SEOmoz vs Google Webmaster Tools on incoming links
-
I'm working on basic SEO for http://queueassoc.com.
Google has indexed the non-www verions of the pages and these are what the SERPS return
SEOmoz toolbar shows that all of the incoming links juice goes to the www. versions of the pages, none to the non-www version.
Yesterday I set up GWMT for the site, submitted a sitemap with the www version of the pages and set the default address to the www version.
I had to verify both versions of the site in order to do this and in looking at the non-www version I saw that Google had all the incoming links there and none in the www.version, the opposite of what SEOmoz shows.
Is this just because Google only has the non-www versions in its index? Will they show the links to the www version once they get them in the index?
I'm worried about losing Google Page Rank value or SEOmoz DA by making this switch.
-
Thanks for that link, I wasn't aware of it.
Yes, I'm trying to get the redirect you mention taken care of. If only the client could tell me who maintains their website!
-
Google PageRank isn't something I'd worry about in this context. Rand covered what PageRank should and shouldn't be used for in his latest Whiteboard Friday: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/what-is-googles-pagerank-good-for-whiteboard-friday.
I prefer a 301 redirect over GWT preferences. I'd 301 redirect the non-www version to the www version (assuming that the www version has the popularity).
Code and directions are provided on the Web Developer's Cheat Sheet: http://static.seomoz.org/user_files/SEO_Web_Developer_Cheat_Sheet.pdf
-
The links were set up long ago. I just started the SEO project a few weeks ago. According to SEOmoz Pro toolbar they all point to the www version.
Thanks for your reply.
-
Did you set up t he links pointing to the www version in the first place? Its not clear from y our question and this might be ther reason. You should ultimately redirect to one or the other and when this is done build linksot the relevant one and you needn't worry anymore then
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Website disappeared from Google :(
Dear all, I've a 5 years old website, which was in top rank for a particular keyword. It's been a couple of months that the site suddenly disappeared from Google.com.au search. However, the site is number one on Bing and Yahoo.
Moz Pro | | jarrodb
I've tried almost everything in my limited knowledge but it doesn't seem to come back. Can you please suggest if something can be done. Google.com.au
website: http://partysuppliesnow.com.au/
keyword: "party supplies" Your help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance 🙂
Jarrod0 -
Setting a campaign in SEOmoz
Hi All, when i set a new campaign i am asked to decide if to use: domin-name.com Or www.domain-name.com Can someone please explain the different in terms of the campaign If i use: domain-name.com - will the campaign run on www.domain-name.com too? Thank you SEOwise
Moz Pro | | iivgi0 -
Problem with seoMoz keyword tool and rank tracking?
hi all, so i get another problem with rank tracking. We’re unable to retrieve your ranking. and keyword difficulty tool The Keyword Difficulty tool is currently unresponsive due to difficulties with real-time rankings retrievals. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to fix it. i seem to keep getting this error messages these past 2 days and this is affecting the numbers on my campaign (history n analysis) can someone tell me what's wrong? thanks,
Moz Pro | | BSutandio0 -
Why does SEOMoz think I have duplicate content?
The SEOmoz crawl report shows me a large amount of duplicate content sites. Our site is built on a CMS that creates the link we want it to be but also automatically creates it's own longer version of the link (e.g. http://www.federalnational.com/About/tabid/82/Default.aspx and http://www.federalnational.com/about.aspx). We set the site up so that there are automatic redirects for our site. Google Webmaster does not see these pages as duplicate pages. Why does SEOmoz consider them duplicate content? Is there a way to weed this out so that the crawl report becomes more meaningful? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | jsillay0 -
Internal Links
I've searched high and low, but I could just be missing it... Is there a report on internal links? Maybe a count? Or better yet, a way to see internal anchor text?
Moz Pro | | MCIMaui0 -
Difference between Webmaster and SEOMoz back-link stats?
Hi there, I just noticed that there are differences between the links to my site showing on my Google Webmaster account and what is showing on my link analysis on SEOMoz. Has anyone noticed this? In webmaster I am showing 857 links to my site from 92 different domains. In SEOMoz I am showing 816 links to my site from 53 total linking root domains and only 39 followed domains? Does anyone know why this there is a difference? Are the links showing in Webmaster all indexed and followed links? Thanks in advance 🙂 Karl
Moz Pro | | onlineexpression0 -
Cleaning up link profile
I've recently been trying to tidy up my link profile. We have been link building for a number of years and I decided to check it out and see how good our profile looks. I used OSE to give me a report of all external links pointing to pages on my www sub-domain. The results are scary! I have hundreds of links point to my site that originate from URLs such as the following url which attempts to start a download, use caution!!! <colgroup><col width="768"></colgroup>
Moz Pro | | Entrusteddev
| http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/cxlinux/demo/install-crossover-pro-demo-9.0.1.sh?m=pc&a=bookmarkList.view&target_user_id=1&search_type=tag&keyword=減量 | Another example (this one attampts to start a .jar download!! Be cautious) <colgroup><col width="794"></colgroup>
| http://www.breastreconstructionguide.com/compare.jar?page=1892&username=DXDZSW | All the other metrics reported for the offending URLs seem ok, such as PA and DA. Also, many have meaningful page titles (as opposed to random characters) and nicely formed anchor text. What I'd like to know is; Are these links having a detrimental effect on my SERPs? How does OSE find them since its a URL to a download? Has anyone else had a similar experience? Thanks for your time. Regards Aran <colgroup><col width="794"></colgroup>0 -
Forum posting link building
Is answering questions on yahoo answers and forums genuine link building opportunity? I dont mean spamming much, but being a genuine member of the forums
Moz Pro | | CompleteOffice0