Modifying Well Established & Well Indexed Content
-
I have a page that is very well indexed and has a 1st position ranking in google. It is the best landing page in my site.
That being said, it's several years old and I honestly think it could be better. The images could be enlarged, the the images could have fancy box enlargements instead of just linking out to flickr, there could be more content about follow up projects that people have done.
I'm noteably nervous about changing such a clutch piece of content on my site.
I do want to improve the content for users, not just make it more SEO friendly (it's already SEO'd), but I'm afraid that any change could cause a set back in ranking.
Am I being afraid of nothing, should I just go for it and improve my content, or should I be extra cautious when editing well indexed content like this?
Thanks for the advice
-
**What about shortening the title tag? **I would drop all of the CMS stuff. Just be sure that it does not change the URL of your page. Check the referral traffic to see if the CMS words are pulling any traffic if you have any doubts.
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? If you change an image name you will lose all current image traffic for that image. If I had lots of traffic I would not change it. If the traffic was nil I would consider a change.
**What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? **I have no fear of adding that. None. It is huge upside if you have a great image.
**What about making these changes incrementally? **Do it if you enjoy farting around. I don't think it will make any difference at all.
My most important advice. If you are improving the page, keeping it relevant and are not changing the URL, title tag or optimization have no fear.
-
**What about shortening the title tag? **I think that it's correct , I would do the same thing
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? Normally the alt image must explain what rapresent the images and help the crawler, for me you can cleaner the incorrect tag
What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? I spoke about the content (text) in the top of page
What about making these changes incrementally? Maybe you can try the change the title before and some tags ( alt) and wait some days
-
Read these answers knowing that this is what I do and how I think. On lots of these answers I don't know what google does and what google prefers. I am betting on my gut rather than on something that somebody somewhere said sometime in the past which might be very different now. I only trust what a very small number of people say and realize that google changes their mind about lots of stuff that they said in the past and don't tell anybody anything.
Make sense? lol
Currently it's "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk - Blog - Projects, Ideas, Inspiration, Kee Klamp, Fittings"
I'd say that is waaaayyyyy too long. I keep mine at about 62 characters or less. Without doing a detailed analysis of traffic that the page is currently pulling I would probably shorten to...
How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage?
Lots of my pages get over half of their traffic from image search. I would not change the image file name or the alt attribute unless I thought that there was a significant upside.
These can be part of the optimization of the page.
I do replace images when I have something better or update a graph, map or photo. However, I always maintain the file name and alt attribute.
Sometimes content update requires images to be deleted and I do that with reluctance.
OMG!
My image tags look like this....
"keyword" is something simple... probably two or three absolutely relevant keywords that describe the image.
giving the files real names and putting them on my own CDN
All of my images are on the same server as the website, in the same folder as the article.... like this...
egolsite.com/article-name/image-name.jpg
Some people have told me to move my images to cloud hosting or a free service instead of my server but I don't want to make it look like I am not serving my own content. I don't know if that makes any difference at all but I gladly pay to transfer terrabytes of images per month to keep them on my own servers. If someone hotlinks one of my images does that help my domain's authority? I don't know... but I got 'em there where I can see what's happening.
But what if I wanted to add a nice "finish" picture to to the top? Would that cause any issues?
I assume you are talking about a nice big image at top of page that will make visitors salivate? If that is what you are talking about then I would say... do it by all means and do it often.
What about making these changes incrementally?
Don't fart around. Go for it.
-
yeah it seems as if the image tag as thrown int out of proportion, I will try to correct.
-
there is a little problem with your text...
-
Ok a couple of followup questions:
What about shortening the title tag? Currently it's "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk - Blog - Projects, Ideas, Inspiration, Kee Klamp, Fittings". The stuff at the end was added by the CMS and I want to shorten it to "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk". Is there any fear in shortening the Title tag when I am refining it and make it more potent (e.g. getting rid of the crap)
**What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? **
Here's an example of what's there now:
src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3039/2770274783_e9c2df4616.jpg"
width="500" />
You can see it's just junk. I could see improve the meta substantially and also giving the files real names and putting them on my own CDN. Doing this of course would cause google to see them as different (but better?) images.
**What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? **Maurizio mentioned not editing the top of the page. But what if I wanted to add a nice "finish" picture to to the top? Would that cause any issues?
**What about making these changes incrementally? **Would it be better to make a little change. Like change an image a week or something silly like that, or make all the changes at once.
-
The changes are always dangerous when you have a good position in Google.
But I always think if you avoid touching the tag in the page type:
meta Title
meta Description
Meta Keywords (only if you were already there!)
and finally, I would not change the content at the top of the page but only the graphic design.
I was afraid too when i did the same for many customers, but i did always so and never i lost a positions
Ciao
Maurizio
-
I improve pages all of the time and have great results. Traffic always goes up and rankings often go up. (A drop is very very rare.)
Adding content to an existing page can significantly increase your longtail keyword traffic.
These are what I use as a guide
-- don't do anything that will change the title tag (unless you are targeting different keywords)
-- don't do anything that will change the onpage optimization (unless you are targeting different keywords)
-- don't change image file names or alt attributes
-- add as much new content as possible
-- revise existing content without fear
-- add additional images whenever you have them
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Index / Monthly Click Number
Hi,
On-Page Optimization | | HypermediaSystems
This is a general question, so sorry in advance if inappropriate. Once I was told, in large scale EC / Forum Site,
the following number should be around 1,
and if it is below 1, it is a good sign ... Google Indexed Page Number / Monthly ( 30days ) Click Number I was told this is just a general idea, and real world situation varies, then
if you don't have any standard, this could be a start. (not dogmatic rules, just reference) Does this sounds about right? or do you have any other formula? I was tasked to do the site wide SEO, and diagnose the general state of SEO-wellness/fitness..
and right now, the number is 1.5, so I am about to report we can do more to get more SERP presence or something... If you guys point me relevant blog article / Q&A forum, I would really appreciate. Thanks!0 -
Advice for grouping short content briefs?
We have an engineering website (chemengonline.com) that publishes regularly, including content from our print magazine. In the magazine we have a section called "Chementators" where we highlight new innovations in chemical engineering. These are typically briefs and are often unique from one another. Last year we would group these briefs on a page like this http://www.chemengonline.com/november-chementator-briefs-5/. We recently relaunched our website and in the process decided to break the briefs apart into their own articles like this http://www.chemengonline.com/metal-free-atrp/. Considering the short length of the briefs but technical nature of the content, would you advise keeping them separate or going back to the old way of grouping them together on the same page? And if we group them, could you offer some advice on page title... Ex. "Chementators for February 2015" vs "Chementators - Graphene, Clean Power, Large Scale CCS, Nanoparticles, etc"
On-Page Optimization | | accessintel0 -
Duplicate Content Issue in Magento
Hi I need help in resolving the duplicate content issue on my magento site I got a product My main product url is https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/shop-by-product/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest and it got variation of url see below that are causing duplicate content issue , I have inserted the canonical tag on the below url and my main url is https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/shop-by-product/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest but still moz is showing it as duplicate content. Help Please <colgroup><col width="1003"></colgroup>
On-Page Optimization | | Adnan.Hassan.Khan
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/product/oak-bedroom-furniture/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/6/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/17/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/shop-by-range/boston/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/42/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/63/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/67/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/46/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/79/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/88/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/75/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/90/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/92/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/33/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/27/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/shop-by-range/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/50/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/22/ |
| https://www.oakfurnitureking.co.uk/catalog/product/view/id/45/s/boston-solid-oak-4-drawer-chest/category/74/ |0 -
Does Google index dynamically generated content/headers, etc.?
To avoid dupe content, we are moving away from a model where we have 30,000 pages, each with a separate URL that looks like /prices/<product-name>/<city><state>, often with dupe content because the product overlaps from city to city, and it's hard to keep 30,000 pages unique, where sometimes the only distinction is the price & the city/state.</state></city></product-name> We are moving to a model with around 300 unique pages, where some of the info that used to be in the url will move to the page itself (headers, etc.) to cut down on dupe content on those unique 300 pages. My question is this. If we have 300 unique-content pages with unique URL's, and we then put some dynamic info (year, city, state) into the page itself, will Google index this dynamic content? The question behind this one is, how do we continue to rank for searches for that product in the city-state being searched without having that info in the URL? Any best practices we should know about?
On-Page Optimization | | editabletext0 -
CMS program that have indexing problems
I am working on optimizing a website that was built with an CMS program. I searched for what pages are indexed on Google using "site:url" command. For some reason none of the pages are indexed on Google. What is the best way to index these web pages?
On-Page Optimization | | webdynamics0 -
No index parts of a page?
Little bit of an odd question this, but how would one go about getting Google to not index certain content on a page? I'm developing an online store for a client and for a few of the products they will be stocking they will be using the manufacturers specs and descriptions. These descriptions and specs, therefore, will not be unique as they will be also used by a number of other websites. The title tag, onpage h1 etc will be fine for the seo of the actual pages (with backlinks, of course) so the impact of google not counting the description should be slight. I'm sure this can be done but for the life of me I cannot remember how. Thanks Carl
On-Page Optimization | | Grumpy_Carl0 -
Why does SEOmoz use /blog/content-title vs /category/content-title? Any difference?
Assume a brand new blog being designed and all other things equal. What are the pros & cons between using the url structure /blog/content-title vs. /category/content-title? Note:
On-Page Optimization | | JasonJackson
Both scenarios would be using categorical archiving.0 -
Does Frequency of content updates affect likelyhood outbound links will be indexed?
I have several pages on our website with low pr, that also themselves link to lots and lots of pages that are service/product specific. Since there are so many outbound links, I know that the small amount of PR will be spread thin as it is. My question is, if I were to supply fresh content to the top level pages, and change it often, would that influence whether or not google indexes the underlying pages? Also if I supply fresh content to the underlying pages, once google crawls them, would that guarantee that google considers them 'important' enough to be indexed" I guess my real question is, can freshness of content and frequency of update convince google that the underlying pages are 'worthy of being indexed', and can producing fresh content on those pages 'keep google's interest', so to speak, despite having little if any pagerank.
On-Page Optimization | | ilyaelbert0