root domains gets better. Thanks for answering! Sebastian
Moz Pro | | Sebastian230 -
Open Site Explorer.. Bit of a let down?
Hi, not too sure if this is a discussion or rant!? I’ve been following SEOMoz for a couple of years now. Testing their tools, reading their blogs, sharing their content, and watching the whiteboard Friday videos (massive thumbs up to that one!). They are at the top of the game, no argument there. Although I should have done so much earlier, I have eventually signed up to the pro version and am about to migrate all my clients over. But there is one major caveat which I’m not sure should exist.. Open Site Explorer. Don’t get me wrong, OSE provides invaluable metrics, some that no other ‘crawler’ provides, but it is far from perfect, there are things that we SEO’s need, and are hoping to get! Some feature SEOMoz could add; Ability to view a chart of ‘link types’ (i.e. blog post, social media, Press Release etc..) – Linkdex do this! Utilise a ‘fresh‘ backlink index as Majestic SEO do. ( we do use majestic alongside SEOMoz) Crawl more frequently – enough said! Index all ‘not so good’ backlinks – this will help identify what backlinks AREN’T helping. I realise this is a lot easier said than done, and I’m sure SEOMoz are working on solutions.. just can’t wait till they launch! What do you think? IS OSE more than it’s cracked up to be? Could it be improved? Let me know 🙂 Lee
Moz Pro | | Webpresence0 -
Any SEO moz users notice a HUGE change in OSE (Open Site Explorer) link data numbers?
Hi All, I am having some serious concern with OSE data recently for numerous clients, one client I want to talk about today has the following data from OSE for the month of August 2011 compared with July 2011: Total links to the domain: (decrease of around 100,000+)
Moz Pro | | ColumbusAustralia
External Followed links: (decrease by around 5,000)
**Linking Root domains: (decrease of over 60) ** The crazy thing is that the domain authority has actually gone up by around 5 points for this client even though every thing has suddenly gone down? Also funny thing is we have been link building quite strong for this client over the last 12 months using only high quality sources from out niche. I am worried that their is serious issues with the data, I realise we saw some updates to OSE recently yet I am suprised it can be this drastic. Kind Regards. PSV1 -
Open Site Explorer CSV reports
Hello, Small question about the Open Site Explorer. on August 24th I've been trying to create several CSV reports which I knew would take a few days. But now, almost a week later when I check Open Site Explorer > Recent CVS reports it tells me it's still saving data. It's been saving data for 4 days now. Am I missing something, is this a bug, do I have to do something or should I wait a little longer? Thanks in advance, Dennis Tappij Gielen Retail&Clicks JFwMt.jpg
Moz Pro | | RetailClicks0 -
The Site Explorer crawl shows errors for files/folders that do not exist.
I'm fairly certain there is ultimately something amiss on our server but the Site Explorer report on my website (www.kpmginstitutes.com) is showing thousands of folders that do not exist. Example: For my "About Us" page (www.kpmginstitutes.com/about-us.aspx), the report shows a link: www.kpmginstitutes.com/rss/industries/404-institute/404-institute/about-us.aspx. We do have "rss", "industries", "404-institute" folders but they are parallel in the architecture, not sequential as indicated in the error url. Has anyone else seen these types of error in your Site Explorer reports?
Moz Pro | | dturkington0