Why is this store getting hurt in SERPs when they removed duplicate content?
-
I work with an e-commerce client who got hit hard by Panda. They are very cautious, and want small-scale tests to prove each hypothesis before committing to larger changes.
Recently, we reworked content on 30 product detail pages. Before, these product pages featured some original content mixed with some manufacturer content. The change we made was to remove the manufacturer content completely from the product page, leaving about 300 words of high-quality, original content--all of which was written by subject matter experts.
I assumed that Google viewed this manufacturer text as duplicate content. However, when these 30 modified pages were compared to the control, they performed significantly worse.
Question 1: Does any have any idea why these pages would perform worse than the control?
Question 2: Do you have any tips for convincing this client to try another test or get the buy-in to make the larger changes that--in theory--need to happen?FWIW, this client has about 10,000 product detail pages--the vast majority of which contain just manufacturer content.
I appreciate your thoughts.
-
I would be curious to look at each form of the pages using the LDA tool.
The main reason to use the tool is to understand if you are significantly reducing the page's relevancy to your target keyword(s).
-
Hi Ryan,
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
We didn't make any changes to any of the titles or any overall site changes. We measured the changes using internal tracking tools to get the daily traffic by search engine to each product detail page. We also used Google Webmaster Tools to estimate SERP positional data.
The updated pages do have about half as many total words as the control, so that could definitely explain it.
For followup testing, I'm thinking of trying:
- test versus control, same word count, test is 100% original, control is 0% original
- test versus control, same word count, test is 50% original, control is 0% original
- test versus control, same word count, test is 25% original, control is 0% original
-
Hi Sarah.
I can't blame the client for wanting small tests. It's actually a prudent strategy.
I think having some manufacturer content mixed in with other quality content is fine. Normally 300 words would be a bit thin but for product pages that is not bad at all.
What changes to the page were made other then the content? Did the title change at all?
How exactly are you measuring the performance of these pages. Please provide as much detail as possible.
Is there any other site wide changes being made at the same time?
Does any have any idea why these pages would perform worse than the control?
Assuming there are no other factors involved, which is a big assumption, the only logical response I can offer is the revised pages are viewed by Google as weaker. By removing the manufacturer's content the pages are thinner and less relevant to the keywords involved.
Do you have any tips for convincing this client to try another test or get the buy-in to make the larger changes that--in theory--need to happen?
How to restore a client's confidence after making an error?
Assure the client you realize they are highly dependent upon their rankings for sales. You are proceeding under your experiences and knowledge, which has been successful in the past. Panda is a new thing and Google is still making rolling out new changes. The industry is still learning and adjusting to these changes. You are consulting with others regarding the unexpected results and you are committed to ensuring this project is properly completed.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
The blog section of my website just got deleted, Would it get my website penalized if I posted the same content again?
The blog section of my website just got deleted, Would it get my website penalized if I posted the same content again?
Content Development | | DustChasersToronto0 -
Why is content getting longer?
I find it odd that with the way life is today -- the gotta-have-it-now, instant gratification, can't hold someone's attention span for longer than 3 seconds -- why Google is wanting content to be REALLY long?? I've read articles saying content should be as long as 2,000 words per page. This just seems nuts to me. No one wants to read anymore. Look at how short Twitter posts are and how videos are so prevalent now. Any thoughts?
Content Development | | SEOhughesm0 -
Curated content on page one of google for medium competition keywords?
Has anyone here ranked curated content on page one of Google for medium competition keywords?
Content Development | | jtbaker19710 -
Duplicate Content In Webmaster Tools
In wordpress on some of our blogs when we have gone to publish them wordpress has shortened the url. In Google webmaster tools the orignal url is coming up as a 404 error. This url is not indexed in Google. Is this something to worry about and can this be avoided? Thank you in advance.
Content Development | | Palmbourne0 -
Same content on site blog as a separate blog. Will unpublishing on one blog evade duplicate content issues?
I just discovered my client was posting the same content as the site I'm working on for him on a separate blog. I don't want to run into duplicate content issues. Both are Wordpress sites. Will it suffice to simply unpublish duplicate entries on the other blog and leave the posts as drafts?
Content Development | | locallyrank0 -
Duplicate Page Content & Rel-Canonicals
The SEO Moz duplicate page content tool lists the following URL's as having duplicate content: http://www.savvyboater.com/1988-newer-8-tooth-15-hp-honda-outboard-props.aspx http://www.savvyboater.com/1988-newer-8-tooth-15-hp-honda-outboard-props.aspx?sort=PriceAsc&pi=2 The second URL is the price sorter/second page of the category and contains the following rel-canonical: | http://www.savvyboater.com/1988-newer-8-tooth-15-hp-honda-outboard-props.aspx"> Are we using the rel-canonical correctly in this case? If so, why does it continue to show up as duplicate content in our SEO Moz report? There are over 1,000 URLS listed in the report with the exact same issue. |
Content Development | | ironpac0 -
Duplicate Text on Blog & Internal News Page
I have two places I post news for our company. Our blog - typically more informal posts
Content Development | | seo-hunter
mycompany.wordpress.com & Our news page - typically more newsworthy than the blog
mycompany.com/news My question is, It is okay to just copy the exact text from my wordpress blog and paste to my news area of my site and vice versa? Does this hurt ranking potential for either page?0 -
What is the best way to remove old pages (if at all)?
Hi, I have a client who has thousands of pages on his site - 50,000+. It is a news website so most of these pages are old news articles and blog posts that receive very little traffic. We are moving to a new content management system and are debating on whether or not to keep all that old content. So far our decision is to keep the content that has gotten at least 100+ visits from Bing or Google in the last 6 months but dump everything else. This amounts to around 30,000 or so pages most of which have several links pointing to them. My question is from an SEO standpoint is that okay to do? We'd not only lose pages but links as well. Part of me thinks that in light of the Panda update getting rid of old content that is good but not great could about help out the site (we do great in the SERPs and actually got a bump in traffic after the Panda update to new articles/posts). However, we obviously don't want to cause problems and that is why I'd appreciate the thoughts and ideas on the best way to handle this major downsizing in content. Thanks!
Content Development | | Matthew_Edgar0