Implementing Schema.org on a web page
-
Hi all,
As we know, implementing Schema doesn't change the look & feel of a web page for the users.
So here is my Question..
Could we implement Schema markup on the web pages only for Bots (but not visible to users in a Source code) so that page load time doesn't increase?
-
Hello Anirbon,
You never want to show Google one thing in the code, and show everyone else something different. That is the very definition of cloaking.
Have you looked into using JASON-LD instead of Schema markup? Built Visible has a great article on micro data that includes a section about JSON-LD, which allows you to mark up code in a script instead of wrapping the HTML.
-
Hi,
I am not saying that schema is bad or that you shouldn't do it - it just seems that some big players only use schema on detail pages of an individual product & not on the overview pages. I found an example of site using it - but in the serp's it's only the average rating which appears (example http://www.goodreads.com/author/list/7779.Arthur_C_Clarke). The first result
You can always test what the impact will be - as mentioned before - I guess even for 50 elements fully tagged with Schema the impact on page speed will be minimal. Check your curent pages with webpagetest.org - see the repartition of load time. Probably the html will only account for 10-20% of the load time - rest being images, javascript & css files. Adding a few hundred lines of HTML will not fundamentally change this (text can be compressed quite well)
rgds
Dirk
-
Hi,
But using Schema, providing a well structure data will help bots to understand what type of content/information is present on a page & i think that will definitely help a page to rank better in Google search either its SRP or JD.
Regards,
Anirban
-
Hi,
I am not sure I adding schema.org on a result page is adding a lot of value. If you send 50 different blocks of structured data how should search engines understand which piece would be relevant to be shown in SERPS. I just did a check on 2 different sites (allrecipes.com & monster.com) - they only seem to use the schema markup on the detail pages - not on the result pages.
If you would like to go ahead - you could always try to measure the impact on the page by creating two (static) versions of a search result page - one with & one without markup and test both versions with webpagetest.org & Google page speed analyser. An alternative would be to using "lazy loading" - you first load the first x results (visible part on screen), when the user scrolls you load the next batch ...and so on. This way, the impact on loading times would remain minimal.
In each case, I would not try to show different pages to users & bots.
rgds,
Dirk
-
Hello Dirk,
Thanks for the reply.
Agreed that the impact of adding the few lines of extra code of schema.org will be zero on the load time of the pages. But it totally depends what content you are going to show on a page.
I want to implement Schema.org on the Search Result pages where a single page contains more than 50 listings with different information like Job Title, Company name, Skills, Job posted etc. For each i will have to use different properties as recommended by Google by which the load time of a page will definitely increase.
Please let me know for the above listed case.
Thanks
-
Try adding schema with meta tags in the html, for example:
This way you're telling bots your phone number with schema but it doesn't appear visibly to users. This is normally done with the latitude and longitude schema tags but you can use it for the others as well. Though I wouldn't rely on this as a permanent long-term solution as Google may change their policies on how they interpret content that is not visible to users.
-
It's a game of words. In the context of the question - if you would provide the schema tagging only to bots the tagged info could also be listed in the SERP's and the bots get a better understanding of what the page is all about. Final goal is off course to serve the user the best answers when he's searching. On the page itself however the user doesn't see any difference if the page is tagged with schema or not.
Dirk
-
Dirk I think you misunderstand my words. Schema for user means exactly the same that you wrote in last lines "Search engines including Bing, Google, Yahoo! and Yandex rely on this markup to improve the display of search results, making it easier for people to find the right Web pages.'
Thanks
-
Hi Alick,
Schema.org is not for users - it is "a collection of schemas that webmasters can use to markup HTML pages in ways recognized by major search providers, and that can also be used for structured data interoperability (e.g. in JSON). Search engines including Bing, Google, Yahoo! and Yandex rely on this markup to improve the display of search results, making it easier for people to find the right Web pages.'
Source: http://schema.org/
rgds,
Dirk
-
Hi Anirban,
I'm completely agree with Dirk second thing I would like to know what is the purpose of showing schema to bot only. In my limited understanding we use schema for user to show price, offers to users not bot.
Thanks
-
Hi Anirban,
The impact of adding the few lines of extra code of schema.org will be zero on the load time of your pages.
Apart from that, serving different content to bots & human users could be considered cloaking by search engines.
Implementing schema.org on the normal pages should do just fine!
rgds,
Dirk
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When making content pages to a specific page; should you index it straight away in GSC or let Google crawl it naturally?
When making content pages to a specific page; should you index it straight away in GSC or let Google crawl it naturally?
On-Page Optimization | | Jacksons_Fencing0 -
Thin Content pages
I have a couple of pages that are thin content. One is essentially a page with the icons of our customers and a link out to their website. The other is a summary portfolio page that has some images of some of the client work we have done with links to internal pages that have more details about each client situation, approach, etc. These deeper pages are just fine. What is the recommendation for handling these thin content pages? We could add content, but then it wouldn't really help the user very much.
On-Page Optimization | | ExploreConsulting0 -
Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question. This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight 🙂 Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community. **Context... ** We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat. However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme. In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth. Make sense so far? Context end..... Issue. Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on). Possible reason? Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO. 2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO). When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page? I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout. Isaac. EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
On-Page Optimization | | isaac6630 -
Sub-pages have no pa
I took over a website a few months ago which is not performing well at all for chosen keywords. When I first inspected it, I found a rel canonical tag pointing to the homepage on every page. This was quickly deleted and all the pages were fetched in webmaster tools. 3 months later and the website is still performing badly. When I use the mozbar, it shows that all of the sub-pages have a pa of 1. It is only a small site and all of the pages are linked to on the navbar in a simple way. The links are not made using javascript and all the pages are on the sitemap which is submitted to wmt. I have checked that all of the changes that have been made have been indexed as well. Could it be possible that google still sees the canonical tag even though its not there? I can't think of any other reason why the pages have no pa or why it is so far behind the competitors despite having better content and links. Also, the site is appropriate for adults, but I found (among the mess left for me) a meta ratings tag set to "general". This has now been deleted, could it negatively affect rankings?
On-Page Optimization | | maxweb0 -
How to improve On-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
please help me - i dont know or understand how to improve on-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
On-Page Optimization | | pwwukpw0 -
Dupelicate content home page and custom page question
I am working on a website that got hit by the penguin update. Didn't get hit terribly bad, but dropped from number one to number 9. As I'm going through the pages, the theme and content is a mess. To give an example, say the site is about custom colored marbles. The main page content covers custom colored marbles, custom promotional marbles, custom glass marbles, etc. Custom colored marbles is mentioned and covered on all pages, which I am going back and trying to make each page theme specific. There is also a custom page, so I am at a cross roads on how best to employ the focus of the custom page and the home page. I am thinking the home page should emphasize colored marbles, and the custom page should emphasize custom colored marbles. My fear is that making such a drastic change will bounce the site completely off front page and that it will take time for the custom page to come up in rankings. AS it stands now I am confused as to how it even ranks on first page as there's two pages with custom colored marbles emphasis. Id like to clean this up as much as possible so there are no big hits with future google updates, but I don't want the site to drop off either as that would be hard to explain to the owner. Yeah, we are cleaning up your site and making it google compliant and in so doing you no longer rank on first page. That won't put food on the table. Thanks for any advise on this.
On-Page Optimization | | anthonytjm0 -
Why does my on-page report card say my page title is 403 forbidden when its not?
I'm trying to get on top of my on page stuff and I'm going through the SEO Moz on-page report cards and it says I'm scoring a fail on certain elements within the 'critical' and 'high importance' factors as my page title is '403 forbidden' but when I go on to my site, my sites CMS it's not '403 forbidden' it's the text I entered?
On-Page Optimization | | jamesj35mm0 -
Too Many On-Page Links
I recently took on a website design client and ran his website through a battery of tests using Pro to take a look at the crawl errors. One that seems to stump me is the error "Too many On-Page links" concerning his blog. (http://franksdesigns.com/wp/blog) This is the first time I've seen this error and am rather confused. The report says there are 104 links on this page. However, I'm having trouble grasping this concept or finding the 104 links. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!
On-Page Optimization | | WebLadder0