Tracking SEO tests
-
Trying to get some best practices on testing SEO changes.
We are going to make a bunch of changes on subsets of pages. Say testing about 5 different on-page changes.
Originally we were going to submit separate Sitemaps to GWT and see if our test sets get indexed, how quickly, etc. But we noticed that GWT says some pages in our Sitemaps aren't indexed even though we know they are (what gives?).
So we thought, for each test, let's put a unique code on the page so we can see how many get indexed by Google.
But that doesn't solve the issue: how many people clicked on our test pages. So we are thinking of putting a tracking pixel on the test pages, specific for each test. But then I am thinking, why not just create a separate Google Analytics profile and place that code on the test pages (set up goals to track visits per test since we aren't going to change the actual URLs).
and on and on
This is where you come in. What kind of tracking do you implement when you set up tests?
Advice appreciated!
E
-
Google's Website Optimizer is ok and it's free. I also highly recommend https://www.optimizely.com/ it's paid tool but it's really great. For SEOmoz pro members there is 20% off.
-
setting up a 1x1 pixel is simple. Just create it, drop it on the page. In Google Analytics in the content section you can search for that pixel to get your numbers. I really think , without knowing your specifics, that you are over complicating this.
You can run multiple GA scripts, but they of course don't recommend it. Remember, if you are playing around with the main stats account, if you screw anything up, you cannot repair it.
I would at least set up a new profile before doing anything so that your main stats are untouched.
-
That's not really true, especially in the case of Google tools. There are many free tools out there that offer features and functionality far beyond the skill level of most mid-level IM's. Optimizly works well, but it costs. The experiements (new GWO) is more than enough for what most people need.
I have used Optimizly and it was decent, definitely makes testing easy, but I go back to GWO every time. Having the tests integrated into the stats is a godsend. Always be testing.
Your link is broken. I assume you meant http://monetate.com/products/testlab/#axzz1zl1r4yWU
-
You have a better chance of being indexed if you create decent content and have a couple links pointing at the page. Don't speculate about a way to improve your love from Google. Smarter people than us have spent a lot of time removing the predictability of Google.
Create good content, run a clean site, make people happy = get paid.
-
I have personally never seen GWO ever effect rankings or behave in any other way than it should. You can set up multivariate and a/b tests directly in Google Analytics now, much easier than GWO (which was easy) to set up, less code, and it uses your defined goals from Google Analytics.
If you want to see the testing in GA, its in experiments in the content section. Works like a charm. Are you testing if the changes you are making have any effect on the amount of time it takes to be indexed? Or is it about ranking.
Keep in mind, if you are testing very small elements on multiple pages, you are going to have to deal with duplicate content warnings, also if these pages are the same pages, you are going to be competing against yourself in the search engines. Typically, when testing pages, the test pages are blocked from search engines for this very reason.
Don't get too hung up in trying to figure out what you can do to a page to get indexed, getting indexed is the easiest part of the show.
-
The funny thing is that I got 6 thumbs down for that answer - but I think it's still true!
-
David,
I have heard this theory before. If you have adsense on a page, google must visit it in order to determine the content to set the ad properly. But as you said ther eis no evidence for this directly.
It sounds to me like you can just have GA on ALL pages and simply drill down to your subset for testing on what ever group you are interested in in the content view and compare accordingly. No need to get too tricky.
-
It seems to me that your test is a little different than how most people would consider SEO.
Most considering higher rankings and more traffic as a success. You are considering a higher percentage of pages as indexed as a success.
I think you should step back and rethink this test. With millions of pages the indexing of your site might get better and your rankings get worse with the same changes. That would probably turn out to be a net loss in benefits and actionable traffic.
I would use SEO and page content for higher rankings.
I would think of linking patterns (internally and externally), site structure, website coding and less redundant content as the way to increase percentage of pages indexed.
-
Interesting question:
I would set up with goals as you mentioned.
GWO can screw up your rankings and is not advised - speaking from personal experience.
Separately, with tens of millions of pages, maybe the basic problem is
-
getting more links
-
trimming the fat and seeing if you can consolidate certain pages together.
-
-
Though I've never personally tested this, technically, multiple tracking codes for different GA accounts should be able to run simultaneously.
http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3781851.htm
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google%20Analytics/thread?tid=608cc854afe9629d&hl=en
I'm not sure if this is the most efficient or effective methodology for a multivariate test, or, rather, for measuring a multivariate test. I generally recommend Google Website Optimizer for most multivariate testing, and Omniture for folks with large, profitable sites.
-
Make life easier on yourself, spend some coin in a solid multivariate testing framework.
Free tools rarely offer the firepower of a commercial product.
This one seems decent: http://monetate.com/features/power-features-list/
-
Well - 6 thumbs down? I guess I was wrong!
I have no proof about what I am about to say, but using logic and a hunch, I would suggest that if one were to have direct links to Google, lets say via AdWords and/or AdSense, then your site has a better chance of getting more of your pages indexed.
In theory.
With no proof at all whatsoever behind this idea.
-
Have you looked into Google's Website Optimizer? It will serve two different versions of a page, roughly half and half, so you can compare which one converts better, which one ranks better, all that good stuff.
-
Hmm, ok.
I understand that linking to deep content will help that content, but we are trying to do discrete tests. My company was founded by a computer scientist, so everything must be scientific, even if my inclination is to simply do all the best practices and expect (hope) for the best. The test sets are too large and not in different directories, so going through logs would be . . . horrifying.
Here's the issue I am curious what peeps think:
What if I set up an additional GA profile and have two sets of GA code on each test page? Then I am getting credit for views in my main GA profile and can easily see if test sets are being viewed in the second profile.
Or, can someone give me info about how to set up a 1x1 pixel and see those stats in GA?
-
CRO = Conversion Rate Optimization.
I only asked as you were looking for link click metrics, which suggested you were looking to get users moving round your site more.
Users visiting specific pages doesn't mean that Google is going to index more of your pages. It's kind of 2 separate tests you want to run.
Your absolute best bet to see what pages Google is visiting is to check your server logs and see what Google is looking at. I appreciate it's confusing looking through them though and it still doesn't show what's being indexed.
I think I understand what you mean by the sitemaps now, treating a subfolder as a different site in WMT and seeing how many pages they index from the sitemap?
Could work...
Eh, normally when I want to see what pages are functionally indexed I would check in analytics to see what pages have actually brought a visitor through search. Anything that's not is effectively not indexed, though I appreciate that's not strictly true.
If a particular section has an increase in the number of landing pages bringing traffic then more pages are being indexed.
I appreciate it's onpage changes your testing but building links into pages further down the site structure should also prod search engines to crawl more pages.
It's not an easy task all in really. I guess sitemaps in WMT, functional indexing and long nights sifting through server logs is my best offer. Sorry it's not quite a solution but something to think about.
-
Basically we are looking to get more of our pages indexed. So rather than do everything to every page (we have tens of millions of pages) we are looking to test ideas on subsets. Whichever test gets indexed faster and more click throughs we will promote to all of the pages.
What is CRO?
-
Are you testing CRO or SEO?
The only reason I ask is that you can only present the search engines with one version at a time for them to index and rank, so the way to tell would be if the pages you've made changes on are getting more or less traffic which is easy enough through analytics.
CRO is an easy thing to test as well but if you could just clarify I'll have a think
-
We are making changes to a subset of our pages that are crawlable by google, but we aren't linking to them in a special way, so I am unsure how the URL builder will help us. But I may be missing something!
-
You could just use the Google Analytics URL Builder that will create some virtual tracking opportunities for you. Are you creating the test, running for a period and altering the test?
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Analytics Stopped Tracking Visits - NEED HELP!
Hi Moz Community, I have about 10 sites, static HTML sites and WordPress sites, which ALL stopped tracking Google Analytics on August 2nd. They go to a flat-line! Dead! No data! Has anyone else experienced this either currently or before? I have confirmed all code is correct as it's been tracking these sites for years. One site gets 5,000+ visits a month and they are sitting at only 1,500 now and will be a fun conversation to have with the client. If all code is correct, what should I do? How do I overcome this without having to re-create another account/tracking ID? Never dealt with something like this before and there is not much on the web or in other forums. Would appreciate any help or advice or tips! - Patrick
Reporting & Analytics | | WhiteboardCreations0 -
Uptick in not tracked conversions / anyone have a list of things that google analytics will not track
There seems to have been an uptick in users on our site not being tracked in Google Analytics cause I see a lot more un-tracked revenue in the last 6 months then I used to. I know analytics is still working as it has been tracking a normal amount of visits but I assumed there might be a reason less would be actually showing up in analytics (mabye a change is what is being reported as organic). I know a lot of stuff goes into "not provided" such as logged in search and stuff like that but is there a list of all of the ones that go into not provided and all that just do not get tracked (javascript not enabled, iOS?). If it could be something else as well let me know. Thanks for the help!
Reporting & Analytics | | Gordian0 -
How to not track mobile redirects in Google Analytics
If a user is on a mobile device and comes to our home page, http://www.darden.virginia.edu/web/Home/ they are redirected to http://m.darden.virginia.edu/web/Home/. We want a way to remove all the redirects from our Google analytics reports. More specifically we do not want to include the the page view of http://www.darden.virginia.edu/web/Home/ in our page view count when the user is on a mobile device. How do we do that?
Reporting & Analytics | | Darden0 -
ECommerc site redirect to external site when add to cart. Need HELP to track sales!!!
Hi, I buil this site on WordPress, http://www.pilatesboisfranc.com When you go on <<plan &="" pricing="">> on the menu you can purchase a package online.</plan> When you click ''Get Started Now'' or ''Add to Cart'' the buyer is redirect to this external site: mindbodyonline.com QUESTIONS: Can I track my sales on Googles Analytics? Can I creat a goal on G.A. ? I found this video: https://getsatisfaction.com/mindbody/topics/chalk_talk_how_to_setup_google_analytics Is this the right way to do this? About goals, a simple goal I would like to create is, one purchase. Can I acheive that? Not shure about Goals. When I test and purchase, URL is always the same https://clients.mindbodyonline.com/ASP/home.asp?studioid=30371 I'm know only very basics stuff when it is time to play in Analytics, I hope you can provide help in details. Thank you, BigBlaze
Reporting & Analytics | | BigBlaze2050 -
What is best practice for tracking RSS feed subscribers
What is the most accurate/achievable way of tracking data about subscribers to your RSS feed through Google Analytics? With standard WordPress sites, we place the RSS link to Feedburner so we could track statistics. However it wouldn't track the way that I use it. I use Pulse on an Android Tablet to read my feeds offline on the bus each morning. At home, Pulse automatically downloads the latest feeds wirelessly overnight. So then I can read them without a connection. The obvious downside for my reading experience is that I only get what is contained in the feeds. If the company only includes an excerpt, it's too annoying to read the teaser and be unable to connect and follow a link. So I only subscribe to feeds that contain the full post. Yeah to seomoz, aimclear, SEL, adwordsblog. I dont subscribe to bruceclays blog, much as i'd like to, because it doesn't contain the full feed. That's probably deliberate on their part, because I have to consciously visit their blog on my desktop at work, to see the whole post. The other problem with say Pulse, is how it locates the feed. I typed in the URL, and Pulse subscribed me. I assume that Pulse simply looked for the domain.com/feed URL and added that, rather than look for feeds2.feedburner.com/domain. I looked at Feedburner stats and they didn't go up for 2 days, so basically it didn't track me. Would it be as simple as using the Google URL builder to add parameters to each post in the RSS feed? Eg utm_source=feedreader, utm_medium=rss, utm_campaign=tracking. But that still wouldn't track offline users. I assume that most people are also not going to paste the Feedburner URL into their FeedReader, but would let the platform auto-detect the feed. Any suggestions?
Reporting & Analytics | | ozgeekmum1 -
Using Google Analytics for tracking statistics of the HOMEpage
Hello, Lets say I have a website with the HOMEpage being http://www.page.com. There are various subpages e.g. http://www.page.com/page1, http://www.page.com/page2, http://www.page.com/page3 . Now when I use Google Analytics it gives me all kind of statistics for the subpages shown as /page1 /page2 /page3 ... (relative path). According to this pattern the HOMEpage should be just "/". Unfortunately I can't find "/" in any statistics. Is this normal? Thanks in advance
Reporting & Analytics | | guitarslinger0 -
Why is Benetton ranking with tracking parameters?
For this search: https://www.google.com/search?q=benetton&pws=0 I see the following URL ranking #1 http://www.benetton.com/?utm_source=centrum.sk&utm_medium=listing Why is this happening? I could likely figure it out but I'm busy so I was hoping someone could dig around and let me know 🙂 Anyone? Incidentally, Benetton is in the middle of a massive campaign at the moment so it's strange timing for them to have this showing up and screwing with their GA tracking... EDIT: I should clarify, Benetton is not a client - I don't know anyone who works for or with them. I'm just curious why this is showing up. cmNWx.png
Reporting & Analytics | | TomCritchlow1 -
Tracking 301'd Domains
'ello SEOMozers 🙂 I've been implementing some awesomely search engine friendly 301'd domains for clients and they work great but I seem to have missed the point where I track said domains in some fashion and come here to ask the question --> how are you all tracking refers from 301'd domains that are pointed to your main hubs? Currently our practice in-house is to alias them in our servers then use .htaccess rules to 301 them to the 1 domain to-rule-them-all but Google Analytics doesn't recognize them as different domains with that plan of action and there goes my refer tracking. Is there a super-star way to use the Google URL Builder and combine that with the above plan of action or a better plan? Has anyone else implemented something else more awesome-er that could help a girl out? Much thanks and Happy Thursday!
Reporting & Analytics | | treefrogseo0