Quick Survey - How much would you pay for a blog post?
-
Hi,
I would be very grateful if you could answer a short question I have related to a project I am working on - I am trying to build up a bit of market research as to where the market lies with regard to the market rate for blog posting.
The answers are pretty subjective as there are other factors in involved but for the purposes of this question, it would be helpful to have simple answers that assume:
ASSUMPTIONS:
a/. The blogs/websites are of AVERAGE quality for the domain authority given, and are genuine niche website (with their own full domains) and not sites which are haunted by spammers (ie NOT anyone can post anything sites such as article directories and Squidoo like sites etc, )
b/. The articles are of AVERAGE quality you would associate with a domain of that authority IE the articles would be better as you go up the DA scale as you would expect. Each article contains a couple of links to your target website.**QUESTION:** In $ how much would you pay for an article both **written AND posted** on a website with the following domain authorities? 1/ DA 20 2/. DA 30 4/. DA 40 5/. DA 50 6/. DA 60 7/. DA 70 8/. DA 80 9/. DA 90+
I'll start off with my answers as follows:
1/ DA 20 - $15
2/. DA 30 - $30
4/. DA 40 - $50
5/. DA 50 - $80
6/. DA 60 - $120
7/. DA 70 - $200
8/. DA 80 - $350
9/. DA 90+ - $600What would you pay?
-
Ok - let me put this another way - Your an SEO company right - I assume blog posting on your clients niche is part of what you offer as part of your SEO services?
If your in business I assume you charge for this service - therefore it has a value (in $ terms) to both you and your client. What I am asking is how you would put a value on this service as you obviously would need to put a value on it to invoice you client.
-
I wouldn't pay anything. If you have good information to share people will post it for free.
-
I would hope for all three, as they should not occur in isolation.
Point C should only be a by product of both A and B.
I would disagree with your point that DA doesn't mean "anything" in relation to A and B. If you were to attempt to get an article on quality high authority site, then such a site is not going to publish an article that is not relevant or interesting to its audience so that covers B. On average a higher authority website (on average) will have a higher audience than a lower authority site - so that covers A.
This is really digressing from the initial point of the post though, which was really to get a gauge of what people would pay approximately be willing to pay for a blog post - given equal niche relevance, but based different DA's. Think of it like this - if you had the opportunity to get 100 posts on 100 DA 90 sites or 100 DA 10 sites, of equal niche target which would you take DA 90 sites or DA 10 sites - obviously the DA 90 sites - but what sort of $ differential would you put on the difference.
-
Here's a dumb question...
Why are you buying this blog post? Which one of these?
A) you have a message to get out and you hope this blog post will show it to a lot of people
B) you hope people see that blog post and think that it is so awesome that the have to visit your site
C) you think that a link in that blog post is going to be valuable
======================
DA doesn't mean anything for two of those answers.
======================
And for the one that does maybe you should pay a lot less for the DA90+? Because it is going to compete hard against your main biz.
-
Thanks Philipp,
I do agree with all you say, but I am trying to get a subjective feel based on "average". I am not trying to say that you should only consider DA.
Your point on $15 - $50 is helpful for an "average" blog is helpful, as I would put an "average" blog in the region of say DA 25 - DA 40 - which matches up with what I would pay. However, I also assume you would be willing to pay a lot more than $50 for a post on say mashable, CNN, BBC etc
-
Thanks for your input.
For the purpose of the post though I am just trying to get a guage of what SEO's would be willing to pay - on AVERAGE (as I pointed out it is all very subjective so to get any figures of use we assume an average quality site for that DA, and an average quality post for that website).
Your point on the DA of you blog is valid, but in my assumption A I said "with their own full domain" and an average website for that DA - so it would ignore your blog for these purposes. I am sure you would agree that when you think of an "average" DA 90+ website, you would think of sites along the lines of mashable, BBC etc, and not a 1 month old website just put up on blogspot.
-
I agree, just looking at a single metric like DA doesn't make much sense. I always dive deep into content factors like:
- are links being sold obviously on the blog?
(the most obvious hint for this is if each blog post links out to a commercial site with optimized anchor text) - these blogs aren't worth much, even with high DA - is the content well-written or just a concatenation of words in order to get another post up?
- is there a topical focus? - i want the topic to be very close to my segment in order to get my money's worth. preferably, it will be an expert in the field, that has some intersting stuff to say about it and not just drop the link for me.
That being said, I pay between 15-50$ on an average blog.
- are links being sold obviously on the blog?
-
It all depends on the user. Me personally I wouldn't pay for any. 1) due to tight budget and 2) just because they have a high DA doesn't mean they are quality blogs.
Take my blog, it probably has a DA of 90 due to it being blogspot, buts its only a month old and has 3 posts on it. So the page authority is probably really low.
If you want to give me $600 for a blog artile, I will take your cash. But your not going to get much of a return I would imagine.
Concentrate on free blog posts. Maybe spend that money on hiring someone to type a shed load of blog articles for you, then try get them out there for free.
Just my 2 pence worth.
If you are going on DA alone, then I think your'll waste your money. Try looking at PA as well, linking domains, number of external links etc... Some blogs have thousands of links on page, will that really offer you any quality? Maybe if it was free, but paying for it would be a waste of money.
A more experience SEO'er may give you a better answer than this.
Cheers
Will
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Archiving Blog Posts To Another Category Changes Permalink But Does It Affect SEO?
I'm launching a website that will give daily updates. The /daily/ category needs to be kept clear for the current day updates only, so each day I will be archiving the previous days updates to another folder, for example: /archive/. Each morning, when I archive the previous days post... the system will 301 the current url from /daily/ to /archive/ and the sitemap will be updated to reflect the change. What I am concerned about is my site will be packed with 301's and the information is more important on the day so I would expect the majority of backlinks + social shares will be to the /daily/ category url and visitors will be 301'd to the new url. How would this affect my SEO and is there a cleaner way to do this so?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AjazMozPro1 -
After blog URL structure change, should you wait to optimize old posts?
Hi all, I'm changing the URL structure on my site's blog (getting rid of dates) soon, but I'm also working on updating/optimizing a bunch of old posts. Some of these old posts have a good amount of traffic, which I don't want to lose when I redirect the old URLs to the new URLs after restructure. I know that you are more likely to maintain your rank and traffic after a redirect if you keep the page content the exact same. So my question is -- should I leave the old posts alone (not making any changes) for a couple of weeks after the URL restructure/redirects for Google to index the new URLs and see that the content is the exact same so the pages don't lose any traffic, OR does it not really matter because I am optimizing these posts, meaning that the content will be better and hopefully get ranked higher? I haven't been able to find a consensus on this, so I'd really appreciate the advice! Many thanks, Rebecca
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rwhite10 -
Disavow post Penguin update
As recent Penguin update makes quick move with backlinks with immediate impact; does Disavow tool also results the changes in few days rather than weeks like earlier? How long does it take now to see the impact of disavow? And I think still we must Disavow some links even Google claim that it'll take care of bad backlinks without passing value from them?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz0 -
How much risk would there be with this 'repeating of a sentence' situation?
Hello, A business owner and design decision was made on a published article page to have a summary sentence/paragraph placed prominently with a unique font treatment in the article header along with the article's main imagery. Historical content that does not have this summary migrated with "the first sentence of the article" used for this introduction/summary sentence/paragraph. In both cases, where there is a unique summary and where the first sentence is used, the article text normally begins below a graphical element below the summary element. Thus, when the first sentence was used for the summary, the first sentence will repeat, relatively close together on each page where this happens. The question is: How much risk would i be taking on in allowing the first sentence of these articles to get repeated in close proximity on the page. I wanted to get some other perspectives on this unique situation. Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JennyTTGT0 -
Optimizing WordPress Pages With List of Posts
A friend of mine has published a new site called www.localsguidesa.com. It is an informational/review site about a resort town. Most of my experience has been dealing with single html pages. In the case of this site, the main "money keyword" pages are mainly an introduction of text followed by a list and snipped of blog posts such as this page http://localsguidesa.com/what-to-see-do/attractions which would target St Augustine Attractions. Would she be better off making the main pages with more content and less blog posts? How would ranking be affected with all the preview blog posts on the page? The strategy is for the blog posts to rank on the longer tail keywords...such as "Top 10 Attractions in St Augustine ", but what suggestions would you have for a main navigation page such as http://localsguidesa.com/what-to-see-do/attractions
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Pinlaser1 -
Blog Not Ranking Well at All in Search Engines, Need Help!
Hi Mozers, Need some help on a CMS I've been working with over the last year. The CMS is built by a team of guys here in Washington State. Basically, I'm having issues with clients content on the blog system not getting ranking correctly at all. Here's a few problems I've noticed: Could you confirm and scale these problems based upon being, "not a problem" "a problem" and "critical must fix" 1. The title tag is pulling from the title of the article which is also automatically generating a URL with underscores instead of dashes. Is having a duplicate URL, Title, and Title tag spammy looking to search engines? Are underscores on long URL's confusing google? Where shorter one's are fine (i.e. domain/i_pad/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Keith-Eneix
(i.e.http://www.ductvacnw.com/blog/archives/2013/05/20/5_reasons_to_hire_a_professional_to_clean_your_air_ducts_and_vents), 2. The CMS is resolving all URL's with a canonical instead of a 301 redirect (I've told webmaster tools which preferred url should be indexed). Does using a canonical over a 301 redirect cause any confusion with Google? Is one better practice then the other? 3. The H1 tags on the blog pull from "blog category" instead of the title of the blog post. Is this is a problem? 4. The URl's are quite long with the added "archives/2013/05/20/5". Does this cause problems by pushing the main target keyword further away from the domain name? 5. I'm also noticing the blog post is actually not part of the breadcrumbs where we normally would expect that to populate after the blog category name, Problem? These are some of the things I've noticed and need clarification on. If you see anything else please let me know?0 -
Purpose of a Blog in a website
How internal blog or external blog is helpful in SEO?why it is good to have a site with blog?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alick3000 -
A Blog Structure Dilemma We're Facing...
We're launching a pretty large content program (in the form of a blog) and have a structure issue: Big fans of Wordpress for efficiency reasons, but our platform doesn't allow hosting of a wordpess (or other 3rd party) blog on the primary domain where we want it. site.com/blog Here are the options: 1. Sub-domain: We can easily put it there. Benefit is we use the efficient Wordpress tools and very fast to setup etc. Downside is that the root domain won't get benefit of any backlinks to the blog (as far as I understand). I also don't believe the primary domain will benefit from the daily fresh/unique content the blog offers. 2. Custom Rig: We could create our own manual system of pages on the site to look just like our blog would. This would allow us to have it at site.com/blog and benefit from any backlinks and fresh content. The downside is that it won't be as efficient to manage. 3. External Site: Create a different site just for the blog. Same issue as the sub-domain I believe. User Experience is a top priority, and all of the above pretty much can accomplish the same UX goal, with #3 requiring a some additional strategy on positioning. Is #1 of #3 going to be a big regret down the road though, and is the backlink/content benefit clearly worth doing #2? (correct me if I'm wrong on my assumptions with #1 but at least with the backlinks I'm almost certain that's the case) Many thanks for your inputs on this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEOPA0