Keyword Cannibalization vs. Optimizing Site
-
I am in the process of optimizing our website and I am having a hard time reconciling two best practices I have found on Moz.
1. You should avoid having multiple pages focus on the same keyword because you will lose some control of which result will show.
2. You should identify your core keywords and weave these keywords multiple times (naturally) throughout your site.
I have spent months identifying our top 7 keywords and am working through the site now. The first piece of advice keeps giving me pause. Can anyone weigh in with other considerations or advice on how I can reconcile these two strategies.
Thank you
-
.... each of your pages/articles would still be focussing on a single keyword (or keyword cluster) while bearing in mind the overall goals.
You are 100% correct. They are all about the same long tail keyword with even longer long tail keywords as variants.
You wouldn't have two pages competing for "Stihl Chainsaw MS170 Maintenance" for example, but you might have multiple pages that are talking about "Stihl Chainsaw MS170" in various ways, all probably linking to the page where the customer could buy the actual product or parts, etc.
You are right. And, those pages linking to one another will support the attack on "Stihl Chainsaw MS170"... and all of them plus all of the pages for other models will support the attack on "Stihl Chainsaws".
-
A brilliant response EGOL, however, I would like to put to you, that each of your pages/articles would still be focussing on a single keyword (or keyword cluster) while bearing in mind the overall goals.
You wouldn't have two pages competing for "Stihl Chainsaw MS170 Maintenance" for example, but you might have multiple pages that are talking about "Stihl Chainsaw MS170" in various ways, all probably linking to the page where the customer could buy the actual product or parts, etc.
Of course, if a customer were to search "Stihl Chainsaw MS170" and not be showing any clear intent, then Google may well show multiple results from your site, which, I agree, would be great. (And you'd also likely show up in the SERP generated by clicking on the various, "People also search for", etc)
-
1. You should avoid having multiple pages focus on the same keyword because you will lose some control of which result will show.
First, disclosure. Most people will consider me to be a heretic when it comes to keyword cannibalization. I embrace it, I advocate it, I practice it, I attack it.... and it makes me a lot of money.
Let's say that I want to sell Stihl chainsaws. I would write multiple articles about each one. I would write an article about the features of each model, an article about maintenance for each model, article about the replacement parts for each model (and how to replace them), an article that show the advantages of each model. There would also be a lot of articles that compare the various models. We are talking about dozens total, a few articles for each model, and many articles about how to select, ideas for use, accessories, chains, sharpening etc. When I was done with these articles my site would be the go-to place for these products and would be 10x better than what the manufacturer has prepared. When you search for one of these saws, you would find two, three or four of my pages at the top of the SERPs.
Lose control over what content will show??? HELL YEAH!!! Because all of my content is gonna show up in the SERPs. People will see that dominance and know that I am The Man for these products and that my site is the go-to-place for the. All of those pages at the top of the SERPs will push the competitors down and people will come to my site instead of my competitors site.
This is not cannibalization. This is deep expertise, deep helpfulness, and deep moneymaking. It's a deep investment of money and time too. And you really gotta be The Man to be able to produce this kind of site.
2. You should identify your core keywords and weave these keywords multiple times (naturally) throughout your site.
Stop thinking about this. Just stop it. Instead, write naturally, paying no regard to how keywords are woven into your website. You will waste less time chasing the myths of SEO and more time writing great content.
While I am dissing "best practices"....
If you build the chainsaw website described above.... you will not have to go begging for links. The links will come to you.
The problem with that, is very few people have the knowledge and the willingness to actually buy all of those saws and use them for enough hours to know them. This experience is what separates the people who really have the content knowledge from those who are faking it.
-
Hi,
For your more generic keywords, perhaps general industry or overall business, I would keep those throughout the site. For more focussed keywords, maybe individual products, services, content pieces; I would keep those to individual pages.
A very brief example, if you were a car servicing centre, I would be using terms like "car maintenance" and "car repair" across the site, but focussing specific pages on "Tyres", "Brakes", "MoTs", "Car Air Conditioning", etc.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are Meta Keywords Still A Thing?
Hey all! First post on here, forgive me for being an SEO newb. Are meta keywords still a thing? Here's why I ask, I read this article from back in 2009 that said they are absolutely not a ranking factor anymore: https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html However, in doing some research on our competition, I found that the top result for "Financial Advisor in Colorado Springs" was this company: http://www.strasbaughfinancial.com/ Honestly, the site seems to be doing everything opposite of what I read to do. It isn't even mobile responsive! With the Moz Bar, I found that no links pointing toward it. Not one video on the site (there is a link to a welcome video but the link is broken!!), no blog or regular content updates, no keywords in the H1 or H2 tags, page titles, etc. The website looks old and, frankly, terrible. Really I’m stumped how this can be ranking so high for so many competitive keywords. Then I realized that they stuffed tons of keywords in the meta description and meta keywords. From what I can tell, this is the ONLY intentional SEO strategy they used. Am I missing something? Are meta keywords still a ranking factor and THAT important?
On-Page Optimization | | otherside130 -
Keyword Stuffing - Image Alt
One of our category pages is keyword stuffed. But we are not able to change the image alt text. It is automatically generated as the title of each product. We would be able to get the keywords down if that was not the case, but now there is 30 alt image keywords along with 25 other elements of the keyword. I can only change 2 image alt texts. What can I do here?
On-Page Optimization | | Mike.Bean0 -
SEO For Replacement Site
I have a client with a website that has gotten a bit outdated. We've already built his new website and optimized it, but I'm trying to figure out the best way to replace the site while doing the least amount of damage to his current Google rankings. He's ranking #1 for some very competitive keywords that are responsible for the bulk of his revenue, so we want to jeopardize that. We've already built a new site and written all new content, although the homepage page title, h1 header and meta descriptions will all remain what they currently are. I'm also trying to keep the keyword density as close to the current site as possible. I am aware of transferring all existing site URLS using 301 redirects. Can anyone provide any tips that I should use when replacing the site? Should I expect a slight rankings drop or am I worrying about nothing?
On-Page Optimization | | atstickel0 -
Breadcrumbs keyword repeats
Hi I have a client project who's developers platform is populating the category part of the breadcrumbs with the header tag. Since these include the pages primary target keywords/phrase they are being repeated in the breadcrumbs increasing the keyword/phrase count on the page as well as repeating/duplicating the sentence. Can this cause problems ? or not because Google knows its not part of the page content/body copy (because its a breadcrumb) ? Cheers Dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Site structure question
I'm currently working on a very awkward custom-WP setup, in which I can't maintain the present drop-down navigation menu without having those pages under a parent or without completely recoding everything. I have two requirements, for SEO purposes I'm looking for the following structure for each targeted landing page: www.example.com/landing-page as opposed to www.example.com/sub/landing-page Of course, having my landing pages as a child, I get the latter of the two. For navigational purposes they need to fall under a specific category in a drop-down menu. With any other theme or setup this is an easy fix, but not here. What I have now is that the landing pages are currently placed under a parent category page. But, they have custom permalinks. The permalinks are setup as follows www.example.com/landing-page But, technically the exact structure is still www.example.com/sub/landing-page which then redirects to the custom permalink. So, my question is - in an attempt to get my most important landing pages close to the root for better PR and crawlability, do I still get the same benefit with my current setup? Is this structure I have, better, worse, or indifferent? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | JayAdams320 -
Keyword confusion
Thanks for taking the time to read through this. I'm currently optimizing a website and have a few structural questions: How should one view targeting keywords with respect to the home page of any given site? EG -> If the home page has the preferred keywords at the beginning of title and the page follows most if not all the recommendations from SEOMOZ tools, why are sub pages outranking my root domain for the set of keywords I'm after? When sub pages use my homepage keyword as the 2nd keyword in its respective title, does that give the overall homepage more power for the keyword it's after? EG. Homepage Title "ABC DEF - DEF ABC - XYZ | Company name I'm targeting "ABC DEF" for the home page Subpage title -> "DEF ABC - ABC DEF - XYZ | Company Name. The sub page keyword is "DEF ABC"
On-Page Optimization | | FPK0 -
Brand keyword is on every page
Suppose a website is devoted to a selling a modest number of products that are sold under one brand name. For example, the site might have product pages for Chevy Camaro, Chevy Suburban, and Chevy Volt, and many other pages related to Chevy. Chevy is in the domain name and on virtually every page. Competitors are also selling Chevy's and you want to rank well on the keyword "Chevy". One SEO rule is limit a keyword to one optimized page, and if it appears on other pages, minimize the use of the keyword on other pages, and pass links to the optimized page. However, it can be really challenging to write prose without using the brand name, particularly if the brand name is of the form "brand training method" or "brand learning center". The other pages can't say "training method" or "learning center". They need to say "brand training method", etc. What are the tactics to rank for a brand name when it appears on virtually every page? Best,
On-Page Optimization | | ChristopherGlaeser
Christopher0 -
Meta Keywords
Hello Everyone- Quick question about meta keywords. Most SEO's agree that meta keywords are no longer used as a ranking factor in Google. My question is, if a client comes to me and they already have a bunch of meta keywords on their site what would the smart strategy be? 1. Remove all the meta keyword data from the clients site 2. Scale the meta keywords back by only leaving the top keywords in the code? 3. Do nothing Thanks for all your time! Regards, Bill Parlaman
On-Page Optimization | | wparlaman0