SEO issues with masking blog domain?
-
We have a client who would like to move their Wordpress blog into a different server from their main site's server for security reasons. However, the blog is almost 10 years old with good traffic and rankings and we'd rather not have them change the domain.
The developer has come back with a URL "masking" rule in .htaccess that will display the contents of the blog placed in the new server under a subdomain but still show the blog's original URL.
If we block the new subdomain from indexing to avoid duplicate content - are there any SEO implications for doing this? Will Google see it as a deceptive practice and tank the blog's rankings?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
-
You are welcome
-
Thanks for all of your help!
-
Yes, you can also you can add no index tags.
-
Thank you Roman. Yes, we definitely don't want the new subdomain to be crawled/indexed. In addition to using the canonical link as you mentioned, couldn't we block it with robots.txt?
-
Domain Masking: Don't do it
A very common scenario I see all the time working on small business, local SEO projects, is a situation where a client owns multiple domains, and they've "masked" those domains to their primary domain. I see this all the time, enough so that I thought it warrants a quick tip.
Domain masking is where you have one domain, let's call it domain1.com, and that domain is actually serving content from another domain, let's call that domain2.com (my domain naming creativity astounds you!).
So, with domain masking, if I type "http://domain1.com" into my browser's address bar, I get a page that appears to be identical to the page I get if I type "http://domain2.com" into my browser's address bar. Okay, so this is much more difficult to explain than I thought. Maybe it'll help if I explain what a redirect is, and how that's different from domain masking.
Let's say you set up a redirect from domain1.com to domain2.com. If you type "http://domain1.com" into your browser's address bar, you'll end up with the actual website located at domain2.com, but, and this is the really important part, the URL in your browser's address bar will actually change. In other words, when you type in domain1.com, the server responds and says, "hey dude, domain1.com has moved, it's new location is domain2.com." Your browser then says, "ok," and asks for domain2.com instead. You can see this in action if you type "http://www.wordpresshacker.com" into your browser's address bar. Watch what you just typed and you'll see it change to rlmseo.com and you'll end up on our homepage. That's because wordpresshacker.com is a domain we own and it's redirected to rlmseo.com.
This is different from domain masking in that with domain masking, if you type domain1.com, your browser won't ever get a message that says domain1.com has moved to (or is actually located at) domain2.com. Rather, the server says, "ok, I've got that page, here it is," and it gives you the content from domain2.com.
Why is domain masking bad?
If you've ever heard the word duplicate content, then you know why this might be bad. What happens when Google visits domain1.com and then visits domain2.com?With a redirect, Google sends a request for domain1.com and the server tells Google that content has moved to domain2.com. The result is Google only finds the content on domain2.
With domain masking, Google sends a request for domain1.com and the server responds with the content from domain2.com, without telling Google the content has moved. Then, sometime down the line, Google might send a request for domain2.com and the server responds with the same content. The result is the exact same content is served from two completely separate URLs…in other words it's a major duplicate content problem.
Now, even though there's no such thing as a duplicate content penalty per se, there's the potential there for the search engines to get confused about which domain is the primary, and you could end up with all kinds of issues down the line.
So, avoid domain masking and instead, opt for a 301 redirect.
Here are a few options that might work for you:
- You could keep the two separate domains and build each of them up with unique content, and be transparent about the interlinks between them.
- You could combine your materials into a single website. This is the approach we took with this site.
- You could set up the two separate (and unique) websites and then wait for a period of time for links to really-exciting-paper.com to build up. Then you could set up a 301 redirect to pass some of the accumulated link equity to the other domain.
- You could follow the pointer/masking approach that you describe, and ensure that one domain is not being crawled and indexed. The ideal approach here is with a canonical tag and will convey to Google these are duplicate sites, example:
Place a canonical reference on both domains pointing to your preferred domain:
http://www.really-exciting-paper.com
What you decide is to do is based on the goals you want to achieve. I want to point out that contrary to some convention SEO wisdom, there is no real “penalty” from Google for having duplicate content or domain masking. The negative outcome of domain masking is mainly the potential for confusing Google, and diluting your domain power which will negatively impact your SEO presence. We hope one of these ideas we’ve provided will suit your needs and preferences!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Domain authority
Hi I Want to know why my website domain authority drop last month it is in 20 now it is in 18 i want to know what are the reasons.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | joaozzi0 -
Backlinks from old domain
Hi, We have gone through a change of company brand name including a new domain name.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Agguk
We followed google recommendations at: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/83106?hl=en and it seems to have worked really well, the new domain has replaced the old in the google search results. My question: Still most of our backlinks, both anchor text and links use the old brand name and domain and it´s a slow process trying to update all references. Although they get redirected fine to the new domain (also following google recommendations), I wonder if the current scenario is doing any harm, SEO wise (other than the missed visual exposure of the new brand name) ? ...since the old brand name is not present at the new site I´m thinking of including "New brand name - previously old brand name" somewhere just to provide some sort of connection to all old backlinks, would that be unnecessary? I should mention that the old brand name actually includes our most important keyword but the new brand name does not. Thanks!0 -
Do industry specific domains help SEO?
Hi everyone, I've looked for an answer to this but I can't find one. Hopefully someone can help! I have a new client that is a builder. They currently have a .co.uk domain (e.g. businessname.co.uk) Would it help them if the website was businessname_.builders_ instead? Thanks, Alex
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WebsiteAbility0 -
Sub-domain or not???
Hi, We're setting up a forum for our users (our target audience responds extremely well to forums). I was wondering if it should be set up on a sub-domain or not. I'm leaning towards sub-domain, but our devs say this will impact how they approach it so I'd like to give them an answer asap so we can proceed with planning it! Thanks, Amelia
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CommT0 -
Joomla SEO
With so many articles on the web talking about how difficult Joomla is to work with in regards to SEO, I'm curious as to what techniques / changes you guys make when using Joomla with your SEO / inbound practices? Any extensions that you love? An extensions that you hate?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DougHoltOnline0 -
Blog home page and SEO
Why do most blog owners not put content that is unique to the home page above the fold before posts begin?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
Retailers Issue
Hi there, We have 20 retailers who are about to launch websites and are going to be selling our products on their websites, however with they have no content for these products they are wanting to take our content we have for our product pages on place the content on their websites, is this going to cause an issue for me? We are ranking well for competitive keywords in this niche and do not want to do anything to harm it. What I would say is the retailers in question of no intention short term anyway of doing anything with SEO. Thanks for any help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul780 -
Help diagnosing a complex SEO issue
Good evening SEOMoz. A series events, in close succession are making it somewhat difficult for me to diagnose a cause of fluctuations in traffic. Please excuse some of the stupid moves I made, but desperation got the better of me. One of my most beloved websites was hit by Panda on January 18th. Pretty sure it was due to a CMS bug that is now fixed. The website site started to show great signs of recovery from April 19th - Panda 3.5. I'm going to be as explicit as possible with the traffic for the days that follow. Traffic was stable previously. April 20th +10%. April 21st +5%. April 22nd +5%. (half way recovered, also the first real fluctuation since the site was hit in Jan). Due to the looming over-optimisation penalty, on the 22nd I changed the titles to unoptimise them a little. (fear is a dangerous thing at times). April 23rd -10%. April 24th -10% April 25th onwards, pretty much levelled out. The websites I've seen hit by Penguin, lost around 40% of their traffic, very steeply on 24th and 25th April. So the drops aren't in keeping with my experience of Penguin. But they do coincide perfectly with the massive site-wide title change. I've haven't read anything definitive about a penalty for changing titles too often, but for obvious reasons, it makes sense. The drop seems terribly soon after changing titles, but the site is very heavily indexed. It's also worth mentioning that I did changed the titles BACK, incase it was purely the fact the titles had been slightly de-optimised, that caused the drop. I waited until May 5th. This had no positive nor negative effect. It's a lot to take in but I'd love to hear your thoughts. I'm feeling a little bamboozled looking at all the figures. There was of course the above the fold update on the 19th Jan, but lets ignore that as we've only ever had a max 1 ad per page, most pages have none.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seo-wanna-bs0