What is the proper URL length? in seo
-
i learned that having 50 to 60 words in a url is ok and having less words is preferable by google.
but i would like to know that as i am gonna include keywords in the urls and i am afraid it will increase the length. is it gonna slighlty gonna hurt me?
my competitors have 8 characters domain url and keywords length of 13
and my site has 15 character domain url and keywords length of 13
which one will be prefered by google.
-
Well to me a proper url link shouldnt be more than 50 in lenght.. i use more below or rather about 60 on my website Timetocare
-
Well to me a proper url link shouldnt be more than 50 in lenght.. i use more below or rather about 60 on my website Timetocare
-
Well to me a proper url link shouldnt be more than 50 in lenght.. i use more below or rather about 60 on my website Timetocare
-
In terms of SEO (Search Engine Optimization), while there's no strict rule for the optimal URL length, it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, descriptive, and user-friendly. Here are some guidelines and considerations:
-
Short and Descriptive:
- Aim for short and descriptive URLs that give users and search engines a clear idea of the page's content. Avoid unnecessary parameters or overly complex structures.
-
Keywords:
- Include relevant keywords in the URL, especially in the domain and the path. This can help search engines understand the topic of the page.
-
Readability:
- Keep URLs readable by using hyphens to separate words instead of underscores. For example, use "example.com/important-page" instead of "example.com/important_page."
-
Avoid Dynamic Parameters:
- If possible, avoid using dynamic parameters in URLs (e.g., "example.com/page?id=123"). Static, keyword-rich URLs are generally more SEO-friendly.
-
Consistency:
- Maintain consistency in your URL structure across your website. This helps both users and search engines navigate and understand the organization of your content.
-
301 Redirects for Changes:
- If you need to change a URL, use 301 redirects to inform search engines that the content has permanently moved. This preserves SEO value.
-
Limit Length:
- While there's no strict character limit for URLs, it's advisable to keep them reasonably short, ideally under 100 characters. Shorter URLs are easier to remember and share.
-
HTTPS:
- Use HTTPS for secure connections. Search engines tend to favor secure websites, and HTTPS is considered a ranking factor.
Remember that the primary goal is to create URLs that are user-friendly and provide a clear indication of the content. Search engines use URLs to understand the context and relevance of a page, so optimizing them for readability and keywords can positively impact your SEO efforts. Additionally, creating a logical URL structure helps users navigate your site more easily.
-
-
The ideal URL length for SEO is typically under 60 characters. Shorter URLs are easier for search engines to crawl and for users to read and remember. Keeping URLs concise, relevant to the page content, and including keywords can positively impact SEO performance. Avoid lengthy URLs with unnecessary parameters or characters.
-
The appropriate page URL is 75 characters length. And the maximum length of URL in the address bar is 2049 characters. For more info. like this click here.
-
In SEO, there is no strict rule for an ideal URL length, but it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, relevant, and user-friendly. Here are some guidelines to consider:
Short and Descriptive: Aim for short and descriptive URLs that give users and search engines a clear idea of the page's content. A concise URL is easier to remember and share.
Include Keywords: If possible, include relevant keywords in your URL. This can contribute to the page's SEO, but don't over-optimize by stuffing too many keywords.
Avoid Dynamic Parameters: Clean, static URLs are preferred over URLs with dynamic parameters (e.g., https://azdentalclub.com/). Search engines prefer URLs that are easily readable and don't contain unnecessary parameters.
Hyphens Between Words: Use hyphens (-) rather than underscores (_) to separate words in the URL. Search engines treat hyphens as space, but underscores are not recognized as separators.
Avoid Stop Words: Consider omitting unnecessary stop words (e.g., "and," "or," "but") from your URLs. Focus on the main keywords that represent the page's content.
Be Consistent: Maintain a consistent URL structure across your site. Consistency makes it easier for both users and search engines to navigate and understand your website.
HTTPS: Ensure that your URLs use the secure HTTPS protocol. Google tends to favor secure websites, and HTTPS is a ranking factor.
While there's no strict character limit for URLs, it's generally advisable to keep them under 255 characters. This is because longer URLs may be truncated in search results, making them less user-friendly.
Remember that user experience is crucial, so prioritize creating URLs that are easy to read and understand. Additionally, focus on providing valuable content on your pages, as content quality is a key factor in SEO.
-
The proper URL length for SEO is generally recommended to be under 256 characters. It's important to keep your URLs concise and descriptive. Short and relevant URLs tend to perform better in search engine rankings and are easier for users to remember and share. Including relevant keywords in your URL can also help search engines and users understand the content of the page. Additionally, using hyphens to separate words in the URL is preferred over underscores or other special characters. Overall, aim for clear, concise, and keyword-rich URLs that accurately represent the content of your web pages.
-
50- 60 characters in a URL is good enough and will not be considered spam by Google. However, the vital aspect would be how you use the keywords and whether they are elegantly placed or one is stuffing it. Try to be as descriptive for the search engine, try to make it scannable and break it down.
Try to aim for a low-character URL because it is less likely to be mistaken as spam.
-
length can be detected as spam. You have to pay attention to the length.
-
The optimal length is 50-60 characters. If you're using a plugin like Rankmath or Yoast, they will also tell you which is optimum.
I'm following the Rankmath's guide to URL length and it's working perfectly and getting amazing results on my courier tracking website. -
It is crucial to consistently conduct competitor analysis, paying close attention to the length of their URLs.
A common mistake that many people make is incorporating long-tail keywords into their URLs, which is not considered a good SEO practice.
Personally, I strive to limit my site article URLs to a maximum of 4-5 words. In certain cases where the search volume is relatively low, I may include additional words, but the general best practice is to keep the URL as short as possible.
Once again, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of competitor analysis in shaping your approach.
-
When it comes to URL length for SEO, there is no definitive answer. However, it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, include relevant keywords, avoid excessive parameters and unnecessary characters, use hyphens as word separators, maintain consistency, and prioritize usability and readability. Remember, URL length is just one factor among many that affect SEO.
-
Somewhere up to 75 characters max, from what I read. Longer than that could cause some difficulties in ranking.
-
While the length of a URL can have some impact on search engine optimization (SEO), it is generally recommended to keep URLs concise and relevant to the content of the page. URLs with fewer words tend to be easier for users to read and remember, and they also tend to be more user-friendly for sharing and linking purposes.
The impact of URL length on SEO is relatively small compared to other factors such as the quality and relevance of the content on your website, backlinks, site speed, user experience, and overall website optimization.
In terms of your specific scenario, where your competitors have 8-character domain URLs and keywords with a length of 13, and your site has a 15-character domain URL and keywords of the same length, it's unlikely that the slight difference in URL length alone would significantly impact your search engine rankings.
Google's algorithms consider numerous factors when determining the relevance and ranking of a website, and URL length is just one of them. It's important to focus on creating high-quality content, using relevant keywords, and ensuring a positive user experience on your website. These factors are likely to have a more substantial impact on your search engine rankings than the length of your URL.
-
I have tried to use proper URL length in my site but in some instances, long tail KWs mess it up. Then you have no option but a more than appropriate URL length
-
but sometimes the the long tail KW makes it difficult to have shorter URL length. for example "how many questions can you ask chatgpt"
-
When it comes to URL length in SEO (Search Engine Optimization), there is no strict rule for the maximum or ideal length. However, it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, descriptive, and user-friendly. Here are some guidelines to consider:
Descriptive and Relevant: A URL should give users and search engines a clear idea of what the page is about. Including relevant keywords or a brief description of the content can help improve understanding and visibility.
Concise and Readable: Aim for shorter URLs that are easy to read and remember. Long, complex URLs can be confusing and difficult to share. Use hyphens (-) to separate words within the URL safe-ways and avoid using unnecessary characters, numbers, or special characters.
Avoid Keyword Stuffing: While it's important to include relevant keywords, avoid keyword stuffing in URLs. Maintain a natural flow and readability, and prioritize clarity over excessive keyword usage.
Maintain Consistency: Consistency in URL structure can benefit both users and search engines. Use a consistent format throughout your website, which can include using lowercase letters, eliminating unnecessary parameters, and organizing URLs in a logical and hierarchical manner.
-
@calvinkj Always analyze your competitors and analyze the length of their URLs.
Most people do big mistake and add long tail keyword in URL which isn't a good SEO practice.
I always add max. 4-5 words in URL for my site articles and in some articles where search volume is relatively lower, I do add more words but the best practice is have the shorter URL as possible.
Again, competitor analysis is the key
-
Some experience from words and hypehns in domain names
I used a hyphenated site www.octopus-energy-referral.co.uk and it is not doing too well compared to the non-hyphenated name. Similarly I have a site www.octopuscode.co.uk and it is doing really well compared to the hyphenated name because is is short and has fewer key words..
I know this is not a forensic comparison but I believe a non-hyphenated short name with fewer keywords is best if you have a choice.. -
If you haven't read this yet, please do (best practices for URLs).
So, it's a combination of things. As Devi Allen said, less is more. You want to use (and not over-use) descriptive words, separated by hyphens, "keeping URLs as simple, relevant, compelling, and accurate as possible". "To correctly render in all browsers, URLs must be shorter than 2,083 characters."
Which is better, your URL or your competitors? They sound pretty close based on your description but what matters is the actual words used in the URL, the site structure represented by that construct, whether the words truly represent what a visitor will find on the page, and whether the page content will provide visitors with the information they came looking for. URL length is but one of many factors that go into determining whether you or your competitor will rank higher.
-
You already answer it, less word is better.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Infinite Scrolling on Publisher Sites - is VentureBeat's implementation really SEO-friendly?
I've just begun a new project auditing the site of a news publisher. In order to increase pageviews and thus increase advertising revenue, at some point in the past they implemented something so that as many as 5 different articles load per article page. All articles are loaded at the same time and from looking in Google's cache and the errors flagged up in Search Console, Google treats it as one big mass of content, not separate pages. Another thing to note is that when a user scrolls down, the URL does in fact change when you get to the next article. My initial thought was to remove this functionality and just load one article per page. However I happened to notice that VentureBeat.com uses something similar. They use infinite scrolling so that the other articles on the page (in a 'feed' style) only load when a user scrolls to the bottom of the first article. I checked Google's cached versions of the pages and it seems that Google also only reads the first article which seems like an ideal solution. This obviously has the benefit of additionally speeding up loading time of the page too. My question is, is VentureBeat's implementation actually that SEO-friendly or not. VentureBeat have 'sort of' followed Google's guidelines with regards to how to implement infinite scrolling https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2014/02/infinite-scroll-search-friendly.html by using prev and next tags for pagination https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1663744?hl=en. However isn't the point of pagination to list multiple pages in a series (i.e. page 2, page 3, page 4 etc.) rather than just other related articles? Here's an example - http://venturebeat.com/2016/11/11/facebooks-cto-explains-social-networks-10-year-mission-global-connectivity-ai-vr/ Would be interesting to know if someone has dealt with this first-hand or just has an opinion. Thanks in advance! Daniel
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Daniel_Morgan1 -
Does type of hosting affect SEO rankings?
Hello, I was wondering if hosting on shared, versus VPS, versus dedicated ... matter at all in terms of the rankings of Web sites ... given that all other factors would be exactly equal. I know this is a big question with many variables, but mainly I am wondering if, for example, it is more the risk of resource usage which may take a site down if too much traffic and therefore make it un-crawlable if it happens at the moment that a bot is trying to index the site (factoring out the UX of a downed site). Any and all comments are greatly appreciated! Best regards,
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | uworlds
Mark0 -
Competitor Bad Practice SEO Still Ranking Well But Why ?
Moz Friends, A very close competitor have always been challenging for similar competitive keywords. We seem to have the advantage for alot of long tail keywords but on one of the higher traffic relevant keywords they seem to do well. I really struggle to understand why, particularly with the back links they use Just my thoughts and notes on the two: Our Page Better written text content (Maybe slightly written to for experienced target audience but we are working on simplifying things) Good Clear site URL structure and navigation for usability Fresh content updates Mobile optimized Reasonable page speeds Good on-page optimization Good back links from industry influences Competitor Page Negatives Site structure and URL's are inconsistent and messy Lower quality content site wide They use tried and tested on page optimization methods like Keyword spamming, Bold Keywords,Underlining Keywords (Sarcasm) Terrible back links, all directories and free article submission sites (Seriously take a look) Less focused on page optimization Not mobile optimized Most of the rest of the sites carry on the same sort of differences, Engine: www.google.co.uk Keyword: Sound level meters **Our Page: **www.cirrusresearch.co.uk/products/sound-level-meters/ **Competitor Page: **www.pulsarinstruments.com/product-information/Sound-Level-Meter.html Any feedback would be greatly appreciated please, i am really struggling to get my head around this Thanks James
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Antony_Towle1 -
Please Correct This on-site SEO strategy w/ respect to all the updates
Hello, I believe my on-site SEO process that I used to use a couple of years ago is not working well anymore for a couple of my sites, including this one. I'll tell you the old strategy as well as my new strategy and I'm wondering if you can give me pointers that will help us rank where we should rank with our PA and DA instead of getting moved down because of what could be our old on-site SEO. OLD ON-SITE SEO STRATEGY: Title tags usually match the page, but title tags occasionally on this site don't match the pages exactly. There's not many of them, but they do still exist in a couple of places. Title tags are either 1. A phrase describing the page 2. Keywords 1, Keyword 2 3. Keyword 1 | Keyword 2 4. Keywords 1, Keyword 2, branding The keywords are in the h1 and h2 of each main page, at the very top of the page. The h1 and h2 do not exactly copy the title tag, but are a longer phrase with the keywords appearing in their exact word order or in word variations. See this page for an example. Keywords occur 3-4 times in the body of the main pages (the pages with a menu link). Right now some of the pages have the exact phrases 3 or 4 times and no variation. meta description tags have exact keyword phrases once per keyword. Meta description tag are a short paragraph describing the page. No meta keyword tags, but a couple haven't been deleted yet. FUTURE ON-SITE SEO STRATEGY: I'm going to change all of the page titles to make sure they match the content they're on exactly. If the title is a phrase describing a page, I'm going to make sure a variation of that phrase occurs at least three times in the content, and once in the meta description tag. Title tags will be either a. Short phrase exactly matching page b. Keyword 1, Keyword 2 | branding c. Keyword 1 | branding 2. I'm thinking about taking out the H1 and H2 and replacing them with one tag that is a phrase describing the page that I'll sometimes put the keyword phrase in, only a variation in it and not the exact keyword phrase - unless it just makes total sense to use the keyword phrase exactly. **I'm thinking of only using the keyword phrase in it's exact words once on the page unless it occurs more naturally, and to include the keyword phrase in word variations two more times. So once (in non-exact word order) in the at the top, once (exact word order) in the text, and two more times (varied word orders) somewhere in the text. All this will be different if the keywords show up naturally in the text. **3. I'll delete all meta keyword tags, and still use exact keyword phrases in meta description tag, though I'll change the meta description tags to always very closely match what the page is about. Do you think my new strategy will make a difference? Your thoughts on any of this?****
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
Is linking out to different websites with the same C-Block IP bad for SEO?
Many SEOs state that getting (too many) links from the same C-Block IP is bad practice and should be avoided. Is this also applicable if one website links out to different websites with the same C-Block IP? Thus, website A, B and C (on the same server) link to website D (different server) could be seen as spam but is this the same when website D links to website A, B and C?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TT_Vakantiehuizen0 -
URL structure: 301 redirect or leave as is?
Hello, My website, www.coloringbookfun.com is very old and authoritative, but the URL structure is terrible. If you check out some of our subcategories such as http://www.coloringbookfun.com/Kung Fu Panda and individual printables such as http://www.coloringbookfun.com/Kung Fu Panda/imagepages/image2.html You can see that they aren't optimized. I am curious to know the pros and cons of fixing the URL structure and 301ing them to the new optimized url. Will 301ing lose authority and backlinks for the sites pages? Does optimizing the url structure outweigh losing the authority/backlinks?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
Got an SEO package, paid $400+ for it, basically got scammed.
Hi guys, I know this is stupid but I bought an SEO package for around $400. Received the report, and my... it was a complete load of spam. It was basically a blast to lots of sites with random articles and my anchor texts all over the place. Theres thousands of these links and the articles dont make sense, I'm not sure what i'm going to do! This is my main Ecommerce website and i'm worried, i've complained and I hope to get a refund however i'm worried hes going to just blast my site and get me penalized by Google. It is clearly blackhat. Is there anything I can do? I'm very worried. Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Superinks0 -
You're a SEO manager for a new company working on a new site. Where to?
So, you've recently begun as a SEO manager for a new company who's just launched a lovely, gleaming corporate site to boot. The onsite stuff is taken care of and your attention turns to link building. Now you've been in the game for a few years. You've seen things change in that time. Directories are out. Link networks are done. You're not going to embark on reciprocal linking either because it's bad and looks horribly tacky. Black Hat, White Hat - you know the score. You're lucky that the company produces a page or two of news a day - it's original, informative, is great for keeping your clients informed and you punt this on Twitter and FB. A bit of link bait, eh? But there's a rub: your competitors, with their bigger budgets, and industry clout, have been around for a some time longer than your company has been. They've snapped up all the good (industry-related) sites to get links from. You've approached all potential targets with the offer of good, relevant content and affiliate partnerships but they aren't having any of it. You're simply out-sized by the big boys next door - you can't compete. They're rich kids. There just seems nowhere to get links from. Do you just go the route of press releases and articles? Do you use paid blogging services? Grovel at doorsteps. The industry you're in is incredibly commercial - no meek altruist is going to take pity and give you a couple backlinks out of kindness. What do you do? What indeed...?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Martin_S0