Which top 10 organic results are my competitors?
-
Hi all,
This is a question about whether the top 10 ORGANIC Google results for a broad match is your competition, or whether it's the top 10 for a phrase match, or an exact match.
I'm a newbie here but not a newbie to the world of SEO. I hope to be able answer just as many questions as I ask
QUESTION: If a customer comes to me and says, "hey, who's my (organic) competition for wedding present?" and I want to use Google to get the top 10 organic results, do I use a broad, phrase, or exact match?
It seems many people think an exact match is the way to go but I think they were more referring to Adwords results / competition. I'm not trying to determine search volume for Adwords or even the search volume for organic results... I'm only interested in the top 10 competitors in the organic results.
No one types in "wedding present" (with inverted commas" when doing a search in Google, so surely to see who ranks organically for wedding present I'd want to simply type in wedding present (no inverted commas, aka broad match).
I understand all the concepts about how Google results cary whether you're logged in, etc, etc so I don't want to get distracted by that. And I know there's a bunch of tools we can use like the SEOMoz Keyword Analysis Tool. But I just want to know specifically what people would use (broad, phrase or exact) to look at the top 10 organic competitors are when doing a manual search in Google.
-
Thanks Adam! (and thanks for reading my post too)
I would love to hear from SEOMoz about the reason for using [exact match] - perhaps because that gives the more relevant results instead of broad match results, which as we all know, get progressively less relevant and sometimes completely irrelevant by the time you get to page 3. Since there's no sense in trying to compete with irrelevant results, it's probably better to know what the true results are for an exact match.
Just a thought. Perhaps someone from SEOMoz can chime in?
-
Hi Dana,
Very strange, I am just reading your blog post now and here you are answering my question. Thanks for the quick reply.
I agree the definition of "competitor" will vary. My question was asked with the definition of "competition" to be anyone taking up a position on the first page because if all 10 positions for shure microphones are taken up by major suppliers / manufacturers then the recommendation to my client would be "don't bother".
What I'm finding with varying tools (SEO Moz, SEM Rush, etc) is they all give search volumes in terms of phrase or exact matches. But when someone searches for wedding present in Google (as a broad match), the number of results is the number of results we care about.
I'm simply not confident in my own opinion because I would have thought all these tools would have put in enough research to decide that phrase or exact results are better. Using a phrase or exact match to provide "search volume" figures makes sense to me, but if you want:
-
the top 10 organic / paid results for a keyphrase
-
the number of organic / paid results for a keyphrase
Then broad match would be the obvious choice.
I'm not sure if anyone from SEOMoz wants to explain why the Keyword Analysis Tool shows results using exact match, but I'm sure there's a logical reason for it - I just can't see it!
-
-
Hi Adam,
This is a great question. My answer (which is my own and not endorsed by any committees or special interest groups, lol), is yes, broad match. You are correct that no one (unless they are librarians or grad students working on their dissertations) uses boolean search elements like "(" or quotes. One thing I will say, is to consult with your clients about your results because the companies who are in the top 10 results for a particular term may or may not be considered to be true "competitors." For example, I work for a company that sells "Shure" brand microphones. If you type in "Shure microphones," you will inevitable get results from the manufacturer in the top 10. While yes, they might be "competitors" in terms of top 10 results, but they aren't competitors in terms of doing business. Most likely, my company is never going to be able to outrank "Shure" for "shure microphones. So, the true "competitors" are the other resellers who are managing to make it into the top 10.
The other thing to consider is location. If your company only sells in the USA, but is being beat out by a company that sells internationally, well, are they really a competitor? I think what I'm trying to say is that there are "competitors" in terms of "who do you have to compete with in order to make it into the top ten of a given term." And there are "competitors" - "Companies that you directly compete with for real customers." I'm absolutely certain that these two groups aren't identical.
Whew, that was a little longer than I intended, but I hope it's comprehensible!
Dana
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best competitor analysis tool comparing my links with competitor links?
Hello All, Can anyone tell me best competitor analysis tool comparing my links with competitor links? Tool which define quality of links either low quality or spammy links etc? Thanks!
Competitive Research | | devdan0 -
How can I tell if a competitor has a KML Geositemap or not?
Is there someone to tell if a competitor has a KML Geositemap or not? Would it be in the source code on their homepage? or can I just put their url in a "Open Site Explorer" type product to find out? Thanks, Ruben
Competitive Research | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
What's the best SEO way to benefit from your competitor's shutting down?
Hi ! Our main competitor is shutting down (website will be offline) at the end of the month and we are negotiating with them to buy their domain name: the idea would be to take advantage of their good rankings in the SERPs to redirect traffic to our pages (we're planning to crawl their site or get their sitemap and redirect th category / product pages to ours). The question is: for how long this strategy will be useful: days / weeks / months? (= for how long their pages will continue to appear in the SERPs from the day we enable the 301 redirections to our site?) Thanks in advance for your help! And if you have better suggestions, we're up to hear them of course.. 😉 Cheers
Competitive Research | | Kuantokusta0 -
What keywords & phrases are my competitors targeting?
I wanted to compare our keyword focus, to my competitors. What is the best way to audit what type of content / keywords - my competitors are using?
Competitive Research | | jwochna0 -
Much better authority and content than some competitors, why do they appear first?
On august we have lost the top positions for some keywords. Our website authority is 62 (google page rank 5), and some quite small competitors appear first now (some of them have authority 22, google page rank 3!). Our only big change was the DNS server, from godaddy to dnsimple.com, which seems to be some milisseconds slower. Every other metric is in our favor: from on-page repports to site speed. Sometimes by a factor of 3 or 4. What can be happening? We have also realized that, in private browsing, rankings will change a little bit in different cities, even if they are quite close to each other.
Competitive Research | | PauloSilveira0 -
Link analysis competitors
Am I missing something here or does SEO Moz only support three competitor sites to do comparisons against in each campaign? If not where do I add another website to the list to compare against? Thanks in advance!
Competitive Research | | AdenBrands0 -
Image only site on top of Google
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to rank in Google for 'Hid xenon' in the netherlands, but there is one site above all results: http://bit.ly/qlsjne As you can see the site almost has no backlinks, and has not a single word in it's content, all images. it's a keyword only domain, and that's probably the only reason why it's ranking that high, but that means then that i can never get higher then him in Google because of it's domainname? Even when it's such a shitty site? Thank you, regards yannick
Competitive Research | | iwebdevnl0 -
Google Places - Top Listing & Strange Analytics
Hello, we have been working with this customer for a few years, doing their PPC, organic marketing, and we had established one google places listing for them as well. I guess the owner got sold on having someone else work with us to do google places for an additional office location they recently set up, and for whatever reason, they bypassed having us do it. This company never gained FTP access to the website. And despite heavy competition (apparantly), they have that new location listed in the #1 - A spot, without making any changes to the website. And, to top it off, when you review the Google places performance, there is a weird result I had never before seen labeled as "* loc:". You can see what I'm talking in both screen shots. Is there any guidance you can offer, first as to what that listing label means, and second, do you have any ideas how to 'reverse engineer' how they were able to get top listing so quickly for our customer like that? local_results.jpg local_analytics.jpg
Competitive Research | | JerDoggMckoy0