Community Consensus: Are These Good Links?
-
I recently used a firm to do 2 months of outreach as a test for quality of work. Their reporting process is monthly, which seems fair, but after the first month's report I was sorely disappointed with the targeted domains for links.
Apparently, the firm decided to condense the two months of outreach in to 4 days, so by the time I was finally able to see the work, the "job is done." Again, extremely disappointed. The original SOW was to target set posts for outreach in month 1, review/adjust and move in to month 2. No dice.
So, here I am now left with a list of sites that have been targeted for outreach, being told "they are quality sites."
What do you think, am I missing something and these are truly good links? Below are just a very, very small sample of the outreach completed:
http://www.vrml.k12.la.us/7th/homework/ss/student/addtional.htm
http://healthyfoodsandmore.com/useful-links.php
-
Hi Julie,
Sorry, I don't think I agree that Google ignores links from pages that have "links" in the title. That would mean they ignore this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/parents/links/
Which obviously wouldn't make sense.
Cheers.
Paddy
-
Hi Hunter,
There are a few things here that I should probably address before giving you my view on those links.
- The expectations that were set by the agency in question
If they didn't tell you in advance that these were the types of links they were going after, then they haven't set expectations very well. If they did set expectations on the types of links they'd be targeting and these are very different to that, then they haven't done a good job on that front.
- The processes they've used
Condensing outreach into a short time frame does seem a bit strange and doesn't allow for refinement at all. Link building can sometimes be hit and miss, so you need to allow time to adjust an approach if something isn't working or you, as the client, want to change something.
On these two alone, you probably have a right to feel aggrieved and haven't had the service you expected.
Having said that, there is a time and a place for these kind of links. They seem to be what's know as "resource" based links because the pages in question list lots of resources on them. I scanned through all of them and they all seem to link out to legitimate resources. I didn't check every single one, but if these were link farms, I'd expect to see links to random websites in a range of industries such as gambling or pharma. I also don't agree with Julie that Google ignore links on pages with "links" in the title, that would mean they ignore links like this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/parents/links/
Which is clearly a good, trusted domain.
The types of links that your agency has built for you aren't necessarily bad, but if this is the only activity that they're doing (and you're not doing anything else), then this can look a bit strange and you need to diversify your tactics a bit more.
In summary, I don't think it's as black and white as those links being low quality. They may be fine, it's more about the context they're being built in and what they're linking to. As well as the other links on the page.
I hope that helps!
Paddy
-
It almost seems like they have paid a link farm to place your links anywhere with the aim of getting as many as they can, to make it look like they have done lots of work.
If all the links are like these, I would potentially look to reach out to these sites and request the links be taken down before they cause your link profile any harm. I would also check each link for relevancy to your site.
I would concentrate on letting your content earn links, create content that your user base wants to share with their friends, colleagues and businesses. This way you will generate a more natural and hopefully relevant series of links that get placed with more relevant content on other sites.
-
No.
Especially the last 3 - anytime the title of a page in links, I believe Google ignores them.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I disavow these links?
Hi all, I have a site that is a year old, we have been building backlinks organically - probably around 50 or so - then almost overnight we had100s of spammy links. Screenshot here: https://ibb.co/cijiub My questions: Should I disavow these? What happens if I don't disavow these? Can I work out where they came from? If I disavow a few of them, is this a token offering to the Google Gods that will lower my risk of being penalised? Thank you. cijiub
Link Building | | Bee1591 -
When we use 'link:' for who get the link, how come google show us the same domain as a link.
the search result show the domain of its own. what is is? and is it meaningful as a link?
Link Building | | onedaykorea0 -
Link Building
Are there any other webmasters in the MOZ community that are interested in creating multiple high quality link exchanges? Our company has a decent size client list we are interested in building links for.
Link Building | | WebMarkets0 -
Link text
Can anyone give me any advise regarding anchor text in back links on external sites. I have about 8 bloggers reviewing our products on their sites. When they link to our site, they either use the words of our company name or something like “click here” as the words in the link. There are a few key words that we are wanting to improve for so should those words be made as the live link on their site?
Link Building | | Hardley1110 -
Adding a link section - good or bad?
Hi all, I am currently thinking about adding a link section to my site. In 2010 I released a new version of the site, where one of the main differences to the old site was that a link section was left out. Now i see in webmaster tools that a lot of old links are still indexed but has a 500 error. My question is: 1. Will my site in general benefit from having a link sections with relevant links for the users - in terms of SEO? 2. Will my site benefit from creating a link section and having all the old link section URLs in google redirected to the new section? Best regards, Rasmus
Link Building | | rasmusbang0 -
Blog traffic / link ratio? (Esimated of how much traffic will result in a link)
Hi, Was wondering if people could please tell me some estimates of how much traffic is likely to gain links to a blog post? For example 1,000 hits = 1 link, Hence 10,000 hits = 10 links to a blog post? I understand there is no magic ratio I just want to know what people have achieved. I’m after averages not just a one off really successful blog post too. Please specify the topic you achieve this in e.g. SEO, photography, business, heath... etc.
Link Building | | charles10 -
What to do with some good links I have?
I have some pretty strong links from relevant sources linking to the homepage of a site I deal with. The links are usually from a PR3-5 pages and display specific result about the linking site. Sometimes they come from badges. We offer several services, so sometimes the page is about one service and next time about the other. Currently all of my pages link to the homepage. Would it not be better to link to the specific product page related to the page I have? Also I can do a canonical to the service pages? Which would be best?
Link Building | | Svetoslav0 -
Link Farming
Are link farms still bad? I still am not sure about this question. I know that some people still do link farms. If they are bad, wouldn't a directory be considered a link farm? For instance I can get my site on a .EDU, but it will just be a list of links. Is that bad?
Link Building | | blackrino0