Multiple Google Places listings under review
-
I have a client with a waste removal business who had multiple listings on his Google Places account for different service locations.
Over the last four months I have been creating separate listings for each separate service location, each under a different Google account and with a unique business name, address, phone number and website URL. They have all been verified by postcard and listed separately in local directories so that they have citations. As I have been creating the new listings I have also been deleted the old ones to make sure they are not flagged as duplicates.
2 months ago all the listings in the client's Google Places account were placed under review. I made some changes and submitted it for re-review but no go with Google.
Now all the new listings I set up have also suddenly been placed under review.
About a week ago I noticed that information in two separate Google Places listings was being mixed up - for example, the website URL for one listing was being shown in another listing. There is no connection between these two listings other than that they were both set up from the same IP address so this seems very strange. I reported this to Google and asked them to sort it out, then all of a sudden I found that ALL of the new listings had been placed under review. So now my client has no active listings at all.
He can't afford to wait another 2 months for Google to review all the listings again so I am wondering whether the best course of action would just be to delete everything and start over.
Any advice would be most welcome!
-
Just to pick up your point about keywords in the title. Yes, all the new business listings have keyword rich titles - e.g. Dagenham Waste Removal, so you could be right about that being the source of the problem.
-
Thanks for the reply.
I hear what you're saying about not creating even more confusion but this situation requires some form of human intervention to unravel and getting someone at Google to respond is nigh on impossible.
Just to be clear, all the new listings I have set up are on separate accounts. They have all been verified by postcard and up until recently were appearing normally in Google Places.
The other suggestion that has been made is that I should set up service locations on the main listing rather than separate listings for each location but as the main listing is suspended I can't do that. It does appear to be a catch 22 situation.
-
Thanks for your reply Robert.
Google doesn't appear to offer the option of phone verification in the UK so I have been forced down the postcard verification route.
Each of the listings has a different business name based on the locality (e.g. Dagenham Waste Removal, Romford Waste Removal) physical address, phone number and website URL.
The reason why I set up separate listings for each service location was that the consensus on the Google forum was not to put all your eggs in one basket.
-
Jan, we have several clients with multiple locations and have not run into this problem. Your issue begs a few more questions, so sorry for the long answer.
Your client is in waste removal and I am assuming your multiple locations are in the same city. I wonder why you are using post cards as opposed to phone numbers for your verification given that using phone numbers is near instantaneous for verification? In highly competitive industries/keywords like brick and mortar dating, etc. my experience has been that Google is a bit more sensitive. Waste removal - is a highly competitive term so, likely more 'watched.'
You stated the URL was different for each listing, do they have common phone numbers? The problem with this is Google really doesn't like call centers for Places. They seem to prefer differing phone numbers.
Currently within Google's known issues on Places is Inability to request reconsideration of a Places listing: Google Places › Help articles › Google Places Known Issues. While this is not your exact issue, you may be better off following the advice there and just start over. Given that this has now been two months....I would start over.
First, I would go into each account and delete it from appearing. I would then create a new Google mail account for each location (again assuming they are real locations and not PO boxes or UPS boxes with 'addresses'). I would insure that if I am using the same domain name in the URL that each location had its own page with address and a distinct phone number and I would verify using that number.
I would also not take months but do each and every one asap. On categories, where possible if a differing service is offered I would certainly show it. Lastly, if the problem is there is one location and multiple service areas, you need to use one account and then show your service areas as opposed to trying to list each. -
I don't think you're going to like the course of action here, because it is be patient. Google's database that runs Google Places has had issues with duplication and mixing up listings going back a long time. They have gotten better over time but are not perfect. I would not continue deleting and recreating things in their database because I think it will only cause more confusion. You could go to the Google Places forum and try to get some assistance there if you have not already done that. They are mostly moderated by the community, but some times you'll see Google employees responding to posts and expediting.
Was there anything in the listing that flagged it for review? Often times people try to use keywords in the title of the listing because it has improved performance in the past, but they do not like that. Moving forward if you want to make changes to a current listing I would just make sure that listing is verified and then process changes as opposed to deleting old listings and creating new listings on top of them, which is what it sounds like is happening, but correct me if I'm misunderstanding.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google not Indexing images on CDN.
My URL is: https://bit.ly/2hWAApQ We have set up a CDN on our own domain: https://bit.ly/2KspW3C We have a main xml sitemap: https://bit.ly/2rd2jEb and https://bit.ly/2JMu7GB is one the sub sitemaps with images listed within. The image sitemap uses the CDN URLs. We verified the CDN subdomain in GWT. The robots.txt does not restrict any of the photos: https://bit.ly/2FAWJjk. Yet, GWT still reports none of our images on the CDN are indexed. I ve followed all the steps and still none of the images are being indexed. My problem seems similar to this ticket https://bit.ly/2FzUnBl but however different because we don't have a separate image sitemap but instead have listed image urls within the sitemaps itself. Can anyone help please? I will promptly respond to any queries. Thanks
Technical SEO | | TNZ
Deepinder0 -
Google Cache issue
Hi, We’ve got a really specific issue – we have an SEO team in-house, and have had numerous agencies look at this – but no one can get to the bottom of this. We’re a UK travel company with a number of great positions on the search engines – our brand is www.jet2holidays.com. If you try ‘Majorca holidays’, ‘tenerife holidays’, ‘gran canaria holidays’ etc you’ll see us in the top few positions on Google when searching from the UK. However, none of our destination pages (and it’s only the destination pages), show a ‘cached’ option next to them. Example: https://www.google.com/search?q=majorca+holidays&oq=majorca+holidays&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3.2151j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 This isn’t affecting our rankings, but we’re fairly certain it is affecting our ability to be included in the Featured Snippets. Checked and there aren’t any noarchive tags on the pages, example: https://www.jet2holidays.com/destinations/balearics/majorca Anyone have any ideas?
Technical SEO | | fredgray0 -
Why Google crawl parameter URLs?
Hi SEO Masters, Google is indexing this parameter URLs - 1- xyz.com/f1/f2/page?jewelry_styles=6165-4188-4184-4192-4180-6109-4191-6110&mode=li_23&p=2&filterable_stone_shapes=4114 2- xyz.com/f1/f2/page?jewelry_styles=6165-4188-4184-4192-4180-4169-4195&mode=li_23&p=2&filterable_stone_shapes=4115&filterable_metal_types=4163 I have handled by Google parameter like this - jewelry_styles= Narrows Let Googlebot decide mode= None Representative URL p= Paginates Let Googlebot decide filterable_stone_shapes= Narrows Let Googlebot decide filterable_metal_types= Narrows Let Googlebot decide and Canonical for both pages - xyz.com/f1/f2/page?p=2 So can you suggest me why Google indexed all related pages with this - xyz.com/f1/f2/page?p=2 But I have no issue with first page - xyz.com/f1/f2/page (with any parameter). Cononical of first page is working perfectly. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Rajesh.Prajapati
Rajesh0 -
What's going on with google index - javascript and google bot
Hi all, Weird issue with one of my websites. The website URL: http://www.athletictrainers.myindustrytracker.com/ Let's take 2 diffrenet article pages from this website: 1st: http://www.athletictrainers.myindustrytracker.com/en/article/71232/ As you can see the page is indexed correctly on google: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dfbzhHkl5K4J:www.athletictrainers.myindustrytracker.com/en/article/71232/10-minute-core-and-cardio&hl=en&strip=1 (that the "text only" version, indexed on May 19th) 2nd: http://www.athletictrainers.myindustrytracker.com/en/article/69811 As you can see the page isn't indexed correctly on google: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KeU6-oViFkgJ:www.athletictrainers.myindustrytracker.com/en/article/69811&hl=en&strip=1 (that the "text only" version, indexed on May 21th) They both have the same code, and about the dates, there are pages that indexed before the 19th and they also problematic. Google can't read the content, he can read it when he wants to. Can you think what is the problem with that? I know that google can read JS and crawl our pages correctly, but it happens only with few pages and not all of them (as you can see above).
Technical SEO | | cobano0 -
Getting Recrawled by Google
I have been updating my site a lot and some of the updates are showing up in Google and some are not. Is there a best practice in getting your site fully recrawled by Google?
Technical SEO | | ShootTokyo0 -
Google is ranking the wrong page
We are trying to figure out why google is ranking the wrong page for the key word motorcycle tires. We have a few ideas but are not sure yet. If you do a search for Motorcycle Tires you will see site on page 2 or top of 3; however, the page will be going to our dirt bike tires page (http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/t/44/86/176/742/Dirt-Bike-Tires-All) not our Motorcycle page (http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/t/49/-/181/750/Motorcycle-Tires-All) any thoughts? We think we know why but want others opinions too.
Technical SEO | | DoRM0 -
Why Google not picking My META Description? Google itself populate the description.. How to control this Search Snippets??
Why Google not picking My META Description? Google itself populate the description.. How to control this Search Snippets??
Technical SEO | | greyniumseo0 -
Where to place your brandname in your URL?
Hello everybody! Quick and short question: What is better when you want to rank for your your brandname? www.jobsbrandname.com or www.brandnamejobs.com I think for SEO it's better to use the last one but marketing has the wish to use the first one. Thanks for your responce!
Technical SEO | | ltom0