Big page of clients - links to individual client pages with light content - not sure if canonical or no-follow - HELP
-
Not sure what best practice here is: http://www.5wpr.com/clients/
Is this is a situation where I'm best off adding canonical tags back to the main clients page, or to the practice area each client falls under?
No-following all these links and adding canonical?
No-follow/No-index all client pages?
need some advice here...
-
Ya, I think that will be the best choice.
Good Luck!
-
okay cool - appreciate the input man. i think im just going to no-follow/no-index all the pages. and the big plan strategy is to slowly optimize each individual page as time goes on
-
problem is so many pages with light content - i feel like this is creating a situation where i have a small leak in a big boat - and fixing this page will plug that hole
-
I like the option of placing a 301 redirect from /clients**/index.cfm** to** /clients.**
Just remember to update both the links in your website menu as well as your sitemap.xml.
That will help with page load speed as well as having a very clean submitted sitemap.xml file.
-
If each specific client page is not going to be optimized in a way to be found organically in search results and they only serves as a value page for users who are already on your site, I would probably go with no-index/no-follow.
My logic here is that with the "no-index" you are not takings any risks with duplicate page issues and with "no-follow" your are not passing away link juice for no reason.
I don't think placing a canonical tag to each client would be the best recommended option since the goal of the canonical tag is to simply notify the search engines that page X is really a duplicate copy of page Y. In other words, you are telling search engines that these pages are exact copies of one another and to please pass all the link juice of X to Y without being penalized.
-
I definitely wouldn't canonical them because as far as I can tell the content on the individual client pages is unique.
Honestly I don't see why you're worried. The pages all have unique content and contain no external links. If the main client page contained direct links to the clients' sites then I could see their being an issue but you shouldn't have to nofollow internal links.
-
Maybe a 301 from /clients**/index.cfm** to /clients - is a better option than the canonical to maintain all link equity.
So you think adding a no-index to the links is best option - over a no-follow or even a no-index/no-follow?
I was thinking of adding a canonical tag on each client - to - their respective practice area to help build the authority and ensure importance of the practice areas
-
that's what my plan of action is going to be - but for the mean time i need to figure out what the hell to do with these links
-
That is a very impressive list of clients, however from a UX point of view it's far too many to list on one page.
Instead why not have a dozen or so featured clients which have more in depth case-study each explaining how you approached each project. Then the rest of the clients can be a non-linked list. Maybe you can show a small description on hover of each client.
That would satisfy the SEO aspect as well. You would have a few strong case-study pages, and the rest of the content will be indexed also, just all on one page. Hope this helps.
-
Hi There!
I think the bigger issue here is that the page http://www.5wpr.com/clients/ is a duplicate copy of **http://www.5wpr.com/clients/index.cfm . **
That being said, I think your best option here is to set up a canonical tag from one of the pages to the other. You will need to determine which page you will want to use as your primary page.
Right now the /clients**/index.cfm ** page has a lot more authority than the **/clients/ **page. It is a shame that **/clients/index.cfm **is the page that is being linked through the website menu, since **http://www.5wpr.com/clients/ **is a lot more user friendly.
As far as each individual client's page, some are coming up as duplicate copies to other press releases, company sites, etc (per copyscape.com) while others are not. Looking at the title tag or the content through each of these client pages, they did not seem like major pages that you are targeting to be found organically in the search results, so I would probably just no-index those pages to be on the safe side.
That being said, I too am interested to know how others would handle this situation.
I hope that helps!
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Spam from Competitor Help
A clients link profile is recently getting lots of spam links related to "abortion pills" and "does my husband cheat" I found a few of the sites that link, and it appears that there is some malicious code on the site injecting links at the top of the site. http://www.med-reporter.at/index.asp?men=Gesundheit&submen=Produkte&artid=1587&kategorie=&blockzl=3 Can anyone look at the link above and tell me what network or software is creating these links?
Technical SEO | | webbroi0 -
Product pages getting no internal links in Magento
Hello I think i have a serious problem. Most of my products are not getting internal links.
Technical SEO | | macrovet
I discoverd this when i was running a Crawl Test Tool Report | Moz Here an example of one product.
This product can be navigate to a normal way true the navigation structure on my website. The navigation is http://www.macrovet.nl/scheermachine/scheerapparaat-paard-paardenscheermachine.html
On this page is the product URL: http://www.macrovet.nl/aesculap-econom-equipe-gt674.html
Time Crawled 2014
Title tag: Aesculap Econom Equipe GT674 | Macrovet.nl
Meta Description: Bekijk en bestel een Aesculap Econom Equipe GT674 paardenscheermachine voor de scherpste prijs Macrovet.nl
HTTP Status Code: 200
Referrer http://www.macrovet.nl/sitemap.xml
Link Count: 550
Content-Type Header: text/html; charset=UTF-8
4XX (Client Error): NO
5XX (Server Error): NO
Title Missing or Empty: No
Duplicate Page Content: NO
URLs with Duplicate Page Content (up to 5)
Duplicate Page Title:No
Long URL NO
Overly-Dynamic URL NO
301 (Permanent Redirect) NO
302 (Temporary Redirect) NO
301/302 Target
Meta Refresh NO
Meta Refresh Target
Title Element Too Short NO
Title Element Too Long No
Too Many On-Page Links YES
Missing Meta Description Tag No
Search Engine blocked by robots.txt No
Meta-robots Nofollow No
Meta Robots Tag INDEX,FOLLOW
Rel Canonical Yes
Rel-Canonical Target http://www.macrovet.nl/aesculap-econom-equipe-gt674.html
Blocking All User Agents No
Blocking Google No
Internal Links 0
Linking Root Domains 0
External Links 0
Page Authority 1 Domain Autority 30 Do you have an answer what is wrong, thanks for your answers Regards,
Willem-Johan0 -
Duplicate content and rel canonicals?
Hi. I have a question relating to 2 sites that I manage with regards to duplicate content. These are 2 separate companies but the content is off a data base from the one(in other words the same). In terms of the rel canonical, how would we do this so that google does not penalise either site but can also have the content to crawl for both or is this just a dream?
Technical SEO | | ProsperoDigital0 -
Canonical tag for Home page: with or without / at the end???
Setting up canonical tags for an old site. I really need advice on that darn backslash / at the end of the homepage URL. We have incoming links to the homepage as http://www.mysite.com (without the backslash), and as http://www.mysite.com/ (with the backslash), and as http://www.mysite.com/index.html I know that there should be 301 redirects to just one version, but I need to know more about the canonical tags... Which should the canonical tag be??? (without the backslash) or (with the backslash) Thanks for your help! 🙂
Technical SEO | | GregB1230 -
Rel=canonical overkill on duplicate content?
Our site has many different health centers - many of which contain duplicate content since there is topic crossover between health centers. I am using rel canonical to deal with this. My question is this: Is there a tipping point for duplicate content where Google might begin to penalize a site even if it has the rel canonical tags in place on cloned content? As an extreme example, a site could have 10 pieces of original content, but could then clone and organize this content in 5 different directories across the site each with a new url. This would ultimately result in the site having more "cloned" content than original content. Is this at all problematic even if the rel canonical is in place on all cloned content? Thanks in advance for any replies. Eric
Technical SEO | | Eric_Lifescript0 -
Canonical Link Quesiton
I wrote an article that is a page article, but would also be a very good blog post - So my question is two things: 1. If i post it as a static page and syndicate it as a blog post and have it as a canonical link to the page, google will read see the blog and read the page _url as the one with credit correct? In turn not dinging me for duplicate content. 2. Given if the above statement is correct, should I write the blog and put it on my static page referencing the blog or the way i have it as a static page with the blog using a canonical reference back to the page. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | tgr0ss0 -
Duplicate Page Content Lists the same page twice?
When checking my crawl diagnostics this morning I see that I have the error Duplicate page content. It lists the exact same url twice though and I don't understand how to fix this. It's also listed under duplicate page title. Personal Assistant | Virtual Assistant | Charlotte, NC http://charlottepersonalassistant.com/110 Personal Assistant | Virtual Assistant | Charlotte, NC http://charlottepersonalassistant.com/110 Does this have anything to do with a 301 redirect here? Why does it have http;// twice? Thanks all! | http://www.charlottepersonalassistant.com/ | http://http://charlottepersonalassistant.com/ |
Technical SEO | | eidna220 -
Does Google pass link juice a page receives if the URL parameter specifies content and has the Crawl setting in Webmaster Tools set to NO?
The page in question receives a lot of quality traffic but is only relevant to a small percent of my users. I want to keep the link juice received from this page but I do not want it to appear in the SERPs.
Technical SEO | | surveygizmo0