In 2016, should all businesses have a Facebook page?
-
Even a couple of years ago, I would have told people that they don't _need _a Facebook page for their business if they don't plan on posting regularly and don't expect many Likes.
In 2016, has this changed? Is it weird now for a business not to have a Facebook page, even if it's not particularly active? Is it just widely expected now for every business to have a Facebook page? Even if it's just used for brand awareness/visibility or as a popular directory listing simply to occupy more results on the first page for a branded search?
-
I think few people are in the circumstance of EGOL, so it would be best not to follow his lead.
The internet changes so rapidly that you need to be predictive. What is the next big thing? What will Facebook do? In my crystal ball, I think that Facebook will take on Google and Yelp. They are already trying, but I think they'll get better at it.
So, if Facebook becomes Google, most businesses will want to be there, with a Facebook Page that has a good number of likes and a couple updates a month at least. No need to go overboard, but make sure the page doesn't look abandoned.
Plus, Facebook and the other social sites rank really well on Google. Does a business want to give up that real estate? When someone looks up my company by name in Google they see
- Company website
- Company Yelp page - with 5 Star Rating
- Company LinkedIn Page
- Person LinkedIn Page
- Company Facebook Page - with 5 Star Rating
- Company Angie's List Page
- Some stinky competitor trying to rank for my biz name
- Personal Experts Page
- Company Groupon Page
- Thumbtack Consolidator
Without social, people would see several of my competitors who try to optimize for my name "Get on the Map" and some dull profiles from websites like Manta.
-
I think the interesting thing about Facebook is that it's become more than just a social media platform to post. I've been hearing from more people that sometimes when they're on Facebook, and they're looking for a particular business or service, they'll search directly within Facebook itself rather than on Google. Since they are, at that moment, already signed in and actively on Facebook. Simply having an informational Facebook page could be the difference between a potential customer clicking on your name or someone else's from the dropdown or the search results.
I've also been seeing in the past month or so with every client I manage, their Facebook is now showing in their knowledge graph where it wasn't before, and showing their reviews/rating for their Facebook, Yelp, Yell, etc. Google seems to be getting more adept at finding business' social profiles and displaying their individual ratings right there in the SERPs. (Which makes me wonder if they have started using these external ratings as a ranking factor for local, organic or maybe even both. Even Moz Local takes into account your Facebook page.) I sometimes struggle to get clients to obtain or even understand how Google reviews work. Facebook, on the other hand, they find it easier to acquire Facebook reviews, without having to ask or explain to their customers. They already get it.
So beyond looking at Facebook as just a social media platform, are they just as necessary as any other large local directory listing like Yell and Yelp? Even if there is no real social content, does its existence alone still provide value to the user?
-
This sounds like to me that it would depend largely on the website/business. Great if you have interesting content, even if it may look a little automated but potentially followers might appreciate being able to keep up to date with the website in this way, but if you're a b2b ecommerce website with no blog in a "boring" industry... would it be better to have a Facebook page to have a place on Facebook but no activity and no followers, rather than a seemingly active Facebook page with no followers?
-
and have to disagree with the notion that a company doesn't need to be on social
You are making that statement as a person who sells the service. I make mine as a person who would have to pay for the service.
Are you willing to guarantee that your work can produce a positive return for EVERY website out there - even ones that you know nothing about?
-
At the very least, a business owner should install a widget on the backend of their site to enable blog posts and new content to be auto-published to Facebook. It provides no additional effort, but then keeps up social presence. Another easy thing to do is repost good testimonials.
That way, you're frequently updating Facebook, but barely doing any work!
-
We've read through all the responses, and have to disagree with the notion that a company doesn't need to be on social. Even if you aren't "good" at social or aren't interested in it, you need to be doing it. Why? If you don't believe any of the trends and expert opinions, you should be doing it for no other reason than Google said so.
One thing that's different in 2016: search engine results are becoming real-time, which means it will rely more on social media for immediate, relevant information. No, social media profiles are not used in the Google Search Algorithm, and as Matt Cutts said in January 2014, “we don’t currently have any signals like that in our web search ranking algorithm.”
However, this is a correlation between sites that have social media profiles and site that are successful: Matt Cutts also said, “Sites that get lots of shares are so good, they likely also earn signals that do affect rankings, such as links.” Said in another way, if you’re investing in quality campaigns on social media and doing well engaging with your audience, you’re also probably doing things that are link worthy.
We all know that in Matt Cutt's head, everything works according to the intention of their rankings. However, if you've ever engaged in SEO, you know that isn't the case. That's why its up to you to get those shares and get that engagement, and the only way to do it is by actively participating. Sure, your website might be fine without social. But think about any company that comes to mind when it comes to being "successful" on the web. With the exception of a few outliers, **they ALL have social media profiles. **
Ignoring social media is like saying you aren't going to a party where 1,000 potential customers will be because you're not good at being social. LEARN TO BE. Yes, I get that the results from social media aren't immediately seen, and are hard to measure, but they're there.
-
I receive thousands of visits each month from facebook, reddit, pinterest, stumbleupon and other sites that could be considered to be social media. Those visits are mostly not high quality, they enter the site and leave quickly. These are generated with zero effort from me and combined they are a small percentage of total site traffic.
If I started participating in social media and traffic from social would shoot up by 10x or 50x, I don't think that they would increase my revenue very much because they are low quality visits. To do that would require effort on our part that would pull us away from the work of producing content that pulls high quality traffic. If we then stopped fanning a fire on social media the traffic from that channel would immediately stop. However, if we stop making content the traffic from that continues to arrive because it is indexed in search and has demand there.
From that I believe that earning traffic from social is a cost that stops producing when you stop working, but traffic earned from producing content continues as long as that content is viable. Also, efforts put into article content produce external links on other websites that deliver traffic and help search engine rankings. Time spent on social does not have that return.
The above is what works for me. I can produce content that does really well in search and has lasting and often growing value. Some people can't do that. At the same time, I know that I would not do well on social and that my time spent there would be a cost rather than an investment.
Most important, is I believe that a person does their best work when they are doing things that are highly motivating and enjoyable. I like producing content but would not enjoy working to produce a following on social. I would be like a racehorse pulling a plow on social media Other people have different talents and social might work well for them.
-
I don't know your website, so I don't know your content or audience or anything. But do you not wonder if there's more traffic to be had from social media, which in turn would increase your ad revenue? Or would it not be significant enough ROI?
What's your social traffic like currently? Like, if it's already high proving you have shareable content, would it not be beneficial to boost that traffic through your own channels?
I personally have no passion for social media at all beyond maintaining my personal Twitter, so I'm not trying to sell you on the idea of starting, but I can definitely see the value in it for some businesses. Just not sure if it's expected these days for every business to have a Facebook page even if it's little more than a directory listing rather than a real social platform.
-
This isn't an answer or advice. It is simply my way of thinking.
I don't use social. We have a website with a lot of traffic and only three people to work on it. That website is mainly monetized by ads.
So, should we work on that website and produce content for those thousands of people per day or should we engage people one-on-one on social media? I think that I should be working for those thousands of people per day, sometimes thousands per hour who visit our website. Take care of them there, be the best you can be, don't take your eye off of the ball if you are good at your game.
If I write an article and post it on my site it will be engaged by dozens or hundreds or thousands of people every day, every day, every day for years. Even after I am dead it will make money for my kids. If I spend time on social media those posts or comments or whatever disappear or become stale a short time later. I like spending my time on an investment, not frittering it away.
We can't monetize content that we put on social media, but we can monetize content on our website. So, why should I build content on social. Why should I even go there? The only answer that I can find is if I enjoy social media (which I don't). I do post on Moz because I enjoy the people and learn from them and that is why I post here - because there is something in it for me. I am not looking for that on social. I have enough ways to spend my time.
Service providers are always calling me because they want to help me with social. I think that they are social evangelists who are trying to make money by telling you what you should be doing when they don't know anything about your business or your personality or your resources. They are only trying to hustle your money. I don't think that most of them are making a positive return for their clients. That's just my guess and opinion.
I don't want to participate in social and that is my attitude because I would rather produce content - which makes me good money and so far has been successful. With that bad attitude about social I think that I would really suck at it and I am right to tell these evangelists "don't bother me". Instead, I should do what I like, be happy while I do it, and don't blow money on social because I don't think that money will get a positive return.
-
Hi Donald,
Thanks for your response. With the vast majority of businesses I have worked with, I would absolutely recommend Facebook. But if the business can't dedicate much time to maintaining a Facebook page, should one be created anyway as a "placeholder"? Is it not embarrassing to link an infrequently updated Facebook to the website?
Ideally, of course, the Facebook would be updated frequently with the intention of building a following.
-
Hi Ria,
I would have said even a couple years ago, it is absolutely necessary to have some sort of social media presence. Does it have to be Facebook? No, it should be where your audience resides, however; with a third of the country (if not more) using Facebook everyday, every businesses audience is on Facebook. All my clients are required to have a Facebook page. It is just easier to send traffic back to their websites, it is a way to monetize an audience and lastly create brand loyalty.
In my opinion it is weird to not have a Facebook page, it is my experience that if a page does not exists the business is loosing potential customers, and necessary to create brand awareness.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Instagram for small manufacturing business?
Hi all, We're a small business based in the UK that manufactures a range of PVC strip curtains and rubber site safety products. We have a presence on twitter, facebook, LinkedIn & google+... I've been considering Instagram for a little while now as I know we would have plenty to post (strip curtains are seen in multiple industries, it'd be great to post unusual applications that we've supplied to...) but I'm wondering what experience anyone has had with Instagram in an industrial manufacturing business... Is the audience there or would it be a waste of time for us? I've briefly looked through # but I'd like to know first-hand experiences!
Branding | | RayflexGroup1 -
Effects of a long-term holding page/503 http code whilst site is being rebranded?
We have a client who is adamant that during the rebranding of their company and website, a holding page is put in place from August 5<sup>th</sup> till go-live date on August 21<sup>st</sup>. They don’t look like budging on the matter, therefore we are looking to set up a 503 HTTP code on the holding page to tell Google the site is down for maintenance and redirect all pages back to the holding page. The general consensus is that implementing this for such a long period of time will see Google de-index all pages and the site will lose masses of traffic as a result for a substantial time afterwards. It would be great to get some insight on best practice for this situation, how Google will determine the situation and the consequences of such actions. If you have any case studies of similar situations or have firm knowledge of how this scenario would affect the site, I would be delighted to hear from you!
Branding | | AndrewAkesson0 -
Merged +Local Page - About Section Formatting?
Hi All, I'm having an issue: I recently merged my Google+ business page and +Local page, and I'm happy it's verified for local search purposes. However, I am having a supremely difficult time getting the formatting and anchor text links I inserted in the "Edit Business Section to apply; It's just one large chunk of unformatted text. Of note is the fact that the text content did actually change when approved. I made a post on Mike Blumenthal's blog about this, and he said that he generally does not recommend merging at all. Any ideas how to get my formatting and text links approved by the Google+ team? Any thoughts on the pros and cons of merging Local+ in general?
Branding | | G2W0 -
Social Media Icons for trust - have link land them on a social media page or have them stay on the page with like, tweet, +,etc?
An interesting question arises out of a conversation with one of my team. We were talking about FB pages in particular regarding a client and I am for icons that allow for trust without leaving the client's site page (I am from a direct marketing background originally and am against sending them somewhere else). She was pointing out that we had a client who has a FB page and we were not sending them to that page. I explained how I do not like to gain a bit of trust by sending them off site because it is the opportunity to lose a conversion by them becoming distracted. I also thought of a client who has over 100,000 likes, shares, etc. and who still is in the direct sales business at the end of the day; were they better off with a prospective client/customer to send them to their FB page/Twitter page, etc. or should they stay on the commercial site? I still believe that in the bricks and mortar world, I would not have a customer who came in to buy/look at a TV first go down the street to a social club for people who liked my company and then hope they come back and buy. Also, is there an opportunity to close a sale that would not have been closed by virtue of sending them away or to increase the size of the sale (remember, this must be such a sale increase or probability of sale increase as to outweigh the risk of loss of a client who would have bought)? I look forward to your assistance.
Branding | | RobertFisher0 -
Do you have to have a Google+ profile page for a person before you can build a Google+ brand page?
There was some debate at MozCon 2012 about this issue. I have my personal Google+ page which I didn't want attached to the brand of one of the sites I manage. I saw no other way to create a new Google+ page for this brand except to create a new profile under a different gmail account. The problem is, I had to put in my personal name to create the profile (you can't put in a business name, Google won't accept it), so now I have two "Dana Tan" author pages in Google+, the second one is where I built the page for this separate business "Celebrate Communion." Unfortunately, this has muddied the waters because people are following me in both places (it's fragmented my circles). I would like to add customers who are already on Google+ to my business pages circles, but the business page won't do it. Is it possible to build a Google+ business page without all of this brand confusion? If so, can you send me directions? I have found nothing online that says you don't need a profile to do a brand page. Also, once the page is built, what is the best way for me to reach out to customers with google accounts? I don't see a good way to do that on businesses pages either. On my profile page I can load all the emails into my contacts list, but then those contacts can only be added to my profile page and not the brand page. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Dana
Branding | | danatanseo0 -
Missing Title Pages
So, one of the campaigns I am running has 90 pages with missing titles. Normally I would consider this a very bad thing, BUT, the pages are product description pages. The referring pages are product listings, and the pages without titles, are small pop-ups. For example on a bigger stage: Nike has a product page, when you click on a shoe, a small window pops up with price, description, etc. How important/ vital/ relevant is it to have titles for these pop-ups, if it is even possible. Thank you in advance!
Branding | | Hartz0 -
Travel agents are creating Google Place pages for our properties - is this a bad thing?
I'm currently trying to develop a clear understanding and policy for my company on how we deal with Google place pages, specifically where we stand on places pages being created by our agents. We run a business in the travel industry with a number of locations around the world. Our services are sold via travel agents. Naturally, we set up places pages for each of our locations but recently we've noticed agents setting up places pages for these locations with different titles & their own contact details (same address though). In one case we've received verification postcards which we've been asked to pass on. The pages are set up in 'good faith' to promote business in the agents respective countries and languages but i'm concerned that we are ending up with multiple pages for the same location, hurting our brand, losing our own pages through being buried and ending up with our account being suspended at some point down the line. There are a number of terms on Google guideline page, in particular, this one: "Do not create more than one listing for each business location, either in a single account or multiple accounts." I contacted my Adwords account manager but didn't get a very clear response on this. What i'm looking for is some 3rd party, definitive advice/opinions on this scenario. Should we be asking agents not to create place pages? Why should they list.. could it end up hurting both of us? Are there pros and cons to this or is it a clear cut case?
Branding | | seoec0