Should I noindex, nofollow a lot of child pages?
-
Some category pages on my website have A LOT of product pages in them. Many of these pages do not receive any sort of organic traffic. Is there a reason for Google to be crawling these pages? Should I noindex, nofollow these pages to make Google's life a little easier? Could I possibly see some benefits from this or should I leave it the way it is?
-
it all comes down to the amount of content on the pages. hyper targeted pages like sizes usually don't get enough editor attention or have enough unique content written about them to make them valuable and in that case a main page listing the sizes will suffice because they will rank for those sizes if the content is on the page because it is so extremely long tail...and protects you from panda. I just went through this exercise with a pool company who had several brands and multiple sizes and we opted to not get so granular.
-
Having pages that no one goes to won't negatively affect the rankings of the rest of your site.
In your case if you're really concerned about those obscure pages and they're thin or duplicate content, you could choose one really popular product in each category (such as "6x6x4 red foil gift box") and add canonical tags on the other similar products in that category (i.e. all the other red box pages) pointing to the popular one.
-
I would say leave them in there as you want Google to see everything on your site that might be relevant to the user.
I think you are referring to what some call Crawl Optimization or Crawl Budget (great article here http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/crawl-optimization) and yes there is something to making sure that you do not waste Google's time in crawling pages that do not matter.
I would still think that product pages are worth Google's time if you have good content and also, these are the things that you sell. Seems that Google would not only want to see your category pages, but what items are in a category. One thing to note, all of those "red box" product pages all link up to the "red box" category page. That is part of what makes the "red box" category authoritative within your site as you are telling Google this with your internal link structure. You may find that if you noindex your product pages, your category pages may go down.
The use of the noindex/nofollow to help with Crawl Optimization is really more for pages like search pages, or pages that can be resorted 100 different ways with 100 different URLs. Those are all duplicates and waste Googles time. Your product pages are really different animals and so my vote would be to keep them in the crawl.
-
Thanks for the response. The thing is these small product pages are too obscure for anyone to find. Many are differentiated only by product size.
For example:
If someone types in "red boxes" into google, we will rank for “red boxes”. On this category page, we have 24 different red box products such as "6x6x4 Red Foil Gift Box" and "5 1/2 x 11 1/2 x 1 Red Glossy Box." Sure, if somebody searched for a "6x6x4 Red Foil Gift Box," our page would show. But nobody is going to search that. There are ways to eliminate some of these extra pages, but it would be less user friendly for a customer clicking through the site.
My question is, if Google sees that these pages consistently get no organic traffic, even if they might rank for some obscure keyword, can keeping these pages have a negative effect on my rankings?
-
I would think you would want Google to find your product pages and then get you traffic for them. I dont think the solution is to use noindex as that would take them out of the index for sure.
I am betting that either due to your site archtecture or how you have your sitemap setup or even possibly that you have thin content on all the product pages are more of the issue.
If you don't want to work on any of those things, sure you can noindex all of your product pages, but then it just seems like you are giving up and limiting your long term outlook for ranking pages in Google.
The only reason I would use the noindex in a case like yours would be to keep duplicate product or category pages out of the index. Additionally, I would use that also to keep Google out of any of your search result pages, shopping cart etc. Those are the pages that are wasting Google's time. That brings up another point, are you having Google crawl a bunch of duplicate content on your site and that is why it never gets to the "good" content pages?
Good luck!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Virtual Hub Page Impact
I currently have a website structure that has multiple subfolders. One of the primary sub-folders has hundreds of pages within (e.g. www.mydomain.com/subfolder1/page) The pages are all accessible through other subfolders, as contextually appropriate, but there is no existing hub page for the specific pages. In other words, while www.mydomain.com/subfolder1/page1....n are all valid URLs, www.mydomain.com/subfolder1/ is a 404. My question is given that the pages within the subfolder are accessible through multiple other subfolders, how much of an issue is it that the specific subfolder these pages are within 404s. Does this negatively impact in any way?
On-Page Optimization | | APFM0 -
A question on cached pages
Hi all. I have been testing different ways of writing the text on the homepage of the website www document-management-solutions co.uk because we are ranking very low for the keyword Document Management Software. I've recently learnt about pages being 'cached' and wanted to just clarify something. The last time the page was cached was on 26th March. I have made changed to the homepage since then and wanted to see how it has affected our ranking. Will I not be able to know if it has had a positive/negative effect until the next time our page is cached? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | janc0 -
Impact of nofollow links
Does anyone know what the impact of a nofollowed link is on the ranking value any given page has to distribute? For example, if I have 2 links on a page, both followed, I know those links each distribute nearly 50% of the total ranking value the current page has to offer. However, if one of those links is nofollowed, does that automatically mean the other link gets the ranking value cast off by the nofollowed link? In other words, the single followed link now distributes nearly 100% of the ranking value the page has to offer? It seems to me I remember hearing this was not the case and that the ranking value a nofollowed link would have if it were followed just evaporates. This would mean the single followed link still only passes on around 50%...not 100%. Is the effect different if the links are internal vs. external? If any citations are available to justify knowledge here, that would be great. I know a lot of people have opinions about this subject, but I'm not sure anyone knows Google's position. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | RyanOD0 -
Your thoughts on page navigation
Hi again SEOmoz community. What are your thoughts on mainpage navigation. How it should be handled? Scenario 1. - links to the main sections with a mouse rollover feature where it shows subsections of the main sections Scenario 2. - links to the main sections, but the subsections are hidden and only visible on the click Scenario 3. links to the main sections and subsections allways visible I would like to hear you oppinions on this. What did you find as the best featrue, or did you try to find someting new entirely. What do you think would be the best scenario SEO wise and in the light of keeping links on page in decent numbers 🙂 Imo, Scenario 2 is the option to go with. Tnx in advance for all your replys. Sincerely, sinisa
On-Page Optimization | | TataSinke0 -
Page Title
Hi All, I am wondering if you could help me please. I am getting the following result after I run my On-Page Analysis Avoid Multiple Page Title Elements _Easy fix _ <dl style="font-style: normal;"> <dt>Page titles</dt> <dd>"Aquashowers-Shower Repairs Dublin -" and "Aquashowers - Shower Repairs Dublin"</dd> <dt>Explanation</dt> <dd>Web pages are meant to have a single title, and for both accessibility and search engine optimization reasons, we strongly recommend following this practice.</dd> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>Remove all but a single page title element.</dd> </dl> Does this mean that i have 2 pages that are nearly identical or i should only name a page with one word? The reason i ask is because i have 1 page called "Aquashowers-Shower Repairs Dublin" and another called "Aquashowers-Dublin Shower Repair" I don't have a page called "Aquashowers - Shower Repairs Dublin" (with the space inbetween the words and the hyphen) Any help would be great. Thanks again Aidan
On-Page Optimization | | aidanlawlor0 -
Canonical tag for home page
This question was asked before but I didn't see a clear answer to it. If I've got a site that has as it's home page: http://www.mysite.com/, and there are many references within the site back to the home page that point to /index.php, should I include a canonical tag in the index.php page like this: to avoid a duplicate content issue, and to have all juice from both links combined into one?
On-Page Optimization | | wcksmith0 -
Why home page ranks higher than keyword-optimized page
We have a page that is optimized for the keyword "job scheduling". A search on the keyword "job scheduling" results in this page not ranking at all, while our home page (uc4.com) ranks third. Could you provide some ideas/suggestions as to why this would be the case and how to make our job scheduling page rank higher? Thanks, claudia
On-Page Optimization | | claudmar0