Modifying Well Established & Well Indexed Content
-
I have a page that is very well indexed and has a 1st position ranking in google. It is the best landing page in my site.
That being said, it's several years old and I honestly think it could be better. The images could be enlarged, the the images could have fancy box enlargements instead of just linking out to flickr, there could be more content about follow up projects that people have done.
I'm noteably nervous about changing such a clutch piece of content on my site.
I do want to improve the content for users, not just make it more SEO friendly (it's already SEO'd), but I'm afraid that any change could cause a set back in ranking.
Am I being afraid of nothing, should I just go for it and improve my content, or should I be extra cautious when editing well indexed content like this?
Thanks for the advice
-
**What about shortening the title tag? **I would drop all of the CMS stuff. Just be sure that it does not change the URL of your page. Check the referral traffic to see if the CMS words are pulling any traffic if you have any doubts.
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? If you change an image name you will lose all current image traffic for that image. If I had lots of traffic I would not change it. If the traffic was nil I would consider a change.
**What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? **I have no fear of adding that. None. It is huge upside if you have a great image.
**What about making these changes incrementally? **Do it if you enjoy farting around. I don't think it will make any difference at all.
My most important advice. If you are improving the page, keeping it relevant and are not changing the URL, title tag or optimization have no fear.
-
**What about shortening the title tag? **I think that it's correct , I would do the same thing
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? Normally the alt image must explain what rapresent the images and help the crawler, for me you can cleaner the incorrect tag
What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? I spoke about the content (text) in the top of page
What about making these changes incrementally? Maybe you can try the change the title before and some tags ( alt) and wait some days
-
Read these answers knowing that this is what I do and how I think. On lots of these answers I don't know what google does and what google prefers. I am betting on my gut rather than on something that somebody somewhere said sometime in the past which might be very different now. I only trust what a very small number of people say and realize that google changes their mind about lots of stuff that they said in the past and don't tell anybody anything.
Make sense? lol
Currently it's "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk - Blog - Projects, Ideas, Inspiration, Kee Klamp, Fittings"
I'd say that is waaaayyyyy too long. I keep mine at about 62 characters or less. Without doing a detailed analysis of traffic that the page is currently pulling I would probably shorten to...
How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage?
Lots of my pages get over half of their traffic from image search. I would not change the image file name or the alt attribute unless I thought that there was a significant upside.
These can be part of the optimization of the page.
I do replace images when I have something better or update a graph, map or photo. However, I always maintain the file name and alt attribute.
Sometimes content update requires images to be deleted and I do that with reluctance.
OMG!
My image tags look like this....
"keyword" is something simple... probably two or three absolutely relevant keywords that describe the image.
giving the files real names and putting them on my own CDN
All of my images are on the same server as the website, in the same folder as the article.... like this...
egolsite.com/article-name/image-name.jpg
Some people have told me to move my images to cloud hosting or a free service instead of my server but I don't want to make it look like I am not serving my own content. I don't know if that makes any difference at all but I gladly pay to transfer terrabytes of images per month to keep them on my own servers. If someone hotlinks one of my images does that help my domain's authority? I don't know... but I got 'em there where I can see what's happening.
But what if I wanted to add a nice "finish" picture to to the top? Would that cause any issues?
I assume you are talking about a nice big image at top of page that will make visitors salivate? If that is what you are talking about then I would say... do it by all means and do it often.
What about making these changes incrementally?
Don't fart around. Go for it.
-
yeah it seems as if the image tag as thrown int out of proportion, I will try to correct.
-
there is a little problem with your text...
-
Ok a couple of followup questions:
What about shortening the title tag? Currently it's "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk - Blog - Projects, Ideas, Inspiration, Kee Klamp, Fittings". The stuff at the end was added by the CMS and I want to shorten it to "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk". Is there any fear in shortening the Title tag when I am refining it and make it more potent (e.g. getting rid of the crap)
**What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? **
Here's an example of what's there now:
src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3039/2770274783_e9c2df4616.jpg"
width="500" />
You can see it's just junk. I could see improve the meta substantially and also giving the files real names and putting them on my own CDN. Doing this of course would cause google to see them as different (but better?) images.
**What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? **Maurizio mentioned not editing the top of the page. But what if I wanted to add a nice "finish" picture to to the top? Would that cause any issues?
**What about making these changes incrementally? **Would it be better to make a little change. Like change an image a week or something silly like that, or make all the changes at once.
-
The changes are always dangerous when you have a good position in Google.
But I always think if you avoid touching the tag in the page type:
meta Title
meta Description
Meta Keywords (only if you were already there!)
and finally, I would not change the content at the top of the page but only the graphic design.
I was afraid too when i did the same for many customers, but i did always so and never i lost a positions
Ciao
Maurizio
-
I improve pages all of the time and have great results. Traffic always goes up and rankings often go up. (A drop is very very rare.)
Adding content to an existing page can significantly increase your longtail keyword traffic.
These are what I use as a guide
-- don't do anything that will change the title tag (unless you are targeting different keywords)
-- don't do anything that will change the onpage optimization (unless you are targeting different keywords)
-- don't change image file names or alt attributes
-- add as much new content as possible
-- revise existing content without fear
-- add additional images whenever you have them
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content hubs vs blog
Hey all! I work for a large healthcare company. We're in the planning stages of redesigning our website, and the question came up of whether we needed to continue with the patient-focused blog at all when we could simply incorporate the blog articles into the service lines they best fit with (i.e. an article about feeding babies solid good would go under the pediatrics section of the website instead of the pediatrics section of the blog).Anybody have an opinion/insight on whether the articles would get better rankings being dispersed to the services sections of the website instead of concentrated on a blog? Or would good internal linking make the whole question moot?Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | MartyIHC1 -
Removing & redirecting old pages
Hi In the case of an e-commerce store when you remove/delete an old sub department page because you no longer sell the products that page was for can you/should you redirect it to its parent main category/dept page first or just delete and let become a 404 ? Being a sub department it is obviously closely related to the main category/dept but seem strange to 301 it since its not really moved permanently to that page but i hear that's what people do to transfer that pages authority before deleting it so its not lost cheers dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Why Does This Site Rank Well?
I noticed recently that the website of a local church (http://www.lifepointfc.com/) has climbed toward the top of the SERPS, and I cannot figure out why. The on-site SEO seems mediocre, at best, and their domain authority is 15 while their homepage authority is just 19. Does anyone see how they are working their SEO magic?
On-Page Optimization | | cbizzle0 -
Multilingual site with untranslated content
We are developing a site that will have several languages. There will be several thousand pages, the default language will be English. Several sections of the site will not be translated at first, so the main content will be in English but navigation/boilerplate will be translated. We have hreflang alternate tags set up for each individual page pointing to each of the other languages, eg in the English version we have: etc In the spanish version, we would point to the french version and the english version etc. My question is, is this sufficient to avoid a duplicate content penalty for google for the untranslated pages? I am aware that from a user perspective, having untranslated content is bad, but in this case it is unavoidable at first.
On-Page Optimization | | jorgeapartime0 -
Static content VS Dynamic changing content
We have collected a lot of reviews and we want to use them on our Categories pages. We are going to be updating the top 6 reviews per categories every 4 days. There will be another page to see all of the reviews. Is there any advantage to have the reviews static for 1 or 2 weeks vs. having unique new ones pulled from the data base every time the page is refreshed? We know there is an advantage if we keep them on the page forever with long tail; however, we have created a new page with all of the reviews they can go to.
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Content placment best for SEO?
We currently have a scroll bar box at the bottom of our page with information in but from what I can see scroll bar boxes at the bottom of websites looking a little spammy (a lot of over optimized websites using them) would we be best in using a strategy like this site www.solopress.com/ which implement a show more link that drops information down would this be read as good information for Google or look just as spammy?
On-Page Optimization | | BobAnderson1 -
Should H1s be used in the logo? If they are and it is dynamic on each page to relate to the page content, is this detrimental to the site rather than having it in the page content?
On some sites, the H1 is contained within the logo and remains consistent throughout the site (i.e. the company name is in the of the logo). If the h1 in a logo is dynamic for each page (i.e. on the homepage it is company name - homepage) is this better or worse to have it changed out on the logo rather than having it in the page content?
On-Page Optimization | | CabbageTree0 -
Does Frequency of content updates affect likelyhood outbound links will be indexed?
I have several pages on our website with low pr, that also themselves link to lots and lots of pages that are service/product specific. Since there are so many outbound links, I know that the small amount of PR will be spread thin as it is. My question is, if I were to supply fresh content to the top level pages, and change it often, would that influence whether or not google indexes the underlying pages? Also if I supply fresh content to the underlying pages, once google crawls them, would that guarantee that google considers them 'important' enough to be indexed" I guess my real question is, can freshness of content and frequency of update convince google that the underlying pages are 'worthy of being indexed', and can producing fresh content on those pages 'keep google's interest', so to speak, despite having little if any pagerank.
On-Page Optimization | | ilyaelbert0