Is this misuse of scheme data?
-
A directory list page that uses the individual business page review data.
Instead of the scheme markup indicating the a particular business page has a review, the page that lists all of the businesses gets the review instead.
This means the list page can get hundreds of reviews which could potentially affect its SERPs.
A competitor is doing this now.
Is this an abuse of the system?
Should it be reported?
How does on report this kind of this?
-
Thanks for the insighful responses.
I need to clarify one point.
They are not aggregating reviews from around the web. Instead they have business profiles which include reviews. Instead of the business' profile page using the mark up, the directory page that lists each of the businesses uses the mark up.
So if there are 50 businesses in a category with 1 review each, the category page shows up in SERPs with 50 reviews.
This would affect CTRs as you pointed out.
Is this considered manipulation?
-
Does the directory page show ratings and reviews (or review snippits) that are viewable by visitors to the page? If so, wrapping those elements in schema.org (or other structure schemes that correctly tag the structured data) does not feel like abuse.
The follow-up questions becomes, does that site have the right to show the reviews/ratings they are showing? This is a somewhat grey area at the moment. Google themselves, used to frequently summarize reviews from other sites without those sites permission (http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/21/google-places-stops-stealing-reviews/) and when they did so, they certainly did wrap the reviews in structured data tags. The IP owner usually wants Google (and other media) to promote its site, and is usually happy for them to use small snippits of their content to do so (that's the whole premise of Google Search). Where the grey area comes in, is when the "promotional" or "editorial" use starts to compete with the original content owners use-case (as happened when Yelp reviews were showing up on Google Plus Places pages).
At the very least, you could use google to see who else has the same reviews as the directory page you are competing with, and then see if one of those sites is the intellectual property owner, and if they want to assert their rights.
So in summary, I don't think using schema.org is abuse (if the data marked up, is in fact accurately tagged), but the site does need to have the rights to the review content they are using.
-
Hi there
First of all, it should be remembered that the schema markup itself will not effect rankings - it is not a ranking factor. However, it will most likely effect click through rate - and so any gaming of the system would be seen as manipulative.
I think what you have described does exactly that - it manipulates the rich snippet in Google search by aggregating reviews of hundreds of other websites to pass off as its own. Pretty clear cut and shouldn't be happening.
Google's algorithmic detection of this appears to be lacking at the moment, but they do have a rich snippet spam reporting tool, which you can find here, which allows you to report anything that you think is spammy.
Hope this helps.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does anyone know how to fix this structured data error on search console? Invalid value in field "itemtype"
I'm getting the same structured data error on search console form most of my websites, Invalid value in field "itemtype" I take off all the structured data but still having this problem, according to Search console is a syntax problem but I can't find what is causing this. Any guess, suggestion or solution for this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alexanders0 -
Is the image property really required for Google's breadcrumbs structured data type?
In its structured data (i.e., Schema.org) documentation, Google says that the "image" property is required for the breadcrumbs data type. That seems new to me, and it seems unnecessary for breadcrumbs. Does anyone think this really matters to Google? More info about breadcrumbs data type:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ryan-Ricketts
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/breadcrumbs I asked Google directly here:
https://twitter.com/RyanRicketts/status/7554782668788531220 -
Keyword ranking verse all other data
Hi there I have just joined Moz so I am not sure if i am doing a good job of analysing all the data, but from what i can see i have a few questions: 1. I seem to have a fairly high visibility compared to a few other competitors 2. All the other competitors i am looking at have a much lower domain authority 3. I win the link metrics in all categories compared to my competitors 4. I have a page optimisation score of 94 5. I dont have any crawl issues (except that i just changed to https and i believe there is a synching issue with Moz and cloud flare..) YET I barely rank for any of the main keyword in my industry.... Kitchen, New Kitchen, Kitchen Renovation etc. I also have a page optimisation score of 94 for related keywords. I feel like i am really missing a big point and was hoping I could get your expert thoughts on this 🙂 Thanks so much! PS my domain is www.bluetea.com.au
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bluetea0 -
Can an "Event" in Structured Data For Google Be A Webinar?
I have a client who is has structured data for live business webinars. Google's documentation seems to talk more about music and tickets than this kind of thing. At the same time, we get an error in search console for "Name" and location, which they list as "webinar." Should I removed this failed structured data attempt or is there a way to fix it? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Need a layman's definition/analogy of the difference between schema and structured data
I'm currently writing a blog post about schema. However I want to set the record straight that schema is not exactly the same as structured data, although both are often used interchangeably. I understand this schema.org is a vocabulary of global identifiers for properties and things. Structured data is what Google officially stated as "a standard way to annotate your content so machines can understand it..." Does anybody know of a good analogy to compare the two? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RosemaryB0 -
Structured Data Questions
I am showing 2 items with errors. These products have both been removed from the site, and will trigger a 404 Page Not Found. I am still seeing the page URLs in Webmaster Central > Search Appearance > Structured Data. They are shown as items with errors, the errors being that they are missing price too. Should I 301 redirect these on an htaccess file, or should I remove the page url in some other way from Google? Also, I have a site with over 50,000 products and 2,000 category level pages. In Structured Data, there are only 2,848 items. Does it seem like Google is collecting very little data compared to how many urls I have on my site?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | djlittman0 -
Pros or Cons of adding Schema Markup via HTML or through Webmaster Data Highlighter
Hello, I am in the process of adding schema to a site that I am working on,, are there advantages or disadvantages to adding via html on site or through webmaster tools? Thank You
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TP_Marketing0 -
List of Search Engines subscribing to the ajax crawling scheme?
Hi, Does anyone have a list of (major) Search Engines that subscribe to the Ajax Crawling Scheme? (https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/) Specifically interested in major international Search Engines such as Bing/Yahoo, Baidu & Yandex - if anyone knows, please let me know! Thanks in advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FashionLux0