Robots.txt
-
Hello,
My client has a robots.txt file which says this:
User-agent: * Crawl-delay: 2 I put it through a robots checker which said that it must have a **disallow command**. So should it say this:
User-agent: *
Disallow:
crawl-delay: 2
What effect (if any) would not having a disallow command make?
Thanks
-
Oops, good catch Paul, you're correct!
-
Michael - you are _incorrect, _I'm afraid! You need to read up on the specifics of the robots exclusion protocol.
A blank Disallow directive absolutely does NOT match all URLs on the site. In order to match all URLs on the site, the configuration would have to be:
User-agent: * Disallow: /
Note the slash denoting the root of the site. If the field after disallow: is blank, that specifically means no URLs should be blocked. To quote www.robotstxt.org:
Any empty value, indicates that all URLs can be retrieved. At least one Disallow field needs to be present in a record.
The second part of that statement is equally important. For a record to be valid, it must include at least one user agent declaration and at least one disallow statement. If you want the file to not block any URLs, you must include the disallow: statement, but leave its value empty.
For more proof of this, here's the exact example, also from robotstxt.org:
To allow all robots complete access
User-agent: * Disallow:
(or just create an empty "/robots.txt" file, or don't use one at all)
The main reason for including a robots.txt which doesn't block anything is to help clean up a server's error logs. With no robots.txt in place, an error will be inserted into the logs every time a crawler visits and can't find the file, bloating the logs and obscuring the real errors that might be present. A blank file may lead someone to believe that the robots.txt just hasn't been configured, leading to unnecessary confusion. So a file configured as above is preferable even if no blocking is desired.
Hope that clears things up?
Paul
[edited to replace line breaks in the code examples that were stripped out by Moz text editor]
-
Caroline,
REMOVE THE DISALLOW LINE.
I am concerned that that line will match all URLs on the site, and disallow the ENTIRE site.
Michael.
-
Thanks to both of you. I will recommend that the Robots.txt is changed to:
User-agent: *
Disallow:in order to configure it right and miss out the crawl delay.
Caroline
-
Your second version is correct, ALBA123 - the robots protocol does require you to include a disallow statement in order to be correctly configured, even if it's blank to indicate crawling the full site.
I really question the wisdom of having a crawl delay in place though. What's the reason for doing so? I never want anything to get in the way of the search crawlers "doing their thing" as effectively as possible.
It's also rather strange to go to a crawl delay, but not be blocking the crawling of any of the non-essential sections of the site. Usually a crawl delay is in place to reduce the resource use by crawlers (vastly better to improve the efficiency of the site or get stronger hosting) but delaying crawl for the whole site instead of saving resources by blocking the non-essential areas first is pretty heavy-handed.
Doers that make sense?
Paul
-
I'd be really, REALLY careful about a disallow statement like that: you run the risk of disallowing your entire website.
FYI I'm not sure putting a crawl delay in your robots.txt file is the right answer. I saw an example a week or so ago where Google (I think, but maybe it was Bing) explicitly said somewhere that it had ignored the crawl delay in the robots.txt. I would specify the crawl delay in Webmaster Tools instead. It's hard to find, but it's there
- in Webmaster Tools, select the site you want to set the crawl rate for
- click the Gear icon in the upper right
- you'll see the option there to set the crawl rate
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Shopify robots blocking stylesheets causing inconsistent mobile-friendly test results?
One of our shopify sites suffered an extreme rankings drop. Recent Google algorithm updates include mobile first so I tested the site and our team got different mobile-friendly test results. However, search console is also flagging pages as not mobile friendly. So, while us end-users see the site as OK on mobile, this may not be the case for Google? I researched more about inconsistent mobile test results and found answers that say it may be due to robots.txt blocking stylesheets. Do you recognise any directory blocked that might be affecting Google's rendering? We can't edit shopify robots.txt unfortunately. Our dev said the only thing that stands out to him is Disallow: /design_theme_id and the rest shouldn't be hindering Google bots. Here are some of the files blocked: Disallow: /admin
Technical SEO | | nhhernandez
Disallow: /cart
Disallow: /orders
Disallow: /checkout
Disallow: /9103034/checkouts
Disallow: /9103034/orders
Disallow: /carts
Disallow: /account
Disallow: /collections/+
Disallow: /collections/%2B
Disallow: /collections/%2b
Disallow: /blogs/+
Disallow: /blogs/%2B
Disallow: /blogs/%2b
Disallow: /design_theme_id
Disallow: /preview_theme_id
Disallow: /preview_script_id
Disallow: /discount/*
Disallow: /gift_cards/*
Disallow: /apple-app-site-association0 -
Best way to create robots.txt for my website
How I can create robots.txt file for my website guitarcontrol.com ? It is having login and Guitar lessons.
Technical SEO | | zoe.wilson170 -
Will an XML sitemap override a robots.txt
I have a client that has a robots.txt file that is blocking an entire subdomain, entirely by accident. Their original solution, not realizing the robots.txt error, was to submit an xml sitemap to get their pages indexed. I did not think this tactic would work, as the robots.txt would take precedent over the xmls sitemap. But it worked... I have no explanation as to how or why. Does anyone have an answer to this? or any experience with a website that has had a clear Disallow: / for months , that somehow has pages in the index?
Technical SEO | | KCBackofen0 -
Empty Meta Robots Directive - Harmful?
Hi, We had a coding update and a side-effect of that was that our directive was emptied, in other words it now reads as: on all of the site. I've since noticed that Google's cache date on all of the pages - at least, the ones I tested - have a Cached date of no later than 17 December '12 - that's the Monday after the directive was removed on mass. So, A, does anyone have solid evidence of an empty directive causing problems? Past experience, Matt Cutts, Fishkin quote, etc. And then B - It seems fairly well correlated but, does my entire site's homogenous Cached date point to this tag removal? Or is it fairly normal to have a particular cache date across a large site (we're a large ecommerce site). Our site: http://www.zando.co.za/ I'm having the directive reinstated as soon as Dev permitting. And then, for extra credit, is there a way with Google's API, or perhaps some other tool, to run an arbitrary list and retrieve Cached dates? I'd want to do this for diagnosis purposes and preferably in a way that OK with Google. I'd avoid CURLing for the cached URL and scraping out that dates with BASH, or any such kind of thing. Cheers,
Technical SEO | | RocketZando0 -
Robots.txt Showing in SERP Results
Currently doing a technical audit for a website and when I search "Site:website.com -www" the only result is website.com/robots.txt I was wondering if anyone else has come across this before -- or what this may mean from a technical audit standpoint. Thank you!
Technical SEO | | vectormedia0 -
Robots.txt for subdomain
Hi there Mozzers! I have a subdomain with duplicate content and I'd like to remove these pages from the mighty Google index. The problem is: the website is build in Drupal and this subdomain does not have it's own robots.txt. So I want to ask you how to disallow and noindex this subdomain. Is it possible to add this to the root robots.txt: User-agent: *
Technical SEO | | Partouter
Disallow: /subdomain.root.nl/ User-agent: Googlebot
Noindex: /subdomain.root.nl/ Thank you in advance! Partouter0 -
Mobile site: robots.txt best practices
If there are canonical tags pointing to the web version of each mobile page, what should a robots.txt file for a mobile site have?
Technical SEO | | bonnierSEO0 -
Trying to reduce pages crawled to within 10K limit via robots.txt
Our site has far too many pages for our 10K page PRO account which are not SEO worthy. In fact, only about 2000 pages qualify for SEO value. Limitations of the store software only permit me to use robots.txt to sculpt the rogerbot site crawl. However, I am having trouble getting this to work. Our biggest problem is the 35K individual product pages and the related shopping cart links (at least another 35K); these aren't needed as they duplicate the SEO-worthy content in the product category pages. The signature of a product page is that it is contained within a folder ending in -p. So I made the following addition to robots.txt: User-agent: rogerbot
Technical SEO | | AspenFasteners
Disallow: /-p/ However, the latest crawl results show the 10K limit is still being exceeded. I went to Crawl Diagnostics and clicked on Export Latest Crawl to CSV. To my dismay I saw the report was overflowing with product page links: e.g. www.aspenfasteners.com/3-Star-tm-Bulbing-Type-Blind-Rivets-Anodized-p/rv006-316x039354-coan.htm The value for the column "Search Engine blocked by robots.txt" = FALSE; does this mean blocked for all search engines? Then it's correct. If it means "blocked for rogerbot? Then it shouldn't even be in the report, as the report seems to only contain 10K pages. Any thoughts or hints on trying to attain my goal would REALLY be appreciated, I've been trying for weeks now. Honestly - virtual beers for everyone! Carlo0