Opinions on Alt tags
-
Reading around the web, there are many sources that suggest all images should have an Alt tag attributed to them. This is good for accessibility etc, however there appears to be conflicting interests between this and what works for SEO. Hence many other sources suggest that you include a keyphrase or two in 1 image Alt tag, and then leave the rest blank so as not to dilute the alts on the page.
In my experience, the latter appears to be true. However this seems wrong when the Alt attribute really should be used for accessibility reasons and not for SEO - why would the search engines encourage us to provide poorer quality information by harming our rankings if we try to make a website accessible?
Interested to hear your opinions and experiences on this subject.
Thanks.
-
As you said it was a generalization, not necessarily directed at you. The quote you are referring to (mine, not Rands) is a simple caveat to anyone who might be reading this question and thinks that alt text will save the day. Optimizing alt tags is a great way to get the job done and accurately describe the images attached, my point was that stuffing, etc... is not. Again not a direct attack on you, just overall advice for people who might want to go down that road.
-
Nobody said anything about stuffing keywords. These images are given a keyword that people are searching for on the internet, therefore they are serving a useful purpose in telling both google bots and people with disabilities and anyone else reading the page what that page is about.
Also, nobody said anything about my site coming down to optimizing alt tags as the only thing being done or the end-all be-all strategy we rely on.
That said, it is widely accepted that optimizing alt tags is a useful tactic in an overall SEO strategy.
Quoted from Rand's post August 17th, 2009:
Alt Attribute - Surprisingly, the alt attribute, long thought to carry little SEO weight, was shown to have quite a robust correlation with high rankings in our studies. Thus, we strongly advise the use of a graphic image/photo/illustration on important keyword-targeted pages with the term/phrase employed in the alt attribute of the img tag.
Finally, if you make broad generalizations about what works in SEO and what doesn't without understanding the particular situation of each site's SEO strategy, then chances are you're the one that's not very good at SEO.
-
are you using the H1 tag multiple times on the same page?
-
an Alt tag is wonderful for those with disabilities to actually understand whats going on in your site. Imagine going to a site that stuffs the same three keywords into their image alt tags? It must be super confusing and frustrating for someone with out the gift of sight. At least consider the purpose of the tag. The benefit of stuffing keywords is far outweighed by making your site accessible and easily understood by those with disabilities, or those trying to figure out what that picture might be. I am sure someone else in this thread has touched on the exact same thing I am saying, but if your site is coming down to over optimizing alt tags, chances are your not a very good SEO, you could easily accomplish more with a great description and title tag than all your alts combined.
-
A large ecommerce site I work on doesn't have a single ALT tag on any of the product images on category and subcategory pages. I have come up with a way to add the H1 tag dynamically to the images on these category pages since I have already put in a lot of long hours optimizing the H1.
My concern is this: will the same keyword text on multiple images on the same page hurt me? No category page has more than 10 images to be optimized.
-
I'm sure many people would say yes, that is spammy, however in my experience that works better than not including a keyphrase at all. My advice would be to do it, see what the results are, but be prepared to change it back if Google decides this is dodgy.
-
Question:
At the moment the alt tag on my logo (which appears on all my 4,000+ pages) simply reads "home". Would it be spammy to change it on all 4,000 pages to, eg, "home of cheap red widgets", assuming cheap red widgets was my target keyword?
-
I wonder if I could dynamically insert alt text based on page title into the logo...
BRB, spamming search engines
-
Like you, I always use the main 1 or 2 keyphrases for the logo alt. I am also a bad man then!
I think, so long as the page is relevant to those keyphrases - which it really should be - it can't be that bad practice because in most cases you're saying what the main focus of the page is. Perhaps I am kidding myself though?!
-
I personnally never heard of this technique (to keep only one alt tag) and thus, I never tried it.
My personal feelings lead me to think it is not natural and I would not recommend using this technique.
-
I would certainly put alt tags on all images for accessibility and usability reasons. The SEO impact of alt tags on images is minimal, but I've never heard of alt tags diluting the SEO success - it sounds ominous to me.
I would be wary of being "too spammy" with your alt tags, as it is entierly possible that googlebot might pick up on this.
It is important to note that good descriptive alt tags (with your keywords) and keywords within your iamge fielnames will certainly help your images rank better on Google Image search. This may or may not be an alternative vertical source of traffic to your site that you may or may not want - really depends on the type of site you're running.
-
I am ashamed to say I spam the heck out of my alt tags because it works
I used to write wonderfully descriptive alt text for accessibility and a different title text, now they're both just the same keyword.
I am a bad man
I've never considered leaving alt text blank if I have multiple pictures as I've seen more than one image rank (image search) from alt text/file name/caption. I do tend to have the first image on the page as the main keyword though.
What do you do about logo alt text?
-
Thanks both for your responses. I think in cases such as this, it's generally a good idea to follow your instincts.
Have either of you guys tested what happens to rankings if you remove all alts except the main, keyphrase rich one?
-
Thanks both for your responses. I think in cases such as this, it's generally a good idea to follow your instincts.
Have either of you guys tested what happens to rankings if you remove all alts except the main, keyphrase rich one?
-
Alt, although a valid signal is not as heavy as title for example, so I suggest that you do not compromise the integrity and quality of site for SEO purposes only and manipulation of this tag. Use ALT as it should be used and describe your illustrations, photos, products images and diagrams well enough so that a visually impaired may get an idea of what the image is. That's what Google expects you to do and is generally a win-win.
-
I personnally always put a quality alt attribute on all my images, with human readable content (for accessibilty reason, or if your image is 404), but also a little bit optimized for SEO. I actually never heard of the alts diluting problem.
I also take the time to put some wisely chosen keywords for the filename of my images. This is the kind of laborious on-page optimization task which individually have no SEO impact, but when combined with many others, can start having an impact on your SEO.
Hope this helps,
J.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Title-Tag question
The Yoast plugin is installed on the website. It generates the following meta property tag when I enter a new title-tag in the plugin: Next to that I have my standard title-tag. <title>dummy</title> Is this meta property tag able to replace the title-tag? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | WeAreDigital_BE0 -
Rel canonical tag back to the same page the tag is on?
Very simple, Why would a website (and I have seen tons doing this) link the rel canonical tag back to the same page the tag is on? Example: somepage.htm has a canonical tag linking to somepage.htm I thought the idea of this tag was to tell google if 2 pages are similar, this page is the original, and it's this page which should be indexed and the page with the tag on should pass all PR to the original. Maybe im wrong and someone can help me out to understand this.
On-Page Optimization | | activitysuper0 -
Is is it true that Google will not penalize duplicated content found in UL and LI tags?
I've read in a few places now that if you absolutely have to use a key term several times in a piece of copy, then it is preferable to use li and ul tags, as google will not penalise excessive density of keywords found in these tags. Does anyone know if there is any truth in this?
On-Page Optimization | | jdjamie0 -
How to Define Best Structure of Title Tag and Meta Description?
I want to define best structure of Title Tag and Meta Description for my eCommerce website. There are too many categories over there and many be increase in near future. There are 7K+ products live on website so, it's quite hard to develop Title Tag and Meta Description for all product pages. That's why I have set automatic Title Tag and Meta Description creation with help of developers. I want to do similar stuff for my category pages. Can anyone suggest me structure of Title Tag and Meta Description which suppose to help me in well over Google's organic result. I have define structure as follow. Title Tag: Category Name: FREE Shipping & Discount Category Name | Vista Stores Meta Description: Category Name with FREE shipping, 100% price guarantee, Buy and save 20% to 40% on attractive, modern and discount Category Name. Meta Keywords: Category Name I also want to give real time example with specific URL. (http://www.vistastores.com/69_21/outdoor/patio-umbrellas.html) Category Name = Patio Umbrellas so with help of above structure Title Tag and Meta Description will be as follow. Title Tag: Patio Umbrellas: FREE Shipping & Discount Patio Umbrellas | Vista Stores Meta Description: Patio Umbrellas with FREE shipping, 100% price guarantee, Buy and save 20% to 40% on attractive, modern and discount Patio Umbrellas. Meta Keywords: Patio Umbrellas So, Does it matter for good performance? If any inputs in same direction so I am eager to read it.
On-Page Optimization | | CommercePundit0 -
Title tag for category page
I’d love some clarification on what would be the best title tag for a shopping category page. The category page is “prams” , the brand is Baby Huddle and the top keywords in order of importance are pushchairs, strollers and buggies. Here are the options I suggest: Buy Prams | Pushchairs, Strollers, Buggies | Baby Huddle Buy the best prams, pushchairs, strollers and buggies on Baby Huddle Buy prams with free delivery and great prices on Baby Huddle
On-Page Optimization | | walidalsaqqaf0 -
Related keywords in title/H1 tag
Hi, I am trying to improve our rankings for pages with photos/images. For the title is it benificial to include keywords that are almost identical in nature? For example: "Brad Pitt Photos and Images" In Google trends photos and images are both commonly used words so including both seems like it would help. When I search for each one separately in Google (Brad Pitt Photos vs Brad Pitt Images) different sites are returned (except for the ones that include both image and photos keywords). I had read that Google knows that Images and Photos mean the same thing, but the search results do vary. I know stuffing all related combinations isn't good, but selective phrases seem to make a difference. Just want to verify if this makes sense. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | NicB10 -
Confirmation regarding canonical and syndication google tags
Hi, We are in the process of improving our CMS upstream to resolve our duplicate content issues. We were hit pretty hard by the Panda update. One of the steps we have taken is implementation of the canonical link tag across all domains in our site. You see, we are a news release service with muliple channels and websites to represent each. The problem is that a client will submit a release and in many cases the news item is relevant to multiple channels I.E. multiple websites under the same IP range. Site Examples:
On-Page Optimization | | jarrett.mackay
www.hotelnewsresource.com www.restaurantnewsresource.com
www.travelindustrywire.com From a user perspective, it makes sense that they should be able to access the article from the site they are browsing without being redirected to the site we feel carries the most relevance. We hope the canconical tag will resolve this issue for us. I have also read about the syndication tag and was looking for feedback or recommendations if we should implement that also, but it may be overkill as the two tags objectives seem to be similar. I guess my first question is if the syndication tag is only used by Google News. Secondly, and a little off topic is that we also offer an API and like many other sites, I have read, our content partners are now doing better in primary and long tail rankings even thought we are the original source. My assumption is that we should modify the API to force using both caconical and syndication tags as well. Lastly, I´m curious if anyone has tested the original source tag and if we should implement that as well. Thanks everyone. Jarrett0 -
Using commas in the title tag?
Is there a disadvantage/advantage to using commas to separate words in the title tag. Which will be more effective as a title tag: "keyword1 keyword2 - Brand" OR "keyword1, keyword2 - Brand"?
On-Page Optimization | | Audiohype0