What can I do to rank higher than low-quality low-content sites?
-
We lost our site in an actual meltdown at our hosting provider in January, and decided to do a new site instead of bring back a dated backup. So we've only been "active" at our URL since about May.
That said, I have not seen any irregular or unexpected penalties. Not showing up is natural if you have literally nothing to show.
We have had a site since then, though, and while it isn't going to win any award, we've built it with best practices using sites like this, trying to use natural, helpful, actual language to convey what we do and why we do it (we're web developers for small business making WordPress sites). Paying attention to titles, keyword frequency and variability, alt tags, etc. Always erring on the conservative side.
While we build sites for people across the country (and a few in places like the UK), we just moved into an actual office space in our hometown so it's never been more important to push our visibility locally.
We've just come back on the scene, in relative terms, so there's no expectation we'll crack the top five or ten; they all have teams of people and bags of capital and have been around many, many years, plus they link to the dozens upon dozens of sites they have done and promote their appearances in press releases and such.
Their content is not bad, and most of it is good and not spammy. They are being genuine.
That said, we're in the late 40s to late 50s right now. Happy to show up at all, but after that first group of legitimate sites, there are
- automatically generated webpages (which I thought couldn't even be listed...one is an MP3 download site that mentions one of the top companies in the page title, and just has a random video on the page)
- local companies touting themselves as SEO "experts" that say things like "Here at Company X, we work hard to bring you the best Rochester, NY web design in the hopes that when you make your Rochester, NY web design decisions, you'll think of us first Rochester, NY web design." I changed the company name and the location, but that's an actual line from their site
- job listings from places like Craigslist and Indeed
- hair stylists
- dentists (?!)
Our code validates, we've incorporated Schema for our addresses, our site is usually fast (650ms to 1.3s in Pingdom from Dallas). We don't do any redirecting, our metas likes everyone else's don't count for ranking but are thoughtfully produced, we pay attention to using concise and accurate URLs without stop words, etc. There are also very very few resources loaded on a given page.
That said, there's not a lot on the blog that's new and all told we have I think 13 total pages including a few posts.
Is it even possible to get close to the actual pack if we, for example, posted more regularly? I was just reading here about how we shouldn't put our links in the site footers of our clients (which we don't always anyway), so I have them only as branded links, only on the homepages, and only on sites that, when crawled, didn't have nonzero spam scores (everyone else has a nofollow link in our portfolio).
I realize this is a super generic question but I wasn't quite sure how to search out this particular use case given that our aspirations are so basic...just trying to figure out if there's something obvious we're missing and shooting ourselves in the foot over.
A thousand pledges of gratitude!
(if this is too common and I just didn't see a duplicate, let me know and I will delete it or ask for it to be deleted....also, I don't want to appear spammy so I am not linking to my site unless it's absolutely necessary...not sure what protocol is...I'm pretty self-aware so I do believe everything I've said above is true).
-
Wow, never caught that before; just saw the similar thing that lists them but doesn't do anything about them down in the crawl section.
Thanks to you as well! Hopefully that'll raise some flags that this stuff needs to not be around anymore when they make another pass at it.
You guys are so helpful and encouraging!
-
If you have many URLs from the old site in the index that are all in the same directory (or a handful of directories) you can quickly and easily remove whole directories of URLs from the index via Google Search Console. We have found it to work very quickly.
-
Go into Search Console, selected ‘Remove URLs’ under ‘Google Index’ in the left hand menu.
-
Add the page or folder you want to remove, and click next. If you add the homepage, that's the same as all pages on the site. If you add a folder you'll get three options under the ‘Reason’ drop down.
One of those options is ‘Remove directory’. Select that.
-
-
1 server error, 1 soft 303, and 5,419 not found. It says it determined those were all pages based on the individual staging site's XML sitemap (which, of course, doesn't exist, which makes it still super confusing).
How do you assign a code to a directory? Is that a similar process to changing folder permissions on FTP?
From what I've read, it doesn't sounds like this will help SEO wise but it sure would give me peace of mind.
At the very least, I have this one thing to tackle that I didn't know about before, so I am going to call that a win and thank you for your time once more!
-
That's good that the backlinks you can find are to new, existing content. Also check the crawl errors in Search Console to see if there are potential 404's that are getting linked.
With regard to the staging content, theoretically you could assign a 410 status code to that directory, thereby telling crawlers that the content does not exist and won't exist ever again. Search Engine Watch has a quick rehash on Google's approach to 404 and 410 codes.
For the remaining urls from the old site, since they don't have current equivalents, a 301 redirect to the home page would be a good move. At least then if someone has an old link to your site, they're getting to something that isn't a 404.
-
The staging sites have not been live for some time. There was no preventative measure if someone had the link, but as I mentioned, I did check off not to be indexed and added them to the root domain's robots.txt. I only gave the link to the client directly, so it's me and them and perhaps a friend or family member who they asked to provide a second pair of eyes in evaluating a given design.
That's part of my concern. They don't exist, and haven't. The apps have been uninstalled in the case of where Installatron was used, and the manually added ones have since been deleted. The folders don't exist, so http://www.myexample.com/staging/ just gives the 404 at the main site, myexample.com, where as previously it would bring up the site located at /staging/.
The pages on my own new site were built from the ground up, so they can't link to the old site in any way; I couldn't tell you for sure what the old page addresses even were except to say I know they're different because they're based off of the unique page titles (in this case).
As far as the staging sites, all the links were internal, just pointing to other pages within that same staging site. I've been through the live sites and all the changing of addresses between domains was clean, including changing the character counts for serialized arrays in the database. And no links have ever been published that pointed to the old site at any given time.
So it makes me think that, when they did exist, Google ignored the checked box in the settings and indexed them thoroughly; their own internal links would suffice, then, to display so many results, but why after a year would they not be cleaned from results when they no longer exist?
Search Console only lists four addresses being linked to, and they're all from the new site, and resultant from my old footer links (except for one place in Taiwan selling hotel reservations...go figure).
Open site shows all the expected footer links for the external links, but perplexingly, has a record of lots of internal links from the old site (even test pages, like checkout pages for shopping cart plug-ins).
Since there aren't any equivalents, is my next move to somehow make a rule that anything beyond the few pages I deliberately made and am aware of get 301'd to the home page? Would that be an effective method of scrubbing the results of ghosts?
Thanks again for your time and patience. If you can't or don't wish to get back with me, I understand, I just am very persistent when something I am not used to is exposed to me and it rolls around in my head and saturates my brain
-
Is the staging site still live & accessible to anyone who has the link? If so, I recommend either shutting it down or password protect it, possibly via htaccess.
Regarding old site to new site mapping, there are likely pages linking to old content that are now resulting in 404 errors. That's going to be where most of the "juice" is. Take a look at the results in Open Site Explorer, as well as Google Search Console's links to your site section, and see where your current backlinks are pointing. If there are equivalents on the new site, having a 301 redirect from an old URL to the new equivalent will help guide visitors to the right content. If there's no equivalent, redirecting to the home page works in a pinch.
-
Thanks for taking the time to respond! It sincerely means a lot.
All of the addresses are new this time around, and none have a precedent from the old site (in other words, we have a page discussing our graphic design services, but those weren't available before, so there's no bridge to be made).
I did the site:domain thing and was floored, though...We do staging versions of all our development sites right on our domain, and are careful never to publish the addresses in electronic form, even in private messages. Also, in using Wordpress, while it says it's up to the search engine to decide to honor it or not, we click the checkbox that says not to index it.
I even have all of the subdirectories wildcarded in my robots.txt file...
...and yet there are tons and tons of addresses up to a year and a half old.
I don't understand how with each new pass the crawler takes, and having a new sitemap, why those would get indexed; those staging sites don't even exist anymore.
Are those diluting my "juice?" How can I remove them? I see a removal tool that Google offers, but it seems they want you to tread lightly and I'm already taking a lot of the preventative measures they recommend.
Thanks again for your help. It's sort of embarrassing to not know these things, but I'm never going to get better at the things I have knowledge gaps in if I don't ask questions.
-
Is the new site at the same domain as the previous one? If so, I'd get a hold of a sitemap from the older version of the site, plus the results of a "site:domain" search to make sure there are proper 301 redirects from legacy pages to new URL structures.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rankings preferring English URL above local URL
We've recently had a redesign for our website and it has influenced our rankings a little bit. However, what I mainly noticed is that for some keywords in MOZ the English URL is looked at in terms of ranking, instead of the local URL. It used to be just the local URL ranking, even for keywords that are more English oriented, and I'm wondering if that might be hurting our rankings. And more importantly, why it's happening. An example of a page where it's happening is: https://www.bluebillywig.com/online-video-platform/
Local SEO | | Billywig0 -
Anything I can throw money at to get a quick boost?
I run SEO for a multi-location business. Most of our locations are great and others are still ramping. SEO is a long process but we have higher expectations for these stores. While all the normal stuff get going to boost our rankings, is there anything quick I can just throw some money to get a jump start?
Local SEO | | danieldaher0 -
From traction to non existent! What happened to my Photography site and what can I do to fix it?
Aloha guys, To start as I always do with the (awesome) Moz community I wanted to say thanks for the insight! This has to be one of the best online communities and help resource with great positive and concise help that really makes a difference, so many thanks everyone! PS I also do my best to relay what I learn here to fellow business owners and point them to SEO boosting avenues to help support the community as much as possible. Anyways... **My Photo website ** **Current top wedding website (I do enjoy her work!!!) ** Attached below is a link to some stats/graphs! The Problem! After the recent Google update last month I've had a drop in my site visibility from 5.8% and some change to now .7% of search volume.. Painful for my photo & video business here on Kauai to say the least. A few images are attached, is there also any correlations you guys can see or think may help to get my site up to the first page? I know we deliver some of the very best work here on the island and deliver great service too, its a bummer that we cant do more for folks visiting here that dont even know we exist! The question! Do you guys have any ideas on what can be done to get my page to gaining organic traction and doing great again? My goal is to have our business rank for Kauai Wedding Videographer, Kauai Wedding Photographer, and Kauai Family Photographer! My moz dashboard is still saying we're on the way for that but that my search visibility is way way down. Any clarity or ideas are greatly appreciated you guys! I would love to relay this to the wedding community as well! Warmest aloha from Kauai everybody and have a great day! NjELT NjELT
Local SEO | | Trey30 -
Duplicate content on multiple domains
Dear all, I have bought 30 geo top level domains. This is for an ecommerce project that has not launcehd yet (and isn't indexed by Google). I am now at a point where I can change/consolidate all domains as sub domains or sub folders or keep things as they are. I just worry that link building would be scattered and not focused and that it might be better to concentrate the efforts on one domain. What are your views on this? Many thanks!
Local SEO | | UpMedio_SEO
Ami0 -
Please tell me why we can't outrank a competitor with such poor metrics
Hi ! New here I'm trying to help a customer rank in the 1st page on a low-mid competition term in a specific city. I did a comparison of both URL in MOZ "Compare link Metrics" & we beat them on 85% of the metrics. They are on the 1st page, often top-3, the closest position we can get is about 13-15. The only higher metric they have is Domain MozRank & MozTrust + equity passing link (??) We are running WordPress with Genesis, they are running a custom site. See attached printscreen of the report. Help ! b60HidT
Local SEO | | JohnF80 -
Local Printing Company Moving to a new IP - Will Our Rankings Change
I operate a local print and direct mail company located in Houston called Catdi Printing (www.catdi.com)We do very well with our local rankings and rank 2 or 3 in our main keywords ( Houston Printing , Direct Mail Houston & eddm Houston ) We are looking to upgrade our online quoting and ordering system. The software is very expensive and the only way we can incorporate this new system is to move our site and redirect our domain. The new hosting provider is located in California and might even be hosted by Google but im not certain on this point. Our current host provider is Hostgator and they are based in Houston so im not this provides any benefit. I guess my main question is will this new change affect our overall regular and local rankings? I would hate to see our positions and ranking fall because of this change. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks CATDI
Local SEO | | ChopperCharlie1 -
Is it necessary to implement hreflang for translated content on different ccTLDs?
Hello there, new MOZ here. I hope someone of the international SEO MOZs can share their opinion on a doubt I have. I've been reading a lot about hreflang and I understand the importance for subdomains and subfolders not only for targeting the same language in different countries (.com, .co.uk, .ca, etc) but also for websites partially or fully translated in other languages. However for these I've always seen examples where you want to have hreflang with subdomains or folders e.g. ru.example.com ; example.com/ru What if I have my translated websites on different ccTLDs - i.e. example.com example.ru. example.br example .fr Do I still need to implement hreflang or in this case is not necessary?
Local SEO | | selectitaly0