Site: Query Question
-
Hi All,
Question around the site: query you can execute on Google for example. Now I know it has lots of inaccuracies, but I like to keep a high level sight of it over time.
I was using it to also try and get a high level view of how many product pages were indexed vs. the total number of pages.
What is interesting is when I do a site: query for say www.newark.com I get ~748,000 results returned.
When I do a query for www.newark.com "/dp/" I get ~845,000 results returned.
Either I am doing something stupid or these numbers are completely backwards?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Ben
-
Barry Schwartz posted some great information about this in November of 2010, quoting a couple of different Google sources. In short, more specific queries can cause Google to dig deeper and give more accurate estimates.
-
Yup. get rid of parameter laden urls and its easy enough. If they hang around the index for a few months before disappearing thats no big deal, as long as you have done the right thing it will work out fine
Also your not interested in the chaff, just the bits you want to make sure are indexed. So make sure thise are in sensibly titled sitemaps and its fine (used this on sites with 50 million and 100 million product pages. It gets a bit more complex at that number, but the underlying principle is the same)
-
But then on a big site (talking 4m+ products) its usually the case that you have URL's indexed that wouldn't be generated in a sitemap because they include additional parameters.
Ideally of course you rid the index of parameter filled URL's but its pretty tough to do that.
-
Best bet is to make sure all your urls are in your sitemap and then you get an exact count.
Ive found it handy to use multiple sitempas for each subfolder i.e. /news/ or /profiles/ to be able to quickly see exactly what % of urls are indexed from each section of my site. This is super helpful in finding errors in a specific section or when you are working on indexing of a certain type of page
S
-
What I've found the reason for this comes down to how the Google system works. Case in point, a client site I have with 25,000 actual pages. They have mass duplicate content issues. When I do a generic site: with the domain, Google shows 50-60,000 pages. If I do an inurl: with a specific URL param, I either get 500,000 or over a million.
Though that's not your exact situation, it can help explain what's happening.
Essentially, if you do a normal site: Google will try its best to provide the content within the site that it shows the world based on "most relevant" content. When you do a refined check, it's naturally going to look for the content that really is most relevant - closest match to that actual parameter.
So if you're seeing more results with the refined process, it means that on any given day, at any given time, when someone does a general search, the Google system will filter out a lot of content that isn't seen as highly valuable for that particular search. So all those extra pages that come up in your refined check - many of them are most likely then evaluated as less than highly valuable / high quality or relevant to most searches.
Even if many are great pages, their system has multiple algorithms that have to be run to assign value. What you are seeing is those processes struggling to sort it all out.
-
about 839,000 results.
-
Different data center perhaps - what about if you add in the "dp" query to the string?
-
I actually see 'about 897,000 results' for the search 'site:www.newark.com'.
-
Thanks Adrian,
I understand those areas of inaccuracy, but I didn't expect to see a refined search produce more results than the original search. That just seems a little bizarre to me, which is why I was wondering if there was a clear explanation or if I was executing my query incorrectly.
Ben
-
This is an expected 'oddity' of the site: operator. Here is a video of Matt Cutts explaining the imprecise nature of the site: operator.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Possible penalty question - need expert help
hallo everyone, I am posting this question to the MOZ community, because I could not find any useful information or proper advice so far, even after consulting a few local SEO experts. I noticed from the end of september a steady and consistent decrease in visits (please see attached pdf) for my website https://bastabollette.it I lost so far almost 40%. Please consider that I have not changed my habits in blog posting lately, both in quantity and quality. I have not made any subtantial change on the website lately. I did a general audit of the site asking to an expert but apart from some generic suggestions (like: "work on increasing PR, add more quality backliks, use more no-follow links, fix broken links" - things I am currently going to fix anyway) I don't really understand the reason of the drop. Please also note the strange drop of 11/22/15 (see search console screenshot). Can you please help me? thank you. Selezione_018.jpg Selezione_019.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | micvitale0 -
Adding a Query String to a Static URL is that good or bad?
I just went through this huge process to shorten my URL structure and remove all dynamic strings. Now my analytics team wants to add query strings to track clicks from the homepage. Is this going to destroy my clean url structure by appending a query string to the end of the URL structure.
Reporting & Analytics | | rpaiva0 -
Some questions on how to set up a multi-visit advanced segment in Google Analytics
Hi I would like some assistance / clarification on how to set up a user segment so that it can track user behavior over multiple visits. Basically I have a campaign set up and want to see conversions - even if they hit the site and then convert later on another visit. I've read that you can do this (over up to 30 days). So I start off by filtering TRAFFIC SOURCE - easy enough. But then I have to add under "advanced" correct? But then when I set the next filter to the GOAL I want, I only get "by session" and "by hit" as options. The blog post I read made it sound like only "by user" would then really do multi visits. Is "by user" only an e-commerce tracking option? (which I don't have set up) Is there another way/path to get the info I need? Thank you!
Reporting & Analytics | | yandl0 -
No Query parameter for site search
Hi Guys, I have enable site search for analytics a number of times. But this time it's the first time I came across a search with no query parameters. example.com/search/item/searchterm What is the most simple way to approach this? thank you!
Reporting & Analytics | | GetApp0 -
Site re-crawled?
I've fixed many of my errors, but they're still showing in my dashboard. When will the site be crawled again?
Reporting & Analytics | | sakeith0 -
Panda 3.8 and Google query report
Today I was plugging the SEOMoz Google change log into my analytics and noticed that our site took an impression jump (30%) on the day Panda 3.8 was released but also, if I'm reading the chart right, a drop in keyword avg. ranking. Does this make any sense or am I misunderstanding the chart? googleseomozq.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | IanTheScot0 -
No Link Data Available for this URL appears often. Are my sites too small to show up?
I am on the trial until Mar 5, 2012. I seldom get the info I want. Is it because my sites are too narrow a niche? I don't seem to be getting the data I'd like from your service. I'm trying to like it, but when I keep getting messages like this, it makes it hard to justify: "No Link Data Available for this URL appears often" Sample sites that I am unable to get data. I especially would like to know how many backlinks exist for each site. I paid someone to help me with them and I'd like to verify their work.: http://costaricadentistreview.com/ http://costaricadentistreviews.com/ http://costaricadentalimplants.org Any suggestions? Thanx Kurt Gross
Reporting & Analytics | | kurtray0 -
Open Site Explorer Discrepency
Hi, I'm just starting to look into this tool as a result of the need to analyse some work that is being carried out on my site by an external SEO company that is charging absolute top dollar. I'm sure it's a simple answer, but looking at the attached image you will see that the total links is shown as 219 which is described as links from all sources. However the report that is on the page shows only 44 links which would appear to be a report based on the same criteria. What is the difference in the numbers please? Simon siteExplorer.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | simonphumphries0