Taking up the entire serp
-
Hey guys,
I tried to search across the q&a for an answer but came up with nothing for this.
I'm competing well for our keyword rankings with 20 keywords, 13 of which on the first page and 9 in the top 3. Which is great!
But what we are interested in doing is taking over the rankings. Currently competitors reside around us in the serps taking up the remainder of traffic.
We are considering creating new websites and competing on the same keywords to rank and eventually take over the google rankings for our products. So that if you were to look to buy 'purple buttons' the top 5 websites sell these but are owned by ourselves.
The question is. Has anyone else done this? What are googles views? Are there any traps that we could run into?
As far as I see it the only real issues we could run into are with google on a moral basis.
Thoughts?
-
A hotel brand dominating serps?
Seems near impossible with all the clout OTA's have.
How do you guys pull it off?
-
Since you are trying to dominate the first 5 positions because you want people to buy from you I would recommend building a new site from scratch with the following:
- Different domain registrar
- Different hosting company
- Different content
- Different link profile
- Different site design
...you get where I'm going.
I can vouch that having done this for a certain client of mine it is indeed possible to dominate a keyword but you have to pose a competing company.
We did this because we had a client who owned 2 hotels with 2 different names that were right across the street from one another in London. In our case we were also able to register two Google places listings.
I was personally uncomfortable about doing this as room service was provided by the same chamber maids, the food by the same chef and the prices were identical. The only difference was in who manned the reception area and the decoration of the rooms...
If you are currently number 1 for most of your keywords but you feel that some people are buying from your competitors there must be a reason and creating a duplicate of your site won't help even if you have the first 2 pages covered. I would invest my time in finding out why. Could it be the prices, the product itself, delivery options, site structure, the images you use etc?
I would build the new site, not to trick customers into buying from me, but to learn what their preferences are and then apply them to my main site.
-
These websites have public whois information. But google is a registrar and might be able to see behind private whois.
-
Ok that is interesting!
So the next question is how are Google determining who owns which website? Are they using who is data? Or something else altogether?
-
I personally believe, from watching my own SERPs carefully over many years, that google now will throttle a second or third website from same company that competes in a single SERP.
Just as you sometimes see PAGES on one website swap positions, I have seen entire WEBSITES owned by one company swap positions in the SERPs. For example... Website A has pages ranking at #3 and #4.... Website B has pages ranking at #13 and #14. I have seen them switch to Website B at #3 and #4 and Website A at #13 and #14.
-
Thankyou for the above points.
I think it's worth pointing out that our keywords are Niche, so although there are a lot of competitors we currently are the mojor brand representing our service.
What we are looking to do here is create new websites, each branded individually offering the same service.
Yes we may be cutting down a consumers choice in reality, but is that an issue when our business core is to offer the best service possible?
I understand that morally this is a grey area. BUT. Has anyone actually attempted or done this with individual sites rather than other methods.
Thanks,
-
Agreed with everything said above.
Google are trying to make the web a better place. By occupying the top 5 SERPs your attempting to reduce the options available to consumers which ruins the customer experience and as such i think Google would take a dim view on it.
Although, my company sells on ebay and amazon, aswell as our own website. For many of our key terms we occupy 3 of the top 10 listings, one for our website, one for our ebay store/product page and again for amazon listings.
Our review centre lising is not far from top 10 when searching for a particular phrase too.
-
I think that there is a much better approach to taking up more of the search engine landscape than potentially using black hat techniques. Here is what I recommend.
- Invest in PPC
- Create a video on that product and submit to video sites such as Youtube.
- Submit that product to Google Product Search
- Create a blog post on that product that is useful to consumers
- Talk about that product on Google Plus.
What people find useful ultimately is the best remedy for strong search engine rankings.
-
I would look into the reactions of consumers who realise you own all the websites.
If it looks unnatural, you might have trust issues and effect conversion. If I for example didn't see a major brand trying to sell me a certain product in the surps, I would be wondering if theres something funny going on with them.
Might be a non-issue, but thats the only other 'trap' that comes to mind.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How will canonicalizing an https page affect the SERP-ranked http version of that page?
Hey guys, Until recently, my site has been serving traffic over both http and https depending on the user request. Because I only want to serve traffic over https, I've begun redirecting http traffic to https. Reviewing my SEO performance in Moz, I see that for some search terms, an http page shows up on the SERP, and for other search terms, an https page shows. (There aren't really any duplicate pages, just the same pages being served on either http or https.) My question is about canonical tags in this context. Suppose I canonicalize the https version of a page which is already ranked on the SERP as http. Will the link juice from the SERP-ranked http version of that page immediately flow to the now-canonical https version? Will the https version of the page immediately replace the http version on the SERP, with the same ranking? Thank you for your time!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JGRLLC0 -
Recent drop in SERP from #1 to #2\.
Our #1 priority keyword, which we've ranked #1 for years, suddenly we're #2. And, the page listed above us doesn't seem to be even compete. Moz On-Page has us at an A and them at a C. When I review the html, I don't even seem any exactly keyword match or matching text on the page. I checked are ranking last week and didn't notice any change - so I've narrowed it down to something changing in the last 4-5 days. Also of note, when I test, We're #1 on mobile, #2 on desktop. Sorry to not list the url's. omitted intentionally. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FX4nWOO0 -
Irrelevant Landing Pages are Ranking on Google SERP
Hi, I have noticed that Google likes to rank random pages on my site higher in the SERPs than the actual relevant content page for that service. Please let me know why it is happening?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RuchiPardal0 -
2 page titles, 1 url in Google SERPS: WTF!?!?
Hey guys, Hope everybody is having a good day. Today i came across something i have never seen in the serps before that i would like to share and getting feedback on. When i search for 'woonverzekering' on google.nl #1 is: **Url: ** www.independer.nl/woonverzekering/intro.aspx
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PrizeWize
**page titel: **Woonverzekering - Independer.nl When i search for 'woonhuisverzekering' on google.nl #1 is: **Url: ** www.independer.nl/woonverzekering/intro.aspx
page titel: Woonhuisverzekering? Vergelijk alle soorten woonverzekeringen - Independer.nl So basically 2 different queries show the same url with 2 different page titles in the serps. The only 'weird' thing i could find was a nobreakspace in the page title code: Woonhuisverzekering? Vergelijk alle soorten woonverzekeringen - Independer.nl I'm i missing something completely obvious here? Is this a commonly used technique. Is the page title getting chopped up because of ? What are they doing to get 2 page title results on 1 url?0 -
Serp and visitor is dropping everyday, Any suggestion?
Hello, My site was getting 1500-2500 visitor and the serp rank was very good, position 2nd to 4th. But now rank is dropping day by day and also the visitor. Its my present serp http://goo.gl/vHB6o and my site URL is secretlovemessages.com Can anyone suggest me whats am i doing wrong and what should i do to get a concreate serp and steady visitor. Thanks to all
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | purplerimon0 -
Geo-specific SERP Rank Tracker that is good for hyper local results?
We've had a lot of success using Raven Tools, as well as some other tools for SERP Rankings for our clients; however, most only go down to the country level. We're researching into some good hyper local trackers (down to the city/zip level). Does anyone have any suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BlastAM0 -
Do Share buttons take LinkJuice?
Hi, I'm using AddThis sharing on my site. The implementation is by embedding a href's all over the site. Do these buttons take my LinkJuice? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet0 -
Help Needed - 301 a .co.uk to a .com Serp Questions
Hey, really need some help deciding what to do... I have a .co.uk site, its my oldest and best site of my network and accounts for maybe 30-40% of my income. Although its a .co.uk site, it actually makes most of its from from USA traffic and targets many terms for the US market - but the problem is that due to it being a .co.uk it doesnt rank as well in G .com and over the last few years Google has defiantly widened the gap as such for the ability for a .co.uk to rank in G .com. Many terms that I used to be #1 for in G .com, I now rank position 5-10 only, but in G .co.uk I'm #1 and often with a duo listing so I wouldnt put the loss of rankings in G .com down to just losing rankings naturally. Now many of my key pages are gradually losing rankings in G .com which is not good and really frustrating Feedback Needed So my dilemma is do I risk my best site and 301 it to a .com hosted in the US for potential at a guess 50% increase in revenues and more future potential (If the 301 worked well and got some US rankings back - Im sure longtail would increase lots too) ? If people with experience with 301ing sites to a new domain could let me know how they did or if you're an SEO and have done this many times, how many times on average has Serps remained stable / unchanged ? Trying to work out the reward to risk ratio, like on average if the transition is seamless 90% of the time it would seem worth the gamble, but if its 50% then I would say its not worth it.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | goody2shoes0