What are the SEO ramifications to forwarding your website to Facebook?
-
I have a client who wants to forward their website traffic to a campaign on Facebook for two week. I think it's a horrible idea on so many levels, but need a solid reason why. My gut says that their Google rankings will suffer, but I can't find any research/articles that state such. Help?
-
Sorry - no specific article comes to mind. but you could pint out our answers!
-
These are all helpful answers. Does anyone have links I can use to show the client this shouldn't be done?
-
Completely agree with everything mentioned, what would be interesting to hear though - and possibly amusing - would be why your client thinks this might be a good idea?
-
This would be a clear violation of Google's terms and, when caught, the site would be removed from Google's index.
The role of a search engine is to help user's find the information they seek. Over time, Google extends a level of trust to your site by indexing your pages and directing users to your content. By redirecting users in this manner, your site is betraying that trust.
The reasons for your site's actions are irrelevant. You can re-direct everyone to a page on Japan disaster relief because you believe strongly in the cause. The action is still not in alignment with Google's interests, nor those of your site's visitors.
-
Take any site out of the search engines and see what happens. Whether it's a 301 or a 302 redirect will determine the long term impact. 302s tell the search engines "this page has temporarily moved". Which is all good and fine for a matter of hours, maybe even a couple days. After that, all bets are off.
Users will be disoriented. Expecting to come to an actual site, and being sent to a Facebook page will be disorienting and alienating. It will be annoying and off-putting to users. Many users may very well never come back to the main site afterward.
Intentionally redirecting users who expect to come to a company site is deceptive. And extremely unprofessional. It breaks an expected user experience trust.
Doing it with an entire site could cause all sorts of red flags from a search engine perspective. Because of those very user deception and alienation issues.
Redirecting an entire site to Facebook is very unwise from an SEO perspective, from a user experience perspective, from a brand cohesiveness perspective. Bad. bad. Bad.
-
They have a large website, I don't know the number of pages. Yes, they do wish to re-direct the entire site to their facebook page.
-
I apologize. I should have been clearer.
Do they have a 100 page website and they wish to re-direct the entire site to a single page on facebook? Or do they wish to forward the traffic from a single page on their site to the facebook page?
-
They want to do a 302 redirect. I'll read the link you provided, thanks!
-
Can you clarify what you mean by "forward their website traffic"?
The idea behind a 301 or 302 forward is to send visitors to the same content in a different location. If the content is altered, then you run afoul of Google rules. This could be seen as cloaking or doorway pages.
Further details can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should my website be accessible by IP?
I have been doing some digging in to this today essentially triggered off by looking at the secure certificate on my site and comparing it to others as i have been seeing some security warnings on a random basis. I noticed that on all instances none of the other sites IP addresses re-direct to the website, whereas on my site it does. is re-directing the IP address to the website a big no-no?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WAWKA1 -
International website. Di I need a new website
i am looking to expand from the UK and open a location in the US. i curretly have a .co.uk domain. what would you recommend I do with th website, create a new one wth a .com domain?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Caffeine_Marketing0 -
Recommended SEO Companies
Looking for advice here.... We are a small business looking to secure/increase rankings in the search engines. What are some recommended SEO agencies/companies that are effective with today's search engine optimization standards. _ Thank you_
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wickerparadise0 -
If a website trades internationally and simply translates its online content from English to French, German, etc how can we ensure no duplicate content penalisations and still maintain SEO performance in each territory?
Most of the international sites are as below: example.com example.de example.fr But some countries are on unique domains such example123.rsa
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Dave_Schulhof0 -
Linking Within Website
Hello - I have about 10 landing pages that I am focusing on ranking for and I'm doing okay. My question is should I have all these pages on a drop down menu from my home page or is the innerlinking too much? http://www.kasplacement.com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ksundheim10 -
SEO Overly-Dynamic URL Website with thousands of URLs
Hello, I have a new client who has a Diablo 3 database. They have created a very interesting site in which every "build" is it's own URL. Every page is a list of weapons and gear for the gamer. The reader may love this but it's nightmare for SEO. I have pushed for a blog to help generate inbound links and traffic but overall I feel the main feature of their site is a headache to optimize. They have thousands of pages index in google but none are really their own page. There is no strong content, H-Tags, or any real substance at all. With a lack of definition for each page, Google see's this as a huge ball of mess, with duplicate Page Titles and too many onpage links. The first thing I did was tell them to add a canonical link which seemed to drop the errors down 12K leaving only 2400 left...which is a nice start, but the remaining errors is still a challenge. I'm thinking about seeing if I can either find a way to make each page it's own blurb, H Tag or simple have the Nav bar and all the links in the database Noindex. That way the site is left with only a handful of URLs + the Blog and Forum Thought?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MikePatch0 -
Are there any SEO Tips before killing a website?
Hey guys, My company acquired another company, and after a couple of months we decided to completely kill their website. I'm not finding any info about SEO best practices for this type of situation. From the "switching domains" and "new sites" articles and blog posts I can extrapolate that I should: 301 redirect their home page to ours Look at specific pages with good authority that relate to our pages and 301 them. Look at the strongest backlinks to their site and try to change them to point to our site. Create a 404 page for the rest of their webpages that tells them that we acquired the company (hopefully with a main menu and search bar) Any other suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nrv0 -
Link Age as SEO factor?
Hi Guys
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | VividLime
I have a client who ranks well within a competitive sector of the travel industry. They are planning CMS move which will involve changing from .cfm to .aspx We will be doing the standard redirects etc However Matt's statement here on 301 redirects got me thinking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW5UL3lzBOA&t=0m24s He says that basically you loose a bit of page rank when you do a 301 redirect. Now, we will be potentially redirecting 1000s of links and my thinking is 'a lot of a little, adds up to a lot' In other words, 1000s of redirects may have a big enough impact to loose some rankings in a very competitive and aggressive space. So recommended that we contact the sites who has the link highest value and ask them to manually change the links from cfm to aspx. This will then mean that there are no loss value as with a 301 redirect. -But now I have another dilemma which I'm unsure about. So the main question:
Is link age factor in rankings ? If I update any links, this will make said link new to Google, so if link age is a factor, would this also lessen the value passed initially?0