I'm shocked! KEYWORD SERPs: GA avg. position vs. SEOmoz
-
SEOmoz has us our position for a particular keyword as "Not in Top 50". The same keyword is listed in GA with an average position of. 3.0. What am I missing here?
When I do a search, I most definitely am not seeing us listed as #3 for this keyword, and tend to believe the SEOmoz number, but why is it so wildly different in GA? Should I have hope?
There is another keyword that SEOmoz has us at #4 and it isn't even on the GA list.
Can anyone explain this to me? Many thanks.
-
So glad I could help, Gina! Google definitely marches to the beat of their own proprietary drum. :]
-
Thanks so much for all the time you put into this.
Yep! You confirmed what I thought and are seeing exactly what I've been seeing, what SEOMoz has been telling me and GA is the odd-"person" out on this. It must have to do with the personalized results as you say- which is kind of funny when you think about how and why people use the analytics in the first place. Thanks for the forum link also.
Well.. it's been a sad situation since up until the Fall, we were #3-4 for those keywords for over a decade and I'm losing hope that we'll ever come back on those.
thanks again! - Gina
-
Hey Gina,
I looked into the keywords that you mentioned that you are tracking ( "web design Santa Barbara" & "Santa Barbara web design") and I am not seeing your site anywhere in the top 50 results when I manually check in an incognito window, except in the ppc section. In regard to the keyword containing "in" we only show results for exact matches for the keywords that you are tracking, so we wouldn't include the results for that keyword in the rankings we show. Here are screenshots of the top 50 results for the two keywords that you are tracking where I did a search on the page for your site and only found it in the ppc section:
web design Santa Barbara:
http://screencast.com/t/kQlxP0I5Santa Barbara web design:
http://screencast.com/t/nt8RKJhroCIt does look like the manual searches I did match with what our tool is showing, so investigated a little bit deeper into how Google calculates the average position metric and it looks like they include the personalized results, which we do not. Our tool shows what most users would see when doing a search for the keyword and, since you are viewing the average position section while signed into your account, that could certainly add bias to the position GA is showing. Here is a forum post from stackexchange.com that talks more about that metric: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/826/what-does-avg-position-from-google-webmaster-really-mean
I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
-Chiaryn
-
HI Chiaryn,
So sorry! I always feel a little weird posting my URL in the forum, but here goes.
http://www.fateyes.com - the campaigns are set up as www.fateyes.com. I recall being unsure as to how I should do that when I set them up...
Keywords: "w.web design Santa Barbara" & "Santa Barbara web design". The "in" phrase is "web design in Santa Barbara"
The local listing thing is not something that has been showing in my campaigns and now I know why. Truthfully, I had never done a search with "in" before so hadn't even known I had that particular listing going for us. No prob that it's not in SEOMoz reports.
Thanks again.
-
Hi Gina,
Thanks for writing in. It is a bit difficult to answer this question without knowing what the keyword is and the site that you are comparing to the keyword, but there are a few reasons this may happen. First, it can depend on how the campaign is set up. For example, if you set up the campaign for www.example.com, but example.com (without the www in the URL) is actually what is ranking, we will show that the site is not in the top 50 because the campaign is only looking for URLs in the rankings containing www in front of your domain name.
Also, you mention local listings, which are not considered organic rankings so, even if you are the #1 places result for a keyword, we will not count that as within the top 50 but that we will label as a universal result.
If you can provide me with the specific keyword and website that you are having this issue with, I can look into it more directly. If you prefer to keep that information private, you can send it ti [email protected] with Attn: Chiaryn in the subject line.
Thanks,
Chiaryn
-
as much as they claim to ignore things like in within actually search they don't in semantic search because it could be quite important.
I would suggest for now keeping an eye on it, thats assuming its only the one keyword/phrase dropping?
-
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your reply.
It's an exact match four word phrase: service type+location. And my position dropped for that phrase and its reverse (location+service) and has been reflected by SEOMoz since it happened, on December 28, 2012. That was a final drop- it had started dropping in Oct. So I guess it could be the 90 day thing.
There is a "like" term with one additonal word: service type + location with the word "in" between them and for this one we are #4 and I can see it. It's the local listings with map pins etc.
-
it's possible that GA, being as it is, doesn't give whole information and is aggregate info - for example if you look on GWT about what your website keywords are it talks about variants of words and not exact words. It is possible therefore it does the same in GA and one of the "like" keyterms does rank at 3 or 4... it's also possible that the data is upto 90 days out of date on GA. Both of these can and do effect both Moz and GA
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Not provided Data in SEOMoz reports
Hi How do SeoMoz reports deal with 'not provided' data I see my total visits from organic search for a month are same as total of both my branded and non branded keyword traffic combined yet GA is reporting 157 visits from non provided data so is SEOMoz being very clever and finding a way to decipher this not provided data and allocate it accordingly in the reports ? Or if not what ? Many Thanks Dan
Moz Pro | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Why would SEOmoz be blocked from a domain?
Am I missing something? I'm trying to do Link Research on www.weddingcarsofhampshire.co.uk but it seems to be blocked, any ideas why that would be the case?
Moz Pro | | JemRobinson0 -
Bug with seomoz level display?
Is anyone else seeing people's moz levels shown incorrectly? Spotted this yesterday, but I am getting the same today. Lots of people showing as Aspirant who shouldn't be.
Moz Pro | | matbennett1 -
How do i target keywords locally
I am working for a cosmetic surgeon with clinics in three geographic places. I would like to give him specific keywords that he can go after successfully. When I use the keyword tool with terms like botox cosmetic staten island or breast augmentation tarrytown, I get competitive rankings like 36% or 37%, but it doesnt tell me if there are only a few searchers doing this per month. In Google's Adwords tool, it thinks that the number fo searchers with these same terms is too small to measure, literally giving me back a dash (= insignificant traffic). However, it I use Google Adwords with more general terms, say breast augmentation surgeon, and get a medium/110 global monthly searches, when I come back to SEOmoz tool and assess the same keyword, I find that the traffic picks up doctor sites in Arizona and elsewhere, where clearly no one who wants cosmetic surgery in new York is going to fly to Arizona for it. So, how do I ensure a balance between targeting too little traffic but including the names of specific towns, and targetting more general terms but not having local prospects. Has anyone tackled this in a specific medical niche?
Moz Pro | | DianeDP0 -
Cities in Keywords Ranking Reports
So I've been in the habit of creating a master list of keywords concatenated with the city name so I can track my local rankings versus competitors. 1. Is this the correct thing to do to help hone in on who competitive my sites are ranking in the local market? 2. If so, by doing this the On Page reports seem to be totally screwed, because the searches I'm tracking (with city) vs the keywords I want to analyse for on-page ranking (without city), are different. What is the solution?
Moz Pro | | justlawonline0 -
How long does the seomoz crawl take?
It's been doing it's thing for over 48 hours now and Ive got less than 350 pages... is this norma? It's NOT the first crawl.
Moz Pro | | borderbound0 -
Avoid Keyword Self-Cannibalization
I'm still having issues with this self-cannibalization...it's referencing my tags as links that are doing this... should i remove the tags on my posts that are exact keyword matches to my article? for example, this post generates an 'a' through the on-page optimization tool for the keyword 'kw cares'...they only thing i receive a warning on is the self-cannibalization. http://www.youdrivethesuccess.com/tag/kw-cares/ Cannibalizing link - "kw cares" is it best practice not to have your tags match your primary keywords? any guidance is appreciated!
Moz Pro | | brentmitchell0 -
What the hell...spam on SEOMOZ!
I received this in my Private Messages section: My name is Fatima,i saw your profile at/www.seomoz.org/today and became intrested in you,i will also like to know you the more,and i want you to send an email to my email address so i can give you my picture for you to know whom i am.Here is my email address ([email protected]) I believe we can move from here I am waiting for your mail to my email address above.Fatima(Remeber the distance or colour does not matter but love matters alot in life) How can somebody spam like this on protected forum?
Moz Pro | | IM_Learner2