Difficult to pinpoint competitive differences
-
Hi moz,
Im currently working with a client that has a number of affiliates that work under similar URLs but operate independently. For example I work with client.com and we are concerned about SEO and ranking competition from affilate1.client.com, affiliate2.client.com etc. As it stands right now, the domain client.com has a higher DA, the homepage has a higher PA, and the equity passing links, both internal and external are much higher as well as number of linking domains, yet for whatever reason for many of the keywords we attempt to optimize for, the smaller affiliates often rank higher.
The only things ive been able to pinpoint is that affiliate1.client.com has a spam score of 2 (rather than 4, for client.com) and the homepage has more total links. External anchor text is pretty branded across the web so i can't imagine it playing into keyword associations. Lastly the sites are constructed and appear very similar so basic on page keyword best practices have been taken care of.
We worry that because affiliate.client.com has been at the SEO game longer, in addition to Google only linking two sites from a domain per search, we will never be able to rank for the keywords we want to rank for.
How else can I go about a competitive analysis if I've taken into account everything said above?
Any help will be very appreciated.
-
They have very, very similar content. Essentially its the same save for some differences due to the region differences.
-
Do these competing pages have identical or very similar content ?
-
Ok to get a little more specific, our client is a telecommunications company but let me still refer to them as client.com. There exist a series of regional sites such as region1.client.com, region2.client.com etc which i guess function as subdomains of client.com.
Our client is specifically client.com not the regional versions so all of our SEO efforts go to ranking client.com
For a given generic, yet important keyword, say "internet," a page on region1.client.com will rank higher than client.com, or sometimes client.com will not rank at all (which may be because of Google's two page rule)
Given all of the information i mentioned above (client.com having a higher PA, more backlinks, etc.) I cannot figure out why this ranking is happening
Please let me know if that clarifies
-
Getting very specific so there is no time spent explaining things that do not apply....
I need an example of the keywords that apply here. For example, if you sell flooring and have ten other branches.... is the problem that one of the branches outranks the main domain for keywords such as "oak flooring" but they are ranking appropriately for "oak flooring pittsburgh"
-
"Affiliate" is a name used for a person outside of your company who sells your products.
Are you talking about "branch offices" or "franchise locations" ?
-
Hi,
Thank you for your passionate response, however now im feeling as if "affiliate" was a touchy word. If client.com is who I am working SEO for, then north.client.com is a regional branch of the same company. However that subdomain outranks the mother tree on many keywords, and wouldn't it be better to navigate from the trunk to branches rather than directly to a branch and not be able to find your way back?
Im just trying to understand what other factors may be playing into the observed ranks when all of the metrics I get from Moz's (awesome) tools would suggest otherwise
-
Affiliates are some of the smartest people on the web -- especially the ones who have survived after Google took a disliking to them a few years ago. They are really good at optimization and they often have strong websites.
As soon as you invite affiliates into your business model you invite competition, smart competition, really smart competition. Most of the time affiliates are so good at what they do that they have no problem defeating the manufacturer, publisher, program site, or whoever offered to pay them to help produce sales. They live and breathe, SEO, optimzation, rankings, traffic, conversions, etc. The program people are usually busy doing other work and generally don't have the time or the smarts to outdo the affiliate.
How else can I go about a competitive analysis
I've been an affiliate for about 20 years. I've sold lots of stuff for lots of businesses. The best situation for me and for the people who pay me is when they value me as a member of their team. I am still with the first program that I joined but many many others have come and gone. What's the difference? The one that I am still with after 20 years values their affiliates as members of their team. They rejoice about the success of the affiliates and enjoy the rain that they make. Even thought they live 2000 miles from me I have been to their homes and to their offices for strategy meetings. I have given them opinions and advice on their products to make them easier to sell. I advise them on how to tweak the checkout process to increase sales. They know my kids and I know theirs. I consider them among my best friends and I am among theirs. Maybe your affiliates can become this valuable to you.
As soon as you start restricting affiliates, maneuvering around them, or giving them a reason to think that you view them with contempt they will start looking for another program. The last thing that you want is for them to start working for your competitor. They can be valuable members of your team, much more than animals who drag in kill for you.
It's not much different than a manufacturer or publisher allowing others to sell your physical products. Actually, most manufacturers and publishers have a higher profit margin from sales produced by affiliates than by resellers.
Affiliates are one of the most effective ways of challenging your competitors... but at the same time there will be some damage done to your own direct sales. You will always be hit with some friendly fire. Competition in search engines works that way.
It sounds like you might have your affiliates on a subdomain. I would probably allow them to use their own websites. I would even offer to redirect the subdomains to their websites as long as they continue to sell my products. Honestly, I would not work on a subdomain because I don't want to work building my fortress on another person's land.
If you have some awesome smart people selling your products, bring them in to closer collaboration. This isn't going to work with every affiliate but when you find one or two or a few like that the cooperation can benefit everyone.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Looking for Competitive Research Tool Recommendations
Hi Moz Community! I'm doing research for a client and trying to gain insights around their competitors website data. Specifically trying to see what landing pages on the competitors site receive the most traffic. Does anyone currently use a tool that shows estimated traffic here? As an FYI, outside of MOZ Pro (which I love), I use SpyFu and SimilarWeb. Right now my client's landing page traffic is mainly homepage traffic and we want to make reccos on where to grow outside the homepage to increase visibility in other specific areas where there is search demand. We have a good idea but I'm hoping the competitor web data will back up those recommendations. Any recommendations here would be super valuable! Thank you in advance for your time. Abbi
Competitive Research | | abbiplunkett0 -
How can you rank nr 1 for high competitive keyword with low DA and only 1 backlink?
Hi! Was wondering if anyone can explain this a bit clearer...
Competitive Research | | AleksanderOlsen
Image attatched... How is it possible to rank on Google Norway for spot nr.1 (page in English language) and spot nr.2 (page in Norwegian language) , when all you competitors have higher PA, DA and a lot more backlinks and better on-page optimization according to MOZ? Is there something I´m misunderstanding?
Just when I thought SEO started to make sense 😞 7sXH00d0 -
Ranking for Competitive Keywords vs. Less Competitive Keyword Variations
I'm curious about situations where a website ranks very well for query variations, but doesn't rank for the query itself (or the reverse of that). For Redfin (where I work), here is the situation with regard to keyword rankings on Google (searched today from USA, incognito)... real estate search - #4 real estate online - #4 real estate site - #5 find real estate - #9 get real estate - #16 real estate - #163 It stands to reason that a site ranking well for a competitive query should also rank well for less competitive query variations - especially query variations that are non-limiting and do not demand a custom landing page (for example, I would consider 'board games' to dramatically limit the query 'games' and be best targeted with a targeted page...not so with 'real estate site' and 'real estate'). So, my question is, what are some theories regarding situations like this? Why do some sites rank so well for competitive queries but not for non-limiting query variations? Why aren't the sites that are crushing us for 'real estate' also crushing us for 'real estate' variations (to be clear...the top sites are crushing us for both)? Is it anchor text? Is it social signals? Is it offline signals, co-occurrence, or citations? What about internal linking and site structure? I realize it's likely a mix of all this, but I'm hoping we can drum up some new ideas here. FYI, on Bing we also rank very well for 'real estate' variations, but leap up to 31st for 'real estate'. Thoughts?
Competitive Research | | RyanOD0 -
Effort for "moderate competition" keywords
I'm rather new to this, and while I'm getting some sense of everything I'm trying to figure out what kind of scope of work lays ahead of me. The keywords I'm looking to rank for are "moderate difficulty" -- somewhere between the 45%-55% "difficulty scale" on seomoz's keyword difficulty report. Assuming I have a number of "A-grade" (according to SEOmoz's reports) optimized pages for these keywords, how many links of a given quality level should I be looking at building up? I mean, of course, the more the better, but if I'm gunning for high DA/PA pages, am I looking at dozens here or hundreds of such links? I can imagine that any answer isn't going to come with much specificity, but if there was just an "idea" of the scale of backlinking involved here, that'd be great!
Competitive Research | | yoni450 -
Competitive Domain Analysis
What is the best way to improve this in reference to my competition? My site(s) are formatted well, returning no errors or warnings. I have removed my keyword meta-tag and tested my sites against the keywords that we want to appear under. Now I need to close the gap on the competition.
Competitive Research | | bobbabuoy0 -
How does the timeline look for the next Competitive Link Analysis? Thanks!
Hello, Just wanted to see if there was an update on the horizon. The last update on my campaign shows 2/28/12. Am I not setting updates correctly on my dashboard? Thanks!
Competitive Research | | GRC0 -
Different SERP results in browsers / different result pages for keyword in browser
Hi, I am making the SEO reports for a travel agency and I have the following problem. SEOmoz shows me the website is on page 1, for a keyword. Yesterday, a google search with firefox showed me the same position, while, searching from a different computer on google using firefox gave me another position. The URL shown was also different. I asked some friends to do the search - the results were the same - first page. Today, firefox shows me the second URL on the 4'th page, and the result from the first page of google does not appear, while Chrome still shows me the first URL on the first page. I have no idea why the URL that was ranking well does not appear on the first page with Firefox, and why it appears on the first page with Chrome, or why the URL that was ranking bad -meaning page 4, appears on Firefox but does not appear on Chrome. Can someone give me some advice?
Competitive Research | | Netlogiq0 -
Use of competitive kw search software for KW discovery for SEO
I use traditional methods for keyword discovery, but occured to me that perhaps competitive keyword software should be applied to competitor's sites for further possibilitites. Any opinions or experience using this strategy? I know it used primarily for PPC, but value for SEO KW discovery? Any personal recommendations on which programs considered most effective? Thanks. Alan
Competitive Research | | ahw0