Will massive "sculpting" make a difference?
-
I'm working with a very popular blog that also is associated with related products we manufacture and sell ourselves.
The blog is about 99% blog content and about 1% product content.
If suddenly some 99% of a 5,000 page blog is changed to have the blog pages no-indexed, will the linkjuice be now more concentrated on the remaining 1%?
Also, be aware that this blog has lots of high quality backlinks from everyday recognizable magazines, newspapers and blogs. Of course, this is a highly competitive market place so I'm trying to leave no-stone-unturned here in working out the kinks.
In the old days, we sort-of-called this "pagerank sculpting" and the idea was to focus the linkjuce on certain pages and defocus it on other pages. It made sense to block certain pages that were not indexible but Google supposedly dinged that tactic years ago, and today people say this is act also helps as it conserves the crawl budget.
Might this make a difference these days??
Keep in mind that the 4,950 remaining pages are still followed, and all backlinks remain in place.
Will the site start ranking better for the keywords on the 50 indexed (product) pages?
-
Noindex + follow on your low quality pages will just allow your crawl budget to potentially be better spent on the content that you want Google to crawl and index. It's not going to boost the value of pages that are already indexed.
So if you have quality pages and product pages that Google isn't seeing due to wasted crawl budget and low quality pages, then noindexing them might be a strategy to consider. I'd also make sure the quality of the pages you want to have indexed is unique and of high quality.
-
And reading between the lines, my guess is you are saying yes, this matters a great deal - elsewise you wouldn't want to be advising lots of analysis before action. Am i right?
You are right.
At a high level, would blocking that old stuff (no index, yes follow) effectively refocus linkjuce on product pages?
I believe that linkjuice will still flow through these pages. Is that correct? Maybe, it depends upon how search engines have decided to process the flow of linkjuice through noindexed pages that are followed... and search engines can decide however they want and change their minds about it without announcement or regard.
So the question remains: will selectively noindexing large quantities of old poor-quality stuff help the relatively smaller quantities of product related stuff in Google's ranking algorhitm?
I don't know the answer to that question because I don't know how search engines handle the noindex. If this was my site, I would be redirecting to remove those pages from the index and push the value of any links to a relevant page on the website - if there is one.
Here is what I have done on a similar situation....
One one of my sites we were posting about six to ten very short news items per day. This was a news blog that covered emerging topics in our industry and related industries. They would get a lot of traffic for a few days and a few of them would attract a nice amount of traffic long term. We would allow them to remain in the blog archive until the first day of January, two years after they were posted. We would then redirect all of them as a group to the homepage of the news section of the website and delete them from the server. Before the redirect was done we would consider any of the posts that were still drawing traffic and write extended articles for those that were of merit.
We continue the news blog because.... lots of other industry related websites link to the homepage of the news section, lots of people have it book marked, it ranks well in search and gets thousands of views per day.
But the main reason we keep it... lots of visitors type our domain into the address window of their broswer or into a search box, land on our homepage and click "news". Google sees this activity because they are the most important search engine and they own the most important browser. Google sees thousands of people asking for our website by name. That in my opinion, is extremely important to the rankings of my website that people ask for us by name and Google sees it. So, if you have this it could be worth more than gold.
-
Indeed, that is what I do - however the question remains.
And reading between the lines, my guess is you are saying yes, this matters a great deal - elsewise you wouldn't want to be advising lots of analysis before action. Am i right?
So - here's some more details of the scenario:
Imagine a news related blog that was very popular and contained years worth of commentary that is about 99% non-product related, with zero useful internal links to products other than through menus and footers.
This 99% tends to be non-quality oriented pages - sure there's traffic due to the volume of pages but it does not convert, nor do people look at products when visiting the blog pages - and there is no question that the older stuff draws way less traffic than newer stuff.
Because there is so much of it, i can generally infer what the keywords are that are being used and they are not presently - nor will they ever be - useful within the broader product strategy of the site. Ads on those pages are also highly non-productive.
At a high level, would blocking that old stuff (no index, yes follow) effectively refocus linkjuce on product pages?
As an example, if this stuff went back 10 years, I might think about selectively blocking the oldest nine, with of course special attention to not block certain pages if any of them were ever-green, super linked, stood out for super-high engagement etc.
So the question remains: will selectively noindexing large quantities of old poor-quality stuff help the relatively smaller quantities of product related stuff in Google's ranking algorhitm?
-
Great answer. EGOL is correct in that you need to consider the performance of the pages you're considering no-indexing.
If this is a popular blog, it seems a reasonable assumption is that the content quality is good. Generally speaking, you don't want to noindex quality content that's driving traffic to your site.
I suspect a noindex strategy on 99% of content for a popular blog is a bad one. But as EGOL pointed out, it's impossible to say for sure without fully understanding your website and its metrics.
-
This is a very important question and you don't want to steer this decision using "shoot from the hip" answers or kibitzing.
I believe that a good answer to this question would require a person to become very very familiar with these 5000 blog posts, the links that flow into them, the amounts of traffic that they receive, their content quality and their search engine health.
If suddenly some 99% of a 5,000 page blog is changed to have the blog pages no-indexed, will the linkjuice be now more concentrated on the remaining 1%?
This is an extremely drastic move. There might be better ways to accomplish your goal of using the power of these pages to drive linkjuice. However, linkjuice is not the single factor here. Traffic, navigation structure, keyword reach of the site and many other things could be more important.
I don't want to give any specific advice because a well considered answer is what you need and I am unable to provide it. I don't think that anyone can given the information provided and without being extremely familiar with your website.
When I have made this type of decision with my own site (that I know extremely well from working on it every day for many years) I usually study on it for weeks, looking at traffic, conversions, content investment and more, then obtained second opinions to give me strength or weakness about making the move.
This is not a decision that is easy to make. Quick answers given here are going to come with risks.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to identify spammy website before making backlinks on them
Hi, I search in google but didnt find a proper answer for this! maybe search an incorrect keyword! The question is, How can I find out a website that I'm going to make a backlink on is a spammy website? For example I did this guest bloging on this good website: Best Sure-Shot Organic Pest Control Approaches Every Gardener Should Know | Balcony Garden Web But it seems to be spammy because I use SEO POWERSUIT software that shows this backlink is 20% risk of google penalty! Is it right!? So how can we rest assured for making a quality backlink? I can not think any other way 😞
Link Building | | Shervin0 -
Why did I lose my rankings for a keyword "CRM" even after getting quality backlinks?
Initially my website is ranking on third page of Google.com for the keyword "CRM". So to improve rankings I got good number of quality backlinks by guest posting in various websites. But now my website is ranking on 6th page, which is a big concern for me. But for Google.in there was neither any improvement nor any fall in the ranking. I have following doubts in my mind 1. Does the sudden increase in backlinks (quality backlinks in the from of guest posts) effect rankings in a negative way? 2. Why did it effect on Google.com and not on Google.in? 3. What needs to be done on urgent basis to recover from this? Kindly help me with all your suggestions. Thanks
Link Building | | sandeep.clickdesk0 -
Do links from between common sites you run count as "bad" links?
Hi everyone,
Link Building | | AMA-DataSet
Iv recently been asked to review a group of sites. There are 3 sites, each of these sites has a link to the other two sites within the footer or the navigation.
These site are about a similar topic each provides a different perceptive or aims at a specific section of the industry so its not like the links are to irreverent sites. However because the links are in a global section they are repeated thousands of times on each site and count for a large proportion of the link profile to each site, I don't think this is good practise and I want to remove them or at least add a no-follow but my client insists they are relevant to each other and doesn't not want the links removing. What would be best in this situation? remove them? no-follow them? or leave them? Thank you in advance,
Liam0 -
Submitting Same Press Releases to Different Sites
Hi, Is it a good idea to submit the same press release to many different press release web sites? if yes, how many a day?I haven't try this yet since i always use paid press releases submission Like: Prweb.com and Prlog.org (Paid) But this time i want to try 50 top free PR websites. so i wandering if its good thing to do! Thank You!
Link Building | | KentR0 -
What is the difference between external followed links and internal followed links.
I have almost 3,000 external links followed and only a tiny amount of internal followed links. My website is doing really badly on google at the mo. I am also an SEO beginner and learning new stuff every day, but am not sure exactly what the difference is! Thanks!
Link Building | | heleni0 -
"Noindex" the Landingpage of a Linkbait or not?
Hey SeoMozzers, I'm wondering if it is recommendable to use the meta-tag "noindex" for the landingpage of a linkbait, or not. Do you have any considerations, experiences, opinions regarding that question? Thank you and best regards!
Link Building | | steffen_0 -
How to advertise "tip of the day"
I have an email list of a few thousand and would like to start giving my subscribers a tip of the day. However, I have found that emailing all of them an email every day calls for a pricey email subscription. I was thinking of an RSS feed and a widget but those will only satisfy website owners/viewers. What is the best way to give a tip of the day via email to my subscribers without it costing me an arm and a leg?
Link Building | | StreetwiseReports0 -
Pagerank sculpting case...
We have a website which has: a) a top navigation with links to top categories b) a footer with links to top categories and to every subcategory c) the following structure: home > category > subcategory > items For usability purposes I plan to remove the links at the bottom and add a drop down menu to each top category in top navigation. I plan to make all links in the top nav no follow in order to be able to do pagerank sculpting for each category (will build links that point to each category and pass link juice to subcategories and then to items, but I don't want link juice to spread across all of the site through links in the footer, which as said before will be removed) Is pagerank sculpting still valid? What do you think of my plan? Thanks for your time.
Link Building | | gerardoH0