Removing pages from index
-
Hello,
I run an e-commerce website. I just realized that Google has "pagination" pages in the index which should not be there. In fact, I have no idea how they got there. For example, www.mydomain.com/category-name.asp?page=3434532
There are hundreds of these pages in the index. There are no links to these pages on the website, so I am assuming someone is trying to ruin my rankings by linking to the pages that do not exist.The page content displays category information with no products. I realize that its a flaw in design, and I am working on fixing it (301 none existent pages). Meanwhile, I am not sure if I should request removal of these pages. If so, what is the best way to request bulk removal.
Also, should I 301, 404 or 410 these pages?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
-
yes the no content page thing is a big problem. If you have a "view all" option, and it's more than a dozen, fifteen or maybe 20 products, that should be paginated, with full indexing. Maile Oyhe even talked about that specific scenario of "view all" being good.
In my experience, all of the no-content pages should, ideally, be 301 redirected in a way that they point to the most relevant highest level category page on your site.
Since there's so many, there's no easy way to get them removed from the index other than doing the 301 then being patient as Google recrawls then re-confirms.
-
Ah - that's definitely better, if you don't go too wide. 2009 - 2010's concept of not having too many links went too far with too many people. Sites became too flat.
Categories and pagination are best served with having enough categories to cover the highest level groups, with sub-categories as appropriate, but not to the the point where there's only a few products in any single sub-category. So if you've got more than a dozen or fifteen products in a category or sub-category, pagination is perfectly valid.
Having more than six, eight or maybe ten categories at most, is also not good.
-
Alan, I think I misspoke. I meant to say that a categorically structured set of your products would be better to index than a paginated version. For example :
http://www.sunglasses.com/mens/black/productx
as opposed to http://www.sunglasses.com/products?page=233
Is it still considered wise to index both paginated results along with categorized results in this case?
-
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the info. I was going to set my page 2+ to "noindex,follow", however your reply makes sense. I will leave them indexable. I do see some competitors "rel=canonical" pagination to "view all" pages. I think I will keep my pages as is.
However, as my reply to Ryan stated, my issue is still the INDEX.
Google has thousands of "no content" pages indexed. They contain links to other "no content" pages making my site look thin. This may be the reason we lost so much ranking/traffic with Panda update.
How do I get these pages removed from the index? And do I return 301, 404 or 410 when Google comes back to reindex them?
Thanks for your help!
Alex
-
Hi Ryan,
I crawled the site, and did not find links to these pages, however it made me realize another HUGE issue. Since the paging is dynamically created, it has links to the "back" & "forward" no matter what page you are on. So, if page # 5000 is displayed, it will have links to page # 4999 and 5001. Although in my website I do not have links to pages that do not exist, all it takes is someone link to my site with "page=10000" and Google to index that page. From this point on, G will index all the PAGEs that do not exist.
Thanks again for getting me a step closer to resolving my problem.
However, the problem is still the INDEX. Google has (now realizing that its in the thousands) pages indexed with no content. These pages just contain links to other PAGING pages that have no content and my main menu/categories.
How do I get these pages removed from the index?
Thanks again!
Alex
-
For the record, that link that SSCDavis referenced includes Matt Cutts discussing faceted navigation, not pagination. Faceted navigation is different than pagination by leaps and bounds. So he (SSCDavis), with all due respect, is absolutely incorrect in his claim of what Matt said.
Maile Ohye, Senior support engineer at Google, definitely recommends allowing pagination to be indexed, if implemented properly. She even discussed this at length this week up at SMX Advanced in Seattle. Vanessa Fox, head of Nine by Blue, and former Googler (the creator of Google Webmaster Tools) agrees.
And so do I.
When performed properly, pagination (with quality optimization of paginated pages) can lead to dramatic increases in individual products indexed, higher quality visits from people further along in the buying process, and more people finding the site through an exponentially greater number of keyword phrases.
Consider this - in pagination (X number of products on the initial page, with X additional DIFFERENT products on page 2, and x additional still more and different products on page 3,etc. - by not wanting those pages indexed, you're communicating to Google - hey - we don't care about these other products enough to include them." Which means they get a false and negative understanding of how many products you have in your catalog. And THAT drives the overall strength of your catalog down.
Now, if, on the other hand, you already show ALL of your products on a top level page that is linked from the main navigation, then sure, pagination should be killed. But only if that's the case.
-
Alex,
I would highly recommend crawling your website and examining the crawl report. If Google is indexing these pages, then they got to them on your site at some point. I would proceed with the idea in mind this is a web design issue, not someone trying to ruin your rankings, as you suggested.
The crawl report will show the referrer page which can help troubleshoot the issue. When you have pages generated by a CMS or other software, there can easily be issues like the one you are experiencing. In my experience this is the most likely cause of your issue.
You mentioned there are 100s of these pages in the index. If you can determine a pattern they match, it is possible you can 301 all of them with a single rule, sending the user to your main category page or where ever you feel is best.
You can also set up a parameter specific instructions in Google WMT. I would avoid doing this until after you have reviewed your crawl report. From your Google WMT dashboard > Site Configuration > Settings > Parameter handling tab > find or add your parameter and adjust the setting as you deem fit.
-
**Edit: Please see alans answer
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why Is this page de-indexed?
I have dropped out for all my first page KWDs for this page https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/dollies-load-movers-door-skates Can anyone see an issue? I am trying to find one.... We did just migrate to HTTPS but other areas have no problem
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Indexed Pages Different when I perform a "site:Google.com" site search - why?
My client has an ecommerce website with approx. 300,000 URLs (a lot of these are parameters blocked by the spiders thru meta robots tag). There are 9,000 "true" URLs being submitted to Google Search Console, Google says they are indexing 8,000 of them. Here's the weird part - When I do a "site:website" function search in Google, it says Google is indexing 2.2 million pages on the URL, but I am unable to view past page 14 of the SERPs. It just stops showing results and I don't even get a "the next results are duplicate results" message." What is happening? Why does Google say they are indexing 2.2 million URLs, but then won't show me more than 140 pages they are indexing? Thank you so much for your help, I tried looking for the answer and I know this is the best place to ask!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | accpar0 -
Better to 301 or de-index 403 pages
Google WMT recently found and called out a large number of old unpublished pages as access denied errors. The pages are tagged "noindex, follow." These old pages are in Google's index. At this point, would it better to 301 all these pages or submit an index removal request or what? Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Removing Blogs and 301 redirect to blog home page?
Hi, I was at the MozCon conference in Seattle this Summer and heard great concepts about deleting a lot of pages on your site that are deemed excess. It got me thinking to remove all of our old blogs that were: Sales(ee) less than 400 words Flat out bad blogs When i begin removing these links, i know i will get a lot of 404 errors because of previous social links. So in your opinion, what would you do? Do i just 301 those blogs to my main /blog page? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Shawn1240 -
We are switching our CMS local pages from a subdomain approach to a subfolder approach. What's the best way to handle this? Should we redirect every local subdomain page to its new subfolder page?
We are looking to create a new subfolder approach within our website versus our current subdomain approach. How should we go about handling this politely as to not lose everything we've worked on up to this point using the subdomain approach? Do we need to redirect every subdomain URL to the new subfolder page? Our current local pages subdomain set up: stores.websitename.com How we plan on adding our new local subfolder set-up: websitename.com/stores/state/city/storelocation Any and all help is appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEO.CIC0 -
Ecommerce SEO - Indexed product pages are returning 404's due to product database removal. HELP!
Hi all, I recently took over an e-commerce start-up project from one of my co-workers (who left the job last week). This previous project manager had uploaded ~2000 products without setting up a robot.txt file, and as a result, all of the product pages were indexed by Google (verified via Google Webmaster Tool). The problem came about when he deleted the entire product database from our hosting service, godaddy and performed a fresh install of Prestashop on our hosting plan. All of the created product pages are now gone, and I'm left with ~2000 broken URL's returning 404's. Currently, the site does not have any products uploaded. From my knowledge, I have to either: canonicalize the broken URL's to the new corresponding product pages, or request Google to remove the broken URL's (I believe this is only a temporary solution, for Google honors URL removal request for 90 days) What is the best way to approach this situation? If I setup a canonicalization, would I have to recreate the deleted pages (to match the URL address) and have those pages redirect to the new product pages (canonicalization)? Alex
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | byoung860 -
How Do You Remove Video Thumbnails From Google Search Result Pages?
This is going to be a long question, but, in a nutshell, I am asking if anyone knows how to remove video thumbnails from Google's search result pages? We have had video thumbnails show up next to many of our organic listings in Google's search result pages for several months. To be clear, these are organic listings for our site, not results from performing a video search. When you click on the thumbnail or our listing title, you go to the same page on our site - a list of products or the product page. Although it was initially believed that these thumbnails drew the eye to our listings and that we would receive more traffic, we are actually seeing severe year over year declines in traffic to our category pages with thumbnails vs. category pages without thumbnails (where average rank remained relatively constant). We believe this decline is due to several things: An old date stamp that makes our listing look outdated (despite the fact that we can prove Google has spidered and updated their cache of these pages as recent as 2 days ago). We have no idea where Google is getting this datestamp from. An unrelated thumbnail to the page title, etc. - sometimes a picture of a man's face when the category is for women's handbags A difference in intent - user intends to shop or browse, not watch a video. They skip our listing because it looks like a video even though both the thumbnail and our listing click through to a category page of products. So we want to remove these video thumbnails from Google's search results without removing our pages from the index. Does anyone know how to do this? We believed that this connection between category page and video was happening in our video sitemap. We have removed all reference to video and category pages in the sitemap. After making this change and resubmitting the sitemap in Webmaster Tools, we have not seen any changes in the search results (it's been over 2 weeks). I've been reading and it appears many believe that Google can identify video embedded in pages. That makes sense. We can certainly remove videos from our category pages to truly remove the connection between category page URL and video thumbnail. However, I don't believe this is enough because in some cases you can find video thumbnails next to listings where the page has not had a video thumbnail in months (example: search for "leather handbags" and find www.ebags.com/category/handbags/m/leather - that video does not exist on that page and has not for months. Similarly, do a search for "handbags" and find www.ebags.com/department/handbags. That video has not been on that page since 2010. Any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SharieBags0 -
Why are so many pages indexed?
We recently launched a new website and it doesn't consist of that many pages. When you do a "site:" search on Google, it shows 1,950 results. Obviously we don't want this to be happening. I have a feeling it's effecting our rankings. Is this just a straight up robots.txt problem? We addressed that a while ago and the number of results aren't going down. It's very possible that we still have it implemented incorrectly. What are we doing wrong and how do we start getting pages "un-indexed"?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MichaelWeisbaum0