The primary search keywords for our news release network have dropped like a rock in Google... we are not sure why.
-
Hi,
On April 11th, a month after the farmer update was released for U.S. users of Google, the primary keywords for ALL our sites significantly dropped in Google. I have some ideas why, but I wanted to get some second opinions also.
First off, I did some research if Google did anything on the 11th of April... they did. They implemented the farmer update internationally, but that does not explain why our ranks did not drop in March for U.S. Google users... unless they rolled out their update based on what site the domain is registered in... in our case, Canada.
The primary news release site is www.hotelnewsresource.com, but we have many running on the same server. EG. www.restaurantnewsresource.com, www.travelindustrywire.com and many more.
We were number 1 or had top ranks for terms like ¨Hotel News¨, ¨Hotel Industry¨, ¨Hotel Financing¨, ¨Hotel Jobs¨, ¨Hotels for Sale¨, etc... and now, for most of these we have dropped in a big way.
It seems that Google has issued a penalty for every internal page we link to.
Couple obvious issues with the current template we use... too many links, and we intend to change that asap, but it has never been a problem before. The domain hotelnewsresource.com is 10 years old and still holds a page rank of 6.
Secondly, the way our news system works, it´s possible to access an article from any domain in the network. E.G. I can read an article that was assigned to www.hotelnewsresource.com on www.restaurantnewsresource.com... we don´t post links to the irrelevant domain, but it does sometimes get indexed. So, we are going to implement the Google source meta tag option.
The bottom line is that I think we put too much faith in the maturity of the domain... thinking that may protect us... not the case and it´s now a big mess.
Any insight you can offer would be greatly appreciated. Do you think it was farmer or possibly something else?
Thanks,
Jarrett
-
I have a client who saw big drops beginning the 11th even though they're U.S. based. A portion of their visits come from international sources. We're still in evaluation mode though because the site had no significant drops on the initial Panda update here in the U.S.
Preliminary checks of other data show it might partially be a Panda issue, but not completely - oddly enough beginning on the 11th they also had a serious lag time in content loading due to advertiser scripts, which I'm thinking is a big factor as well.
Something that I have been speculating on with several new clients is the gradual degradation concept. My theory is many of their links coming from other sites that got hit has caused a rolling drop effect. Since none of my longer term clients have seen any significant drop though it's a more difficult assessment.
-
Did you see any cases where the Panda update went live, but it did not impact a given site till later on... like 30 days plus, which is our case? I do see a downward trend in analytics starting the day Panda was implemented, but it was´t until the 11th of April did it really drop.
-
That's your biggest challenge - to find the best ways to monetize enough to justify the editorial uniqueness. Yet it's that uniqueness that will ultimately bring you back. Be aware though - I have yet to hear of a single site that's bounced back significantly. All the sites I've audited that were hit by the Panda update require tremendous changes, especially in the unique content aspect, and in building quality links to category level and deep internal pages.
-
Thanks Alan,
Yes, the number of ads is another issue I intend to address... that will be a tough one to overcome.
Yes, it appears that every site hosted on our server has suffered... even the non related news websites like www.2casarealty.com, which does not have any news stories posted on, but is in the same IP range as the news sites and does have links to it from the news websites.
I would say 50% of the paid releases sent to us are first distributed in our network and then filtered down to other relevant websites... some of whom use widgets to link back to the full story, others use our API and then there are the content scrapers of course.
We have around 50 niche news release sites in our network as well as a number of websites we have launched to further monetize our business... E.G. hospitalityexpos.com, hotelsupplyresource.com
Yes, I full intend to implement that source meta tag and assign credit to the most appropriate site in out network. Not sure what to do with stories that have come to us after the customer posted on their site or another news release network first. I suppose the safest method is to find out where it was posted first and give them credit.
I was thinking we could balance the daily submissions with more editorial content that is written by us. That will help I´m sure.
Part of the problem is the business model itself... paid news release submissions haven´t necessarily hit our service first.
J
-
Jarrett
There are potentially several other factors as well, beyond what you've already pointed to yourself.
Panda/Farmer issued in a new era where many old "rules" were tossed by the wayside. Some of these were already questionable, as the seedlings of Panda were planted with last year's May Day update. if any single site in your network saw significant drops but not the others, it might well have been something else that caused it. Given the breadth and severity, this clearly does sound like Panda.
Taking a brief look at some of your content, site structure and duplicate content issues gives me even more confidence that's the cause.
Example 1: Duplicate content severity
I randomly picked one article and searched Google. Found a dozen sites where the same article shows up, including the site that's currently #1 in organic rankings in my result, which is the actual author's own site (Daniel Edward Craig). http://www.google.com/search?q=In+this+post+I+discuss+how+newly+available+reputation+metrics+are+paving+the+way+for+the+integration+of+the+online+reputation+management+and+revenue+m&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
How many sites are in your network where you share the content? So that begs the question - do you intend to find a way to give credit to the original news source for articles shared across sites? That's a big recommendation.
Obviously just this factor alone shouldn't necessarily cause bottoming out. News articles from major wire services routinely spread across the net in massive numbers every day.
Yet it's just one indicator to now consider. Especially when considering other major factors. Like the sheer volume of ads on pages. Too many ads is a big factor now. Amount of content that's unique to each site is a big part of the puzzle. If most of the content is duplicated across all sites, what makes each site uniquely valuable?
I could go on, but those are some high level areas for consideration.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ranking drop after new website
Hi there, I have a new client who has just had a new website built (by someone else). It was quite a major change as it was 12 years old and has just been moved to Wordpress. However although they are by and large happy with the new site, they have lost a lot of their rankings in Google. The content and menu structure is apparently identical. I told them I didn't think this was unusual but I'm not sure how easy it will be to get them ranking again. Where are they likely to be starting from? Is it a case of starting from the beginning or will there be some residual ranking capability left over? Or can they expect a full recovery over time? I was going to start by looking to see if things like tagging and meta data has been filled in (I will add the site to my Moz account) but is there any way of comparing the old site with the new for SEO purposes? Thanks so much, Sarah.
Web Design | | Frog-Marketing0 -
I am Using <noscript>in All Webpage and google not Crawl my site automatically any solution</noscript>
| |
Web Design | | ahtisham2018
| | <noscript></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="line-number"> </td> <td class="line-content"><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;url=errorPages/content-blocked.jsp?reason=js"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="line-number"> </td> <td class="line-content"><span class="html-tag"></noscript> | and Please tell me effect on seo or not1 -
Responsive Site has "Not Found" Errors for mobile/ and m/ in Google Search Console
We have recently launched a new responsive website for a client and have noticed 2 "Not Found" errors within Google Search Console for /mobile and /m Both these URLs are not linked from anywhere within the site. However Google is reporting them as being linked from the homepage. This is not the first site we have seen in which Google has reported this error, however the other site was not a mobile friendly site. My thoughts are to 301 them back to the Homepage. Anybody else have any thoughts on this? or have recently received the same errors?
Web Design | | JustinTaylor881 -
Links not visible in "Google cache text version" but visible in "Fetch as Google" in Webmaster tool
Hi Guys, There seems some issue with the coding due to which Google is not indexing half of our menu bar links. The cached text version of http://www.99acres.com/ is not showing links present in dropdown "All India" , dropdown "Advice" and "Hot Projects" tab in blue bar on top menu whereas these links are visible in "Fetch as Google" in Google Webmaster tool. Any clue to why is there a difference between the links shown in Google webmaster and Google cache text version. Thanks in advance 🙂
Web Design | | vivekrathore0 -
Looking for a developer with Network Solutions platform experience
Looking for a developer with Network Solutions platform experience. 714-744-1926Tony Ashford
Web Design | | OCFurniture0 -
Why is this page removed from Google & Bing indices?
This page has been removed from indices at Bing and Google, and I can't figure out why. http://www.pingg.com/occasion/weddings This page used to be in those indices There are plenty of internal links to it The rest of the site is fine It's not blocked by meta robots, robots.txt or canonical URL There's nothing else to suggest that the page is being penalized
Web Design | | Ehren0 -
Sudden dramatic drops in SERPs along with no snippet and no cached page?
We are a very stable, time tested domain (over 15 yrs old) with thousands of stable, time tested inbound links. We are a large catalog/e commerce business and our web team has over a decade's experience with coding, seo etc. We do not engage in link exchanges, buying links etc and adhere strictly to best white hat seo practices. Our SERPs have generally been very stable for years and years. We continually update content, leverage user generated content etc, and stay abreast of important algorithm and policy changes on Google's end. On Wednesday Jan 18th, we noticed dramatic, disturbing changes to our SERPs. Our formerly very stable positions for thousands of core keywords dropped. In addition, there is no snippet in the SERPs and no cached page for these results. Webmaster tools shows our sitemap most recently successfully downloaded by Google on Jan 14th. Over the weekend and monday the 16th, our cloud hosted site experienced some downtime here and there. I suspect that the sudden issues we are seeing are being caused by one of three possibilities: 1. Google came to crawl when the site was unavailable.
Web Design | | jamestown
However, there are no messages in the account or crawl issues otherwise noted to indicate this. 2. There is a malicious link spam or other attack on our site. 3. The last week of December 2011, we went live with Schema.org rich tagging on product level pages. The testing tool validates all but the breadcrumb, which it says is not supported by Schema. Could Google be hating our Schema.org microtagging and penalizing us? I sort of doubt bc category/subcategory pages that have no such tags are among those suffering. Whats odd is that ever since we went live with Schema.org, Google has started preferring very thin content pages like video pages and articles over our product pages. This never happened in the past. the site is: www.jamestowndistributors.com Any help or ideas are greatly, greatly appreciated. Thank You DMG0 -
What is the current thought how/if cufon affects keywords?
What is the final opinion about how (and if) cufon affects keywords in H1 tags?
Web Design | | Court_LOQUA0