Testing your code and site
-
I’ve got various WordPress websites with the Share This social plugin for WordPress. I have been using Firebug and http://analyze.websiteoptimization.com/wso to do general checks on the site and the code. And used W3C validator too.
Due to the way WordPress appears to work we never seem to be able to get all the firebug/ website optimization tests to pass and the W3C validator passes everything on HTML 5 apart from 7 errors with the Share This social plugin.
How do you test your code/websites? Should I stop be a perfectionist and just be happy?
-
W3C feedback -
Validation Output: 7 Errors
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute xmlns:fb not allowed here.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute with the local name xmlns:fb is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute xmlns:addthis not allowed here.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute with the local name xmlns:addthis is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 109, Column 382: Attribute addthis:url is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")`
`* Line 109, Column 382: Attribute addthis:title is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code>
````<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")` `* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 382_: Attribute addthis:url not allowed on element div at this point.``` <code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' **>**<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dl><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dt><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code="">Attributes for element </a>[`div`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-div-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> </dl>` `* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 382_: Attribute addthis:title not allowed on element div at this point.``` <code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' **>**<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dl><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dt><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code="">Attributes for element </a>[`div`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-div-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> </dl>` `* ![Warning](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/warning.png "Warning") _Line 109, Column 452_: Attribute fb:like:layout is not serializable as XML 1.0.``` <code class="input">…ok_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"**>**<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a> <a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")` `* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 452_: Attribute fb:like:layout not allowed on element a at this point.``` <code class="input">…ok_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"**>**<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a> <dl><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a> <dt><a class="addthis_button_tweet">Attributes for element </a>[`a`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-a-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> <dd>`[href](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-href)`</dd> <dd>`[target](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-target)`</dd> <dd>`[rel](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-rel)`</dd> <dd>`[media](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-media)`</dd> <dd>`[hreflang](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-hreflang)`</dd> <dd>`[type](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-type)`</dd> </dl>` `* ![Warning](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/warning.png "Warning") _Line 109, Column 557_: Attribute g:plusone:size is not serializable as XML 1.0.``` <code class="input">…oogle_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"**>**<a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code></pre> <p class=" helpwanted"=""></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")</code> ````* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 557_: Attribute g:plusone:size not allowed on element a at this point.``` <code class="input">…oogle_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"**>**<a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code></pre> <div class=" ve="" html5"=""></a> <dl><a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code></pre> <div class=" ve="" html5"=""></a> <dt><a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code>Attributes for element </pre> <div class=" ve="" html5"=""></a>[`a`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-a-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> <dd>`[href](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-href)`</dd> <dd>`[target](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-target)`</dd> <dd>`[rel](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-rel)`</dd> <dd>`[media](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-media)`</dd> <dd>`[hreflang](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-hreflang)`</dd> <dd>`[type](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-type)`</dd> </dl></code> ``````````
## Analysis and Recommendations * TOTAL_HTML - Congratulations, the total number of HTML files on this page (including the main HTML file) is 1 which most browsers can multithread. Minimizing HTTP requests is key for web site optimization. Y * TOTAL_OBJECTS - Caution. You have 20 total objects on this page. From 12 to 20 objects per page, the latency due to object overhead makes up from 75% to 80% of the delay of the average web page. See Figure II-3: [Relative distribution of latency components showing that object overhead dominates web page latency](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/performance/II-3-object-overhead.html) in [Website Optimization Secrets](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/) for more details. Consider reducing, eliminating, and combining external objects (graphics, CSS, JavaScript, iFrames and XHTML) to reduce the total number of objects, and thus separate HTTP requests. Consider using [CSS sprites](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/css-sprites/) to help consolidate decorative images. * TOTAL_IMAGES - Caution. You have a moderate amount of images on this page (14 ). Consider using fewer images on the site or try reusing the same image in multiple pages to take advantage of caching. Using CSS techniques such as colored backgrounds, borders, or spacing instead of graphic techniques can help reduce HTTP requests. * TOTAL_SIZE - Warning! The total size of this page is 315393 bytes, which will load in 66.86 seconds on a 56Kbps modem. Consider reducing total page size to less than 100K to achieve sub 20 second response times on 56K connections. Pages over 100K exceed most attention thresholds at 56Kbps, even with feedback. Consider optimizing your site with [Website Optimization Secrets](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/), [_Speed Up Your Site_](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/) or [contacting us](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/contact/) about our optimization services. * TOTAL_SCRIPT - Caution. The total number of external script files on this page is 5 , consider reducing this to one or two. Combine, refactor, and minify to [optimize your JavaScript](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/javascript-optimization/) files. Ideally you should have one (or even embed scripts for high-traffic pages) on your pages. Consider [suturing JavaScript files together](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/suture/) at the server to minimize HTTP requests. Placing external JavaScript files at the bottom of your BODY, and CSS files in the HEAD enables progressive display in XHTML web pages. * HTML_SIZE - Congratulations, the total size of this HTML file is 12545 bytes, which less than 50K. Assuming that you specify the HEIGHT and WIDTH of your images, this size allows your HTML to display content in under 10 seconds, the average time users are willing to wait for a page to display without feedback. * IMAGES_SIZE - Warning! The total size of your images is 207700 bytes, which is over 100K. Consider [switch graphic formats](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/graphic-optimization/%3Eoptimizing%20images%3C/a%3E%20for%20size,%20combining%20them,%20and%20replacing%20graphic%20rollovers%20with%20CSS.%20You%20can%20often%20%3Ca%20href=) to achive smaller file sizes (from JPEG to PNG for example). Finally, substitute CSS techniques for graphics techniques to create colored borders, backgrounds, and spacing. * SCRIPT_SIZE - Warning! The total size of external your scripts is 95148 bytes, which is over 20K. Consider [optimizing your JavaScript](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/javascript-optimization/) for size, combining them, and using [HTTP compression](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/compress/) where appropriate for any scripts placed in the HEAD of your documents. You can substitute [CSS menus](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/cssmenus/) for JavaScript-based menus to minimize or even eliminate the use of JavaScript. * MULTIM_SIZE - Congratulations, the total size of all your external multimedia files is 0 bytes, which is less than 10K. Firebug on Firefox Yahoo: See attached image Google: See attached Image [OdPjx.png](http://i.imgur.com/OdPjx.png) [VRW71.png](http://i.imgur.com/VRW71.png)```
-
-
Hi John,
7 errors all related to 1 plugin shouldnt be a big deal - especially when it comes to social plugins. A lot of the social share buttons themselves dont validate.
Im also not sure what you mean "the way WordPress appears to work"?
Could you post some of the errors here so we can see and try to help? The W3C error itself should let you know what you can do to fix the problem
-
Do you use Firebug? Any other tool suggestions?
-
W3C is an indicator of how well you have built your website but not for SEO as it use to be. I would suggest you focus on the sites speed, as it would typically deal with the issues you are facing with plugins and code. Hope this helps, Vahe
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Incorporating Spanish Page/Site
We bought an exact match domain (in Spanish) to incorporate with regular website for a particular keyword. This is our first attempt at this, and while we do have Spanish speaking staff that will translate/create a nice, quality page, we're not going to redo everything in Spanish page. Any advice on how to implement this? Do I need to create a whole other website in Spanish? Will that be duplicate content if I do? Can I just set it up to show the first page in Spanish, but if they click on anything else it redirects to our site? I'm pretty clueless on this, so if anything I've suggested is off-the-wall or a violation, I'm really just spit-balling, trying to figure out how to implement this. Thanks, Ruben
Web Design | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Site structure and blog tags for local with five locations
I have a client who has five locations. Their current web site was structured very well for the pre-penguin and Panda world. However it does not seem to do as well after these changes. I believe it would serve them both with their customers as well as on Google if they localized the site for each location. Currently all the content on the site if focused on one location that is in the largest metro. On the content side we have a plan to produce local content and blogs for each location. My questions are how to go about structuring the site map and blogs to provide the most local juice. I was also wondering how to properly mark up a site with a main trunk and five local branches. I am also trying to figure out how to structure the tags on the blog. On the site map itself I was planning on maintaining all the content as well as the older blogs in the main trunk of the web site. Under this trunk there is a locations page that currently goes to five pages that simply have an address as well as a bulletin board of upcoming events. The blog is directly off the main page with no tie to any location. Here are my thoughts on what I think we should do: I believe we should create a mini web site starting at the location page that has specific content and navigation related to each location. That the content should focus on the specifics of that area and what would serve that clientele the best. We should add to each branch location based on the key words and competition in that area. The blog off the main web site should continue to house the general categories that are already there as well as any other general posts. I think we should add a link to each store page with a location specific blog in each mini location site. Each mini location site should have it's own blog with specific blogs targeted towards the local market. This local blog would also feed in the general blogs from the "trunk" as they are posted. Relating back to my original questions: is what I outlined the right approach or is there a more effective way to do this? Is there any special mark up I should do to tell the directories what to do? How do I structure the tags for the blog? I was thinking of a structure like this: General blog/category/subject under the main structure : local blog/category/subject Any ideas of input on this? Ron
Web Design | | Ron_McCabe1 -
Pulling old site-map and URL structure of a site
Hey guys how do I pull an old sitemap or URL structure of a site ! This company I am helping out . Build a new site without any 301 redirect ! It's been about 2 months and hosting company sent me. SQL database file said we basically need to build another site ! Wondering if there are any other ways to see what exact urls were existent before their change over
Web Design | | BizDetox0 -
Can the website pages have the site name like Title of the page | Sitename.com
Hi, Can the website pages have the site name like Title of the page | Sitename.com I have a site with 50K pages and all pages have | Sitename.com mentioned would that be a good practice or bad? Thanks Martin
Web Design | | mtthompsons0 -
Need to hire a tech for find out why google spider can't access my site
Google spider can't access my site and all my pages are gone out of serps. I've called network solutions tech support and they say all is fine with the site which is wrong. does anyone know of a web tech who i can hire to fix this issue? Thanks, Ron
Web Design | | Ron100 -
My Site Is Using A Lot of Hosting Bandwidth. Suggestions?
My website http://www.socialseomanagement.com/ is using tons of bandwidth. I received a message from the hosting company saying I exceeded my monthly bandwidth and it has only been a few days. Can anyone take a look and make suggestions? Thanks
Web Design | | JChronicle0 -
How SEO friendly (or unfriendly) this site structure is
We have a client who wants a site structure like this http://thethomasoliverband.com/home - try to scroll down on the content and see how the url of the site changes. Would there be any problems on trying to SEO this type of structure?
Web Design | | paulct0 -
Two sites in same industry and which shopping cart
Right. So I suspect I am going to sound paranoid here - but you'll all forgive me right?? I am sure I saw a reply to a question on the Q&A suggesting that it was a bad idea to have two sites in one industry as Google may see it as trying to get two bites of the SERP cherry... is this accurate? I have an existing asp.net site in the maternity wear industry here in Australia and am wanting to start another site to appeal to a different customer base... the market is quite broad. There will be a core list of products that are the same between the sites, but also some quite different products. Content, product descriptions and categorys will be different. I have another website that I bought with reasonable age and links in the industry that I was going to 301 to the new site to give it a kick in the juice. So, not wanting to deceive my customers in anyway, I was thinking I would call it a "division of" or "sister site to" the existing ecommerce site, with a single link back and forward between the two sites. Would there be anything wrong with this in googles eyes? Even with same contact details? They would be run on totally different platforms and hosted by totally different providers. Or would you keep them totally seperate and only have contact details in images? Or a step further and have totally different phone numbers etc? Then the shopping cart - I would love some suggestions on which opensourse cart to use, preferrably one that I can set up myself, and that has a good framework for seo. I want to use schema.org, authorship, seo friendly urls all of which I am having trouble getting out of the developer of my asp.net site.... I don't want the new site to be asp.net Thanks in advance!!
Web Design | | catfree0