How to recover from duplicate subdomain penalty?
-
Two and half a weeks ago, my site was slapped with a penalty -- 60% of organic traffic disappeared over 2-3 days.
After investigating we discovered that our site was serving the same content for all subdomains, and Google somehow had two additional subdomains it was crawling and indexing. We solved the issue with 301 redirects to our main site (www) a couple of days after the drop -- about two weeks ago.
Our rankings have not recovered, and the subdomains are still indexed per Webmaster Tools. Yesterday we submitted a Reconsideration Request. Will that help? Is there any other way to speed up the process of lifting the penalty?
This is the site: http://goo.gl/3DCbl
Thank you!
-
No recovery yet. Quick update... I put in a reconsideration request and was denied, saying No Manual Spam Actions found.
From WMT: The Total Crawled count on the bad subdomains is steady, and there are still no Removed pages, but the Not Selected count is steadily increasing--in fact the total of Indexed and Not Selected is greater than the Total Crawled count -- how does this make sense?
Thanks.
-
Oh - if the subdomains showed no pages indexed, and then all of a sudden at the exact time you dropped, the subdomains showed thousands of indexed pages, then you can definitely assume they are related.
I didnt realize there was such a clear correlation. The suggestions above still stand - you might want to go one further and simply add a noindex right in the robots.txt on those subdomains (make sure its on the subdomains and not the money site!).
Dont forget in WMT you can also do a change of address under Configuration. Youve already completed the first two steps, so you can simply tell Google exactly where the subs have moved.
There's no reason at all why these steps will not prompt google to de-index the subs. The links by the way are simply a 'nudge' to get Google to look at the subdomains again and 'discover' the changes.
-
We'll give the links a shot.
We did consider that the high number of similar static pages may be viewed negatively by Google, but we were ranking very well on many long tail searches before the drop. On WMT, the subdomains show no pages indexed until the exact date range that our rankings dropped, when they spike to the tens of thousands.
What do you think is the likelihood that the subdomains are the culprit in this case?
Thanks for all of your help.
-
Its definitely hard to say with that many URLs - I would definitely point a few at the sub's home page however. It could be that those sub-domains were cached at such long intervals, that Google simply hasn't checked the site again.
Sometimes, adding the sub to WMT, then submitting an xml sitemap, waiting until Google acknowledges it (and tells you how many are indexed) then removing the sitemap can help.
If and when the subdomains are de-indexed (and theres no reason to believe they wouldn't be), then watch your positioning for a week or two after - if it doesnt change, you have to consider that the drop in positioning may be from another cause. For example, the way that each sorting variable for the products lands on its own static page can be viewed as good for SEO but slightly risky since so many pages are so close to duplicated.
-
Thanks Jared. The subdomains are www.ww and www.lnirfrx. We configured all subdomans to 301 to www. We did not receive any messages in WMT -- just the sudden drop ranking.
I'm thinking about putting some links on a forum that I know doesn't have nofollows and is crawled several times a day. But we have tens of thousands of these subdomain pages indexed, will posting a couple of the links help? I wouldn't want to post more than that because it would look spammy.
-
Hi tact - what were your subdomains?
You mentioned that you sent in a Recon. Request - did you receive an unnatural links penalty in WMT?
If you have properly 301'd your subs so that NO subdomain page can be accessed, then by simply pointing a few links at the redirect like Ben said should help it de-index faster. Make sure though that the 301's are properly set up (do a header check) and also make sure that no content from the sub is available unless you are certain the the redirect is applied properly (clear the subdomain of files).
-
Do some guest blogging and point links at your 301s from your guest posts. Google will see that you mean business. You'll have new links and the old pages will be deindexed quicker.
-
I would submit a sitemap and keep moving forward with creating valuable content and sharing it to the right people. It can take Google a long time to get to your message.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Slowly recovering from algorithm penalty
Hi , over the years a website we took over was hit by an algorithm penalty (a combination of penguin and panda). We managed to bring rankings back (after 6 months) from page 5/6 to page 2 after we used the google disavow tool. now for the past 9 months we have been stuck on page 2.. is there anything you think can be done to bring it back to page 1? we are building quality links now and moved away from low quality links other link builders were making. We are managing the process much closer and ensuring we maintain good standards of links. also making the pages flatter and merging short page content to larger content pages now we are looking at site structure and creating structured internal link flow is there anything we should be aware of and any recommendations to get back on page 1.. this is a tailor-made travel related website with a small selection of destinations
Technical SEO | | Direct_Ram0 -
Minimising the effects of duplicate content
Hello, We realised that one of our clients, copied a large part of content from our website to his. The normal reaction would be to send a cease and desist letter. Nevertheless this would probably mean loosing a good client. The client dumped the text of several articles (for example:
Technical SEO | | Lvet
http://www.velascolawyers.com/en/property-law/136-the-ley-de-costas-coastal-law.html ) Into the same page:
http://www.freundlinger-partners.com/en/home/faqs-property-law/ I convinced the client to place our authorship tags on this page, but I am wondering if this is enough. What do you think? Cheers
Luca0 -
Should I blow up our subdomain?
Hey folks, Several years ago we created a couple subdomains (ie, NEWS.URL.COM) and the posts that we put on this subdomain were very full of keyword anchor text links. Each post sometimes had 4-5. We haven't posted any new content on this subdomain for 3 years. After getting hit with manual "linking" penalty, we disavowed tons of links. But left the links on the subdomains alone. They really aren't providing any traffic and the content is poor, and not written by me. Do you think having these links is hindering our ranking efforts? I think I should just blow up this subdomain and get rid of it and all the keyword anchor links. Thoughts? Thanks ron Thoughts?
Technical SEO | | yatesandcojewelers0 -
Drupal duplicate pages
Anyone else encountered massive numbers of duplicate pages being reported on SEO Moz crawls for Drupal based sites? I assumed it was b/c there was no redirect on the print format pages, so I fixed that with a cannonical tag. But still seeing 2 or 3 duplicate pages reported for many pages. Any experience fixing this would be awesome to hear about. Thanks, Kevin
Technical SEO | | kevgrand0 -
Duplicate Content Vs No Content
Hello! A question that has been throw around a lot at our company has been "Is duplicate content better than no content?". We operate a range of online flash game sites, most of which pull their games from a feed, which includes the game description. We have unique content written on the home page of the website, but aside from that, the game descriptions are the only text content on the website. We have been hit by both Panda and Penguin, and are in the process of trying to recover from both. In this effort we are trying to decide whether to remove or keep the game descriptions. I figured the best way to settle the issue would be to ask here. I understand the best solution would be to replace the descriptions with unique content, however, that is a massive task when you've got thousands of games. So if you have to choose between duplicate or no content, which is better for SEO? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Ryan_Phillips0 -
Are all duplicate pages bad?
I just got my first Crawl Report for my forum and it said I have almost 9,000 duplicate pages. When I looked at a sample of them though I saw that many of them were "reply" links. By this I mean the "reply" button was clicked for a topic yet since the crawler was not a member, it just brought them to the login/register screen. Since all the topics would bring you to the same login page I'm assuming it counted all these "reply" links as duplicates. Should I just ignore these or is there some way to fix it? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | Xee0 -
Duplicate Pages Issue
I noticed a problem and I was wondering if anyone knows how to fix it. I was a sitemap for 1oxygen.com, a site that has around 50 pages. The sitemap generator come back with over a 2000 pages. Here is two of the results: http://www.1oxygen.com/portableconcentrators/portableconcentrators/portableconcentrators/services/rentals.htm
Technical SEO | | chuck-layton
http://www.1oxygen.com/portableconcentrators/portableconcentrators/1oxygen/portableconcentrators/portableconcentrators/portableconcentrators/oxusportableconcentrator.htm These are actaully pages somehow. In my FTP there in the first /portableconentrators/ folder there is about 12 html documents and no other folders. It looks like it is creating a page for every possible folder combination. I have no idea why you those pages above actually work, help please???0 -
Duplicate Content and Canonical use
We have a pagination issue, which the developers seem reluctant (or incapable) to fix whereby we have 3 of the same page (slightly differing URLs) coming up in different pages in the archived article index. The indexing convention was very poorly thought up by the developers and has left us with the same article on, for example, page 1, 2 and 3 of the article index, hence the duplications. Is this a clear cut case of using a canonical tag? Quite concerned this is going to have a negative impact on ranking, of course. Cheers Martin
Technical SEO | | Martin_S0