Duplicate Content/Missing Meta Description | Pages DO NOT EXISIT!
-
Hello all,
For the last few months, Moz has been showing us that our site has roughly 2,000 duplicate content errors. Pages that were actually duplicate content, I took care of accordingly using best practice (301 redirects, canonicalization,etc.). Still remaining after these fixes were errors showing for pages that we have never created.
Our homepage is www.primepay.com. An example of pages that are being shown as duplicate content is http://primepay.com/blog/%5BLink%20to%20-%20http:/www.primepay.com/en/payrollservices/payroll/payroll/payroll/online-payroll with a referring page of http://primepay.com/blog/%5BLink%20to%20-%20http:/www.primepay.com/en/payrollservices/payroll/payroll/online-payroll. Some of these are even now showing up as 403 and 404 errors.
The only real page on our site within that URL strand is primepay.com/payroll or primepay.com/payroll/online-payroll. Therefore, I am not sure where Moz is getting these pages from.
Another issue we are having in relation to duplicate content is that moz is showing old campaign url’s tacked on to our blog page i.e. http://primepay.com/blog?title=&page=2&utm_source=blog&utm_medium=blogCTA&utm_campaign=IRSblogpost&qt-blog_tabs=1.
As of this morning, our duplicate content went from 2,000 to 18,000. I exported all of our crawl diagnostics data and looked to see what the referring pages were, and even they are not pages that we have created. When you click on these links, they take you to a random point in time from the homepage of our blog; some dating back to 2010.
I checked our crawl stats in both Google and Bing’s Webmaster tool, and there are no duplicate content or 400 level errors being reporting from their crawl. My team is truly at a loss with trying to resolve this issue and any help with this matter would be greatly appreciated.
-
Thanks Dirk. Very insightful tip about not using campaign tracking to check internal links. There was an old blog post that had anchor text with campaign tracking that was causing many SEO issues. As for the latter part, it is unknown why a string of gibberish can be placed after /blog/ and also for our locations page. Our team's web developer is looking further into this issue. If anyone has any more advice on the matter it would be greatly appreciated.
-
Hey there
Dirk pretty much hit upon the issue, which I'll reiterate with a visual. If you enter any gibberish /blog URL (like this: http://primepay.com/blog/jglkjglkjg) in the browser it returns a 200 OK which, but it should return a 404 code --> http://screencast.com/t/cStpPB5zE
Otherwise pages that are really broken will look to crawlers like they are supposed to exist.
-
You shouldn't use campaign tracking to check internal links - you have to use event tracking. Check http://cutroni.com/blog/2010/03/30/tracking-internal-campaigns-with-google-analytics/ . Apart from the reporting issue - it's also generating a huge number of url's that need to be crawled by Google bot and is just wasting it's time (most of these tagged url have a correct canonical version). You mention these tags are old - but they are still present on a lost of pages.
For cases like this it's better to check with a local tool like Screaming Frog which gives you a much better view which pages are generating these links.The other issue you have is probably related to a few pages that have a bad formatted (relative) url in a link - the way your site is configured it's just rendering a page on your site - so the bots are then crawling your site over and over again, each time encountering the same bad relative link - and each time adding the bad formatting to the url. It's an endless loop - best way to avoid this is to use absolute internal links rather than relative links. Not sure if it's the only one - but one of the pages with this error is :http://primepay.com/blog/7-ways-find-right-payroll-service-your-company - it contains a link to
[Your payroll service is no different.]([Link to - http://www.primepay.com/en/payrollservices/] "Your payroll service is no different.")
This page should generate a 404 but is generating a 200 and the loop starts here.
Again - with screaming frog you can for each of these bad url's you can generate a crawl path report which shows you exactly on which page the error is generated.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
-
Example:
http://primepay.com/blog/hgehergreg
Status:
My site as an example:
https://caseo.ca/blog/hgehergreg
If I put in random gibberish in this URL, it should be displaying a 404 page and not the blog page.
-
Getting you some help for direct advice on your problem, but wanted to leave a comment about the tool itself. When you are looking at the Moz crawl tool, it only updates once a week, so if there hasn't been that long between the last crawl and when you did the work, it won't be updated. Here's more info.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content flagged by Moz that's not actually duplicate content at all
Hi, Moz has flagged a whole lot of pages as dupe content, but I cannot see how they qualify as such.
Moz Pro | | Caro-O
Not sure if I'm allowed to post actual URLs here....happy to if I can, but I feel certain that the pages are not 90% similar. Has anyone else had this experience? ~Caro1 -
I have double-checked the rel canonical is properly employed on our page but the On Page Grader says it's not working?
I have double-checked the rel canonical is properly employed on our page but the On Page Grader says it's not working Here is the URL - http://www.solidconcepts.com/industries/aerospace-parts-manufacturing/ What is wrong with how we are doing things?
Moz Pro | | StratasysDirectManufacturing0 -
Problem with Rankings and On-page Optimization
Hi SEOZ 🙂 I have a question regarding the Rankings and On-page Optimization in the seomoz Campaign Manager. I have setup a website url for examle: www.keyword.com After that created a list of all the target Keywords, that I want to reach within my Website: keyword-a, keyword-b, keyword-c and so on... Then I did a On-Page Analysis for all the urls with the specific keywords. keyword-a: www.keyword.com/keyword-a/ keyword-b: www.keyword.com/keyword-b/ keyword-c: www.keyword.com/keyword-c/ and so on... Most of the urls got the A grade. Now after the Website hast launched and got crawled, I have a problem with the Rankings and the On-page Optimization. The Rankings for my Keywords and also the Grades at the On-page Optimization are only shown for my Start/Homepage: www.keyword.com NOT for the urls that are specific for a Keyword for example: www.keyword.com/keyword-a/ Also the Grades are shown for the Keywords but again only in combination with my Start/Homepage www.keyword.com NOT for www.keyword.com/keyword-a/ What is the problem? Bye, Alex
Moz Pro | | krseo0 -
SEOmoz crawler and duplicate content
Does anybody know if the SEOmoz crawler picks up canonical tags when its looking for duplicate content? I've got a ton of errors in one of my projects even though they all have canonical tags. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | neooptic0 -
Sorting On-page Optimization Reports
I know there are several pre-set ways to sort the on-page optimization reports, but how can I custom sort them into my own order?
Moz Pro | | WillWatrous0 -
Does the SEOMoz weekly crawl that highlights no meta description tag, take into account if there is a meta robots noindex,follow tag on the pages it indicates the missing meta descriptions?
The weekly crawl website report is telling me that there are pages that have missing meta description tags, yet I've implemented meta robots tags to 'noindex, follow' those pages which are visible in those page source files. As far as Google Is concerned, surely this then won't be a problem since it is being instructed NOT to consider these specific pages for indexing. I am assuming that the weekly SEOmoz website crawl is simply throwing the missing meta description crawl findings into its report without itself observing that the particluar URL references contain the meta robots 'noindex,follow' tag ???? Appreciate if you can clairfy if this is the case. It would help me understand that (at least in terms of my efforts towards Google) your own crawl doesn't observe the meta robots tag instruction, hence the resultant report's flagging the discrepancy.
Moz Pro | | callassist0 -
Multiple Page Title Elements?
Greetings, I am baffled by the recommendation I repeatedly receive from seomoz's on-page optimization tool. The web page I am working on only shows one title between <title>and</title> in it's head. However, seomoz is also reading "Pass to multiple" from somewhere. It recommends that I "Avoid Multiple Page Title Elements" and I would like to but cannot find them. Any suggestions? By the way, I inherited this site and am just trying to deconstruct someone else's work. As a novice, I realize there might be some obvious explanation that I am just missing. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | shedontdiet0 -
Page Rank and offline sites
I have a domain with PR6 according to the Historical Pagerank Checker. But that last PR was calculated 2 years ago. I brought the site back online a few days ago and have checked that many/most of the backlinks are still valid. It is now in the Google index but the Historical Pagerank Checker shows PR0. Will it get back its previous rank or something close to it? How long will it take?
Moz Pro | | DomainOptions0