Can Javascript Links Be Used to Reduce Links per Page?
-
We are trying to reduce the number of links per page, so for the low-value footer links we are considering coding them as javascript links. We realize Google can read java, but the goal is to reduce level of importance assigned to those internal links. Would this be a valid approach?
So the question is would converting low-value footer links to js like below help reduce the number of links per page in google's eyes even though we're reasonably sure they can read javascript.
<a <span="" class="html-tag">href</a><a <span="" class="html-tag">="</a><a class="html-attribute-value html-external-link" target="_blank">javascript:void(0);</a>" data-footer-link="/about/about">About Us
-
Thanks Russ, ultimately I'd like to remove the low value links. We can work to increase links to the more important pages but was hoping to reduce these low value links as well.
-
Thanks much, I appreciate the heat map suggestion and context.
-
This kind of PageRank sculpting has largely fallen out of fashion because Google has become so good at detecting alternate link forms and ignoring PageRank sculpting attempts that attempt to hide links. Your best bet is to work on INCREASING the number of links inside your site pointing to important pages, rather than trying to hide links to one section. I would not worry at all about having a sitewide link to your about page, for example. It is a drop in the bucket.
-
Hi James,
I'm not sure this approach will work, as Google is getting better and better at reading Javascript links. In this post from Search Engine Land, Adam Audette researched Javascript links, and found that all tested links were found and followed by Google.
Do you have a very large number of links? I'd try using heat-map data tools (for example MouseFlow) to work out what your visitors are actually clicking on on your site, and whether you could narrow down the number of links that way, keeping user experience as your key factor.
Hope this helps, good luck!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Landing page separate from product page
Hello there, I have a wordpress website with a woocommerce plugin. I have 4 landing pages that describe my products and at the end of the pages, I have a CTA to my product page. is it bad for SEO? my website: https://relationadviser.ir
On-Page Optimization | | Aaron.be1 -
If Product Pages Perform Well In Google then Is It Possible That Category Page Can perform Well In Google?
Hi All, For my ecommerce site I have optimized my product pages very nicely like good images, detailed information about products, good reviews, implemented schema for my product and reviews and very perfect onpage. Now my query is if my products pages performing well in google then there are chances that my category page rank well in google too? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | wright3350 -
Is it safe to use Microformats and Schema.org on one page?
I'm running a news blog and I'm using schema.org/NewsArticle. I would like to know if I should add microformats on the article page too or just use the schema? If I add both, will it effect my sites SEO/ranking? Thank you
On-Page Optimization | | hakhan2010 -
Google Indexed = 35, 445 pages, Bing Indexed = 243 pages... Why?
Dear MozSquad, Can anyone check our site and let me know if there's anything super apparent that would cause Bing to treat us like a bum on the street? I recently made some structural changes which really helped with Google, but Bing didn't even budge. It's a lot harder to keep up with all the SEO initiatives I have in mind with it being a small start-up where I'm responsible for planning the entire Internet Marketing campaign, giving constant input on UX and site design, etc on top of 900 other things, so I figured it'd be a good time to use The Moz to help a brother out. Ideas? Domain: homeandgardendesignideas.com (yeah, I know it's a little long =P)
On-Page Optimization | | zDucketz0 -
When setting up campaigns should I set a landing page up per campaign?
eg Home page is landing and and has 5 Keywords, should this be 1 campaign, and then 2nd landing page with 2 keywords is another campiagn. In my current campaign I have lots of "F's" for On site optimisation for keywords that dont have relevance to the landing page. Sorry about the newbie question.
On-Page Optimization | | ingageseo0 -
Why a page with an On Page A grade has a less good rank than a page with a F grade?
Why a page with an On Page A grade is ranked 17 in Google when the home page with a F grade is ranked 9 ? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Amadeus_eBC0 -
Can you optimize for 2 keywords per URL?
Or should you just stick to 1 page, 1 keyword all the time? If you do 2, are there any things you should watch out for? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | inhouseninja0 -
Would it be bad to change the canonical URL to the most recent page that has duplicate content, or should we just 301 redirect to the new page?
Is it bad to change the canonical URL in the tag, meaning does it lose it's stats? If we add a new page that may have duplicate content, but we want that page to be indexed over the older pages, should we just change the canonical page or redirect from the original canonical page? Thanks so much! -Amy
On-Page Optimization | | MeghanPrudencio0