Haven't received an update on site crawl issues more than a week
-
Hello, my account has be scheduled to have the next updated report on 1st March. However, up till now, the latest data I have for our site crawl issues is made on 21st Feb. May I know if there is any issue related to this? Any way that i can draw the data for this week?
-
Thank you so much for your help.
I think the past few site crawl reports were quite on time, normally just a day later than the scheduled day. You mentioned our site appears to be large in size, may I know if our site size has been increased recently or the same as the previous time ?
-
Hi there,
Sam from Moz's Help Team here!
It appears that your site is quite large, and every week we typically crawl over fifteen thousand pages. Any site bigger than about 15k pages is going to take additional processing time. I'm looking at your historical crawls and it appears they each took around 3-4 days, rather than the usual 1 day for smaller sites. Your most recent crawl is still running, so you should expect to see your crawl information arrive within the next day or two, but I am afraid that I can't guarantee that, as the time to process the crawl data can fluctuate from week to week.
Unfortunately, we don’t have a way to force the crawler to re-crawl at a specific time right now - I'm sorry about that - if you’d like to do a mini crawl in the meantime to check up on your progress, you can run a Crawl Test! This'll allow you to crawl up to 3,000 pages of your site and evaluate the results in CSV form.
If you have any other questions, do feel free to ask away or pop a message over to [email protected]!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Crawling error emails
Recently we start having random error messages about crawling issue:
Product Support | | DTashjian
2024-08-30 edweek:Ok
2024-08-29 marketbrief:Err. advertise: Err, edweek:Err, topschooljobs:Ok
2024-08-23 edweek:Ok
2024-08-22 marketbrief:Err. advertise: Err, edweek:Err
2024-08-21 topschooljobs:Ok, edweek:Ok
2024-08-15 marketbrief:Ok. advertise:OK
2024-08-13 edweek:Ok
2024-08-12 marketbrief:Ok
2024-08-08 marketbrief:Ok, advertise:Ok
2024-08-03 edweek:Ok, topschooljobs:Ok
All for 2024-07 - are Ok Yesterday I set 2 more crawls for the same sites (edweek and marketbrief) and I get a morning email about original edweek site is ok (still have some problem but crawl occurs and all is fine) but for test crawl for the same site "EW Test" I just got error email.
Also I suppressed ALL email communications and frankly surprised by this email. Can you please check what is wrong with a crawler or stat collection or I don't know who produced the issues.0 -
Link to Moz Pro home 404s, and then I stumbled upon Moz's staging site...
I'm wary of giving more information as it's probably best that little to no one be able to access Moz staging for one reason or another. I should also mention that this was done very unintentionally on my part. That said, from the 404 from Moz Pro home, I tried to access "My QA", and that's when I realized that everything I did thereafter was within staging.moz.com (and posted a question similar to this one). Does Moz permit access to their staging site, or did I stumble upon a mistake - or Moz-stake, if you will?
Product Support | | Lumina0 -
Duplicated content issue?
Hi, Moz tools tell me that I have approx. 15xx Pages with High Priority Issues [Duplicate Page Content] going thru the details here are the majority: many products no longer exist and visitor redirected (404) to a same not found page. duplicated content with url appended with utm_source/utm_medium/utm_campaign GA tracking paras. On those page there are already canonical tags plus I've configed those parameters in Google Webmaster "URL Parameters" how much of these warning could compromise the seo proformance or provided that there have been dealt with should I just ignore these warning?
Product Support | | LauraHT0 -
Does the Moz toolset have a monthly reporting function yet? Can't seem to find it in the interface. I'm trialling the software but probably going to move to another service if this isn't available.
Does the Moz toolset have a monthly reporting function yet? Can't seem to find it in the interface. I'm trialling the software but probably going to move to another service if this isn't available.
Product Support | | bobbybaldpatch0 -
Issues with Page Grader Tool and competitor KW Rankings
I'm having two very frustrating issues with Moz: The page grader tool is not 'connecting' the correct keyword with the correct URL. For instance, if I want to rank for Dallas Motorcycle Accident Lawyer and create page of optimized content at Dallas.Zdfirm.com/Motorcycle-Accident, Moz doesn't grade THAT page. It grades Dallas.ZDFirm.com which to no surprise rates as an F. This is happening with both web sites on this account so much that the page grader tool is not delivering any value. My competitors keywords are not tracking properly. They are showing for "not in the top 50" for keywords that they are on the first page for. Again, this is for both domains on this account. Thanks, Brian
Product Support | | ZDAdmin0 -
Why can't the dates be changed in automatic reports?
I want to be able to change the publish date of automatic reports in my campaigns. One such campaign, which is a client campaign, it's set to run on the 8th after I selected "monthly". However, this doesn't work for me as this client want's to meet each month on between the 2nd and 5th of each month and I have to have this report data. So, I need to run this report on the first. Not the 2nd, not every 4 weeks... on the first. It seems like you guys have a fundamental flaw in the design of this tool, as great as it is. You've set the projects to auto run each month from the date it was added (at least from what I can tell). Provided that's true, then this would explain why the monthly reports won't work on my schedule because their on a weekly schedule instead. We, as clients, should be given the option to schedule when our scanning runs, when our reports get generated, etc. Every company runs their SEO and marketing differently, but the away you've set this up with the lack of options for us, forces us to work around your tools scheduling and not the other way around. Also, out of all of the SEO tools I've tried (quite a few), none have had this limitation. This should be addressed immediately. Thanks, Micha
Product Support | | Multiverse-Media-Group1 -
Moz pricing plans don't make sense
Hey. I posted a question about this on my other Moz account (one I use for moz local), but it appears to have been removed, so here goes again. Can someone from Moz please explain to me why that in your plans, as the price goes up and more campaigns are allowed, the amount of keywords tracked per campaign goes down? $149 plan - 5 campaigns - 450 keywords = 90 keywords per campaign. $249 plan - 25 campaigns - 1100 keywords = 44 keywords per campaign $599 plan - 100 campaigns - 3700 keywords = 37 keywords per campaign What confuses me here with your pricing plans is two fold Modern SEO requires a lot of quality content, interlinked together to rank well (in most cases). Your SEO guides even talk about this. Blogging is one of the most popular ways to do this. However, in any modest website these days, especially one that runs a blog, how does tracking only 37 keywords per campaign make sense? The fact is, that even your starter plan with only 90 per campaign doesn't make sense. My business website is tracking about 300 (that actually drive traffic). I provide my SEO clients with the same type of work I would do for my self, which again reinforces that 37 keywords is plainly pathetic. Every online pricing model I've ever seen follows one simple rule: When price goes up, you get more for your money, not less. At first glance you might think that is what you're getting when you step up a plan and get more campaigns, but then to have less keywords per campaign simply doesn't make sense at all. What does make sense is to have a more flexible pricing model. Instead of locking us into set tiers which don't really make sense, you should allow a more flexible pricing BEFORE we have to go up to enterprise. Why not have a per project price of 'x' price per month, then have a price per keyword or maybe per 100 keywords. This would allow all of us the flexibility to run campaign depths that make sense for us, not for your counterintuitive views of how we should be tracking them. Again, I'd really like a Moz staff person to respond to this as the last time I commented about this, it was removed.
Product Support | | Multiverse-Media-Group0 -
My campaigns are all missing and can't access archives
"Oops! Try refreshing the page, if that doesn't work, please click here to contact our help team." Yu0PY7g
Product Support | | matthewjharris0