Site: Query Question
-
Hi All,
Question around the site: query you can execute on Google for example. Now I know it has lots of inaccuracies, but I like to keep a high level sight of it over time.
I was using it to also try and get a high level view of how many product pages were indexed vs. the total number of pages.
What is interesting is when I do a site: query for say www.newark.com I get ~748,000 results returned.
When I do a query for www.newark.com "/dp/" I get ~845,000 results returned.
Either I am doing something stupid or these numbers are completely backwards?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Ben
-
Barry Schwartz posted some great information about this in November of 2010, quoting a couple of different Google sources. In short, more specific queries can cause Google to dig deeper and give more accurate estimates.
-
Yup. get rid of parameter laden urls and its easy enough. If they hang around the index for a few months before disappearing thats no big deal, as long as you have done the right thing it will work out fine
Also your not interested in the chaff, just the bits you want to make sure are indexed. So make sure thise are in sensibly titled sitemaps and its fine (used this on sites with 50 million and 100 million product pages. It gets a bit more complex at that number, but the underlying principle is the same)
-
But then on a big site (talking 4m+ products) its usually the case that you have URL's indexed that wouldn't be generated in a sitemap because they include additional parameters.
Ideally of course you rid the index of parameter filled URL's but its pretty tough to do that.
-
Best bet is to make sure all your urls are in your sitemap and then you get an exact count.
Ive found it handy to use multiple sitempas for each subfolder i.e. /news/ or /profiles/ to be able to quickly see exactly what % of urls are indexed from each section of my site. This is super helpful in finding errors in a specific section or when you are working on indexing of a certain type of page
S
-
What I've found the reason for this comes down to how the Google system works. Case in point, a client site I have with 25,000 actual pages. They have mass duplicate content issues. When I do a generic site: with the domain, Google shows 50-60,000 pages. If I do an inurl: with a specific URL param, I either get 500,000 or over a million.
Though that's not your exact situation, it can help explain what's happening.
Essentially, if you do a normal site: Google will try its best to provide the content within the site that it shows the world based on "most relevant" content. When you do a refined check, it's naturally going to look for the content that really is most relevant - closest match to that actual parameter.
So if you're seeing more results with the refined process, it means that on any given day, at any given time, when someone does a general search, the Google system will filter out a lot of content that isn't seen as highly valuable for that particular search. So all those extra pages that come up in your refined check - many of them are most likely then evaluated as less than highly valuable / high quality or relevant to most searches.
Even if many are great pages, their system has multiple algorithms that have to be run to assign value. What you are seeing is those processes struggling to sort it all out.
-
about 839,000 results.
-
Different data center perhaps - what about if you add in the "dp" query to the string?
-
I actually see 'about 897,000 results' for the search 'site:www.newark.com'.
-
Thanks Adrian,
I understand those areas of inaccuracy, but I didn't expect to see a refined search produce more results than the original search. That just seems a little bizarre to me, which is why I was wondering if there was a clear explanation or if I was executing my query incorrectly.
Ben
-
This is an expected 'oddity' of the site: operator. Here is a video of Matt Cutts explaining the imprecise nature of the site: operator.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Analytics Question - Impressions & Queries Up, Sessions Down
I'm working with a client who, according to the Google Query report, impressions and sessions are up since we've started work with them about 6 months ago, but Google sessions are down. In moz, we're seeing a gradual, but steady increase in search visibility specifically with Google. Note: this is all organic. From when we started tracking queries, the first month we were tracking there were 43,581 impressions and 690 click throughs for the month. This past month there were 98,293 queries and 1015 clicks throughs for the month (granted not year over year data) - of these 1,015 clicks, 995 of them were from web. However, for those same time periods, sessions from Google are down over 30% - 1,750 vs. 1,189. I'm not sure how to interpret this. I realize that clicks and sessions are not a straightforward comparison, but I would think that if clicks were up according to the query report that sessions would also be up. Is it that some of these clicks are bouncing and therefore not being tracked as a session? Is there a potential issue with how data is being tracked?
Reporting & Analytics | | Corporate_Communications0 -
Webmaster Tools Pages and Queries
In Google Webmaster Tools, under Search Analytics, what is the difference between positions in queries and positions in pages?
Reporting & Analytics | | CostumeD0 -
Https question
I had a site with an ssl certificate on. It has now been taken off. We are getting 404 errors on the weekly report for pages that were indexed as https What is the best way to get rid of these? How can I take them off the map or do we need to put the ssl back on? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | sharpster0 -
Bounce Rate Question - The percent calculated does not add up
Hello All, I'm attempting to see why organic search bounce rate has increased by 5% when compared to last year for a certain section of my website. I am using a custom segment to filter the specific pages I want to look at. Once the custom segment is set, I go to Acquisition - > Channels - > Organic. Then, I click the Landing Pages tab. Because we don't have keyword data anymore the only thing I can look at is the landing pages that contributed to the change in bounce. Finally, I set my date range and compare to the same date range as last year. Once I set the date range I am presented with a list of URLs and the percent change in bounce rate for each URL. This is where I get confused. If you look at the average bounce rate at the top of the column (example 1 attached) it does not add up with the data below it. If you export all of the data to excel, and then do an "Average" function in Excel, the data adds up to 17.29% instead of 35.04% for Sept. 2013. Why does this not add up? Isn't GA calculating the Average? Also, I always notice several URLs with only 1 session per URL. Several of these 1 session URLs have a 100% bounce rate. Since the bounce rate at the top of the column (example1) is a reflection of the average bounce rate, wouldn't these 1 session URLs significantly distort my data? I ultimately just want to see the pages that are contributing to the increased bounce rate when compared to last year. Having a hard time figuring this one out. Thank you all, Dave zMfAGls
Reporting & Analytics | | DaveGuyMan0 -
How Am I Linked to These Sites?
I was going through Google Analytics, specifically looking at the Channels under Acquisition. I found a number of sites that Google is giving credit as sources of traffic.
Reporting & Analytics | | TowerMarketing
When I went to the sites, however, and searched the page source for links to my site, I could not find any. My site is www.towermarketing.net. The sites being listed by GA are:
blackhawkhardware.com
musicas.baixar-musicas-gratis.com If anyone can tell me how Tower is getting traffic from these sites, and what I can do to fix it - because at this point I am considering them spam - I would appreciate it. Thanks!0 -
When one of my sites returns a ranking that consistently reads "No Data", what does that say about the site?
I am getting "No Data" reads for some of my sites - I personally think it has to do with the site's construction - especially the landing page... I inherited this site to do SEO - it was not created with on site SEO in mind - please help if you can sites are: www.storagesanangelo.com www.storagemidland.com Should I get webmaster to remove the big map graphic and add text and pics instead... Sure appreciate brilliant thoughts - even about yetis and beer
Reporting & Analytics | | creativeguy0 -
For an optimized site, any available stats / guesstimates on what is avg % of traffic to homepage vs. second-level pages?
I'm interested in passing this info on to a client who experienced a period of time when an incorrect GA code was installed on their homepage. They were able to get Google stats on second level pages only. This is a site that gets 80 + % of visits from organic search engine referrals. They do minimal advertising. Thanks in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | alankoen1230