Captcha wall to access content and cloaking sanction
-
Hello, to protect our website against scrapping, visitor are redirect to a recaptcha page after 2 pages visited.
But for a SEO purpose Google bot is not included in that restriction so it could be seen as cloaking.
What is the best practice in SEO to avoid a penalty for cloaking in that case ?
I think about adding a paywall Json shema NewsArticle but the content is acceccible for free so it's not a paywall but more a captcha protection wall.What do you recommend ?
Thanks,Describe your question in detail. The more information you give, the better! It helps give context for a great answer.
-
In general, Google cares only about cloaking in the sense of treating their crawler differently to human visitors - it's not a problem to treat them differently to other crawlers.
So: if you are tracking the "2 pages visited" using cookies (which I assume you must be? there is no other reliable way to know the 2nd request is from the same user without cookies?) then you can treat googlebot exactly the same as human users - every request is stateless (without cookies) and so googlebot will be able to crawl. You can then treat non-googlebot scrapers more strictly, and rate limit / throttle / deny them as you wish.
I think that if real human users get at least one "free" visit, then you are probably OK - but you may want to consider not showing the recaptcha to real human users coming from google (but you could find yourself in an arms race with the scrapers pretending to be human visitors from google).
In general, I would expect that if it's a recaptcha ("prove you are human") step rather than a paywall / registration wall, you will likely be OK in the situation where:
- Googlebot is never shown the recaptcha
- Other scrapers are aggressively blocked
- Human visitors get at least one page without a recaptcha wall
- Human visitors can visit more pages after completing a recaptcha (but without paying / registering)
Hope that all helps. Good luck!
-
Well I'm not saying that there's no risk in what you are doing, just that I perceive the risk to be less risky than the alternatives. I think such a fundamental change like pay-walling could be moderately to highly likely to have a high impact on results (maybe a 65% likelihood of a 50% impact). Being incorrectly accused of cloaking would be a much lower chance (IMO) but with potentially higher impact (maybe a 5% or less chance of an 85% impact). When weighing these two things up, I subjectively conclude that I'd rather make the cloaking less 'cloaky' in and way I could, and leave everything outside of a paywall. That's how I'd personally weigh it up
Personally I'd treat Google as a paid user. If you DID have a 'full' paywall, this would be really sketchy but since it's only partial and indeed data can continue to be accessed for FREE via recaptcha entry, that's the one I'd go for
Again I'm not saying there is no risk, just that each set of dice you have at your disposal are ... not great? And this is the set of dice I'd personally choose to roll with
The only thing to keep in mind is that, the algorithms which Googlebot return data to are pretty smart. But they're not human smart, a quirk in an algo could cause a big problem. Really though, the chances of that IMO (if all you have said is accurate) are minimal. It's the lesser of two evils from my current perspective
-
Yes our DA is good and we got lot of gouv, edu and medias backlinks.
Paid user did not go through recaptcha, indeed treat Google as a paid user could be a good solution.
So you did not recommend using a paywall ?
Today recaptcha is only used for decision pages
But we need thoses pages to be indexed for our business because all or our paid user find us while searching a justice decision on Google.So we have 2 solutions :
- Change nothing and treat Google as a paid user
- Use hard paywall and inform Google that we use json shema markup but we risk to seen lot of page deindexed
In addition we could go from 2 pages visited then captcha to something less intrusive like 6 pages then captcha
Also in the captcha page there is also a form to start a free trial, so visitor can check captcha and keep navigate or create a free account and get an unlimited access for 7 days.To conclude, if I well understand your opinion, we don't have to stress about being penalized for cloaking because Gbot is smart and understand why we use captcha and our DA help us being trustable by gbot. So I think the best solution is the 1, Change nothing and treat Google as a paid user.
Thank a lot for your time and your help !
It's a complicated subject and it's hard to find people able to answer my question, but you did it -
Well if you have a partnership with the Court of Justice I'd assume your trust and authority metrics would be pretty high with them linking to you on occasion. If that is true then I think in this instance Google would give you the benefit of the doubt, as you're not just some random tech start-up (maybe a start-up, but one which matters and is trusted)
It makes sense that in your scenario your data protection has to be iron-clad. Do paid users have to go through the recaptcha? If they don't, would there be a way to treat Google as a paid user rather than a free user?
Yeah putting down a hard paywall could have significant consequences for you. Some huge publishers manage to still get indexed (pay-walled news sites), but not many and their performance deteriorates over time IMO
Here's a question for you. So you have some pages you really want indexed, and you have a load of data you don't want scraped or taken / stolen - right? Is it possible to ONLY apply the recaptcha for the pages which contain the data that you don't want stolen, and never trigger the recaptcha (at all) in other areas? Just trying to think if there is a wiggle way in the middle, to make it obvious to Google you are doing all you possibly can to do keep Google's view and the user view the same
-
Hi effectdigital, thanks a lot for that answer. I agreed with you captcha is not the best UX idea but our content is sensitive, we are a legal tech indexing french justice decision. We get unique partnership with Court of Justice because we got a unique technology to anonymize data in justice decision so we don't want our competitor to scrap our date (and trust me they try, every day..). This is why we use recaptcha protection. For Gbot we use Google reverse DNS and user agent so even a great scrapper can't bypass our security.
Then we have a paid option, people can create an account and paid a monthly subscription to access content in unlimited. This is why I think about paywall. We could replace captcha page by a paywall page (with a freetrial of course) but I'm not sur Google will index millions of page hiding behing a metered paywall
As you said, I think there is no good answer..
And again, thank a lot to having take time to answer my question -
Unless you have previously experienced heavy scraping which you cannot solve any other way, this seems a little excessive. Most websites don't have such strong anti-spam measures and they cope just fine without them
I would say that it would be better to embed the recaptcha on the page and just block users from proceeding further (or accessing the content), until the recaptcha were filled. Unfortunately this would be a bad solution as scrapers would still be able to scrape the page, so I guess redirecting to the captcha is your only option. Remember that if you are letting Googlebot through (probably with a user agent toggle) then as long as scrape-builders program their scripts to serve the Googlebot UA, they can penetrate your recaptcha redirects and just refuse to do them. Even users can alter their browser's UA to avoid the redirects
There are a number of situations where Google don't consider redirect penetration to be cloaking. One big one is regional redirects, as Google needs to crawl a whole multilingual site instead of being redirected. I would think that in this situation Google wouldn't take too much of an issue with what you are doing, but you can never be certain (algorithms work in weird and wonderful ways)
I don't think any schema can really help you. Google will want to know that you are using technology that could annoy users so they can lower your UX score(s) accordingly, but unfortunately letting them see this will stop your site being properly crawled so I don't know what the right answer is. Surely there must be some less nuclear, obstructive technology you could integrate instead? Or just keep on top of your block lists (IP ranges, user agents) and monitor your site (don't make users suffer)
If you are already letting Googlebot through your redirects, why not just have a user-agent based allow list instead of a black list which is harder to manage? Find the UAs of most common mobile / desktop browsers (Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge, Opera, whatever) and allow those UAs plus Googlebot. Anyone who does penetrate for scraping, deal with them on a case-by-case basis
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Shall we add engaging and useful FAQ content in all our pages or rather not because of duplication and reduction of unique content?
We are considering to add at the end of alll our 1500 product pages answers to the 9 most frequently asked questions. These questions and answers will be 90% identical for all our products and personalizing them more is not an option and not so necessary since most questions are related to the process of reserving the product. We are convinced this will increase engagement of users with the page, time on page and it will be genuinely useful for the visitor as most visitors will not visit the seperate FAQ page. Also it will add more related keywords/topics to the page.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lcourse
On the downside it will reduce the percentage of unique content per page and adds duplication. Any thoughts about wether in terms of google rankings we should go ahead and benefits in form of engagement may outweight downside of duplication of content?0 -
Why Did My Google Crawls Hit A Wall?
Hello, One my the sites I work with, http://www.oransi.com, has seen a significant decrease in crawl Googlebot activity in the last 90 days. See screenshot. This decrease in crawl stats runs in conjunction with less Kb downloaded per day & an increase in how much time it took Google to download a page. The client did just go through a redesign, however that happened on 4/16/15, which was after the decrease in Googlebot activity, so that should not be the issue. Same could be said for the mobilegeddan algorithm change. Any help would be greatly appreciated. 5u1lM6B
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BrandLabs0 -
Best-of-the-web content: Graphical Tips
This question is for EGOL (if he's willing) and anyone else who wants to partake. EGOL is the best content writer I've ever run into, really. I'm wondering what his top 3 to 5 tips are on how to use graphical layout (font, images, graphics, organization, menu, etc) to make content irresistable. A couple of assumptions: The content is written really well from a perspective of authority. Also, we're not including video on this one. Again, anyone is welcome to answer this. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW1 -
Content Landing Page
Hey Mozzers, I wanted to get some opinions on here. I'm going to be building out the content on my site a lot of the next couple of months, and have recently started thinking about creating a content landing page. For those not familiar with the concept it's the idea of building this page that basically just pulls together all the content you've written on a specific subject & serves as hopefully a link magnet & destination for people interested in the topic. So my question is this, I am just outlining all of the different posts & areas that I want to cover on specific topics & it is a lot. I'm talking ~20 posts on each subject. Do you think that would be too much content to try & get on one page? Should I break it down to a more finite 5-7 links to high quality articles per page, or create basically this monster guide that links to all these different articles I'll create. Looking forward to getting your opinion, Chris
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | chris.kent0 -
Trying to determine if either of these are considered cloaking
Option 1) In the browser, we use javascript to determine if you meet the redirect conditions (referrer not mydomain.com and no bypassing query-string). If so, then we direct your browser to the subdomain.mydomain.com URL. Googlebot would presumably get the original page. Option 2) In the browser, we use javascript to determine if you meet the redirect conditions. If so, we trigger different CSS that hides certain components of the page and use javascript to load in extra ads. Googlebt would get the unaltered page. In both scenarios the page content does not change. However, the presentation is different. The idea is that under certain conditions users are redirected to a page with more ads. The ads are not too severe on the redirected page and will not cause an above the fold penalty. That said, will either option be considered cloaking by Google?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BostonWright0 -
Is this will post Duplicated Content
I have domain let say abcshoesonlinestore.com and inside pages of this abcshoesonlinestore.com is ranking very well such as affiliate page, knowledgebase page and other pages, HOWEVER i would like to change my home page and product page to shorter url which abcshoes.com and keep those inside page like www.abashoesonlinestore.com/affiliate or www.abcshoesonlinestore.com/knowledgebase as it is - will this pose duplicate content? This is my plan to do it: the home page and product page will be www.abcshoes.com and when people click www.abcshoes.com/affiliate it will redirect 301 to abcshoesonlinestore.com/affiliate HOWEVER if someone type abcshoesonlinestore.com or abcshoesonlinestore.com/product it will redirect to abcshoes.com or its product page itself (i want to use 302 instead 301 (ASSUMING if the homapage or product page have manual penalization or anything bad we want to leave it behind and start fresh JUST assume because i read some post that 301 will carry any bad thing to new site too) The reason i do not want to 301 from abcshoesonlinestore.com to abcshoes.com is because those many pages is ranking top 3 in GOOGLE ( i worry will lose this ranking since this bringing traffic for us) Is this good idea or bad idea or any better idea or should i try to see the outcome 🙂 - the only concern is from abcshoesonlinestore.com to abcshoes.com will pose as duplicate content if i do not use 301 - or can i use google webmaster tools to remove the home page and product page for abcshoesonlinestore.com can we tell google that? PS: (home page and product page will have new revise content and minor design change) but inside page will stay the same design Please give me some advise
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | owen20110 -
How to manage duplicate content?
I have a real estate site that contains a large amount of duplicate content. The site contains listings that appear both on my clients website and on my competitors websites(who have better domain authority). It is critical that the content is there because buyers need to be able to find these listings to make enquiries. The result is that I have a large number pages that contain duplicate content in some way, shape or form. My search results pages are really the most important ones because these are the ones targeting my keywords. I can differentiate these to some degree but the actual listings themselves are duplicate. What strategies exist to ensure that I'm not suffereing as a result of this content? Should I : Make the duplicate content noindex. Yes my results pages will have some degree of duplicate content but each result only displays a 200 character summary of the advert text so not sure if that counts. Would reducing the amount of visible duplicate content improve my rankings as a whole? Link back to the clients site to indicate that they are the original source Any suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mulith0 -
BEING PROACTIVE ABOUT CONTENT DUPLICATION...
So we all know that duplicate content is bad for SEO. I was just thinking... Whenever I post new content to a blog, website page etc...there should be something I should be able to do to tell Google (in fact all search engines) that I just created and posted this content to the web... that I am the original source .... so if anyone else copies it they get penalised and not me... Would appreciate your answers... 🙂 regards,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TopGearMedia0