Is there a difference between .us and .org for a website targetting the US market?
-
Hello,
We were searching for some evidence regarding this and couldn't find much so the question.
We have a service that is related only to the USA market. If we buy a .us domain name with the service we provide in the domain name will google treat it the same with a .org? We did searches regarding this but didn't see too many .us domains popping up. Unfortunately the .com is not available.
Thank you
-
Edited the above re: clarifying rel=canonical advice
-
Hmmm good question!
Caveat: I don't know your exact situation, but let's discuss the options a little (I'll provide some links to reference material and a useful tool too).
I've not had to do this personally, most of the international SEO I've done involved the site having the same service offering across different economic regions, so the subfolders were only needed in their specific language (e.g. /es for Spain, /mx for Mexico etc).
This might get confusing, so I'll use some examples
One option would be to use subfolders for country, then language. This is a more complex scenario, so would need good planning of course, but by way of an example... A section of your website targeting Spain (as a country) could be:
Now, if you wanted a translated copy in English, of this page, you could do:
1) Query string (urgh!)
2) subfolder-subfolder
An example when 'deeper' into an international subfolder, say the visitor is on the 'widgets' page, on the Spanish (Spanish country folder, showing Spanish by default, translated into English)...
https://domain.com/es/widgets/en
To add a little more complexity (sorry!) it'd probably be wise to set a rel canonical tag from the translated copy, to the country-specific version. So in the above 'widget' example, the page https://domain.com/es/widgets/en would have:
Then, on https://domain.com/es/widgets/, I'd set the hreflang to be self referencing, and I'd add a hreflang to the other country versions too (country versions in their own languages, rather than translated version of this one):
So on the above, as the english translation of the Spanish page is unlikely to want to be indexed (google.es should only have the Spanish version, google.co.uk, you'd want to index the English site, not the English translation of the Spanish site!), I'd rel=canonical it to the original Spanish page. But on every page that isn't rel=canonical'd to another pre-translated page (so, the ones we want indexing in their own country & language), I'd add hreflang tags to self and all other international sites, with their own language code.
Some reference material for hreflang (set to open in a new tab so you won't lose your place :D):
- https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2010/09/unifying-content-under-multilingual.html
- https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077
- http://www.rebelytics.com/hreflang-canonical/ (VERY strongly recommended read on not creating confusion between hrefland and rel=canonical)
- http://www.aleydasolis.com/en/international-seo-tools/hreflang-tags-generator/ (a generator for hreflang, but DO check it's output!).
Note: I'd still target the first subfolder from root (/es in the above example) to the specific country (Spain) in Search Console).
Of course as an alternative, you could do ccTLDs (.es/.co.uk etc) and then have a single subfolder for the country (domain.co.uk/es, for example).
UX Conisderations:
(You may have considered this already, forgive me if that's the case! Only adding here as I've had conversations on this in the past and have seen it cause confusion).
One realllllyyyyy important consideration here is how the visitor makes the switch from languages and also to a different country site. THIS is key.
Seriously. If the visitor gets confused and exits because something they didn't expect happened (switched to another country version of your site when they wanted a translation - this becomes worse when you have a considerable amount of country-specific content, such as guides etc), all the technical SEO work behind the scenes for the international SEO set-up is kinda wasted.
What I mean by this is (and this is true regardless of if you go down the ccTLD or gTLD with subfolders routes)...
When a visitor lands on your site, let's say domain.com root/homepage, how will they:
-
See this page in another language
-
Switch to a different country page?
A better example. Say I'm in Spain, you sell widgets and I search Google.es for 'best widgets for under €250' - you've done some awesome International SEO, so your site shows up high and I click on it. I land on:
https://domain.com/es/widgets/
Now, I'm on the **Spain **(country) version of your site, in Spanish (language), how would my journey be (in terms of clicks), if I wanted to:
a) View the English version of this page (domain.com/es/widgets/en)
b) Switch to the English site (domain.com/en/widgets/)
c) Switch to the English version of the site, but view it in Spanish (domain.com/en/widgets/) < Likely 2 clicks needed for this of course.
If you're adding to your site, the ability to both switch to another site country AND translate the current page into English (for non-English pages), it needs to be really clear to the visitor how to do either, so they don't click on a country flag and get a result they were not expecting.
Again, the above is true regardless of the gTLD or ccTLD issue. Good planning & labeling can help with this, just make it damn obvious to the visitor what clicking a flag will do and make sure they know how to 1) Translate the current page vs 2) Switch to another country-version of your site.
Whatever you decide, once you've worked out how you want it to work, I'd:
-
Role-play it yourself, visiting the site (mentally or on pen & paper if it doesn't exist online yet!) and try to 'be' the visitor in different scenarios - Is it obvious to get to where you want both country-wise and language-wise?
-
Once the site prototype is built, repeat the above, but on the actual site.
-
Write 2 or 3 scenarios (seriously, it will only take 5mins each!) and pass them to work colleagues - Ask them to run through the scenario and see if they get stuck).
-
If you want to really push the boat out (I recommend this!) use an online UX testing service:
-
https://usabilityhub.com/ < Cheapest option of the two, with a few different tests you can do. Personally in your situation I'd probable have them open a country-specific page and ask them to switch language to English, then run a separate test asking another bunch to switch the country to England (or whatever countries you serve, but you get the idea... Ask one group to switch language, another group to switch country - check they do it right).
-
https://www.usertesting.com/ < More expensive, but worth getting a small number done. Here you set a series of tests and a screencast of the user trying to carry out your tasks, whilst they talk into a mic.
Spending a few $ on user tests can be VERY useful for identifying where users may be getting confused, resulting in a much better user experience which, let's face it, is key not only for SEO these days, but also for conversions and £, $, and €
Phew! long-ass post that may raise more questions than it answers I guess?! I don't know your exact situation so it's a tough one to advise on, but hopefully the above is some food for thought
-
Thank you for your reply, it was really helpful.
One other thing. You mentioned "or a gTLD with subfolders (domain.com/ domain.com/es, domain.com/it etc)"
Is there any way to add multiple target countries in google webmaster tools based on subfolders (each translated in another language like domain.com/es domain.com/it etc)? I couldn't find anything on this.
Thank you
-
One difference is targeting options.
With a ccTLD (country code top level domain), you're not able to set the target country, it defaults to the country of the ccTLD. With a gTLD (generic top level domain), you can set your target in Google's Webmaster Tools (okay, Search Console).
I guess there are branding considerations and possible effects on CTR of having a .us domain - perhaps (100% conjecture here!) some folks would be more likely to click, due to confidence the site is targeting their country (though lots of variables here, for example with a SaaS business that is global, such as an SEO tool, prob less important than, say, a clothing company that only ships to one country!).
Personally, I prefer gTLDs in MOST situations, primarily because:
- You can target the country of choice
- It's easy to target a wider, international market in the future (domain.com/es. or domain.com/mx, /it etc)
- In Search Console, with a gTLD, you can even target different countries for different subfolders (or subdomains, but I'd usually recommend subfolders).
As for Google's preference/SERP advantages? Personally, I think that using a gTLD that has it's target set in Search Console to USA, VS a ccTLD (such as a .us domain) have no advantages either way in terms of USA ranking from an algorithm standpoint - OR at least any algorithmic advantage will be negligible.
Plenty of other factors to focus on, so I'd go with your preference, but if there's a chance you'll want to target internationally in the future, think now if you'd prefer separate ccTLD domains for each country (domain.us, domain.es, domain.it etc) or a gTLD with subfolders (domain.com/ domain.com/es, domain.com/it etc).
Others may have a differing opinion though
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Stuctured data for different sized packages
Hi all, We are currently working on implementing structured data to our webshop, for SEO and for google shopping. We sell stones, pebbles, gravel etc. (to be used in gardens).We offer each product in different sized bags. Customers can buy 20KG minibags, 250KG minibags, 500KG midibags, 1500KG bigbags and bulk quantities (ranging from 3000KG up to 35000KG). For example, we sell Black Beach Pebbles in the bags as described as above (+ the bulk quantities). We have a product page for these Black Beach Pebbles and on that product page customers can choose the desired bag or desired bulk quantity. For google shopping, visitors land on these productpages. A while back that caused a problem; the landing page contained different prices so sometimes google could not match the prices on the landing page with the prices in our productfeed (because of course, each bag has a different price). So, besides SEO, another reason for us to implement structured data. I have two questions regarding the implementation. 1. For the landing page as described above, the idea now is to mark 1 product with different offers (an offer for each bag + an offer for the bulk quantities). This raises a problem regarding the bulk quantities; the price of the bulk quantity depends on the chosen quantity (customers can pick the desired bulk quantity using a dropdown) on the productpage. How should we markup the price? The idea know is to markup 1 product with different offers for each bag and 1 aggregate offer for the bulk quantities (and using the lowest price, so the price for the smallest bulk quantity). So, for the Black Beach pebbles: Product = Black beach Pebbles
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AMAGARD
Offer (= 20KG minibag)
Price = ...
Offer (= 250KG minibag)
Price = ...
Offer (= 500KG midibag)
Price = ...
Offer (= 1500KG bigbag)
Price = ...
AggregateOffer (= Bulk quantities)
Lowprice = ... Is combining Offer and AggregateOffer within 1 product the right solution? 2. For the 1500KG Bigbags and bulk quantities we have separate landing pages (because people specifically search for bigbags and bulk quantities). So those landing pages are dedicated to bigbags / bulk quantities. How should we mark up those pages? Should we for example just do this: On the page for te bigbag:
Product = Black Beach Pebbles 1500KG bigbag
Offer (=Black Beach Pebbles 1500KG bigbag)
Price =.... and on the page for the bulk quantities: Product = Black Beach Pebbles bulk quantities
AggregateOffer (=Black Beach Pebbles bulk quantities)
Lowprice=...... Could that cause any confusion for google, because on the productpage with all the available bags, the bigbag is an offer for the product 'Beach Pebbles Black'. And on the second page it is a product on its own. Thanks in advance! Best!1 -
Delay to rank for authority website versus new website
Hello, I have a website that has been existing for years. How long does it take if I have a good content on a page for it to rank ? I read here and that that it can take 4 to 6 months but it never says if it is for a brand new website or a old website that has an authority and some links. I also read that some people publish content and rank within a week on competitive keywords. So who is right, what is there to read in between the lines ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
University website outbound links issue
Hi - I'm working on a university website and have found a load of (1) outbound links to companies that have commercial tie ups to the university and, beyond that, loads of (2) outbound links to companies set up by alumni and (3) outbound links to commercial clients of the university. Your opinions on whether I should nofollow these, or not, would be welcome. At the moment I'm tempted to nofollow (1) yet leave (2) and (3) - quite simply because the (1) backlinks may have been negotiated as part of a package (nobody can actually remember at the university!), yet (2) and (3) were freely given by the university. Your thoughts would be welcome!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Can I use the old website content on the new website, after deleting it from the server?
My website nowwhatstudio.com hit by google pure spam and google applied manual spam action to the website. I create new website (nowwhatmoments.com) with the same content from the old spam action website (nowwhatstudio.com). As google removed my old website content from search indexed. Can I use the same content for a new website? If I delete my old website from the server, after that Can I use the old website content for a new website? Or Can make edits the old website content and make it 80% original for a new website?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bondhoward0 -
Can you spot the differences?
Well, I have been scratching my head on this for days, I will try throwing the ball to you with hopes someone more experienced than me can help. The scenario is: e-commerce -> brand page -> SERP -> comparison between how two pages rank; one from my website, one from a competitor website. The brand is Michelin, the keyword is "pneumatici michelin" (equivalent in italian of “michelin tires”). I am not looking at SERP first page, where competition is surely much more fierce. I am looking at position 11: http://www.cambio-gomme.it/marchi/michelin/ And my page (not in the first 50): http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/michelin My page: MOZ Page Grade (for keyword “pneumatici michelin”): A External backlinks to the page: 1 Domain Authority: 29 Page Authority: 24 On-page SEO optimization: keyword density: 0.87% internal links: 145 external links: 3 page size: 108kb html size: 24kb words on page: 2077 link-words: 408 non-linked words: 1669 time to first byte: 0.419s Competitor page: MOZ Page Grade (for keyword “pneumatici michelin”): A External backlinks to the page: 0 Domain Authority: 26 Page Authority: 13 On-page SEO optimization: keyword density: 0.75% internal links: 70 external links: 1 page size: 31kb html size: 9kb words on page: 1521 link-words: 168 non-linked words: 1353 time to first byte: 0.373s Domain age is very similar, both websites launched close to each other in 2012. Ideas? Suggestion on other metrics to compare?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | max.favilli0 -
Do I redirect pages that no longer appear on the website?
Here is an example of the link that is no longer on the website (Broken link) http://www.weddingrings.com/item.cfm?str_shortdesc=UNIQUE The broken link was fixed to : http://www.weddingrings.com/item.cfm?str_shortdesc=UNIQUE CARRE CUT DIAMOND ETERNITY BAND&str_category=Diamond-Bands-and-Gold-Rings&grouping_id=9&category_id=21&int_item_id=6884 Would I still need to redirect the old broken link to the new fixed one using 301 redirect?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | alexkatalkin0 -
Ranking better in different countries than in the UK
My URL is: www.geckonewmedia.comMy friend's site is being ranked in the top 10 in Google in countries such as Norway, Poland, Spain, Germany and France for the term "web design Edinburgh"The site is UK based and it's ranking on page 3 over here. I went into the webmaster tools and changed the location setting to UK on Monday this week as I thought that might be the issue. So far there's been no change.Can anyone help me out with the reason why it might be ranking so well abroad but not in the UK?Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | geckonm0 -
Rel=canonical an iframed version of the same website?
My issue is that we have two websites with the same content. For the sake of an example lets say they are: jackson.com jacksonboats.com When you go to jacksonboats.com, the website is an iframed version of jackson.com. However all of the companies email addresses are [email protected] so a 301 is not possible. What would be the best way to forward over the link juice from jacksonboats.com to jackson.com? I'm thinking a rel=canonical tag, but I wanted to ask first. Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BenGMKT0