Why is a low ranking site outperforming a higher one?
-
Hi,
I've got a question here that is more about learning than about rectifying this specific situation, as it is a low traffic (low dollar) situation. I would appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Ken
The targeted long-tail is: carrollton ga internet marketing
The targeted site is: http://www.kennethlewis.com/
Yet, when I run the keyword search I get this other site of mine, which is older, but has much worse metrics. http://www.breemawellness.com/ On this site, all I did was put a in-text link on it and added the keywords to my title tags.
Open Site Explorer shows these metrics:
KennethLewis.com 34, 23, 18, 98
vs. BreemaWellness 27, 15, 7, 10.
Both are on the same server.
Note:
-Until two months ago the KennethLewis.com was only partially about Internet Marketing- mildly so, actually- and it was a 2-3 page iWeb not-optimized site. But BreemaWellness has never been about Internet Marketing, and those words were just added two months ago for the first time.
-KennethLewis.com gets regular content changes, to the blog. BreemaWellness.com almost never gets touched.
Thoughts?
-
Links are what you want in SEO, they are probably the strongest ranking factor (at least for the time being), but the easiest way to get those is to visible create content that people want to create links around. This is the reason that content is so important.
If you are doing all your linkbuilding manually, by yourself, you have a long road ahead of you.
Google has indexed your page, so it's been crawled but it only has the one link pointing at it and as I said that's not providing any particular context.
I don't think that anyone is going to disagree with the concept that knowing more about SEO is an advantage, but it's not a game winner.
Your situation will all be solved by sorting out that slider and getting some more links with the right anchor text pointing at KennethLewis, specifically at the page we're discussing.
-
I obviously haven't optimized KennethLewis.com for the given term, but the term is all over the site on multiple pages. As for the Breema site, it is mentioned just on the homepage of a site that otherwise has no relevance to the keywords.
I thought Google would know better, and wouldn't give much weight to the addition to the homepage of a different topic (Breema in this case). I put it on there clearly for SEO purposes, and find it strange that Google is taking the bait so easily.
**What happened to all I've read about Google looking site-wide for relevance, and not just on one page? ** How can an Internet Marketing website appear lower in an Internet Marketing search than one with a radically different topic and three usages of the keyword on one page?
In my eyes this reveals that it is not content/relevance that is important, but rather one's ability to play the SEO game, which is exactly what Google says it wants to avoid. Right?
Just trying to wrap my head around this.
-
Yes, maybe I was a little blunt there, sorry about that, it wasn't how I intended it.
Nothing wrong with a sales page as the front page if your clients are mostly direct and you expect that to remain the case.
With that said if they have gone to the trouble of typing in your URL, they are expressing quite a lot of interest already, so it's unlikely that they'll begrudge clicking through to a sales page if you make it an obvious and desirable option.
-
"cars, hunger, and statistics" LOL
Yes, it is true that I used the index page as a sales place for potential clients, and significantly overlooked SEO. Hypocritical, I must say of myself.
Thanks guys for pointing out the obvious. It is funny how much easier it is for me to see other site's issues then my own.
Any other thoughts, anyone?
-
It's a bit tricky to give you anything firm, because in very broad terms these things are down to the volume of links pointing at a site, and both the sites in question are low on links (if you were to get a few reasonable external links pointing at KennethLewis.com I think you'd see a rapid change). But going on the data we have I think this is a mix of site structure, content and page title.
Breema has reasonable content relevant to the query you've mentioned on the front page. It's in plain text there is really no messing around, it's nice and simple. On the other hand the page on KennethLewis is somewhat buried behind a slider containing none of your quoted keywords (and it's the last slide as well).
Moving on to the titles Search engines will read in the region of 70 characters of your title, anything more than that and you are likely to be losing the later words in it. In the case of the page Google is ranking the word "marketing" gets cut off halfway. Breema on the other hand has Georgia mentioned twice and Internet Marketing all covered within those 70 characters and this is going to have an impact.
If you were to create even a few text links to that page from other pages on the site using your quoted keywords I think you would see an improvement, it would be even better if you got the text on your slider sorted, right now it's all about cars, hunger and statistics rather than internet marketing.
Links are the key, get a few reasonable external links with the right anchor text and you'll see some results.
Hope that helps.
-
Perhaps I am misunderstanding your query. Based on a very cursory review, http://www.kennethlewis.com/ isn't optimized for any georgia or carrollton terms. On the other hand, http://www.breemawellness.com/ contains several optimizations for those terms (i.e. title tag, internal links, etc).
Like I said, perhaps I am misunderstanding at what you're driving...
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why isnt my site in top 10 SERPs?
Our website, https://www.tradewindfinance.com, hasnt improved ranking for keyword " international trade finance companies." we average around the 10th page of Google SERPs. Our DA, PA, and links are higher thank the top 10 competitors. What are we doing wrong or what can I do to increase rank?
Moz Pro | | solution.advisor0 -
Why did my rankings drop so fast?
Hi Mozzers, One of my clients have suffered from a sudden ranking loss that started beginning of August. A little background: My client is a big cleaning company that has many franchises nationwide and had very good rankings for the past few months. Generally the busiest time of the year is summer and the 4th quarter is the slowest. Organic Traffic generally drops by 5 to 10% between Q3 and Q4 of each year. 2 things have caught my attention while investigating these ranking losses The latest recent Update from the moz index evaluated the website's DA of 48 when in the summer we had a DA of 56. Never seen such a drop before!! My first question is how accurate is the moz index? How can I make sure this data is accurate? I am very surprised because we have been working hard on getting good quality links for the past year and a half. If the DA is accurate then that could explain the ranking loss Google updating its search engine to the Hummingbird version. Do you guys think this has anything to do with the drop in rankings? The content on the website is not the best but is fairly decent. I am still not sure how the ranking drop could be related to Hummingbird? I have also checked webmaster tools to see if I got hit somehow by penguin and it seems fine. Thanks mozzers
Moz Pro | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Ranking report orderng when exporting to pdf
When I am in my rankings report I like to view the results in order of ranking, so that the keywords with higher position in google for example appear at the top, which is great. However when I export it to PDF it seems to default back to appearing in alabetical order... is there a way around this? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | stardigital0 -
Keywords rankings compared competitors not working
Hello, My keywords rankings compared competitors is not working : http://screencast.com/t/x88Z6tXB2r For months I've never have any stats in the competitors columns, why ? Thank you
Moz Pro | | JeanlouisSEO0 -
Keyword Rankings nos showing up?
My crawl was on Thursday and I am still not seeing any keyword rankings? This is happening to two different campaigns I have running. Is there something I need to do or is there something going on with the tool? Thanks,
Moz Pro | | hottwigg0 -
SEOmoz campaign - keyword rankings...
Hi there, I have a quick question: Does it make a difference if I add keywords to a campaign with the '[' and ']' brackets included? I just realized that I had copy/pasted many of my keywords from the exported CSV from the Google AdWords Keyword Tool and I fear that the keyword rankings on SEOmoz might factor the brackets as part of the keywords themselves. Thanks in advance! Ben
Moz Pro | | BenHammer0 -
Rankings Check and Googles Quality Guidelines
Hi, I am trialing SEOmoz at present. What i dont understand is how come the rankings check, which presumably involves sending requests to Google, doesnt contravine the Google quality guidelines and cause a website to be penalised. Sorry if being a bit dim - but if anybody could explain it would be really helpful cheers stayin
Moz Pro | | stayin0 -
Site not showing data in Open Site Explorer
I have run open site explorer for a couple of sites but I am getting the "no data available for this URL" message. I have read the reasons listed on the error message but none of these apply to the particular sites I am looking for data from. Any thoughts as to why this might be? Thanks, Kwan
Moz Pro | | SocialKwan0