How do I know if an inbound link offers value?
-
Is there a way to find out if inbound links that have been pointing to my site for a year or more are still offering value to my site.
I know the value decreases over time (especially press release and blog article links), but it would be nice to know how much value bring to a site.
-
No problem Everett. Thanks for the information.
-
Brad, sorry I didn't mean to imply that you were buying links. But to answer your question then, yes your links aren't going to be as strong once they drop off the home page of a blog. But that, technically, is not the same link as the one from the blog post page. Yes, you'll lose the power of the link when it's no longer on the page. It's the same as losing the link. But the link on the post page will retain its value, although that may not be much if nobody links to that blog entry.
I hope that helps. Sorry about the confusion.
Regards,
Everett
-
Hi Everett,
Good information, thanks! The reason I think they lose value is exactly what you said, they "drop off the home page" and get pushed back.
There are reasons for this quesiton other than paying for a link. For example, guest article links where you want to know if your efforts are working. Also, if you are asking for a link on a site, it would be nice to know that your link will count by looking at current links on the site.
-
Hi Brad
You should be able to look at the metrics provided by the SEO tools to see the authority of the page the link is from. If it is still a highly relevant site, with high domain authority then there would be no reason to suspect that the value would be lessened by the passing of time.
If the site or page that the link was from was devalued then this reduction of value may occur but this would be because of this rather than because time has passed.
-
Hello Brad,
Where did you hear that links lose value over time? My experience has always been the exact opposite. As for blog, PR and article distribution links, one reason it may "seem" like they lose value is because they drop off the home/index/category pages as new content is added. But in terms of a URL that has a link on it that is five years old and that same URL that has a link on it that is three weeks old - all other things being equal - I find more value in the aged link. But that wasn't your question so...
I'm assuming the only reason one would want to know this is if they are paying for links on a recurring basis. Otherwise why not just leave it up? SSCDavis is sort of correct, although I have seen sites that sell links stop passing page rank even though their toolbar Page Rank was never removed, meaning that just because a link is followable and the site has page-rank doesn't necessarily mean the links pass page rank.
The only real way (that I know of) to figure that out is to run anchor-text tests on the page. I wouldn't change the anchor text on your old links, but you could get a new link on that same page going to a different site and see what that does for your rankings for that query. It has to be anchor text that is already on your page though. So take a two or three word phrase from your page that doesn't get many searches (and that you're maybe below the #5 spot for) and get a link from the page you're testing into the page from which you took the text with that phrase. See how your ranking changes.
This, of course, won't help you determine if your old links on that page have lost any value but, like I said, my experience has been that older links are more valuable, not less.
PS: Rand does a better job of explaining this here than I just did above.
-
I agree with you about the value of links over time. I think an aged, older link from an older page is definitely stronger than the average link. I also think there is a temporal boost for a new link. So when you get a new link, it might be valued at a 7 on a scale of 1-10. After that initial window (whether it's weeks or months) it may drop to a 4 or 5, but then over time will work back up to a higher number. I think it's a bit more complex than that, but in general that's how I look at it.
I use the same criteria for looking at existing links as I do for new ones. Is the site relevant to yours? Does it have authority? Is it spammy? Does it link to bad neighborhoods? If not, I'd say it's always valuable.
-
**Is there a way to find out if inbound links that have been pointing to my site for a year or more are still offering value to my site. **
If they are followed links and the host site is still ranking and has not seen a PR reduction then they are probably passing value, especially if the topic of the site is related to the topic of the page that they are linking to. If any of these have been violated then all bets are off.... also if that site is selling links or doing other naughty things then the value of the links could have been turned off by Google and you will never know.
I know the value decreases over time (especially press release and blog article links), but it would be nice to know how much value bring to a site.
Some people think that the value of aged links is higher.
-
From a SEO standpoint if the link is on a page with good PA/DA and is not 'nofollowed' then it is still offering value.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is There Value in Disavowing Links if you there is No Google Penalty?
I have just started using Link Detox to determine if our clients have links/domains pointing to their sites that could be harming them in organic search. In a few cases 7%-9% of links have been flagged as a high priority to be disavowed. I would be interested in your opinion on the following: If your site does not have a Google penalty is there an advantage to disavowing pages that have been flagged as high risk? When I go to those pages they look spammy and have no real value other than an inbound link. If a client acquires another website/company and that website is now 301 redirected to the client's site, would "high risk" inbound links from the acquired company cause a problem for my client? A client has taken down content from their site that was completely unrelated to their current business. Is there a benefit in disavowing those links to the old content that are deemed by Link Detox as being high risk? Thank you, Rosemary
Link Building | | RosemaryB2 -
Is there value of consistently getting a link from a high DA site?
Is there value in consistently getting a link from a high DA sites? For example, consistently posting on a blog monthly rather then only doing it once and getting a link/being done with it. Could you list the pros of consistently getting links on high DA sites?
Link Building | | calf0 -
Link Detox and Link Removal
I have a question about which links to remove after running a link detox from Link Research Tools. First a little back story. I had had an SEO company link building for one of the websites I own. But I have recently stopped working with them. In the last month my rankings have near dropped off the charts. I have just recently gotten access to Google webmaster tools and noticed an unnatural link warning from back in March. So yesterday I ran link detox and it reported 19 toxic links, 120 suspicious links, and 24 healthy links. It's rather obvious that I should remove all of the toxic links. They all from sites that have been deindexed by google. But my question is a about the suspicious links. What should my criteria be for removing them? Am I better off removing them all and leaving my site with only 24 healthy links or should I personally comb through them and remove only the worst of the worst so that I leave my site with a few more links? I'd really like to get the site ready to resubmit to google as soon as I can. Thoughts? yyCOf.png
Link Building | | CobraJones950 -
Are the following considered bad links for Link Building.
I've been doing a lot of research lately on link building & I've read a lot about having a diverse amount of links. Social links, Blog links, comment links, footer links, No follow links, Directory links as well as links with Anchor text URL match, brand match, partial brand match, non-descriptive, and with keywords. But there is a lot of talk of removing those links that look like a site that's built just for link building purposes.... but Directories are basically built for link building are they not? I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if they feel links from the following directories would be bad links. (Non-Paid) http://www.yoganza.com http://www.wkool.com http://www.wee-directory.com http://www.voicelet.com www.hotfrog.ca http://www.webdirectorieslist.com http://multiplelistingboard.com http://mozdirectory.net http://freedirectorypr.info Industry specific below: http://bestautolinks .com http://automotivedome.com http://automobilebuzz.com http://craigsautolinks.com Thanks so much for the help!
Link Building | | DCochrane0 -
Changing links
Hi guys i wanted you views on changing the anchor text of links. I have quality links coming in but with year terms such as 2012 in there, if i want to change them all to 2013 for example would it be badly seen by Google? I cant say i feel comfortable about doing it but they are my links and are related to our products. Any advice much appreciated.
Link Building | | pauledwards0 -
Why do my inbound links hardly ever show up?
I'm sure this question has been asked before but I couldn't quite find the answer I was looking for. Basically, I'm trying to understand why the inbound links I've created hardly ever show up in Webmaster Tools or Open Site Explorer, when other (relatively new) sites have hundreds of them. For example, I'm building a small niche site for which I have written all original content; some product reviews, some more general articles. Then I have rewritten the articles and posted them on popular Web2.0 sites to find human traffic as well as building authority through the links. I've linked some of the smaller sites together to form a wheel for additional authority. I've pinged the off-site articles and some of them have been indexed but the links don't show up in, even after a couple of months. I've checked the articles for duplication, just in case, and they're all 80-90% unique, or more. I've done similar things for other small sites and the links sometimes show up, but it takes 4-6 months which seems ridiculous. It's frustrating when I'm doing everything by the book (as far as I'm aware) and getting nowhere in the SERP's, while other sites have hundreds of links from spam blogs with poor quality, unrelated content and are sitting on page 1. I've also bookmarked the off-site articles and submitted the RSS feed where appropriate. My intention was to continue adding content on and off site but it just seems pointless if it never has any value. I just don't know what else I'm supposed to do. Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated. The URL of the site I'm currently working on is www.impact-wrench-reviews.com. Thanks, Tom.
Link Building | | TomFrearson0 -
NEW LINKS
Hi If you plan to add new links to a site which currently has very few inbound links what is the maximum amount you could add in any one day before it is deemed by Google to be suspicious and unatural. I am referring ot manually added links, not robotic. Thank you 🙂
Link Building | | PH2920 -
Do links from a Tumblr blog count as inbound links?
That's it. I'm thinking of making a Tumblre blog (s) for inbound links. Is it worthwhile?
Link Building | | Spreader73760