Is International Geotargeting with Duplicate Content Effective?
-
A company located in Canada is currently targeting Canada through the geotargeting setting in Google Webmaster Tools. Google.ca rankings are good, but Google.com rankings are not. The company would like to gain more traction for US people using google.com.
The idea on the table is to set up a subfolder www.domain.com/us/ and use WMT to designate this version for the US.
Here's the kicker: the content is exactly the same.
Will Google consider the US version duplicate content? Is this an effective way to target US and Canada at the same time? Is it better to forget a duplicate US site altogether and use the "unlisted" setting in WMT?
-
Hi Rui,
I see what you mean, we just redirect our .co.uk domain with the ISP to the .com one as it was being treated as a low quality domain. It was something like a .com DA of 68 as opposed to a co.uk DA of 16 (bizarre why that was happening). After that our content in SERPs was/is balanced across all the countries in question.
Personally I like to partner with people in these countries, help them write content with our PR people and optimize the content for their countries. I know not everyone has the facility to do this but I find it drives traffic well from these countries on content that was originally written in the UK but tailored for say an Australian audience i.e. 'If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it probably is a duck!' in other words the more localised the content can be the better when trying to work in other countries.
Cheers
David
-
Thanks, David.
I do have some sites that has country level targeting (.com.au and .co.uk) which are ranking in Google.com as well as Google UK & Google Australia.
I thought what you meant was that I wouldn't lose the UK and Australian rankings if I switched off geotargeting
-
Sorry, seems I forgot to say that the current domain is a .com...
-
I would be more inclined to say that other factors are at play to how my ranks appeared in other countries other than the one I reside and work in. My site does not really have a country level target so geo-targeting would not be a strategic/necessary tool for me. My approach here would be to leave it to the search engines to determine if the value/quality of your content to searchers in other countries and not feel that just by using geo-targeting in GWT that it is actually going to improve your presence in a specific target country.
Here I have 2 stories that are optimised for specific keyword phrases. One story is from Ontario, Canada and the other Atlanta, US. I don't think about them in the sense that the first should be geared towards Canadians and the other Americans, more important are the thematics of the stories that should be deemed more importantly than a searchers geographic location.
http://www.instantatlas.com/public-health-ontario.xhtml
http://www.instantatlas.com/CDC_Story.xhtmlI asked Rand a similar question years ago about geo-targeting and from memory I think he said this feature is not active on the Moz site (at the time) as they want the site to be available to all, irrespective of what country the reside in.
David
-
Did your rankings improve for Canada/US after you turned off targeting?
-
This is fairly new to me so I'd like to know the answer to your question as well..
From the brief research I've done, I've read somewhat conflicting info. I've read that you could implement the rel=alternate tag on the geo-targeted page/subfolder that contains the dupe content. This will tell Google which page is the preferred version but for people searching in the targeted location it would return the geo-targeted page. (If its in a different language, you'd include the hreflang tag as well)
On the other hand, I also read that you cant geo target different countries if you have a country specific domain. So for example, website.ca is dedicated to serving canada results, and therefore cant geo target US. You can only geo-target when you have international domains (.com, .net, ,org etc.) I'm not sure how true this is, and cant find a source that explains this in detail.
If someone has experience in implementing geo-targeting with success (languages/locations/country specific domains etc) i'd also appreciate some clarification.
Greg
-
Agreed it will be flagged as duplicate content and personally speaking I would not set geo-targeting to Canada I'd just leave it off targeting completely. Done it like this for years and my ranks for my target keyword phrases are near the same irrespective of Canada or the US and my site is actually a UK domain.
I always find this tricky about the type of domain as well so as Irving is saying a .com would be helpful, with unique content and I guess 'maybe' the domain should be understood by Google to actually reside within the US i.e. hosted there. You might want to look into the importance of a domains registered geo-location these days - but that might just be old paranoia on my part.
However, ultimately content should be king with a good link quality strategy, can the owner of the domain for instance attain & build good US based root domain links?
David
-
Yes it's still duplicate content. Also, you almost never see a .ca domain ranking in the US. If the US market is big enough they should consider buying a .com and making unique content got the .com site.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
International SEO & redirects - do these solutions make sense?
I’m currently working on SEO for an international website with subdirectories set up for each international version. The site is has never had any SEO previously and is having a lot of indexing and visibility issues. Also geotargeting seems very off in search results. I’ve diagnosed various issues and want to check my assumptions and solutions below make sense... The root domain uses a 302 redirect to display content from the /en-GB page. (302 redirects seem to be a default language fallback setting configured in the CMS) and they’re used for most key pages. I’m concerned these redirects are contributing to a lot of the issues with incorrect indexing. The en-GB is the default language version of the site. So far, the en-GB has been set as the canonical version too. Both the root domain and this subdirectory URL display the same content. (en-US is also a near duplicate page). All other international homepages appear only on their subfolder URL. Various SEO tools have been showing redirect loops (caused by language changing parameter versions of URLs being crawled that don’t have redirects on them) and issues with hreflang and canonicals. I believe the hreflang tags and canonicals have been ignored due to relative URLs being used for each, as search results don’t always contain the desired versions of the URLs (in terms of regional version and preferred canonical versions). My questions are: Could these 302 redirects be conflicting with hreflang tags? If so, I’m thinking they should be removed (if not made 301s). GSC doesn’t like the fact these are on key pages, as redirected pages are listed in the sitemap. Will changing hreflang tags and canonical tags to absolute URLs possibly be enough to fix these issues from what you can tell? (Or will redirects need to go too?) Is the en-GB correctly set as the canonical when the root domain is also accessible, indexed and using this page’s content within the CMS too? (I feel like the root domain should be the canonical version, but not sure that works together with other language version subfolders or with a redirect in place from root to subfolder). As an extra point to the last question, GSC has recently chosen the root domain as the canonical (despite en-GB being set as user preference) and is now choosing to deindex some international versions of the homepage as a result. Hoping that getting the hreflang tags fixed and possibly redirects removed should correct this ASAP. But perhaps this also confirms en-GB should be the canonical and marked X-default too. I hope that all makes sense and sorry it’s a small collection of related questions. Really appreciate any replies.
International SEO | | MMcCalden0 -
Footer pages on international sites
Hi guys, i have a question about footer indexed pages like about us, frequently questions, press or ads with us, among others. I'd like to put the same page in our website of .com.mx but i don't know how because i think it will be duplicate content. should i create new content for these pages? Thanks, J
International SEO | | pompero990 -
Best International Rank Checker?
Anyone have a recommendation for the best international ranking tool. I'm looking to gather accurate ranking trends and am looking for a service that will return rankings in as many localized countries as possible.
International SEO | | marcbn0 -
Are Subdomains better or SubDirectories better for an international website ?
Can anyone explain why the structure of your website: yourbrand.com/es/category is better than es.yourbrand.com for multi language and multi country website.
International SEO | | Tushar_P0 -
International targeting
Hi I have a UK based website using a .com, we also own the .co.uk which points to the .com. We get IRO 40,000 UVs per month and we have good domain authority. I now want to launch the site in America however if I seperated the sites out and used the .co.uk for the UK and the .com for the US I would decimate my UK rankings. Am I able to target both the US and the UK under the one domain, or will the fact that I host in the UK ultimately impact on any rankings I may achieve in the US?
International SEO | | danielparry0 -
International Hub site: .uk vs domain vs subdomain
Financial company with 2 sites: 1- Mybrand.com for the US market.
International SEO | | FXDD
2- global.mybrand.com is the hub for international with selection for 10 languages: drop-down allows selecting between mybrand.jp, mybrand.fr, etc Now we have the opportunity to redesign the site from zero and I am exploring to get rid of the subdomain for the global site What would be your preference to use as the international hub? a) mybrand.co.uk: I have to use lawyers to get the URL from squatter b) mybrandGlobal.com : URL easy to get, and can be geo targeted using google webmaster tools. Cons: It might not rank as well as .co.uk in the UK, which is our biggest market c) global.mybrand.com-- pros: keep using it because it is aged and has some authority. Google might now see subdomains as part of TLD, thus making it a valid way to separate international from US .. Cons: SEO best practices advice to avoid subdomains because it might not pass full link value across domains. There is not really different content the subdomain, it is just the hub for international Thanks in advance for the help0 -
Pop-up to select country. Any negative SEO effect?
Hi there! We have similar websites in different countries (it's an ecommerce site). Some times, those websites share the same language and, for example, people from Mexico end up in a page from our website in Argentina. Therefore they see our products in their language buy in a foreign currency. We would like to show them a pop-up (like a shadowbox) depending on their IP to allow them to go to their local website. There wouldn't be any redirect. Would that affect our rankings in any way? Would Googlebots see that as well? Thanks!
International SEO | | jorgediaz0 -
Is duplicate content really an issue on different International Google engines?
i.e. Google.com v.s. Google.co.uk This relates to another question I have open on a similar issue. So if I open the same e-commerce site (virtually) on company.com and company.co.uk, does Google really view that as duplicate content? I would be inclined to think they have that figured out but I havent had much experience with international SEO...
International SEO | | BlinkWeb0