Local SEO penalty?
-
Hi Moz Community
We are in a unique position. We just launched a new site for a client. The site was doing fine before but it wasn't very user friendly. We created a site with almost identical architecture and content as the last one, just new design and layout.
Within 5 days, the site dropped off of LOCAL search almost completely, it now ranks on the 9th page in Austin Texas. (reliantplumbingdotcom). Every other location (Dallas, LA, Philadelphia, Houston) all show the site on the first page for relevant keywords (Austin Plumbers, Austin Plumber)
I have no idea what to think about this and don't know if we're being penalized somehow (checked GSC and no manual penalty) I have never experienced a site being blacklisted locally but well ranked everywhere else. Thoughts?
-
very interesting thread. Is there an update?
Reviewed same and though the links stand out. Am inclined to believe as google amps up the power of GMB. It is more address proximity on map that is skewing the outcome. Lakeway is simply a little too far out of Austin.
-
Hi Team,
We super appreciate everyone's insights. I agree that at this point it makes the most sense to get individual help. The collective power of the thoughts of your expert team have been super helpful. We will take steps to do some fixes while also continually looking into alternative theories/solutions.
Thank you all for your help and thoughts towards the matter. When we initially posted we didn't know how much people would care to evaluate the issue so this is a nice surprise in terms of the response value/time that was put into this question.
Super appreciative - Josh
-
Marie - how awesome of you to stop by! I am a fan
Did you notice that GrueBleen mentioned in their original post that there are no penalties showing in GSC? Clearly, the links are bad, but like you, I can't explain the SERP behavior for Austin-only users.
GrueBleen, you're getting weigh-ins here from some amazing experts, and as no one has been able to pinpoint the exact cause of the weird SERP behavior, I think you're at the point where hiring a consultant for a full audit is likely necessary. Many ranking problems are easy to solve, but what you've presented here is unusual. In the scope of a forum, we can't fully audit every aspect of a business (history, technical issues, usability, local, etc.). You need someone to do this to see if they can connect the dots between the Austin-only behavior and something the business is doing/failing to do.
-
Most likely, yes.
However, if the content on the pages that were redirected is the same as it was in the past, Google can sometimes apply a hidden canonical. In other words, lets say that the old domain used to be their main site and they built unnatural links to a page called /services. Now let's say that there is a page on the new site called /service_offerings. The content is the same as the old and the old is redirected to the new.
In that case, Google can often recognize that those old links, even if the redirect is removed, should be counting towards the new page.
I'd still want to disavow to make it even more likely that Google stops counting the quality of those links towards this site.
If you do remove the redirects though, it can take a few months to start seeing the benefits, so it will be a hard thing to test. I'd remove the redirects AND disavow. And in a case like this I'd recommend regularly doing link audits to find new unnatural links that the link aggregator tools have missed.
-
Marie,
Since the links are pointed at a different domain that 301s to their site, would removing the 301 (killing the domain) be sufficient or do they still need to file a disavow?
-
Hi. Joy asked me to take a look at this as it's an unusual ranking situation.
While I agree that it is unusual for an organic filter to suppress rankings in just one location, I think that the egregious backlink profile of this site cannot be ignored.
If this is related to backlinks (which I think is quite likely), it's likely not a location issue, but rather, the anchor text of the unnatural links is holding the site back. And...the majority of the anchors use some form of the words "plumbing" and "austin".
I know what you're thinking...Penguin is supposed to just ignore unnatural links, not penalize for them. However, there are two things that I think we should consider here.
First, John Mueller recently said that unnatural links can impair a site's ability to rank somewhat. There are algorithms outside of Penguin that look at link quality. If they see that there are a large number of links that go against Google's guidelines, they can choose to put less trust in all of your links.
When asked whether unnatural links can hurt a site algorithmically, John said, "“That can definitely be the case. So it’s something where our algorithms when we look at it and they see, oh, there are a bunch of really bad links here. Then maybe they’ll be a bit more cautious with regards to the links in general for the website. So if you clean that up, then the algorithms look at it and say, oh, there’s– there’s kind of– it’s OK. It’s not bad.”
But wait...if this is the case, then why would only the Austin rankings be affected?
This is a long read, but a good one. Bill Slawski wrote about a Google patent that looks at link quality. That patent talks about how pages can be devalued for a particular query if there are a large number of links that are never clicked upon. I know it sounds crazy...it's worth taking the time to read it. Also, it's a patent so we don't know whether Google is using it, but if they are, it is built for cases like this.
The only thing that I can't fully explain is why this is only happening for searches from Austin. I think it's conceivably possible that if the patent mentioned above is being used in this case, that the system can detect that there was an attempt to manipulate rankings for Austin searches and therefore, it is suppressing the ability to rank there.
I haven't looked into the website at all...just the backlinks, but this is one of the more manipulative backlink profiles I've seen in a while. We had a similar case about a year ago where we audited the links and disavowed about 70% of a site's link profile. The links were quite similar to yours in the sense that they were low quality links anchored with a keyword plus the city name in which they wanted to rank. Within two months of filing the disavow, we started to see a nice uplift and it has continued to grow (see image).
The first thing I would do is check for the presence of a manual action. Do this in Search Console. You'll see Manual Actions in the left sidebar. If there's no manual action, I'd go straight to disavowing. Be extremely aggressive as the only cases where I have seen improvements after disavowing are ones where we dramatically cut out as much of the unnatural linking as possible. Even if there is something else going on such as a technical issue, these backlinks can't be ignored. While most sites do not need to disavow these days, this one, in my opinion does!
-
GrueBleen,
Just spoke with one of our top organic SEO folks here at Moz (Dr. Pete) and he agreed it would be strange that an organic penalty would only affect users in Austin. So, while I agree that the link anchor text of your links is something you need to be looking at because it's believed that Google devalues (more than penalizes) such links, the mystery continues!
Tom Waddington's idea is also definitely worth looking at. Good idea reaching out to him, Joy!
-
Tom Waddington (one of the smartest people I know) pointed out, most of the spammy backlinks are pointing to a domain (reliant-plumbing.com) that is redirecting to your site. Why don't you kill that domain (make it 404) and see if it fixes this?
-
Thank you both for your awesome thoughts, this has been such an interesting question that we ourselves are so stumped on. Please update as you find out more!
-
I had noticed this as well, Joy, but somehow, it doesn't satisfy me that this would somehow exclude the client organically ONLY for Austin searchers. If that were the root of the problem, would it not be affecting organic rankings across the board? To me, the link anchor text seemed like a possible explanation until I asked myself that question.
I'll see if I can get one of our organic SEOs to weigh in on whether Google could exclude something only in a specific area.
-
I believe I found the problem on why they rank nowhere organically (not in the top 100) and it's likely hurting their local ranking as well outside their immediate area. They have 97 referring domains with the anchor text "austin plumbers" and another 91 with "austin plumber". The sites appear to be a giant PBN. I'd suggest they do a very thorough link audit and file a disavow.
-
Joy, I searched from the zip using Bright Local and was not seeing the client come up at all. So glad you stopped by
-
Hey GrueBleenAgency,
What tool are you using to track rankings? Do you have the tool set to search from "austin" or from a specific zip code? The reason why I ask is that searching from a city has been known to return really innacurate results since Google almost always knows the zip code of the searcher (usually about 90% of the time) so they don't default to a city, they default to a zip code or sometimes a very precise location if the person is using mobile.
Have you actually seen a decline in traffic or impressions according to GMB Insights?
I do actually get you for "austin plumber" when I search from your location as first in the local pack. Organically you are way down but it's because Google is listing your emergency plumbing page which is a much weaker page vs your homepage. Looking at the title tags, both your homepage and your emergency page are optimized for extremely similar keywords so I'd try and differentiate this more. I'd optimize the homepage for generic plumbing terms (plumber, plumber near me) and make sure all references to emergency link to the emergency page. Some solid internal linking will help here too.
Using the Local Falcon, it shows you ranking as expected and I have a strong suspicion you didn't actually have a ranking drop on the local pack end but just need to update the settings on the ranking tracker to make sure you're not searching on a city-level.
https://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/3904914/1a5bb0a17deab2755bf9f579048e93a9
-
Awesome thanks for the thorough response!
1. Thanks for checking this. Yes they are outside the limits but i has never been an issue before and nationally obviously this isn't hurting them.
4. I know...weird right?! The discrepancy is mind boggling.
5. This whole issue started because they did exactly that, they google'd themselves from work and they didn't show up so I'm fairly certain its a proximity issue. However I have googled them from San Antonio (closest big city outside of Austin) and they show up page one. So it's pretty much everywhere but Austin and a 30 mile radius.
At a loss for the discrepancy. Made some content changes to hopefully offset it a bit - Josh
-
Thank you for the replies to my questions. I'm just going to start jotting things down here:
-
Your client is outside of the Austin city limits. The location is the quite a bit west of the city boundary, as perceived by Google: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Austin,+TX/@30.3172704,-97.91144,11z/data=!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x8644b599a0cc032f:0x5d9b464bd469d57a!2sAustin,+TX!3b1!8m2!3d30.267153!4d-97.7430608!3m4!1s0x8644b599a0cc032f:0x5d9b464bd469d57a!8m2!3d30.267153!4d-97.7430608
-
I mention this, because Google is fairly biased towards physical location, and a business outside of city borders is not one I'd typically expect to see ranking well locally, unless there was little competition. Organically, I might see them ranking however. So, I'm walking into this not really expecting your client to rank well locally, and I just want to mention that.
-
Using BrightLocal's rank checker tool and setting my zip to the zip code at Google's perceived center of Austin (78701) I am unable to find your client in the first 10 pages of the organic results for "austin plumbers". You mentioned you are seeing them on page 9 from another tool. I just can't find them at all.
-
Yet, when I search from my own location in California for this same term, your client is #1 in the local pack and #2 organically (just below Yelp). So, for non-Austin-based searchers,your client is doing extremely well. And, this comes as a bit of a surprise to me, given what I said above about them being beyond city limits. To have overcome this, the site must be doing something right to be so dominant!
-
So, now, the frustrating part of this. It has long been observed that Google handles proximity of the searcher quite differently when the searcher is near a business vs. in some other city or state. In other words, if, from my location in California, I look for a plumber in Austin, I'm not likely to see the exact same results as someone actually in Austin would see. Rank checking tools aren't great at approximating this. So, I want to ask you to ask your client to do something. Have them search from their office computer on Ranch Road for "austin plumbers" and tell you exactly where they see themselves both locally and organically. Please, if you can do this, come back and let me know what they say.
Clearly, the launch of the new site design is making you question whether something you did caused the ranking drop. But, I want to be sure that we aren't overlooking that Google somehow made a change that is coincidental to your redesign and has nothing to do with it. If your client's site was penalized, I wouldn't expect to see it ranking so excellently for my searches from California. And the GMB listing is not suspended or anything like that. So, let see if you can get your client to tell you what they see searching from their own office. I'll stay tuned.
-
-
HI Miriam,
Thanks for the response! See below:
1. The redesign kept the exact same URL structure. And very little content changes. We have since (today) removed some of the spammier links and 301 redirected them.
2. Yes correct. Every other city so far except with in a 30 mile radius of Austin. I'm using isearchfrom.com to verify.
3. Local was well ranked before and consistent with national (first page for terms such as Austin Plumber, Austin Plumbers, Plumbing in Austin, as well as brand name - Reliant Plumbing)
4. Launched on February 22nd.
Thank you!
-
Good morning!
So sorry to hear you've encountered some trouble. Can you answer some questions for me about your scenario, please?
-
Did your re-design of the website keep the exact same domain and URLs, or did you have to do any re-directs?
-
Am I right that your concern is that, when you search for things like "austin plumbers" while you are physically located in Dallas, you are seeing your client on the first page of the organic results, but when you search from a physical location in Austin, your client is coming up on the 9th page of the organic results? Is that right?
-
You mention local results, as well. What were your client's local pack rankings prior to the re-design and how, exactly, have they changed?
-
How long ago did you launch the re-design?
-
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disconnect MOZ Local and Google My Business
I've had problems with one of our eight branch locations when I connected GMB to Moz Local about a year ago. The location was suspended for being a duplicate. I would like to sever the connection so I could keep Moz Local live but at least temporarily delete the suspended Google My Business. Also, if you might have any guides or tutorials on performing this task it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Local Listings | | gallowaywebteam0 -
Local Pack Ads v. Organic Business Listings
Hey everyone, So I'm noticing lately that Google is showing ads via AdWords for my locations in the local pack. I am fine with that, but unfortunately it is now driving me a little bit insane wondering how much Google really cares about NAP, distance from centroid and or user, links to domain, completed business profile and so on. They will pull an ad into the top of the local pack for my location, yet, my actual organic business listing in some cases will not even show up until I hit the second page of business results. I get that it's Adwords, it's pay-to-play, but from most accounts, the differences in ranking for traditional listings results compared to business results on both desktop and mobile are pretty different. For example, by doing my traditional SEO best practices, I can rank high in traditional listing results even when my business does not show in the local listings. I have done this time and time again. I am able to accept that since we have 100 locations in the US and our lists were an absolute mess before I got here, that some of our NAP across multiple directories and listing sites are not exactly up to snuff which I have been working on. So I guess the thing is, if my location in Google's eyes is not good enough to be shown organically for the user even at the bottom of page of one of business results, why is it good enough to show an ad for my business location for that query as the absolute first result? Again, I know its Ad Words which basically allows you to cut in line like that special pass you can buy at a roller coaster park, but still. Isn't their goal to provide the best possible experience for their user? If they feel something is worth holding back my organic listing from the user, why is it fine with them to show the user that same location with the top possible local pack spot in an ad? I guess this is more of a rant than anything but I wanted to know if anyone else is dealing with this or anyone has any info they have found that could help shed light on this? It kind of just kicked everything I thought about trust, authority, links in order to rank in the local pack organically out the window. Thanks! -Ben
Local Listings | | Davey_Tree0 -
How to handle Local SEO when two businesses merge
Hi, I have a landscaping client who is buying another company and merging the two companies together. I trying to figure what the best way to handle this type of situation is. Here are the specifics. Company A I've been working with him for a number of years, he has a really robust site with good content and with really good rankings. I've done a ton of citations, he's in good shape. His company has decent name recognition. Company B My client is buying Company B. Their site is really poor, no SEO done on site and no directory listing work. The company has great name recognition in the community and gets most clients through word of mouth. My client has decided to take Company B's name because its a more well known company. He is going to merge the companies, because he doesn't want to have 2 companies from a management standpoint. He plans to keep both physical locations open. So here are my questions. Do I keep both sites live for a period of time and put a message notifying people that "Company A is now Company B Name"? OR Do I transfer all the good content from Company A's site to Company B's site and do a 301 redirect of the URL. How should I handle the data aggregators and directory listings? I'm trying to keep all the great natural traffic that Company A gets to its site, start to build traffic around company B's location while following all of Google's policies. I could just start over and in the long-term they'd be fine, but I really love to find a strategy to avoid my client taking a big hit in organic traffic. Thanks in advance Mozzers!
Local Listings | | JohnWeb121 -
Local Link Building Question: High DA Chambers vs Low PA Trade Groups
Hi all, We've been researching relevant, real organizations in our area that allow members to link their websites from the directory. I've basically got two buckets of prospects: Chambers of commerce type sites with more authority (DA ~40+) but less relevance to our niche (injury law) Bar associations with less authority (DA ~20) but super relevant. Assuming that they cost the same and covered the same geographic area, which links would you go after if you had to choose one or the other? Thanks in advance.
Local Listings | | LeeAbrahamson0 -
Struggling with SEO and Rebranding...
I have a question for you... have a client who originally I built and ranked individual websites for them for multiple services. One website was for auto sales, one for auto repair and one for auto detailing. But the names were all different and individual. They decided to rebrand and they wanted to bring them all under one common name. And they were talked into building a new website under the one common brand name and put all the content under that website and have since 302 redirected everything. I know.... should have been 301's So of course now I have to go back in there and repair the SEO damage as everything has now tanked. So here is my dilemma I have the following brands/services - all located same city, some in different physical locations new website is XYZ.com XYZ Car Sales - located at 123 any street XYZ Auto Repair - located at 123 any street XYZ Auto Detailing - located at 456 any street XYZ Customizing - available at 456 any street Should I just build out the content on the XYZ.com domain and use subfolders so XYZ.com/customizing, XYZ.com/autosales, XYZ.com/autodetailing etc or should I use subdomains autodetailing.XYZ.com, etc And as a final question to this scenario... how does this affect the Google+ business pages for each of these businesses? If i use the subfolder method, should I have the XYZ Car Sales, XYZ Auto Detailing all point to the XYZ.com root or should each Google business page point to the actual subfolder? And how will this affect SEO? If I build out the Auto Detailing section for example I was thinking it would look like this XYZ.com/auto-detailing
Local Listings | | seo.help
XYZ.com/auto-detailing/about-us
XYZ.com/auto-detailing/services
XYZ.com/auto-detailing/contact-us Will that be good enough for Google to properly link the content to that particular section/brand assuming things like Title Tags/ H1 tags, etc are done properly? Keeping in mind we have Google business pages already in existence for XYZ Auto Sales
XYZ Auto Detailing
XYZ Customizing
XYZ Auto Repairs Your help will be hugely appreciated, Ive searched and searched, but most things seem to lead back to multi location SEO questions, this is multi-location but also multi brand and different business names (although quite similar)0 -
Yext & Moz Local - Avoiding Dupliates
What happens if we are using Yext and Moz Local at the same time? I hear it can create duplicates. However if the NAP is exactly the same on both, why cant the aggregators/citation sources figure this out on their own? I need to develop a clearer understanding before i start submitting a select few of my clients through Yext. I do have the option to opt out of the Factual aggregator on Yext. Instead we would only update the sites that Yext has access to. End of day we are going to continue using Moz.com/local but yext saves us dozens of man hours while trying to clean up citations and fix duplicates (temporarily ofcourse until we contact them ourselves).
Local Listings | | waqid0 -
What to do if the domain name is very different from real business name for local listings
Hey guys, any advice is very welcome , I m´ ranking locally a website in the bay area for cabinets www.cabinetsbayarea.com we picked this domain name more for SEO purposes because it has the two most important keywords that we want to rank. My issue is that the real busniess name is HEMA DESIGN CENTER, so i dont know if we should change the name in the chamber of commerce to CABiNETS BAY AREA or list the business as HEMA DESIGN CENTER, with this website www.cabinetsbayarea.comr. We only mention the real name in the About Us. CABINETS BAY AREA it is more as a deparment of the real business name HEMA DESIGN CENTER What should i do? Thanks a lot, David
Local Listings | | conexion330 -
Local Subdomain vs. Local Subfolder
I know this is an issue that's been discussed here ad nauseum but I have, possibly, an interesting case. A third party company created our local search pages, and they perform very highly in SERPs, but are subdomains (local.website.com). But my problem comes down to two things, one of which isn't necessarily a subdomain vs. subfolder issue. 1.a. With the subdomain local.website.com we rank much higher for local search than we do for regular search on our main domain and it's respective keywords, would changing these subdomains to subfolders keep the link juice that the subdomain currently possesses and actually help our website rankings? b. And what strikes me as the most puzzling is that on local.website.com ALL of the content is identical (I can thank Copyscape for that) to the other local search pages on our own site and various other sites in our industry. I know the duplicate content is hurting our domain, which makes it even more confusing that our subdomain is ranking so highly for things like "diamonds by the yard florida". 2. We're an online only company, and I feel as though gaming the local search function isn't exactly something we should be doing, both from an ethical and an SEO standpoint. Is there any evidence that abusing the local search functions can have a negative affect on a domain's rankings? Hopefully this makes sense, if anyone needs clarification please let me know and I'll endlessly clarify. Thanks,
Local Listings | | allurez0