Is it better to try and boost an old page that ranks on page #5 or create a better new page
-
Hello Everyone,
We have been looking into our placements recently and see that one of our blog posts shows on page #5 for a popular keyword phrase with a lot of search volume.
Lets say the keyword is "couples fitness ideas"
We show on page 5 for a post
/couples-fitness-ideas-19-tips-and-expert-advice/
We want to try and get on the first page for that phrase and wanted to know if it is better if we did one of the following:
1. Create a new page with over 100 ideas with a few more thousands of words. with a new url (thinking /couples-fitness-ideas)
2. Create a new page with a new url (thinking /couples-fitness-ideas) with the same content as the currently ranking post. We would want to do this for more freedom with layout and design of the page rather than our current blog post template.
Add more content, let's say 100 more ideas.
Then forward the old URL to the new one with a 301 redirect.
3. Add more content to the existing post without changing the layout and change the URL.
Look forward to your thoughts
-
I just wanted to thank everyone again for their insight as well as send an update on the status of our page.
We are now ranking #2 for our target keywords as well as other top10 rankings for similar keywords.
Appreciate all your insight and feedback.
-
Looks good plan. Except content promotion. You need to do them both (updating and promotion) at same time.
-
I have a question regarding adding content to the page.
Currently we have the 19 ideas. Would it do more harm than good to add 5 ideas then publish it.
Then add 10 then publish, add 20 then publish. And so on. Basically updating the post every week or daily with more ideas. Rather than update it one time with 100 new ideas.
Would it be more beneficial or harmful to update the post more frequently than one major update.
Then once we have a significant number we would promote across social and outreach for links.
-
I have a question regarding adding content to the page.
Currently we have the 19 ideas. Would it do more harm than good to add 5 ideas then publish it.
Then add 10 then publish, add 20 then publish. And so on. Basically updating the post every week or daily with more ideas. Rather than update it one time with 100 new ideas.
Would it be more beneficial or harmful to update the post more frequently than one major update.
Then once we have a significant number we would promote across social and outreach for links.
-
Thanks for your feedback. It's good content it can just me expanded upon and have more added to it. This will make it great content.
-
I love how Peter actually brings this point as I recently faced this problem with one of my client. Here is what I would have done if I would be at your place.
If the content you are trying to rank is not good enough, after all the effort all you will get is more traffic with higher bounce rate which I am sure you do not want at the end of the day. One thing you need to make sure that the content you are planning to create is more powerful or the one that you already have is good enough for your target audience.
If you are fine with the content you currently have, stick with that and move as Peter suggest but if you think that the content you are planning is more powerful, I would suggest creating a new page and redirect the current page to the new URL. This way you will skip self-cannibalization plus the audience will get new and more powerful content than the one you were previously targeting.
Now you have the new content ready with old one redirecting to the new URL, it’s time for you to properly optimize your page, get some links and get it rank on your targeted key phrase.
Hope this helps!
-
Awesome.
So add some new ideas to the current post that ranks while we work on the new and improved page. This will move it up a little bit to make the switch even more effective.
Your other insight is great as well. I love Brian Dean's stuff too. Super Helpful.
I'll keep you updated on our progress.
Hopefully it can be a learning experience for all.
-
True.
First make backup and then proceed with #2 or #3. Also you can improve little bit #3 with few "extra" tips and just to see movements in SERP. Because you know - there is vacantions ahead and probably beginning of 2016 you can see move.
Of course implement good and old tricks - social signals, little bit fresh links from authoritative and trusted sources. Also you can put there videos - one video can put your average visit duration up and do engagement. Example is Moz - their regular articles are text-text-text-image-text-text-image and so on. But their WBF articles are text-video (length approx. 10 mins)-text-text-text.
#2 is same way as Brian Dean (Backlinko) - Skyscraper Technique.
Also Rand Fishkin talk about that as 10x http://www.slideshare.net/randfish/onsite-seo-in-2015-an-elegant-weapon-for-a-more-civilized-marketer/102-10X_Content_is_the_Future -
Thanks for your feedback. I would assume if did a whole new page/post for the same keyword we would be competing with ourselves and do more harm than good.
We are going to move forward with number 2 and see how it goes.
-
First you need to read this one:
https://mza.seotoolninja.com/ugc/how-to-keep-keyword-cannibalism-from-robbing-your-sites-performance
and more articles about "keyword cannibalism" or "content cannibalism" or something.
Because for you it's much more important to not harm current position as primary goal and secondary goal is to get some improvements.So it's safe to try N:3 on same or other page just for test. But N:2 is probably correct way. You just to watch for implementing same on-page SEO optimization for new layout if there is new one.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
To avoid the duplicate content issue I have created new urls for that specific site I am posting to and redirecting that url to the original on my site. Is this the right way to do it?
I am trying to avoid the duplicate content issue by creating new urls and redirecting them to the original url. Is this the proper way of going about it?
On-Page Optimization | | yagobi210 -
Which is better? One dynamically optimised page, or lots of optimised pages?
For the purpose of simplicity, we have 5 main categories in the site - let's call them A, B, C, D, E. Each of these categories have sub-category pages e.g. A1, A2, A3. The main area of the site consists of these category and sub-category pages. But as each product comes in different woods, it's useful for customers to see all the product that come in a particular wood, e.g. walnut. So many years ago we created 'woods' pages. These pages replicate the categories & sub-categories but only show what is available in that particular wood. And of course - they're optimised much better for that wood. All well and good, until recently, these specialist page seem to have dropped through the floor in Google. Could be temporary, I don't know, and it's only a fortnight - but I'm worried. Now, because the site is dynamic, we could do things differently. We could still have landing pages for each wood, but of spinning off to their own optimised specific wood sub-category page, they could instead link to the primary sub-category page with a ?search filter in the URL. This way, the customer is still getting to see what they want. Which is better? One page per sub-category? Dynamically filtered by search. Or lots of specific sub-category pages? I guess at the heart of this question is? Does having lots of specific sub-category pages lead to a large overlap of duplicate content, and is it better keeping that authority juice on a single page? Even if the URL changes (with a query in the URL) to enable whatever filtering we need to do.
On-Page Optimization | | pulcinella2uk0 -
Regarding Ranking.
Hi, Could anyone please advise me on how long would he take to get my website ranked in the top 3 results on first page on google. It's an university's website and close to no university's in Malaysia are doing SEO
On-Page Optimization | | navinan0 -
Particular page fails to rank well
Hi all We are building, managing and marketing a Danish tourism site for VisitSweden. The site targets a Danish market-group with information and travel tips on going to Sweden. We have one page in particular that has always failed to rank well for some reason. http://www.meresverige.dk/rejser/malmo This page targets the keyword "Malmø". Another page, with similar layout and content seems to rank alot better. http://www.meresverige.dk/rejser/goeteborg Keyword "Gøteborg" Any ideas? Smart tips? Have the best of days Fredrik
On-Page Optimization | | Resultify0 -
Google is indexing spam pages from my site. What is the most effective way to get ride of the search results? Pages are deleted now but should I do something more?
A long time ago I created a forum (Invision Power Board) and it got full of spam. Massive amounts! /forum/ I've now deleted the forum but the spam pages are still indexed on Google. Can I do something else to hurry up the process to get ride of them?
On-Page Optimization | | ocarlsson0 -
Page Cache And Index
If you are browsing a site, what is the best way or programs to use to see if the page has been indexed and cached? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | gregster10000 -
On page links?
Hi all, Ive be going through the pages in my site getting rid of errors so i can the work of a clean slate and get the best for my site. However, i have a large amount of pages which is flagged up by seo moz pro tool as too many on page links. How bad is this in terms of seo rankings? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | wazza19850