Does Page Load Time Affect SEO Rankings?
-
I was curious about how much page load times affect rankings. Here's what I did:
- I put together a lot of interactive media on specific landing pages
- Time-on-Page from organic visitors went from 50 seconds to average of 34 minutes
- Bounce Rate decreased by 20%
- Page Load time increased from 1 second to 6 seconds and at peak times to 8 seconds (on 56KB test)
- In the meantime the page was re-indexed and re-cached
My question is three-fold:
- Would the time on page give higher rankings for keyword
- Would decreased bounce rate enhance rankings?
- Would the page load time decrease rankings?
Did anyone do a similar test? What were the results?
-
20% is repeat traffic. 80% is new. In past 2 weeks impressions increased around 30-35% and the only thing I can attribute the change to is the interactive stuff.
I have what you may call a niche market. All the competitors out there are focusing on selling products, we're offering a service on top of education. In many cases we're sharing the stuff the product companies would never want clients to know.
But it doesn't hurt to be prepared once other competitors arise, and I'm sure they're coming.
It would be good to find out about the correlation of Time on Page vs. Rankings from others that have tested this.
I'll be sure to post an update in a couple of weeks.
-
To add to Christy's well written and quite accurate response, page load time has been a key factor since Panda first rolled out. It may have been a factor before this, however Panda is when it first really took hold as a clear, change = results measure. For example, I have had numerous audit clients who had severe page load problems, and several of those have seen increased rankings and resulting traffic from organic listings solely by resolving page load speed.
In one client situation, simply by changing site templates (and resulting load speeds), the client saw a doubling of organic traffic literally overnight. To then test that this was the cause, he then did the same thing with a completely different site that had a completely different model and also saw traffic dramatically increase literally overnight.
However, given the complexity of SEO in 2012, with so many other factors, if there are other serious flaws to the SEO, just increasing page load speeds may not get the same results I've described.
Bounce rates CAN negatively impact rankings, but not purely as a stand-alone factor. It's when someone comes to your site, can't find what they're looking for, then returns to Google and then clicks to another site and does not then come back to Google. Which is also the case even if they didn't initially bounce on first landing on your site. They could also have spent more time, or visited more pages before returning to Google to re-search.
-
Yes, page load time is a ranking factor. Optimizing pages so they load quickly is listed as a best practice in Google's Webmaster Guidelines. So yes, increased page load load time may decrease rankings. It should definitely decrease traffic. Eight seconds is a looong time these days to wait for a page to load! Have you seen any changes in the SERPs since making these changes?
On the positive side, you must have some fantastic content if users are willing to wait that long for a page to load -- and stay on it for over half an hour I am curious, are you having a lot of repeat traffic?
No, bounce rates do not affect rankings. Matt Cutts has said that if a user visits only one page on a site and finds the information they need, this is a positive user experience. High bounce rates aren't positive for every site, don't get me wrong. If you have an ecommerce site for shoes and you have a very high bounce rate, meaning customers aren't browsing your offerings, writing reviews, and going through checkout, you aren't likely selling very many shoes on the site. The bounce rate is measured in GA to give you the information you need to analyze your site performance in this regard, not for the purpose of ranking your site.
Increased time on page correlates with increased user engagement. Users engage with, and engage longer, with quality content. Or at least highly entertaining content While it is not as clear-cut as to weather this is a ranking factor as is the case for page load time, Google is measuring it and they are all about rewarding websites that provide a great user experience, right?
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
COPIED CONTENT IS RANKING Above Orignal
Please check following 2 cases https://www.screencast.com/t/fqOJlrfHuNto https://www.screencast.com/t/G6FCaKlH In above case, why original content outranked? Can someone tell me how to stop this copying process done by another site from my website?
Search Behavior | | Janki990 -
Using https: Beyond the standard seo metrics
Hi All, I've been doing quite a bit of browsing around the topic of utilising https vs http when constructing urls and I wanted to know if anybody has research on the customer perception of a site where all urls are https. We originally used rel canonical tags to inform the browsers that the http and https were the same but we are considering stepping this up to having the http pages redirect to the https and I'm wondering how customers may react if they know that all pages are https. Anybody have insights on possible outcomes? Thanks, Tom
Search Behavior | | Tmon0 -
UK & Ireland Websites displaying same page differently in serps
Hi there, I have a Magento Enterprise store based in the UK and we have an Irish version which we created after finding an increasing amount of traffic from Ireland. One thing that I don't understand, is that if I search for one keyword on Google, the websites are displayed differently, when effectively they are identical websites. Here is how a result looks like for my UK store: http://i.imgur.com/NKSt4Qq.png And here is how a result looks like for my IE store: http://i.imgur.com/Cynv8Mz.png They both have the same Meta description, barring a few geographical words and terms. Both have on page descriptions as well as products. Yet the IE results display the description and the UK results display products and a tiny snippet of the description. Any ideas on how I can make my UK pages display like the IE one? Or, just why they are both displayed differently? Thanks
Search Behavior | | tomhall900 -
Only 11 pages being crawled
Hi, Can some one have a look and see why out of 400+ pages we only have 11 being crawled on here?? http://www.lifetimelegal.co.uk Kind Regards Elissa
Search Behavior | | Chris__Chris0 -
Is it my back link profile that is affecting my rankings ?
my website www.funktiongolf.co.uk had been ranking well until January and i'm nearly sure its due to low quality links and poor back-link profile i.e over-optimized money keywords can someone guide me? thanks for anyone that replies. I really do appreciate the
Search Behavior | | funktiongolf
help.0 -
Why are Google ranking changes so drastic?
Hi SEOmoz community I'm sure this question has been asked numerous times before. At the same time there must be plenty of people out there wondering about the same thing: Why are Google ranking changes so drastic? It's like the diva of search engines. When checking the SEOmoz ranking reports, sometimes lots of keywords improve, the next week it's vice versa. Mind though that the ranking changes are not in proportion. While improving keywords climb up by approx. 1 - 10 positions, declining keywords always get a smack with a 15 - 25 position drop, even though these very same keywords are being targeted onsite through new content. It seems to make no difference after all 😉 Is it possible, that keyword fluctuations are stronger for younger sites? The site I am talking about is about a year old. Is it possible that more competitive keywords see more drastic fluctuations? Would be interested to hear your thoughts. Thanks!!
Search Behavior | | Hermski0 -
Is a Shorter Page Title Better?
Is there any evidence that SEs give a greater weighting to keyword phrases in the page title if there are less characters? For example: 1. "Buy Silver Bullion" 2. "Buy Silver Bullion Coins Bars Rounds Easily Privately Securely" The key phrase I am trying to optimize for is "Buy Silver Bullion." To my knowledge, current practices would say the 2nd phrase is better optimized since it contains more keywords and it has a few USPs. But is there any evidence that the 1st example would be higher ranked in google for the phrase "Buy Silver Bullion" because it is more focused than the 2nd?
Search Behavior | | nwright0 -
Need to rank xxx.com to 2 locations
Hi, I have a voip service, currently my keywords are ranking good in US. But i would like to rank them for India too. As i am selling India based voip services. I have a single domain .COM and no country specific domain. Here what i am planning to do. I would change the setting in Google webmasters central to change the target country to USA. And then i will do on page seo to match keywords related to India. Is there anyother suggestions? please let me know.
Search Behavior | | Dexx220