Migrating online store to subdomain using shopify and effects on seo and energy down the road for seo
-
I'm looking for some clarity...
Looking at using Shopify for an existing online store that we have to migrate. Setting up the store with shopify means we will be using a subdomain such as shop.mywebsite.com instead of mywebsite.com/shop.
The following are points to consider when responding
- The client currently has an online store, however it's a proprietary shopping store and CMS that has since gone defunct and they need to migrate to an alternative in order to survive online against new CMS systems that allow the site and its content to be better optimized.
- There is a lot of existing SEO done on the current site that we don't want to loose PR on.
- There is roughly 2000 products
- Client has a fixed budget, dealing with checkout issues, custom work and various other "bugs" seems to be easier controlled with Shopify...thus budget can be used more on content/strategy and migration
- We want to run the main site in Wordpress and are wanting to use Shopify since it supports a gateway, has great features and seems like it would allow us to get more bang for the buck and can focus more on the main site and content strategy and drive traffic to the subdomain store if needed
Or main concern is the effort of migrating 2000+ products to shopify and the traffic and PR it gives the current site will have a negative effect on the main domain itself.
Should we really be considering this path?
The domain is diveidc.com
One main benefit to the subdomain is the ability to clearly segment products from the service portion of the site in the analytics and focus 2 clear strategies and track it in a very defined manner.
We're really on the fence with this...any thoughts are welcome.
-
Yes, all good insight.
We are the developers/agency for the client...and we are only considering this option purely on budget reasons. There is a lot of work to address the move to a new CMS, we require stronger content with the move and on top of it all we have to integrate all content to the new CMS....this equates to a treamedeous amount of work...not the best argument but again, posting this in seomoz allows us to have a nice sounding board.
The current CMS is so poorly geared for today's seo strategies that migration to another CMS is 100% required. Moving hosts isn't the problem. The CMS is.
To illustrate how pour the current CMS is, we can't even touch the root .htaccess file to redirect WWW. Doing so breaks the entire CMS system, insane. Thus we have www.mysite.com and mysite.com directly competing against each other, duplicate content etc. That's just 1 issue of many.
Moving to a new CMS is required, but with this move we have budget constraints wrapped in a very big site, wrapped around seo migration issues, wrapped in making things painless for the client, wrapped in making this all work.
We're looking for any insights knowing very well best practices...but having to deal with the reality of budgets. This could end up being "save a penny today, costs big bucks later".
We understand this is our unique issue and we may have to bite the bullet a bit, go with something like Cart66 and work through the bugs knowing the light at the end of the tunnel will be a brilliant seo/business solution for the client...but may take some painful hours getting there...hours we may have to suck up to keep a happy client and a relationship we've nurtured for some years.
-
What isn't so clear is that 2 years down the road this may be a really bad decision that was made just on budget.
I agree.
You never know how google is going to treat a subdomain.... but I have very few doubts about how they are going to treat a folder on my site.
So, if I was in the situation that you are in... I would move hosts, or change developers, or find something besides Shopify... to run a website that has the highest present and long-term probability to be as highly competitive as possible.
I work really really hard to compete for rankings.. I am not going to let a host, a shopping cart or a developer screw it up.
It's pretty easy to find new hosts, new developers and new shopping carts when you compare that to the huge job of getting 500 new unique domains to link to a store. We are comparing issues of convenience to those that are jugular.
Just me sayin' how I look at this.
-
Yes, we're definitively very aware of this...I'm hoping this post just gives us more brain power to the conversation we're already having internally as an agency knowing we will be loosing a treamedous amount of PR due to products currently being housed within the main domain but knowing that we have to migrate the site out of the existing CMS and go to Wordpress and most likely be using Shopify due to various reasons, mainly around Wordpress and Ecom not playing so hot together and a 3rd party provider (Shopify) cuts a lot of the de-bug work out of the picture allowing us to focus the budget on a content strategy more than build/de-bug time.
To give a bit more of a insight to the type of items the clients website currently caters to. There are 2 sales funnels, one being products and another being services. The products are all scuba dive equipment and the services are all local scuba courses. Currently the site ranks well in a local market for both, however services only ranks well locally while products tend to do much better regionally.
Ranking locally for services is fine, since you can't be in New York and take a scuba course being offered in Vancouver. But, people do query "scuba dive courses" globally and if we get the content strategy right the clients rank will go up regardless of the services being local or not which will benefit products or anything else on the site and vice versa.
Now, going ecom with Wordpress isn't fun. There's no real bullet proof solution that doesn't require some serious elbow grease to get the kinks worked out. Drupal isn't an option for budget reasons. Knowing this we are leaning towards Shopify, a rented solution that offsets some of the headache allowing us to focus on content strategy more than the build and bettering the seo of the overal site and shop...it feels like s safe bet.
I also read that search engines are a bit more aware of what you are doing with subdomains especially when the content you segmenet in to the subdomain is 1 type of content. movies.mysite.com for instance tells search engines it's 1 type of content...so shop.mysite.com essentially says "it's all products 24/7" and we start to focus 2 strategies, metrics and marketing. 1) for the products subdomain and 2) for the services. Sucks we can't cross-share the love, but lead-gen pages may be able to compensate for this as well as other content strategies we would put in place.
What isn't so clear is that 2 years down the road this may be a really bad decision that was made just on budget.
Just a train of thought...
-
I have one concern.
There is a big difference in ranking potential between store.domain.com and domain.com/store/
With domain.com/store/ the pages in the store benefit from the authority and linkpower accumulated by the main website. However, with store.domain.com the benefit is much less.
That alone would have me reject a solution that requires moving the store to a subdomain.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can cross domain canonicals help with international SEO when using ccTLDs?
Hello. My question is:** Can cross domain canonicals help with international SEO when using ccTLDs and a gTLD - and the gTLD is much more authoritative to begin with? ** I appreciate this is a very nuanced subject so below is a detailed explanation of my current approach, problem, and proposed solutions I am considering testing. Thanks for the taking the time to read this far! The Current setup Multiple ccTLD such as mysite.com (US), mysite.fr (FR), mysite.de (DE). Each TLD can have multiple languages - indeed each site has content in English as well as the native language. So mysite.fr (defaults to french) and mysite.fr/en-fr is the same page but in English. Mysite.com is an older and more established domain with existing organic traffic. Each language variant of each domain has a sitemap that is individually submitted to Google Search Console and is linked from the of each page. So: mysite.fr/a-propos (about us) links to mysite.com/sitemap.xml that contains URL blocks for every page of the ccTLD that exists in French. Each of these URL blocks contains hreflang info for that content on every ccTLD in every language (en-us, en-fr, de-de, en-de etc) mysite.fr/en-fr/about-us links to mysite.com/en-fr/sitemap.xml that contains URL blocks for every page of the ccTLD that exists in English. Each of these URL blocks contains hreflang info for that content on every ccTLD in every language (en-us, en-fr, de-de, en-de etc). There is more English content on the site as a whole so the English version of the sitemap is always bigger at the moment. Every page on every site has two lists of links in the footer. The first list is of links to every other ccTLD available so a user can easily switch between the French site and the German site if they should want to. Where possible this links directly to the corresponding piece of content on the alternative ccTLD, where it isn’t possible it just links to the homepage. The second list of links is essentially just links to the same piece of content in the other languages available on that domain. Mysite.com has its international targeting in Google Search console set to the US. The problems The biggest problem is that we didn’t consider properly how we would need to start from scratch with each new ccTLD so although each domain has a reasonable amount of content they only receive a tiny proportion of the traffic that mysite.com achieves. Presumably this is because of a standing start with regards to domain authority. The second problem is that, despite hreflang, mysite.com still outranks the other ccTLDs for brand name keywords. I guess this is understandable given the mismatch of DA. This is based on looking at search results via the Google AdWords Ad Preview tool and changing language, location, and domain. Solutions So the first solution is probably the most obvious and that is to move all the ccTLDs into a subfolder structure on the mysite.com site structure and 301 all the old ccTLD links. This isn’t really an ideal solution for a number of reasons, so I’m trying to explore some alternative possible routes to explore that might help the situation. The first thing that came to mind was to use cross-domain canonicals: Essentially this would be creating locale specific subfolders on mysite.com and duplicating the ccTLD sites in there, but using a cross-domain canonical to tell Google to index the ccTLD url instead of the locale-subfolder url. For example: mysite.com/fr-fr has a canonical of mysite.fr
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danatello
mysite.com/fr-fr/a-propos has a canonical of mysite.fr/a-propos Then I would change the links in the mysite.com footer so that they wouldn’t point at the ccTLD URL but at the sub-folder URL so that Google would crawl the content on the stronger domain before indexing the ccTLD domain version of the URL. Is this worth exploring with a test, or am I mad for even considering it? The alternative that came to my mind was to do essentially the same thing but use a 301 to redirect from mysite.com/fr-fr to mysite.fr. My question is around whether either of these suggestions might be worth testing, or am I completely barking up the wrong tree and liable to do more harm than good?0 -
Should I use https schema markup after http-https migration?
Dear Moz community, Noticed that several groups of websites after HTTP -> HTTPS migration update their schema markup from, example : {
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | admiral99
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"name": "Your WebSite Name",
"alternateName": "An alternative name for your WebSite",
"url": "http://www.your-site.com"
} becomes {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"name": "Your WebSite Name",
"alternateName": "An alternative name for your WebSite",
"url": "https://www.example.com"
} Interesting to know, because Moz website is on https protocol but uses http version of markup. Looking forward for answers 🙂0 -
SEO page descriptions on mobile - how to hide while preserving the juice for SEO?
Hi everybody, On our pages we have crafted good text paragraphs for SEO purposes. On desktop everything is fine but on mobile the paragraph of text pushes the main content really low on the page. Is there a way of hiding the text while preserving the SEO juices and not getting penalised by Google for spamming techniques? I'd appreciate any recommendations on how to deal with this. Thanks very much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Firebox0 -
Mirrors Hosting SEO
Hello, I notice that some sites do provide hosting for mirroring file downloading for cpanel, apache and other big developers. I assume that benefits of it is link building but look at this site: http://apache.mirrors.hoobly.com/ Hoobly provide mirrors for most developers but none of them are indexed by google for ex: http://apache.mirrors.hoobly.com/ So can someone explain why would be that or what is going on ? is that something hidden here ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eriklogo50 -
SEO issues with Magento
Hi Everyone, We use Magento CMS for our site and we are having a frustrating time resolving our SEO issues. The site was very poorly managed in years past and in the past year I have redesigned and cleaned up many things. However we are recently having trouble with indexing and keyword ranking. Issue #1: Our main keyword ranking has dropped quite a bit while our other less important keywords have steadily risen. I suspect a very strict robots.txt implemented back in early January may have been the culprit. We have since been modifying it with out much luck. Many of our pages are still blocked. 12/05/12 : ranked 12th 1/09/13: ranked 19th 1/16/13: ranked 35th Now: out of top 50 (52nd) Issue #2: Not a single image is being indexed. We are 0 for 582 according to Webmaster tools. Not sure why... Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated as I have great determination and interest in learning the correct way to fix/do this. Site: www.scojo.com Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | t_parrish0 -
Mobile SEO
Hey, In the following article, Google recommended using a 301 redirect but doesn't specify why. http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/making-websites-mobile-friendly.html I assume this is to pass over link equity to the relevant mobile/desktop variation. Can anyone confirm this? Also is there any other reason? Again assuming this would keep the correct URLs in the correct index? Anything else anyone can chip in would be great. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CraigAddyman0 -
Subdomain or Subfolder for Locations?
I have a client who is ranking #1 for every term related to "bathroom renovations (main city)". They have now started to take on dealers/franchisees in neighbouring cities, and each location would now like to be ranking for THEIR cities. Is it better to use bathcompany.com/location or location.bathcompany.com? Considerations: The site has the address and phone number of the main location listed in the header, so if we do /location you will still see the main NAP. Using /location, If someone browses beyond the location landing page, they will venture into pages that target the main city (ex. "Bath Remodelling (Main City)") Using a subdomain will mean that we will need to duplicate content such as their image gallery, and we will have to create new content for their service pages or risk duplicate content. (ex. "shower remodelling (city)") Questions By using /location they will benefit from the strength of the subdomain, while using a new location-based subdomain will this mean we will have to start from scratch in terms of domain authority / link-juice? Will the NAP in the header affect the ranking of these location pages?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ATMOSMarketing560 -
Where is the Real Value in SEO?
Interesting topic and would love to hear some thoughts. How do you justify SEO, measure results, etc etc
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | imageworks-2612900