Yahoo Site Explorer died. Does DA and PA Seomoz parameters have all it takes to replace YSE?
-
We're trying to simplify our link analysis job when acquiring a new external link. We're wondering to know if Domain Authority Seomoz parameter is all what we need to take a decision.
Does DA Seomoz parameter takes into consideration 'domain age', 'alexa ranking', 'dmoz links', indexed pages on google', and 'inbound links vs outbound links'?
-
A few thoughts regarding your guidelines:
It can take 60 days for the PA of a new page to be updated in OSE. If the page you are attempting to acquire a link from is new I would not be concerned about the page's PA at all.
The Domain Age is not a factor I would consider at all when acquiring a link.
Toolbar PR is only updated every 3-4 months so you wont know the true PA of a page, especially if it is a new page.
I would recommend the following primary considerations when acquiring links: site DA, popularity of the page which offers the link (if it is a new page, what is the expected PA/PR of the page in 90 days), relevance of site and page and the location of the link (in content, footer, etc).
-
Hi! I've read Matt's blog post Introducing SEOmoz's Updated Page Authority and Domain Authority and now we better understand how PA and DA works. You guys do a really good job!
We check the metrics of hundreds of pages and domains when acquiring new links and that's why is very important for us to make this fast.
Now that Y!SE died and we better understand how PA and DA works we conclude that we'll be checking the following factors before acquiring new links:
- PA: should be 25+
- DA: should be 25+
- IP: links should not be from the same C class.
- Domain Age: at least 1 year old
- Indexed Pages: at least more than 30.
- IP Neighborhood: domain should not have more than 2 spammy sites on its neighborhood.
- Context and Relevance: according to target keyword.
- PR: page rank should be 1+.
- Google Cache: no more than 2 weeks latency.
We thinks that the metrics above are all what we need BUT honestly still too much to check. Seems that nobody has the magic wand!
Are we missing something? Checking more than should I check?
-
Just figured I'd toss in my $0.02.
As others have noted, Y!SE offered no metrics as to the importance/influence of a site or page in its index, so there's really nothing to compare it with. Google offers PageRank, which Linkscape also has (mozRank). But PA and DA are designed to be predictive algorithms with tons of inputs that try to best reflect how Google.com (US) values links and link metrics.
Matt Peters, our data scientist, has a blog post going up in the next few days with details about how we do this and what PA/DA are from a technical standpoint, but you can basically think of them as the best correlated query/content-agnostic metrics for Google rankings (at least, we've never measured something that could better predict rank position).
-
Will be really useful for the SEO community to see a detail of what specific metrics DA takes into consideration.
The link I shared above shows all the details.
Maybe the DA parameter became the new standard
Many SEOs have used DA as a standard for some time. When there was a problem with the Linkscape crawler a lot of SEOs were quite vocally upset as they even shared DA with clients in reporting, and this reporting was impacted by the issues experienced at the time.
Do you think there's place to improve it? We want only 1parameter for everything.
DA is the most solid form of an all-encompassing parameter. It is far from perfect, and will not be even close in 2012 and likely much longer. There are numerous major considerations which need to be considered such as: impact of social sharing, penalties, link valuation by location (footer vs in content), relevance and more.
The bottom line is Google's algorithm is hidden and likely will always be kept private. It also includes hundreds of factors. It's a struggle in futility and the impossible to mimic Google's ranking. With that said, DA is a solid attempt at a critical metric which is part of that process.
-
Thanks Ryan for your input!
Cyprus, as you said, you can't add into the DA parameter the Link Relevance and Context, but what about other metrics? Do you think there's place to improve it? We want only 1parameter for everything.
Will be really useful for the SEO community to see a detail of what specific metrics DA takes into consideration. Maybe the DA parameter became the new standard
-
I really like Ryan's answer, and I'm going to endorse it.
If you are only looking for ONE metric to judge links, then DA or PA wouldn't be a bad choice. Certainly better than the old PageRank. But I wouldn't advise using just one metric.
DA takes all of SEOmoz link metrics into consideration, including MozTrust and MozRank. Of all the metrics out there, it is best indicator of a given domain's (or page's) ability to rank for a particular phrase. We know of no other publicly available measurement that does as good of job.
That said, it shouldn't be the only thing you should look at when evaluating link prospect. Relevance, Context, number of links on the page, position and other considerations should all be brought into play.
Best of luck in your link building!
-
Everything you wanted to know about Domain Authority can be found here: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/domain-authority
A few other notes:
Alexa Ranking is not a relevant metric for most aspects of SEO. Overall the ranking has been shown to be highly inaccurate for most sites and it is very easy to manipulate. I like to look at Alexa ranking to gain a rough initial idea of a site's popularity, and that's it.
Domain age isn't a relevant metric for most aspects of SEO either. There are brand new domains with high PR and 10 yr old domains with low PR. Any correlation between a site's age and it's PR seems to be simply from the idea that older sites have had more time to earn links.
Open Site Explorer does capture a site's links whether they are from dmoz or any other site. OSE also can differentiate between internal and external links.
I can see the value in adding "indexed pages on Google" to OSE. That request will quickly expand to indexed pages of the various Google sites for each country, and then to Bing as well.
I am all for adding additional metrics to support SEO. I only ask the metrics be relevant information which can be used to understand or improve SEO performance.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Open Site Explorer backlink results different that MajesticSEO... why?
When checking the number of external links linking to a site, Open Site Explorer and MajesticSEO give completely different results. In one case Open Site Explorer is saying the website has: "49 Total Links" and MajesticSEO is saying the website has: "6,143 External Backlinks (in the last 5 years)" and "497 External Backlinks (in the last 90 days)" Does anyone know why this is?
Moz Pro | | conor10050 -
Opens Site Explorer sees two pages that are one
www.mysite.com/ and www.mysite.com/default.asp are both showing up in open site explorer. How do I make sure that these are not being interpreted as two pages when they are the same page? (Both in search engines and OSE.)
Moz Pro | | EugeneF0 -
In Open Site Explorer is it possible to use wildcards?
If I have a section on my website called lists with articles in there can I use wildcards in Open Site Explorer to find how many backlinks all articles in that section have - and ideally which pages are most linked to? Something like www.example.com/lists/* to give number of backlinks to all articles in that website section and which are the most highly linked to. Would be a great feature to have! Cheers Siimon
Moz Pro | | SimonCh0 -
Does SEOmoz give a way to know what link on what page produces the 404 errors that SEOmoz is telling me I have??
SEOmoz gives me a report of 404 errors on my site. Do they give a way to know from what link on what page produces the error?
Moz Pro | | MeridianGroup0 -
Difference in data between http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/keyword-difficulty and http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/url-metrics/
Hi, Has any once else experienced any difference in data between http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/url-metrics/ and http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/keyword-difficulty Please look at the attached image. For "http://www.webmd.com/diet/guide/choosing-weight-loss-program" and "http://www.freedieting.com/" page authority and domain authority match exactly. But for "http://www.fitnessmagazine.com/weight-loss/plans/" data does not match. The data from "http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/url-metrics/" was retrieved brely 60 seconds latter after data from "http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/keyword-difficulty". We used our custom app for retrieve data from "http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/url-metrics/". The columns were matched against the specs given in "http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/w/page/13991153/URL-Metrics-API". We are retrieving following columns 1)ut(Title) 2)ueid(External Links) 3)uid(Links) 4)umrp(mozRank) 5)upa(Page Authority) 6)pda(Domain Authority) Any help will be greatly appreciated. zvFif.jpg
Moz Pro | | claytons0 -
Inbound Link Discrepancy: Campaign vs Open Site Explorer
Hello, I am getting starkly different inbound link amounts from Open Site Explorer and my Campaigns tab. Domain 1
Moz Pro | | truckguy77
Campaigns: Total links = 10,895,942 Open Site Explorer - Links = 224,000 Domain 2
Campaigns: Total links = 25,670,287
Open Site Explorer - Links = 157,000 Why would these be so different? For reference, the "Historical Domain Analysis" shows these sites getting exponentially more links starting in February. This is of concern to me. I didn't do anything different in February to get so many more links (especially not in the millions). If anything, I am hoping the "Campaigns" section is simply wrong about this.0 -
New To SEOMOZ, 2 Questions...
Hi, 1. I got signed up with SEOMOZ yesterday and would like to know about the competitive analysis tool. I saw in a demo video of SEOMOZ that there was an aspect of Social links (Facebook etc) included in the analysis, I can't see this in my analysis however. 2. Is it possible to change websites over time? Let say in a few months I want to work on a new website, can I remove one of my 5 and add a new one? Thanks! James
Moz Pro | | James10 -
SEOmoz application suggestion
I would like to suggest the ranking changes be broken into two categories, You and Competition, right now it seems everything is lumped in together... Screen shot attached. Thanks. A24tp.jpg
Moz Pro | | CouponCactus0