Diagnosing a Penguin Demotion
-
Whilst ive noyt hit the panic button just yet ive learnt that a specific target term I was optimising a site flor has dropped off the Google radar from forth to zero
The site is www.davidclick.com the target term was "York wedding photographer" and the demotion happened at the end of March this year, below illustrates the carnage..
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/target-term-demotioncopy.jpg
When i first learnt about this I began to wonder if I was a victim of the Penguin update. I suspected i might so I ran a test to see how many inbound links used the target term York wedding photographer and here is what i found... Only one site http://www.singingwaitersx2.com/links/ and at a push this site also http://york-wedding-photographer.blogspot.co.uk/
So my question is have i fallen foul to the penguin update? If yes then is the only remedy to block the aforementioned site links via this technique:
http://www.htaccess-guide.com/deny-visitors-by-referrer/
Thanks in advance,
David
-
Thanks riplash, respect the detail you've gone into here , ive got work to do
-
EDIT 2: You never know, the site might bounce back once that blogspot domain change (from .com to .co.uk) completes properly in the SERPs.
In the meantime, I would still fix the other problems I mentioned in my first post (the on page stuff, the 302s, etc), and perhaps change some of the backlinks you are getting from the blogspot blog to non-exact match anchor text. You could also consider getting rid of some of the links in those blog posts completely to make the blog less spammy overall, as the content therein doesn't actually seem that bad.
Meanwhile, try approaching wedding blogs/sites (local sites and general UK authority sites too), to see if you can write a guest post or two on for them. You could offer to write about anything, from the obvious (How to choose a Wedding Photographer), to the more interesting/unique (Top 5 things you should never say to a Wedding Photographer). It's sometimes good to break the ice by helping the webmaster or blog owner out, e.g. if you can find a broken link on their site, or a spelling error, email them about that first to get the conversation going. As well as finding wedding sites, you could post for some general local blogs/sites - perhaps an article about wedding venues in York could work on a general local interest website.
When it comes to the davidclick.com site, I'd add a blog to that, and start trying to create some great content that will really attract links from other sites within the wedding sphere. Whilst you want to be giving your guest blogs some good content, you definitely need to save the best for your own blog. There are loads of great articles, videos and webinars to spark ideas for content here at SEOmoz!
-
Not for me.
EDIT: Ah, I see.. the .com blogspot URL is indexed.. but the blog has moved to a .co.uk - Do you happen to know when this occurred?
-
Thanks Riplash But curious about the following "The blog that you mentioned, http://york-wedding-photographer.blogspot.co.uk/ is not indexed by Google"
Ermm... when i google "Dark side of wedding photography" or put the url directly in the serach box it does appear in the SERPS. Does this not mena it is indexed?
-
Based on the date your site dropped down the rankings, it was not a Penguin related change. Penguin did not roll out until 24th April 2012. I've had a very brief look at the SEO for this site, I can see a few issues - this is not by any means an exhaustive or definitve list, but is probably a good place to start
-
You have canonicalisation issues - i.e. I can visit the site by going to www.davidclick.com and davidclick.com. Make sure you fix this with a 301 redirect.
-
You have 302 (temporary) redirects from wedding-york-photographer.co.uk (a URL linked to from the blog mentioned below, incidentally), and also www.davidclick.com - you prob want to make those 301 (permenant) redirects
-
The blog that you mentioned, http://york-wedding-photographer.blogspot.co.uk/ is not indexed by Google, having most likely been deindexed due to Panda.This will be because it's clearly there to affect ranking and not much else - evidenced by the fact that every post links back to the same website. I'd bin it completely if I were you as it's not doing you any favours SERP wise, and could be evidence of over optimisation leading you to fall foul of Penguin further down the line.
-
As a result of the blog above being de-indexed, the site basically has very few backlinks, and none with the anchor text matching the keywords you are targetting. Therefore there is no real reason that it should be ranking for those keywords.
-
A quick glance at the on-page for the site shows multiple repetitions of the keyword (title tag, h1, h2, body text) which isn't necessarily the cause of the ranking drop (as I said, Penguin came later) - but potentially looks like over optimisation. I would clean up the site - target the text at human visitors, not SEO.
Hope this helps a bit. I'd certainly start with the basics, and get those right, then build some relationships and get some good quality links in.
-
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unable to demote contact us & about us pages from sitelink?
Hey all, It's been 3 months now I demoted contact us & about us page via search console but it still appearing in my sitelink. Is there any other guidelines to be followed? Do anyone have the same experience? Susan.
Technical SEO | | promodirect0 -
Sitelink demotion not working after submitting in Google webmaster tool
Hello Friends, I have a question regarding demotion of sitelinks in Google webmaster tool. Scenario: I have demoted one of the sitelink for my website two months back; still the demoted sitelink has not been removed from the Google search results.May I know any reason, why this page is not getting removed even after demoting from GWT? If we resubmit the same link in demotion tool one more time, will it work? Can anybody help me out with this? Note: Since the validly of demotion exists only for 3 months (90 days), I am concerned about the same.
Technical SEO | | zco_seo0 -
Do you think this site has been hit by penguin?
Hi Guys, I need some opinion on a website i am working on www.colourbnners.co.uk They updated their website in August but the company they used did not take into account the URL structure and hence there's a massive loss in links in August time. They also dropped off Google for all their key terms except their brand name 'colour banners'
Technical SEO | | gezzagregz
Since then, they have implemented a 301 redirect. Some key points They have not received any manual warnings in WMT I have disavowed some poor quality links that they have built over the years I am building high quality links quite selectively/slowly There were a lot of duplicate content issues - these have been resolved now.
So my question to you SEO pros is do you think its penguin? or something that i am missing?
If it is penguin, what is the best form of attack to get it removed? regards gezzagrez0 -
Can Silos and Exact Anchor Text In Links Hurt a Site Post Penguin?
Just got a client whose site dropped from a PR of 3 to zero. This happened shortly after the Penguin release, June, 2012. Examining the site, I couldn't find any significant duplicate content, and where I did find duplicate content (9%), a closer look revealed that the duplication was totally coincidental (common expressions). Looking deeper, I found no sign of purchased links or linking patterns that would hint at link schemes, no changes to site structure, no change of hosting environment or IP address. I also looked at other factors, too many to mention here, and found no evidence of black hat tactics or techniques. The site is structured in silos, "services", "about" and "blog". All page titles that fall under services are categorized (silo) under "services", all blog entries are categorized under "blogs", and all pages with company related information are categorized under "about". When exploring the site's links in Site Explorer (SE), I noticed that SE is identifying the "silo" section of links (i.e. services, about, blog, etc.) and labeling it as an anchor text. For example, domain.com/(services)/page-title, where the page title prefix (silo), "/services/", is labeled as an anchor text. The same is true for "blog" and "about". BTW, each silo has its own navigational menu appearing specifically for the content type it represents. Overall, though there's plenty of room for improvement, the site is structured logically. My question is, if Site Explorer is picking up the silo (services) and identifying it as an anchor text, is Google doing the same? That would mean that out of the 15 types of service offerings, all 15 links would show as having the same exact anchor text (services). Can this type of site structure (silo) hurt a website post Penguin?
Technical SEO | | UplinkSpyder0 -
Page Indexing increase when I request Google Site Link demote
Hi there, Has anyone seen a page crawling increase in Google Web Master Tools when they have requested a site link demotion? I did this around the 23rd of March, the next day I started to see page crawling rise and rise and report a very visible spike in activity and to this day is still relatively high. From memory I have asked about this in SEOMOZ Q&A a couple of years ago in and was told that page crawl activity is a good thing - ok fine, no argument. However at the nearly in the same period I have noticed that my primary keyword rank for my home page has dropped away to something in the region of 4th page on Google US and since March has stayed there. However the exact same query in Google UK (Using SEOMOZ Rank Checker for this) has remained the same position (around 11th) - it has barely moved. I decided to request an undemote on GWT for this page link and the page crawl started to drop but not to the level before March 23rd. However the rank situation for this keyword term has not changed, the content on our website has not changed but something has come adrift with our US ranks. Using Open Site Explorer not one competitor listed has a higher domain authority than our site, page authority, domain links you name it but they sit there in first page. Sorry the above is a little bit of frustration, this question is not impulsive I have sat for weeks analyzing causes and effects but cannot see why this disparity is happening between the 2 country ranks when it has never happened for this length of time before. Ironically we are still number one in the United States for a keyword phrase which I moved away from over a month ago and do not refer to this phrase at all on our index page!! Bizarre. Granted, site link demotion may have no correlation to the KW ranking impact but looking at activities carried out on the site and timing of the page crawling. This is the only sizable factor I can identify that could be the cause. Oh! and the SEOMOZ 'On-Page Optimization Tool' reports that the home page gets an 'A' for this KW term. I have however this week commented out the canonical tag for the moment in the index page header to see if this has any effect. Why? Because as this was another (if not minor) change I employed to get the site to an 'A' credit with the tool. Any ideas, help appreciated as to what could be causing the rank differences. One final note the North American ranks initially were high, circa 11-12th but then consequently dropped away to 4th page but not the UK rankings, they witnessed no impact. Sorry one final thing, the rank in the US is my statistical outlier, using Google Analytics I have an average rank position of about 3 across all countries where our company appears for this term. Include the US and it pushes the average to 8/9th. Thanks David
Technical SEO | | David-E-Carey0 -
How do I diagnose a site that has had a corrupted database restored?
Here's the situation: Downloaded a backup of a full database from CPanel, because we needed to perform some queries on it. Found out that after restoring it, CPanel had not been able to zip up the full database because the server memory was set so low (some posts weren't showing up after the restore). SO, how would I go about determining exactly what content is missing from the site? What search engine queries would you perform? Is there a plugin I could use to establish the inconsistencies between the database content and the search results? Your help is appreciated in advance!
Technical SEO | | featherseo0 -
Are gallery sites ok post Penguin?
We're getting ready to re-launch a redesigned site and I was hoping to use the opportunity to get some quality links. Are some of the higher-quality web design gallery sites still ok to submit to? Did Penguin have any effect on these? Just looking for opportunities for a little boost from our re-launch.
Technical SEO | | _JP_0 -
Strategy for recovering from Penguin
I have a web site that has been hit hard by the penguin update. I believe that main cause our problem has been links from low quality blogs and article sites with overly optimized keyword anchor text. Some questions I have are: I have noticed that we still have good ranking on long tail search terms on pages that did not have unnatural links. This leads me to believe that the penalty is URL specific, i.e. only URL with unnatural linking patterns have been penalized. Is that correct? Are URLs that have been penalized permanently tainted to the point that it is not worth adding content to them and continuing to get quality links to them? Should new contact go on new pages that have no history thus no penalty, or is the age of a previously highly ranked page still of great benefit in ranking? Is it likely that the penalty will go away over time if there are no more unnatural links coming in?
Technical SEO | | mhkatz0