Once on https should Moz still be picking up errors on http
-
Hello,
Should Moz be picking up http errors still if the sites on https? Or has the https not been done properly? I'm getting duplicate errors amoung other things.
Cheers,
Ruth
-
Wow - sorry this question slipped past, Ruth.
As long as the proper HTTP redirect has been written to HTTPS, there's nothing that needs to be done with canonical tags.
The beauty of 301-redirects is that they are server directives - once in place, its no longer even possible to reach the non-HTTPS URLs. The HTTPS URLs should of course still keep their own self-referential canonical tags, but that's handled automatically in most CMSs (Content Management Systems like WordPress.)
Hope that covers what you were asking?
Paul
-
Hi Ruth,
I am more than happy to help. Please have a look at these resources if you believe the migration has not been done correctly.
Please have a look at these resources I think they will be immensely helpful. Please remember the Google doc referenced in number one is available in line 3 as well as In the instructions anchor text on line 2.
- https://www.aleydasolis.com/en/search-engine-optimization/http-https-migration-checklist-google-docs/
- To easily make a copy, add to your own Drive, download or print, go to the Google Docs, then choose “File” and select your preferred option: (Or use link below)
- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XB26X_wFoBBlQEqecj7HB79hQ7DTLIPo97SS5irwsK8/edit?usp=sharing
Please let me know if I can be of any help,
Thomas
-
Thanks, Thomas will have a look at those.
-
Hi Ruth,
Paul brought up a very good point.
If using Apache and it sounds like you are you can force the HTTP to HTTPS redirect using
<ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !^443$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]</ifmodule>See this for more https://www.aleydasolis.com/htaccess-redirects-generator/https-vs-http/
301 Redirects are in place verify that by using a tool like this one. you can drop all the URLs you want to check in here. https://httpstatus.io/
Then make sure any HTTP is a 301 and any HTTPS is a 200
Then run a search and replace
http://mydomain.com
tohttps://mydomain.com
http://www.mydomain.com
tohttps://www.mydomain.com
If you are running a WordPress website this is a very effective plug-in ( and free if you type the name into wordpress.org's plugin repo)
https://bettersearchreplace.com/ or https://interconnectit.com/products/search-and-replace-for-wordpress-databases/
Your canonical tags (unless very good reason like third-party content) should be self-referencing meaning add canonical's to the https:// urls not the http:// URLs like below. A good example is what you see below
Moz will tell you as will https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/redirect-checker/ & https://deepcrawl.com will easily find any of the problems. some references below for rel-canonical tags
https://mza.seotoolninja.com/blog/rel-canonical
https://yoast.com/rel-canonical/
Last but not least here is a wonderful tutorial that goes over migrating from http to https
https://www.keycdn.com/blog/http-to-https/
I hope this was of help,
Tom
-
Hi Paul,
Yes thank you, that's brilliant and confirms what I've been thinking - that the https hasn't been done properly as they're not redirecting when going to the http version. I thought the client had at the htaccess so will look into that.
If the redirects are done properly do I need to add canonical tags or are the redirects enough? Just want to make sure I'm covering all bases.
Thanks so much for your advice.
Cheers,
Ruth
-
You need to ensure that the HTTP version of the site's URLs are no longer reachable, Ruth. That means adding a 301-redirect to force all URLs to their HTTPS versions. This is the most likely cause of your issue
To test, simply go to a page URL in the browser address bar and remove the s from the HTTPS and hit enter. Watch what happens. If the address bar shows the automatic change back to the HTTPS version of the URL, you're good. If it doesn't, you'll need to add the redirect.
You should also ensure that all the internal links within the site have been rewritten to use the HTTPS version of the URLs - like menus, sidebars, widgets, and in-content links to other pages.
Hope that helps?
Paul
-
Thanks, Thomas. The https urls are in place but I was concerned that if the http urls are showing up still that the move to https hasn't been done properly.
-
Do a search & replace on your site then recheck it.
search for HTTP url's & replace with https URL's
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redirect to http to https - Pros and Cons
Hi, I know its best practice to redirect a website from http to https, instead of having many entry point to your website. When a website has been running for a long time on http and https, what are the SEO Pros and Cons of implementing a redirect from Http to Https?
Technical SEO | | FreddyKgapza1 -
Which URL do I request Google News inclusion for: the http or the non-http?
In Google WMT/Search Console, I've marked the non-www. version of my site as the preferred. But I haven't run into a choice between http:// and non-http:// before. Should I choose the one listed at the top, which is the non-http (AND the non-www) version? Thanks! Unknown.png
Technical SEO | | christyrobinson1 -
What do I need to do for HTTPS switch in Webmaster Tools?
My site is currently verified using a meta tag for both Google and Bing. Will I need to recreate the meta tag or will I be able to use the same one?
Technical SEO | | EcommerceSite1 -
Wordpress 4xx errors from comment re-direct
About a month ago, we had a massive jump in 4XX errors. It seems the majority are being caused by the comment tool on wordpress, which is generating a link that looks like this "http://www.turnerpr.com/blog/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.turnerpr.com%2Fblog%2F2013%2F09%2Fturners-crew-royal-treatment-well-sort-of%2Fphoto-2-2%2F" On every single post. We're using Akismet and haven't had issues in the past....and I can't figure out the fix. I've tried turning it off and back on; I'm reluctant to completely switch commenting systems because we'd lose so much history. Anyone seen this particular re-direct love happen before? Angela
Technical SEO | | TurnerPR0 -
Is it needed to use http:// or not?
Hi, When doing link building and getting my URL to other websites, is it necessary that the other websites include http:// before the domain? Example: I want to increase the number of links to my site www.example.com . When I ask other websites to add a link to my site, should I ask them to use http://www.example.com or is www.example.com enough (without http://)? Or it really does not matter? Thanks in advance, Sam
Technical SEO | | Awaraman0 -
Webmaster tools...URL Errors
Hi mozzers, Quick question. Whats the best thing to do about URL errors in webmaster tools. They are all 404s that point from external sites. Many of them are junk spam sites. Should I mark them as "fixed" or just leave them. I'm hoping google is aware it's out of my control if spam sites want to link to 404s on my site. Peter
Technical SEO | | PeterM220 -
Will I still get Duplicate Meta Data Errors with the correct use of the rel="next" and rel="prev" tags?
Hi Guys, One of our sites has an extensive number category page lsitings, so we implemented the rel="next" and rel="prev" tags for these pages (as suggested by Google below), However, we still see duplicate meta data errors in SEOMoz crawl reports and also in Google webmaster tools. Does the SEOMoz crawl tool test for the correct use of rel="next" and "prev" tags and not list meta data errors, if the tags are correctly implemented? Or, is it necessary to still use unique meta titles and meta descriptions on every page, even though we are using the rel="next" and "prev" tags, as recommended by Google? Thanks, George Implementing rel=”next” and rel=”prev” If you prefer option 3 (above) for your site, let’s get started! Let’s say you have content paginated into the URLs: http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=1
Technical SEO | | gkgrant
http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2
http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3
http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=4 On the first page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=1, you’d include in the section: On the second page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2: On the third page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=3: And on the last page, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=4: A few points to mention: The first page only contains rel=”next” and no rel=”prev” markup. Pages two to the second-to-last page should be doubly-linked with both rel=”next” and rel=”prev” markup. The last page only contains markup for rel=”prev”, not rel=”next”. rel=”next” and rel=”prev” values can be either relative or absolute URLs (as allowed by the tag). And, if you include a <base> link in your document, relative paths will resolve according to the base URL. rel=”next” and rel=”prev” only need to be declared within the section, not within the document . We allow rel=”previous” as a syntactic variant of rel=”prev” links. rel="next" and rel="previous" on the one hand and rel="canonical" on the other constitute independent concepts. Both declarations can be included in the same page. For example, http://www.example.com/article?story=abc&page=2&sessionid=123 may contain: rel=”prev” and rel=”next” act as hints to Google, not absolute directives. When implemented incorrectly, such as omitting an expected rel="prev" or rel="next" designation in the series, we'll continue to index the page(s), and rely on our own heuristics to understand your content.0 -
SEO MOZ technical questions
Hi there, I would be very grateful if you can provide me with an explanation to the following so I understand it better - what do these heading mean? Domain Authority: (out of 100) Domain MozRank: Domain MozTrust: Total Links: Ext. Followed Links: Linking Root Domains: Followed Linking Root Domains: Linking C-Blocks: Thanks very much guys, much apprciated. Thanks Gareth
Technical SEO | | GAZ090