Url question for seo
-
Would it be beneficial to use url that is a match for my keyword to help with seo, then have my currently url forward to that one so I don't have to change any marketing materials?
I was one of the feedback that I got when doing the on page keyword optimization tool on seo moz.
Thanks
J
-
No, you would keep MOST of the link juice. You would lose between 1-10% of your link juice with the redirect.
-
Ryan,
I do have a lot of links pointing at my current url. Would I loose all that link juice if I was to change to a keyword specific url with a .com and forward the old url to that address. That is the main thing I took form you first response as to why this may not be a good idea.
Thank you so much,
J
-
Not necessarily.
You would need to put time and effort into the web page for the keyword URL. You can't just make a crappy page and then link it to your site. That is called a doorway page. It is a violation of Google's terms and your site can be removed from Google's index for this violation.
If you do create a quality page which targets these keywords, it will rank well because of the domain name, but you lose out on your domain authority. This one page website will never have quality links to build it's page or domain authority.
People are often attracted to the glamor of a key word site ranking at the top of SERPs. What they don't realize is the page ranks so well because the other results are not properly optimized for the same keyword, and/or are low quality pages.
-
It would still be suggested to have a website built on that keyword rich domain and you can link to your main website from this satellite site. It will still stand a good chance ranking high if the domain matches your main target phrase exactly.
-
Search engines treat extensions equally. A .edu site is not rated higher then a .com site, and a .com isn't seen as better then a .info or any other extension.
The reason a .com is preferred is "brand" awareness of the .com TLD. Think of any major company like McDonalds, Walmart, or Facebook. Add a .com to the name and you have their website. Many people automatically will add a .com to any brand to find their web address.
If you build a site cheap-cars.net, then you can be certain a percentage of your potential customers will wind up on the cheap-cars.com, cheapcars.com and cheapcars.net sites. If those sites are offering a similar product to you, then those potential customers might never make it to your site.
The other consideration is whether you already have an established site, or are you building a new one. With an already established site, it doesn't make sense at this point to move unless you already have challenges with your site name.
-
If I understand your question correctly, you want to know if you should redirect traffic from your established site to a new URL which is a keyword match to help boost your search engine ranking.
If you have an existing site with traffic and links, then I would not move to a keyword site unless it was an absolute perfect match and a .com. Google has clearly indicated they are reconsidering reducing the value of keyword domain matches. You could move and then wind up moving back a short time later.
It seems many are drawn to the glamor of a keyword URL. Yes, it is nice to have but it is only one of 200+ factors used to determine ranking. I would focus your time and effort on improving your site's content rather then chasing the URL.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical URL Tag Usage
I have a large website, almost 1500 pages that each market different keywords for the trucking logistics industry. I don't really understand the new Canonical URL Tag USAGE. They say to use it so the page is not a duplicate but the page that MOZ is call for to have the tag isn't a duplicate. It promotes 1 keyword that no other page directly promotes. Here is the page address, now what tag would I put up in the HEAD so google don't treat it as a duplicate page. http://www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php 1. Number 1 the actual page address because I want it treated like its own page or do I have to use #2 below? 2. I don't know why I would use #2 as I want it to be its own page, and get credit and listed and ranked as its own page. Can anyone clarify this stuff to me as I guess i am just new to this whole tag usage.
On-Page Optimization | | dwebb0070 -
My website is being opened by multiple URLs?
Dear Friends, I have a website which is being opened like example.comand example/index to same page. Is there any problem SEO point of view. By the way I have placed the Rel= canonical tag in source page. its working fine but
On-Page Optimization | | docbeans0 -
Similar URLs
I'm making a site of LSAT explanations. The content is very meaningful for LSAT students. I'm less sure the urls and headings are meaningful for Google. I'll give you an example. Here are two URLs and heading for two separate pages: http://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-69/logical-reasoning-1/q-10/ - LSAT 69, Logical Reasoning I, Q 10 http://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-69/logical-reasoning-2/q10/ - LSAT 69, Logical Reasoning II, Q10 There are two logical reasoning sections on LSAT 69. For the first url is for question 10 from section 1, the second URL is for question 10 from the second LR section. I noticed that google.com only displays 23 urls when I search "site:http://lsathacks.com". A couple of days ago it displayed over 120 (i.e. the entire site). 1. Am I hurting myself with this structure, even if it makes sense for users? 2. What could I do to avoid it? I'll eventually have thousands of pages of explanations. They'll all be very similar in terms of how I would categorize them to a human, e.g. "LSAT 52, logic games question 12" I should note that the content of each page is very different. But url, title and h1 is similar. Edit: I could, for example, add a random keyword to differentiate titles and urls (but not H1). For example: http://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-69/logical-reasoning-2/q10-car-efficiency/ LSAT 69, Logical Reasoning I, Q 10, Car efficiency But the url is already fairly long as is. Would that be a good idea?
On-Page Optimization | | graemeblake0 -
Do Parent Categories Hurt SEO?
I have parent categories and subcategories. Will it be harder for the subcategories to rank well because they have a parent category? The URL is longer, for one. I am just wondering if I should not have parent categories. I have one category page doing really well and I am trying to boost the others (most of which are subcategories) and this is a concern for me. Thanks! Edit: I also have a category that has 2 parent categories. I want it automatically in those 2 categories and one of its own. By itself it is very important keyword. Is this ok or should I have it be a parent category?
On-Page Optimization | | 2bloggers0 -
SEO for Japan
Google and Yahoo are the two major search engines in Japan. You can search using Western characters, and you often see English language results with Japanese (Chinese) characters next to them. As I don't speak Japanese, how do I approach SEO for my Japanese-language site? would appreciate any experiences and educational sources on the topic.
On-Page Optimization | | KnutDSvendsen0 -
Page title in SERP question
Has anyone typed in a phrase in Google and seen their listing on the SERP, but the page title on the Google SERP is not what the CMS is set to ? Ie the page title in the SERP is not what is expected? Something related to the company, but not what is set on the CMS… Very odd – has anyone seen something like this before? What could be causing it? Is there a way to change it?
On-Page Optimization | | inhouseninja0 -
URL question
Hi guys, the pro campaign thing you got going is wicked, love it. I'm recieving good results with my keywords and have noticed that categories that go beyond sub/sub/sub don't do to well. So I wanna move those that do one step up which makes it go from: http://spytunes.com/practice-guitar/advanced-routine/scales/aeolian to here http://spytunes.com/practice-guitar/advanced-routine/aeolian The existing menu system that follow all these categories across the site will soon go so it won't be a user friendly problem, I will have other type of menus. But, and here is the question: Would I greatly benefit from taking the non existent menu away and just go for: http://spytunes.com/practice-guitar/aeolian while i'm at it? Or do I stick with my current structure? I guess my real question is; how much is there to flat URLs? Cheers -dan lundholm spytunes.com
On-Page Optimization | | spytunes0